Abstract
In the social sciences, the debate over the structural foundations of social capital has long vacillated between two positions on the relative benefits associated with two types of social structures: closed structures, rich in third-party relationships, and open structures, rich in structural holes and brokerage opportunities. In this paper, we engage with this debate by focusing on the measures typically used for formalising the two conceptions of social capital: clustering and effective size. We show that these two measures are simply two sides of the same coin, as they can be expressed one in terms of the other through a simple functional relation. Building on this relation, we then attempt to reconcile closed and open structures by proposing a new measure, Simmelian brokerage, that captures opportunities of brokerage between otherwise disconnected cohesive groups of contacts. Implications of our findings for research on social capital and complex networks are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahuja, G.: Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Adm. Sci. Q. 45, 425–455 (2000)
Aral, S., Van Alstyne, M.: The diversity-bandwidth trade-off. Am. J. Sociol. 117(1), 90–171 (2011)
Barrat, A., Barthélemy, M., Pastor-Satorras, R., Vespignani, A.: The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 3747–3752 (2004)
Baum, J.A.C., McEvily, B., Rowley, T.J.: Better with age? Tie longevity and the performance implications of bridging and closure. Organ. Sci. 23, 529–546 (2012)
Borgatti, S.P.: Structural holes: unpacking Burt’s redundancy measures. Connections 20, 35 (1997)
Brass, D.J.: It’s all in your social network. In: Ford, C.M., Gioia, D.A. (eds.) Creative Action in Organizations, pp. 94–98. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1995)
Burt, R.S.: Structural Holes. The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)
Burt, R.S.: The gender of social capital. Ration. Soc. 10, 5–46 (1998)
Burt, R.S.: Structural holes and good ideas. Am. J. Sociol. 110, 349–399 (2004)
Burt, R.S.: Brokerage and Closure. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)
Burt, R.S.: Neighbor Networks. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)
Burt, R.S., Knez, M.: Kinds of third-party effects on trust. Ration. Soc. 7, 255–292 (1995)
Centola, D., Macy, M.W.: Complex contagion and the weakness of long ties. Am. J. Sociol. 113, 702–734 (2007)
Coleman, J.S.: Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 94, S95–S120 (1988)
Coleman, J.S.: Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1990)
Cover, T.M., Thomas, J.A.: Elements of Information Theory. Wiley, New York (1991)
Davis, J.A.: Clustering and hierarchy in interpersonal relations: testing two graph theoretical models on 742 sociomatrices. Am. Sociol. Rev. 35(5), 843–851 (1970)
Davis, J.A., Holland, P.W., Leinhardt, S.: Comments on Professor Mazur’s hypothesis about interpersonal sentiments. Am. Sociol. Rev. 36, 309–311 (1971)
Dekker, D.: Measures of Simmelian tie strength, Simmelian brokerage, and Simmelianly brokered. J. Soc. Struct. 7(1), 1–22 (2006)
Fleming, L., Mingo, S., Chen, D.: Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Adm. Sci. Q. 52, 443–475 (2007)
Fortunato, S.: Community detection in graphs. Phys. Rep. 486, 75–174 (2010)
Friedkin, N.E.: Social cohesion. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 30, 409–425 (2004)
Gargiulo, M., Benassi, M.: Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organ. Sci. 11, 183–196 (2000)
Gargiulo, M., Ertug, G., Galunic, C.: The two faces of control: network closure and individual performance among knowledge workers. Adm. Sci. Q. 54, 299–333 (2009)
Gould, R.V.: Multiple networks and mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871. Am. Sociol. Rev. 56, 716–729 (1991)
Granovetter, M.: The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78, 1360–1380 (1973)
Granovetter, M.: The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. J. Econ. Perspect. 19(1), 33–50 (2005)
Hansen, M.T.: The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Adm. Sci. Q. 44, 232–248 (1999)
Holland, P.W., Leinhardt, S.: A method for detecting structure in sociometric data. Am. J. Sociol. 76, 492–513 (1970)
Holland, P.W., Leinhardt, S.: Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comp. Group Stud. 2, 107–124 (1971)
Holme P., Kim, B.J.: Growing scale-free networks with tunable clustering. Phys. Rev. E 65, 026107 (2002)
Holme, P., Park, S.M., Kim, B.J., Edling, C.R.: Korean university life in a network perspective: dynamics of a large affiliation network. Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl. 373, 821–830 (2007)
Ingram, P., Roberts, P.W.: Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. Am. J. Sociol. 106(2), 387–423 (2000)
Krackhardt, D.: Simmelian tie: super strong and sticky. In: Kramer, R.M., Neale, M.A. (eds.) Power and Influence in Organizations, pp. 21–38. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1998)
Krackhardt, D.: The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. 16, 183–210 (1999)
Krackhardt, D., Kilduff, M.: Structure, culture and Simmelian ties in entrepreneurial firms. Soc. Netw. 24, 279–290 (2002)
Lambiotte, R., Panzarasa, P.: Communities, knowledge creation, and information diffusion. J. Informetr. 3(3), 180–190 (2009)
Latora, V., Marchiori, M.: Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 198701 (2001)
Latora, V., Marchiori, M.: Economic behavior of small-world networks. Eur. Phys. J. B 32, 249–263 (2003)
Lin, N.: Social Capital. A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge University Press, New York (2001)
Lin, N., Cook, K., Burt, R.S. (eds.): Social Capital. Theory and Research. Aldine Transaction, New Brunswick and London (2001)
Long Lingo, E., O’Mahony, S.: Nexus work: brokerage on creative projects. Adm. Sci. Q. 55, 47–81 (2010)
Luce, R.D., Perry, A.D.: A method of matrix analysis of group structure. Psychometrika 14(1), 95–116 (1949)
Mizruchi, M., Stearns, L.B.: Getting deals done: the use of social networks in bank decision-making. Am. Sociol. Rev. 66, 647–671 (2001)
Nahapiet, J., Ghoshal, S.: Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23, 242–266 (1998)
Obstfeld, D.: Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 50, 100–130 (2005)
Onnela, J.-P., Saramäki, J., Kertész, J., Kaski, K.: Intensity and coherence of motifs in weighted complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 71, 065103 (2005)
Opsahl, T., Panzarasa, P.: Clustering in weighted networks. Soc. Netw. 31, 155–163 (2009)
Palla, G., Derényi, I., Farkas, I., Vicsek, T.: Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature 435(7043), 814–818 (2005)
Perry-Smith, J.E.: Social yet creative: the role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Manag. J. 49, 85–101 (2006)
Podolny, J.M., Baron, J.N.: Resources and relationships: social networks and mobility in the workplace. Am. Sociol. Rev. 62, 673–693 (1997)
Ravasz, E., Barabási, A.-L.: Hierarchical organization in complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 67, 026112 (2003)
Reagans, R., McEvily, B.: Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Adm. Sci. Q. 48, 240–267 (2003)
Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E.: Networks, diversity and performance: the social capital of R&D units. Organ. Sci. 12, 502–517 (2001)
Rodan, S., Galunic, C.: More than network structure: how knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strateg. Manag. J. 25, 541–562 (2004)
Saramäki, J., Kivelä, M., Onnela, J.-P., Kaski, K., Kertész, J.: Generalizations of the clustering coefficient to weighted complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 75, 027105 (2007)
Serrano, M.A., Boguñá, M.: Tuning clustering in random networks with arbitrary degree distributions. Phys. Rev. E 72, 036133 (2005)
Simmel, G.: The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Lightning Source, Milton Keynes ([1923] 2011). Trans. by K.H. Wolff
Sosa, M.E.: Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organ. Sci. 22, 1–21 (2011)
Stovel, K., Shaw, L.: Brokerage. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 38, 139–158 (2012)
Tortoriello, M., Krackhardt, D.: Activating cross-boundary knowledge: the role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Acad. Manag. J. 53(1), 167–181 (2010)
Tortoriello, M., Reagans, R., McEvily, B.: Bridging the knowledge gap: the influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organ. Sci. 23, 1024–1039 (2012)
Uzzi, B.: Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Adm. Sci. Q. 43, 35–67 (1997)
Uzzi, B., Spiro, J.: Collaboration and creativity: the small world problem. Am. J. Sociol. 111, 447–504 (2005)
Vázquez, A.: Growing network with local rules: preferential attachment, clustering hierarchy, and degree correlations. Phys. Rev. E 67, 056104 (2003)
Vázquez, A., Pastor-Satorras, R., Vespignani, A.: Large-scale topological and dynamical properties of the Internet. Phys. Rev. E 65, 066130 (2002)
Vedres, B., Stark, D.: Structural folds: generative disruption in overlapping groups. Am. J. Sociol. 115(4), 1150–1190 (2010)
Watts, D.J.: Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks Between Order and Randomness. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1999)
Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature 393, 440 (1998)
Zhang, B., Horvath, S.: A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 4, 17 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Latora, V., Nicosia, V. & Panzarasa, P. Social Cohesion, Structural Holes, and a Tale of Two Measures. J Stat Phys 151, 745–764 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-013-0722-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-013-0722-z