Abstract
This study investigated the students’ learning process of the concept of concentration at the elementary school level in Taiwan. The influence of different representational types on the process of proportional reasoning was also explored. The participants included nineteen third-grade and eighteen fifth-grade students. Eye-tracking technology was used in conducting the experiment. The materials were adapted from Noelting’s (1980a) “orange juice test” experiment. All problems on concentration included three stages (the intuitive, the concrete operational, and the formal operational), and each problem was displayed in iconic and symbolic representations. The data were collected through eye-tracking technology and post-test interviews. The results showed that the representational types influenced students’ solving of concentration problems. Furthermore, the data on eye movement indicated that students used different strategies or rules to solve concentration problems at the different stages of the problems with different representational types. This study is intended to contribute to the understanding of elementary school students’ problem-solving strategies and the usability of eye-tracking technology in related studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ametller J, Pintó R (2002) Students’ reading of innovative images of energy at secondary school level. Int J Sci Educ 24(3):285–312
Anderson JR, Bothell D, Douglass S (2004) Eye movements do not reflect retrieval processes: limits of the eye-mind hypothesis. Psychol Sci 15(4):225–231
Chang KT, Antes J, Lenzen T (1985) The effect of experience on reading topographic relief information: analyses of performance and eye movements. Cartogr J 22:88–94
Duchowski AT (2003) Eye tracking methodology: theory and practice, 1st edn. Springer, London
Goldberg JH, Kotval XP (1999) Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs. Int J Ind Ergon 24:631–645
Hegarty M, Carpenter PA, Just MA (1991) Diagrams in the comprehension of scientific text. In: Barr R, Kamil ML, Mosenthal P, Pearson PD (eds) Handbook of reading research, vol 2. Longman, New York, pp 641–668
Henderson JM, Hollingsworth A (1998) Eye movements during scene viewing: an overview. In: Underwood G (ed) Eye guidance in reading and scene perception. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 269–294
Inhelder B, Piaget J (1958) The growth of logical thinking: from childhood to adolescence. Basic, New York
Just MA, Carpenter PA (1984) Using eye fixations to study reading comprehension. In: Kieras DE, Just MA (eds) New methods in reading comprehension research. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 152–182
Kozma R (2003) The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learn Instr 13(2):205–226
Kozma R, Russell J (1997) Multimedia and understanding: expert and novice responses to different representation of chemical phenomena. J Res Sci Teach 34(9):949–968
Linn M (2003) Technology and science education: starting points, research programs, and trends. Int J Sci Educ 25(6):727–758
Mackworth NH, Morandi AJ (1967) The gaze selects informative details with pictures. Percept Psychophys 7:173–178
Mathewson JH (1999) Visual-spatial thinking: an aspect of science overlooked by educators. Sci Educ 83(1):33–54
Noelting G (1980a) The development of proportion reasoning and the ratio concept: part i—differentiation of stages. Educ Stud Math 11:217–253
Noelting G (1980b) The development of proportion reasoning and the ratio concept: part ii—problem structure at successive stages; problem solving strategies and the mechanism of adaptive restructuring. Educ Stud Math 11:331–363
Patrick MD, Carter G, Wiebe EN (2005) Visual representations of DNA replication: middle grades students’ perceptions and interpretations. J Sci Educ Technol 14(3):353–365
Piaget J (1952) The child’s conception of number. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
Piaget J (1974) The child’s conception of quantities (A. J. Pomerans, Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
Rayner K, Rotello CM, Stewart AJ, Keir J, Duffy SA (2001) Integrating text and pictorial information: eye movements when looking at print advertisements. J Exp Psychol 7:219–226
Schnotz W, Kulhavy RW (eds) (1994) Comprehension of graphics. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Schnotz W, Bannert W, Seufert T (2002) Towards a integrative view of text and picture comprehension: visualization effects on the construction of mental models. In: Graessser A, Otero J, Leon JA (eds) The psychology of science text comprehension. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 385–416
Seufert T (2003) Supporting coherence formation in learning from multiple representations. Learn Instr 13(2):227–237
Slykhuis DA, Wiebe EN, Annetta LA (2005) Eye-tracking students’ attention to PowerPoint photographs in a science education setting. J Sci Educ Technol 14(5–6):509–520
Stavy R, Tirosh D (2000) How students (Mis-)understand science and mathematics: intuitive rules. Teachers College, New York
Stavy R, Strauss S, Orpaz N, Carmi G (1982) U-shaped behavioral growth in ration comparisons, or that’s funny I would not have thought you were U-ish. In: Strauss S, Stavy R (eds) U-shaped behavioral growth. Academic, New York, pp 11–36
Steffe LP, Parr RB (1968) The development of the concepts of ratio and fraction in the fourth, fifth and sixth year of elementary school. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington D. C.
Tai RH, Loeher JF, Brigham FJ (2004) Introduction to the use of eye-gaze tracking to study participant behavior during problem-solving. In NARST (ed) Annual meeting of the national association for research in science teaching, Vancouver, 2004. NARST
van Sommeren M, Reimann P, Boshuizen H, de Jong TD (eds) (1998) Learning with multiple representations. Permagon, Amsterdam
Von Keitz B (1988) Eye-movement research: do consumers use the information they are offered? Market Res Today 16:217–224
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the National Science Council of Taiwan for financially supporting this research under Contract No. NSC 99-2511-S-017-004-MY3 and NSC 99-2511-S-017-005-MY3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, CJ., Shen, MH. The Influence of Different Representations on Solving Concentration Problems at Elementary School. J Sci Educ Technol 20, 621–629 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9293-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9293-4