Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Constructing Media Artifacts in a Social Constructivist Environment to Enhance Students’ Environmental Awareness and Activism

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current science education reforms and policy documents highlight the importance of environmental awareness and perceived need for activism. As “environmental problems are socially constructed in terms of their conceptualized effects on individuals, groups, other living things and systems research based on constructivist principles provides not only a coherent framework in which to theorize about learning, but also a context for understanding socially constructed issues” (Palmer and Suggate in Res Pap Educ 19(2), 2004, p. 208). This research study investigated the impacts of the learning processes structured based on the theories of constructionism and social constructivism on students’ environmental awareness and perceived need for activism. Students constructed multimedia artifacts expressing their knowledge, attitudes, awareness, and activism about environmental issues through a constructionist design process. In addition, a social networking site was designed and used to promote social interaction among students. Twenty-two high school environmental science students participated in this study. A convergent mixed methods design was implemented to allow for the triangulation of methods by directly comparing and contrasting quantitative results with qualitative findings for corroboration and validation purposes. Using a mixed method approach, quantitative findings are supported with qualitative data (student video projects, writing prompts, blog entries, video projects of the students, observational field notes, and reflective journals) including spontaneous responses in both synchronous and asynchronous conversations on the social network to provide a better understanding of the change in students’ environmental awareness and perceived need for activism. The findings of the study indicated that students’ environmental awareness and perceived need for activism were improved at different scales (personal, community, global) throughout the constructionist and social constructivist learning processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambusaidi A, Boyes E, Stanisstreet M, Taylor N (2012) Omani students’ views about global warming: beliefs about actions and willingness to act. Int Res Geogr Environ Educ 21(1):21–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989) Science for all Americans. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993) Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barraza L (2001) Perceptions of social and environmental problems by English and Mexican children. Can J Environ Educ 6:139–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Barraza L, Walford RA (2002) Environmental education: a comparison between English and Mexican school children. Environ Educ Res 8(2):171–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartkus KR, Hartman CL, Howell RD (1999) The measurement of consumer environmental knowledge: revisions and extensions. J Soc Behav Personal 14(1):129–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Baytak A, Land SM (2010) A case study of educational game design by kids and for kids. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2(2):5242–5246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouillion LM, Gomez LM (2001) Connecting school and community with science learning: real world problems and school–community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. J Res Sci Teach 38(8):878–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyes E, Stanisstreet M (2012) Environmental education for behaviour change: which actions should be targeted? Int J Sci Educ 34(10):1591–1614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyes E, Skamp K, Stanisstreet M (2009) Australian secondary students’ views about global warming: beliefs about actions, and willingness to act. Res Sci Educ 39(5):661–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley JC, Waliczek TM, Zajicek JM (1999) Relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental attitude of high school students. J Environ Educ 30(3):17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradner E, Kellogg W, Erickson T (1999) The adoption and use of ‘Babble:’ a field study of chat in the workplace. European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruckman A, Resnick M (1995) The MediaMOO project. Converg Int J Res New Media Technol 1(1):94–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull G, Bell RL (2008) Educational technology in the science classroom. In: Bell RL, Gess-Newsome J, Luft J (eds) Technology in the secondary science classroom. NSTA Press, Arlington, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Chhokar K, Dua S, Taylor N, Boyes E (2012) Senior secondary Indian students’ views about global warming, and their implications for education. Sci Edu Int 23(2):133–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Council NationalResearch (2012) A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW, Clark VLP (2010) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzen A (2003) Environmental attitudes in international comparison: an analysis of the ISSP surveys 1993 and 2000. Social Science Quarterly 84(2):297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fusco D (2001) Creating relevant science through urban planning and gardening. J Res Sci Teach 38(8):860–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez de White T, Jacobson SK (1994) Evaluating conservation education programs at a South American zoo. J Environ Edu 25(4):18–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han S, Bhattacharya K (2001) Constructionism, learning by design, and project based learning. In: Orey M (ed) Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved 29 December 2011, from http://www.coe.uga.edu/epltt/LearningbyDesign.htm

  • Hansen A (2000) Claims-making and framing in British newspaper coverage of the ‘Brent Spar’ controversy. In: Allan S, Adam B, Carter C (eds) Environmental risks and the media. Routledge, London, pp 55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Harel I (1991) Children designers: interdisciplinary constructions for learning and knowing mathematics in a computer-rich school. Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines JM, Hungerford HR, Tomera AN (1987) Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. J Environ Educ 18(2):1–8

  • Hungerford H, Volk T (1998) Changing learner behavior through environmental education. In: Hungerford H, Bluhm W, Volk T, Ramsey J (eds) Essential readings in environmental education. Stipes, Champaign, pp 289–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang YH, Kim S, Jeng JM (2000) Examining causal relationship among selected antecedents of responsible environmental behaviour. J Environ Educ 31(4):19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jinliang W, Yunyan H, Ya L, Xiang H, Xiafei W, Yuanmei J (2004) An analysis of environmental awareness and environmental education for primary school and high school students in kunming. Chin Educ Soc 37(4):24–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafai YB (2005) The classroom as living laboratory: design-based research for understanding, comparing, and evaluating learning science through design. Educ Technol 45(1):28–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Kılınç A, Boyes E, Stanisstreet M (2011) Turkish school students and global warming: beliefs and willingness to act. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics. Sci Technol Educ 7(2):121–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim B (2001) Social constructivism. In: Orey M (ed) Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved 29 Apr 2012, from http://www.coe.uga.edu/epltt/SocialConstructivism.htm

  • Kirschner P, Strijbos J, Kreijn K, Jelle Beers P (2004) Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educ Tech Res Dev 52(3):44–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenhart A, Madden M (2007) Teens, privacy, and online social networks: how teens manage their online identities and personal information in the age of my space. Pew Internet & American Life Project report. Retrieved 10 Dec 2011, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/211/report_display.asp

  • Lester BT, Ma L, Lee O, Lambert J (2006) Social activism in elementary science education: a science, technology, and society approach to teach global warming. Int J Sci Educ 28(4):315–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littledyke M (2008) Science education for environmental awareness: approaches to integrating cognitive and affective domains. Environ Educ Res 14(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, R. (1998). Concepts and applications of inferential statistics. R. Lowry

  • Maibach EW, Leiserowitz A, Roser-Renouf C, Mertz CK (2011) Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: An audience segmentation analysis and tool development. PLoS One 6(3):e17571. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017571

  • Mathis C (2011) What are supports and barriers to using social constructivism and the Reggio Emilia approach in state funded preschool programs in California? (Ed.D dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (Order No. 3474428)

  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis, 2nd ed. edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgil I, Arda S, Secken N, Yavuz S, Oskay OO (2004) The influence of computer assisted instruction on environmental knowledge and environmental awareness. Chem Educ Res Pract 5(2):99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2012) A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

  • National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) (1993) Science/technology/society: A new effort for providing appropriate science for all. In: Yager RE (ed) The science, technology, society movement. NSTA Special Publications, Washington, DC, pp 3–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Negev M, Sagy G, Garb Y, Salzberg A, Tal A (2008) Evaluating the environmental literacy of Israeli elementary and high school students. J Environ Educ 39(2):3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newstetter WC (2000) Design education: A special issue of the journal of the learning sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Day VL, Bobrow DG, Shirley M (1996) The socio-technical design circle. In: Proceedings of the CSCW’96 conference on computer-supported cooperative work. ACM, New York, pp 160–169

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1998) Instrument design: a framework for assessing scientific literacy. Report of project managers meeting. Programme for International Student Assessment, Arnhem, The Netherlands

  • Palmer JA, Suggate J (2004) The development of children’s understanding of distant places and environmental issues: report of a UK longitudinal study of the development of ideas between the ages of 4 and 10 years. Res Pap Educ 19(2):205–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papert S (1991) Situating constructionism. In: Harel I, Papert S (eds) Constructionism. Ablex Publishing, Norwood, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert S (1999) What is logo? Who needs it? In: Logo philosophy and implementation. LCSI, Montreal, Canada, pp VIII–IX

  • Pata K, Metsalu E (2008) Conceptualizing awareness in environmental education: an example of knowing about air-related problems. Sci Educ Int 19(1):24

    Google Scholar 

  • Pata K, Zimdin L (2008) Teaching for environmental awareness and conceptual coherence of air related problems. In: Pace P (ed) Thinking and acting outside the box. A European contribution to the UN decade of education for sustainable development. CEEE 10th conference, Malta, 15–19 October, pp 8–15

  • Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Pempek TA, Yermolayeva YA, Calvert SL (2009) College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. J Appl Dev Psychol 30(3):227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posch P (1993) Research issues in environmental education. Stud Sci Educ 21:21–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahm J (2002) Emergent learning opportunities in an inner city youth gardening program. J Res Sci Teach 39(2):164–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, R., & Caperton, I. H. (2009). The emergence of six contemporary learning abilities (6-CLAs) in middle school, high school and community college students as they design web-games and use project-based social media in globaloria. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, April, 2009

  • Rosenthal DB (1990) Warming up to STS activities to encourage environmental awareness. Sci Teach 57(6):28–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth C (1992) Environmental literacy: Its roots, evolution and directions in the 1990s. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Said AM, Yahaya N, Ahmadun FLR (2007) Environmental comprehension and participation of Malaysian secondary school students. Environ Educ Res 13(1):17–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salequzzman MD, Stocker L (2001) The context and prospects for environmental education and environmental career in Bangladesh. Int J Sustain High Educ 2(2):104–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon G, Perkins DN, Globerson T (1991) Partners in cognition: extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educ Res 20(3):2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherburn M, Devlin AS (2004) Academic major, environmental concern, and arboretum use. J Environ Educ 35(2):23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuohino A (2003) Environmental awareness and environmentally friendly behavior—case sulkava rowing event. Environ Pap Ser 6(2):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1977) Final report. Paper presented at the Intergovernmental conference on environmental education. USSR, Tbilisi, Republic of Georgia

  • Vygotsky L (1978) Mind in society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. STEM Education Center, University of Minnesota, Learning and Environmental Science 320, 1954 Buford Ave, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA

    Engin Karahan & Gillian Roehrig

Authors
  1. Engin Karahan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gillian Roehrig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Engin Karahan.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 2.

Table 2 Descriptive statistics of students’ responses for each segment
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karahan, E., Roehrig, G. Constructing Media Artifacts in a Social Constructivist Environment to Enhance Students’ Environmental Awareness and Activism. J Sci Educ Technol 24, 103–118 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9525-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9525-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation