Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Almost Contact Metric Structures on the Hypersurface of Almost Hermitian Manifolds

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. A. Abu-Saleem and M. Banaru, “Some applications of Kirichenko tensors,” An. Univ. Oradea, Fasc. Mat., 17, No. 2, 201–208 (2010).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Adachi, M. Kameda, and S. Maeda, “Real hypersurfaces which are contact in a nonflat complex space form,” Hokkaido Math. J., 40, 205–217 (2011).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Alegre, “Semi-invariant submanifolds of Lorentzian Sasakian manifolds,” Demonstr. Math., 44, No. 2, 391–406 (2011).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. V. Apostolov, G. Ganchev, and S. Inanov, “Compact Hermitian surfaces of constant antiholomorphic curvature,” Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 125, 3705–3714 (1997).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. V. I. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Arslan, U. C. De, C. Ozgur, and J.-B. Jun, “On a class of Sasakian manifolds,” Nihonkai Math. J., 19, 21–27 (2008).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. C. S. Bagewadi and E. Girish Kumar, “Note on trans-Sasakian manifolds,” Tensor (N.S.), 65, 80–88 (2004).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. C. S. Bagewadi and V. S. Prasada, “Note on Kenmotsu manifolds,” Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc., 91, 379–384 (1999).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. M. B. Banaru, A new characterization of the classes of almost Hermitian Gray–Hervella structures [in Russian], preprint, Smolensk. State Pedagogical Institute (1992). Deposited at the All-Russian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (VINITI), Moscow, No. 3334-B92.

  10. M. B. Banaru, “Gray–Hervella classes of almost Hermitian structures on 6-dimensional submanifolds of the Cayley algebra,” in: Nauch. Tr. MGPU im. V. I. Lenina, Prometey, Moscow (1994), pp. 36–38.

  11. M. B. Banaru “On spectra of the most important tensors of 6-dimensional Hermitian submanifolds of the Cayley algebra,” in: The Newest Problems of the Field Theory [in Russian], Kazan’ (2000), pp. 18–22.

  12. M. B. Banaru, “The axiom of g-cosymplectic hypersurfaces for 6-dimensional Hermitian submanifolds of the octave algebra,” in: Boundary-Value Problems in Complex Analysis and Differential Equations, Vol. 2, Smolensk (2000), pp. 36–41.

  13. M. Banaru, “Six theorems on six-dimensional Hermitian submanifolds of Cayley algebra,” Izv. Akad. Nauk Resp. Moldova, Ser. Mat., 3 (34), 3–10 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. B. Banaru, “On six-dimensional Hermitian submanifolds of Cayley algebras satisfying the g-cosymplectic hypersurfaces axiom,” Ann. Univ. Sofia Fac. Math. Inform., 94, 91–96 (2000).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. M. B. Banaru, “On the geometry of cosymplectic hypersurfaces of 6-dimensional submanifolds of the Cayley algebra,” in: Proc. Int. Conf. “Volga-2001” (Perovskii Readings), Kazan’ (2001), p. 25.

  16. M. B. Banaru, “Two theorems on cosymplectic hypersurfaces of six-dimensional Hermitian submanifolds of Cayley algebra,” J. Harbin Inst. Tech., 8, No. 1, 38–40 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. B. Banaru, “A new characterization of the Gray—Hervella classes of almost Hermitian manifolds,” in: Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Differential Geometry and Its Applications, Opava, Czech Republic (2001), p. 4.

  18. M. B. Banaru, “On the geometry of 6-dimensional Hermitian submanifolds of Cayley algebras,” in: Invariant Methods of the Study of Structures on Manifolds in Geometry, Analysis, and Mathematical Physics [in Russian] (L. E. Evtushik and A. K. Rybnikov, eds.), 1, Moscow (2001), pp. 16–20.

  19. M. B. Banaru, “Two theorems on cosymplectic hypersurfaces of six-dimensional Kählerian submanifolds of Cayley algebras,” Bul. Ştiinţ. Univ. Politeh. Timiş., 46, No. 2, 13–17 (2001).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. M. B. Banaru, “Some theorems on cosymplectic hypersurfaces of six-dimensional Hermitian submanifolds of Cayley algebras,” Mat. Vesn. (Bull. Math. Soc. Serbia), 53, Nos. 3-4, 103–110 (2001).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. M. B. Banaru, “On W 3-manifolds satisfying the axiom of G-cosymplectic hypersurfaces,” Proc. XXIV Conf. Young Scientists, Moscow State Univ., Moscow (2002),pp. 15–19.

  22. M. B. Banaru, “Two theorems on cosymplectic hypersurfaces of 6-dimensional Hermitian submanifolds of Cayley algebras,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Ser. Mat., 1 (476), 9–12 (2002).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. M. B. Banaru, “On the typical number of cosymplectic hypersurfaces of a 6-dimensional Kählerian submanifold of the Cayley algebra,” in: Proc. X Int. Conf. “Mathematics. Economics. Education,” and II Int. Symp. “Fourier Series and Their Applications,” Rostov-on-Don (2002), pp. 116–117.

  24. M. B. Banaru, “On spectra of some tensors of six-dimensional Kählerian submanifolds of Cayley algebras,” Stud. Univ. Babeş-Bolyai. Math., 47, No. 1, 11–17 (2002).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. M. B. Banaru, “On Kenmotsu hypersurfaces in six-dimensional Hermitian submanifolds of Cayley algebras,” in: Proc. Int. Conf. “Contemporary Geometry and Related Topics,” Beograd (2002), p. 5.

  26. M. Banaru, “On nearly-cosymplectic hypersurfaces in nearly-Kählerian manifolds,” Stud. Univ. Babeş-Bolyai Math., 47, No. 3, 3–11 (2002).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. M. B. Banaru, “Six-dimensional Hermitian submanifolds of Cayley algebras and u-Sasakian hypersurfaces axiom,” Izv. Akad. Nauk Resp. Moldova. Ser. Mat., 2 (39), 71–76 (2002).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. M. B. Banaru, “On totally umbilical cosymplectic hypersurfaces of six-dimensional Hermitian submanifolds of Cayley algebras,” Acta Univ. Palack. Olomuc. Fac. Rerum Natur. Math., 41, 7–12 (2002).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Banaru, “On minimality of a Sasakian hypersurfaces in a W 3-manifold,” Saitama Math. J., 20, 1–7 (2002).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. M. B. Banaru, “Hermitian geometry of 6-dimensional submanifolds of Cayley algebras,” Mat. Sb., 193, No. 5, 3–16 (2002).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. M. B. Banaru, “On the similarity and dissimilarity of the properties of Kenmotsu and Sasaki hypersurfaces of special Hermitian manifolds,” in: Proc. X Military-Scientific Conf., Smolensk (2002), p. 196.

  32. M. B. Banaru, “On W 4-manifolds satisfying the axiom of G-cosymplectic hypersurfaces,” in: Proc. Int. Sci. Conf. “Volga-2001” (Perovskii Readings), Kazan’ (2002), p. 16.

  33. M. B. Banaru, “On the typical number of weakly cosymplectic hypersurfaces of approximately Kählerian manifolds,” Fundam. Prikl. Mat., 8, No. 2, 357–364 (2002).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. M. B. Banaru, “On Hermitian manifolds satisfying the axiom of U-cosymplectic hypersurfaces,” Fundam. Prikl. Mat., 8, No. 3, 943–947 (2002).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. M. B. Banaru, “On the geometry of weakly cosymplectic hypersurfaces of NK-manifolds,” in: Proc. Int. Semin. on Geometry and Analysis to the Memory of Prof. N. V. Efimov, Rostov-on-Don (2002), pp. 18–19.

  36. M. B. Banaru, “On cosymplectic hypersurfaces of 6-dimensional Kählerian submanifolds of the Cayley algebra,” Izv. Vyssh. Ucheb. Zaved. Ser. Mat., 7 (494), 59–63 (2003).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. M. B. Banaru, “On the geometry of cosymplectic hypersurfaces of 6-dimensional Hermitian submanifolds of the Cayley algebra,” in: The Newest Problems of the Field Theory [in Russian], Kazan’ (2003), pp. 38–43.

  38. M. B. Banaru, “On eight Gray–Hervella classes of almost Hermitian structures realized on 6-dimensional submanifolds of the Cayley algebra,” in: The Newest Problems of the Field Theory [in Russian], Kazan’ (2003), pp. 44–50.

  39. M. B. Banaru, “On W 4-manifolds satisfying the axiom of G-cosymplectic hypersurfaces,” in: The Newest Problems of the Field Theory [in Russian], Kazan’ (2003), pp. 51–55.

  40. M. Banaru, “Hermitian manifolds and U-cosymplectic hypersurfaces axiom,” J. Sichuan Normal Univ. Nat. Sci. Ed., 26, No. 3, 261–263 (2003).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. M. B. Banaru, “A note on Kirichenko tensors,” in: The Newest Problems of the Field Theory [in Russian], Kazan’ (2003), pp. 56–62.

  42. M. B. Banaru, “On Sasakian hypersurfaces of 6-dimensional Hermitian submanifolds of the Cayley algebra,” Mat. Sb., 194, No. 8, 13–24 (2003).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. M. B. Banaru, “On the typical number of cosymplectic hypersurfaces of 6-dimensional Hermitian submanifolds of the Cayley algebra,” Sib. Mat. Zh., 44, No. 5, 981–991 (2003).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. M. B. Banaru, “On almost contact metric structures on hypersurfaces of 6-dimensional Kählerian submanifolds of the octave algebra,” in: Actual Problems of Mathematical Physics [in Russian], Prometey, Moscow (2003), pp. 40–41.

  45. M. B. Banaru, “On Kenmotsu hypersurfaces of 6-dimensional Hermitian submanifolds of Cayley algebras,” in: Differential Geometry of Manifolds of Figures [in Russian], 34, Kaliningrad State Univ., Kaliningrad (2003), pp. 12–21.

  46. M. B. Banaru, “On Kenmotsu hypersurfaces of special Hermitian manifolds,” Sib. Mat. Zh., 45, No. 1, 11–15 (2004).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. M. B. Banaru, “On typical numbers of almost contact metric hypersurfaces of almost Hermitian submanifolds,” in: Proc. VIII Int. Semin. “Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications,” Moscow State Univ., Moscow (2004), pp. 379–381.

  48. M. B. Banaru, “On Sasakian hypersurfaces of special Hermitian manifolds,” in: Proc. XXV Conf. Young Scientists, Moscow State Univ., Moscow (2004), pp. 11–14.

  49. M. Banaru, “On cosymplectic hypersurfaces in a Kählerian manifold,” in: Proc. Int. Conf. on Mathematics and Its Applications, Kuwait (2004), pp. 62–63.

  50. M. Banaru, “On Kenmotsu hypersurfaces in a six-dimensional Hermitian submanifold of Cayley algebras,” Proc. of the Workshop “Contemporary Geometry and Related Topics,” Belgrade, Yugoslavia May 15–21, 2002, World Scientific, Singapore (2004), pp. 33–40.

  51. M. B. Banaru, “On the Gray–Hervella classes of AH-structures on six-dimensional submanifolds of Cayley algebras,” Ann. Univ. Sofia Fac. Math. Inform., 95, 125–131 (2004).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  52. M. B. Banaru, “On the axiom of Kenmotsu u-hypersurfaces for special Hermitian manifolds,” in: Proc. XIII Military-Sci. Conf., Smolensk (2005), pp. 224–225.

  53. M. B. Banaru, “On some almost contact metric hypersurfaces in six-dimensional special Hermitian submanifolds of Cayley algebras,” Proc. Int. Conf. “Selected Questions of Contemporary Mathematics” Dedicated to the 200th Anniversary of C. Jacobi, Kaliningrad (2005), pp. 6.

  54. M. B. Banaru, “On almost contact metric structures on hypersurfaces of almost Hermitian manifolds of the classes W 3 and W 4,” in: Proc. Rep. Int. Conf. “A. Z. Petrov Anniversary Symposium on General Relativity and Gravitation,” Kazan’ , November 1–6, 2010, Kazan’ (2010), pp. 41–42.

  55. M. B. Banaru and V. F. Kirichenko, “Hermitian geometry of 6-dimensional submanifolds of the Cayley algebra,” Usp. Mat. Nauk, 1, 205–206 (1994).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  56. A. Bejancu and H. R. Farran, “On totally umbilical QR-submanifolds of quaternion Kählerian manifolds,” Bull. Austr. Math. Soc., 62, 95–103 (2000).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  57. F. Belgun, A. Moroianu, and U. Semmelmann, “Symmetries of contact metric manifolds,” Ceom. Dedic., 101, 203–216 (2003).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  58. A. Besse, Einstein Manifolds, Springer-Verlag, Berlin etc. (1987).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. A. M. Blaga, “Affine connections on almost para-cosymplectic manifolds,” Czechoslovak Math. J., 61 (138), 863–871 (2011).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  60. D. E. Blair, “The theory of quasi-Sasakian structures,” J. Differ. Geom., 1, 331–345 (1967).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  61. D. E. Blair, Contact Manifolds in Riemannian Geometry, Lect. Notes Math., 509 (1976).

  62. D. E. Blair, “Two remarks on contact metric structure,” Tôhoku Math. J., 29, 319–324 (1977).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  63. D. E. Blair, “A hyperbolic twistor space,” Balkan J. Geom. Appl., 5, 9–16 (2000).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  64. D. E. Blair, Riemannian Geometry of Contact and Symplectic Manifolds, Progr. Math., Birkhäuser, Boston–Basel–Berlin (2002).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. D. E. Blair, “A product twistor space,” Serdica Math. J., 28, 163–174 (2002).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  66. D. E. Blair, J. S. Kim, and M. M. Tripathi, “On the concircular curvature tensor of a contact metric manifold,” J. Korean Math. Soc., 42, No. 5, 883–892 (2005).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  67. D. E. Blair, D. K. Showers, and K. Yano, “Nearly Sasakian structures,” Kodai Math. Semin. Repts., 27, 175–180 (1976).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  68. D. Borthwick and A. Uribe, “Almost complex structures and geometric quantization,” Math. Res. Lett., 3, 845–861 (1996).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  69. R. L. Bryant, “Submanifolds and special structures on the octonions,” J. Differ. Geom., 17, 185–232 (1982).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. C. Calin, “On the geometry of hypersurfaces in a quasi-Sasakian manifold,” Demonstr. Math., 36, No. 2, 451–462 (2003).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  71. C. Calin, “Kenmotsu manifolds with η-parallel Ricci tensor,” Bull. Soc. Math. Banja Luka, 10, 10–15 (2003).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  72. C. Calin, Subvarietati in varietati aproape de contact, Performantica, Iasi (2005).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  73. J. T. Cho, “A new class of contact Riemannian manifolds,” Isr. J. Math., 109, 299–318 (1999).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  74. J. T. Cho, “Ricci solitons and odd-dimensional spheres,” Monatsh. Math., 160, 347–357 (2010).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  75. T. Choi and Z. Lu, “On the DDVV conjecture and comass in calibrated geometry, I,” Math. Z., 260, 409–429 (2008).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  76. E. Cartan, Riemannian Geometry in an Orthogonal Frame [Russian translation], Moscow State Univ., Moscow (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  77. U. C. De and G. Pathak, “Torseforming vector fields in a Kenmotsu manifold,” An. Ştinţ. Univ. Al. I. Cuza, Iaşi, 49, No. 2, 257–264 (2003).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  78. U. C. De and G. Pathak, “On 3-dimensional Kenmotsu manifolds,” Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 35, No. 2, 159–165 (2004).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  79. U. C. De and Avijit Sarkar, “On ϕ-Ricci symmetric Sasakian manifolds,” Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc., 11, 47–52 (2008).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  80. U. C. De, A. A. Shaikh, and Biswas Sudipta, “On Φ-recurrent Sasakian manifolds,” Novi Sad J. Math., 33, No. 2, 43–48 (2003).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  81. U. C. De, A. A. Shaikh, and Biswas Sudipta, “On weakly symmetric contact metric manifolds,” Tensor (N.S.), 64, 170–175 (2003).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  82. R. Deszcz and M. Hotlos, “On hypersurfaces with type number two in spaces of constant curvature,” Ann. Univ. Sci. Budapest. Eötvös Sect. Math., 46, 19–34 (2003).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  83. G. Dileo, “A classification of certain almost α-Kenmotsu manifolds,” Kodai Math. J., 44, 426–445 (2011).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  84. G. Dileo and A. M. Pastore, “Almost Kenmotsu manifolds and local symmetry,” Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin., 14, 343–354 (2007).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  85. G. Dileo and A. M. Pastore, “Almost Kenmotsu manifolds and nullity distributions,” J. Geom., 93, 46–61 (2009).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  86. G. Dileo and A. M. Pastore, “Almost Kenmotsu manifolds with a condition of η-parallelism,” Differ. Geom. Appl., 27, 671–679 (2009).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  87. B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov, and A. T. Fomenko, Contemporary Geometry. Methods and Applications [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  88. N. Ejiri, “Totally real submanifolds in a 6-sphere,” Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 83, 759–763 (1981).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  89. H. Endo, “On the curvature tensor of nearly cosymplectic manifolds of constant Φ-sectional curvature,” An. Ştinţ. Univ. Al. I. Cuza, Iaşi, 51, No. 2, 439–454 (2005).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  90. H. Endo, “Remarks on nearly cosymplectic manifolds of constant Φ-sectional curvature with a submersion of geodesic fibres,” Tensor (N.S.), 66, 26–39 (2005).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  91. H. Endo, “On nearly cosymplectic manifolds of constant Φ-sectional curvature,” Tensor (N.S.), 67, 323–335 (2006).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  92. H. Endo, “Some remarks of nearly cosymplectic manifolds of constant Φ-sectional curvature,” Tensor (N.S.), 68, 204–221 (2007).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  93. H. Freudenthal, Oktaven, Ausnahmegruppen und Oktavengeometrie, Mathematisch Instituut der Rijksuniversiteit te Utrecht (1951).

  94. S. Fueki and H. Endo, “On conformally flat nearly cosymplectic manifolds,” Tensor (N.S.), 66, 305–316 (2005).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  95. S. Funabashi and J. S. Pak, “Tubular hypersurfaces of the nearly Kähler 6-sphere,” Saitama Math. J., 19, 13–36 (2001).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  96. G. Gheorghiev and V. Oproiu, Varietati diferentiabile finit si infinit dimensionale, Bucuresti Acad. RSR (1976–1979).

  97. C. Gherghe, “Harmonic maps on Kenmotsu manifolds,” Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl., 45, No. 3, 447–453 (2000).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  98. A. Ghosh, “Kenmotsu 3-metric as a Ricci soliton,” Chaos Solitons Fractals, 44, 647–650 (2011).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  99. S. Goldberg, “Totally geodesic hypersurfaces of Kähler manifolds,” Pac. J. Math., 27, No. 2, 275–281 (1968).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  100. S. Goldberg and K. Yano, “Integrability of almost cosymplectic structures,” Pac. J. Math., 31, No. 2, 373–382 (1969).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  101. F. Gouli-Andreou and N. Tsolakidou, “On conformally flat contact metric manifolds,” J. Geom., 79, 75–88 (2004).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  102. A. Gray and L. M. Hervella, “The sixteen classes of almost Hermitian manifolds and their linear invariants,” Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., 123, No. 4, 35–58 (1980).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  103. R. S. Gupta, S. M. K. Haider, and M. N. Shahid, “Slant submanifolds of cosymplectic manifolds,” An. Ştinţ. Univ. Al. I. Cuza, Iaşi, 50, No. 1, 33–50 (2004).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  104. R. S. Gupta and A. Sharfuddin, “Screen transversal lightlike submanifolds of indefinite Kenmotsu manifolds,” Sarajevo J. Math., 7 (19), 103–113 (2011).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  105. T. Hamada and J. Inoguchi, “Ruled real hypersurfaces of complex space forms,” Kodai Math. J., 33, 123–134 (2010).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  106. Y. Hatakeyama, Y. Ogawa, and S. Tanno, “Some properties of manifolds with contact metric structures,” Tˆohoku Math. J., 15, 42–48 (1963).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  107. L. Hernandez-Lamoneda, “Curvature vs. almost Hermitian structure,” Geom. Dedic., 79, 205–218 (2000).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  108. M. Hristov, “On the locally quasi-Sasakian manifolds,” C. R. Acad. Bulgare Sci., 56, No. 2, 9–14 (2003).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  109. N. E. Hurt, Geometric Quantization in Action. Applications of Harmonic Analysis in Quantum Statistical Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory, Math. Appl., 8, Reidel Publ., Dordrecht–Boston–London (1983).

  110. S. Ianus, “Submanifolds of almost Hermitian manifolds,” Riv. Mat. Univ. Parma, 3, 123–142 (1994).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  111. S. Ianus, Geometrie Diferentiala cu Aplicatii in Teoria Relativitatii, Editura Academiei Romane, Bucureşti (1983).

  112. N. Jamal, K. A. Khan, and V. A. Khan, “Generic warped product submanifolds of locally conformal Kähler manifolds, Acta Math. Sci., 30B, No. 1605, 1457–1468 (2010).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  113. D. Janssens and L. Vanhecke, “Almost contact structures and curvature tensors,” Kodai Math. J., 4, 1–27 (1981).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  114. J. Jost, Riemannian Geometry and Geometric Analysis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg–New York (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  115. K. Kenmotsu, “A class of almost contact Riemannian manifolds,” Tôhoku Math. J., 24, 93–103 (1972).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  116. Q. Khan, “On an Einstein projective Sasakian manifold,” İstanbul Üniv. Fen Fak. Mat. Derg., 61–62, 97–103 (2002–2003).

  117. H. S. Kim, I.-B. Kim, and R. Takagi, “Extrinsically homogeneous real hypersurfaces with three distinct principal curvatures in H n (C),” Osaka J. Math., 41, 853–863 (2004).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  118. H. S. Kim and R. Takagi, “The type number of real hypersurfaces in P n (C),” Tsukuba J. Math., 20, 349–356 (1996).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  119. V. F. Kirichenko, “Almost Kählerian structures induced by 3-vector products on 6-dimensional submanifolds of the Cayley algebra,” Vestn. MGU, Ser. Mat. Mekh., 3, 70–75 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  120. V. F. Kirichenko, “A classification of Kählerian structures induced by 3-vector products on 6-dimensional submanifolds of the Cayley algebra,” Izv. Vyssh. Ucheb. Zaved. Ser. Mat., 8, 32–38 (1980).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  121. V. F. Kirichenko, “The stability of almost Hermitian structures induced by 3-vector products on 6-dimensional submanifolds of the Cayley algebra,” Ukr. Geom. Sb., 25, 60–68 (1982).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  122. V. F. Kirichenko, “The methods of the generalized Hermitian geometry in the theory of almost contact manifolds,” in: Itogi Nauki Tekhn. Probl. Geom., 18, All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (VINITI), Moscow (1986), pp. 25–71.

  123. V. F. Kirichenko, “Hermitian geometry of 6-dimensional symmetric submanifolds of the Cayley algebra,” Vestn. MGU, Ser. Mat. Mekh., 3, 6–13 (1994).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  124. V. F. Kirichenko, “Differential geometry of principal toroidal bundles,” Fundam. Prikl. Mat., 6, No. 4, 1095–1120 (2000).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  125. V. F. Kirichenko, “On the geometry of Kenmotsu manifolds,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 380, No. 5, 585–587.

  126. V. F. Kirichenko, Differential-Geometric Structures on Manifolds, [in Russian], Moscow (2003).

  127. V. F. Kirichenko and E. V. Rodina, “On the geometry of trans-Sasakian and almost trans-Sasakian manifolds,” Fundam. Prikl. Mat., 3, No. 3, 837–846 (1997).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  128. V. F. Kirichenko and A. R. Rustanov, “Differential geometry of quasi-Sasakian manifolds,” Mat. Sb., 193, No. 8, 71–100 (2002).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  129. V. F. Kirichenko and L. V. Stepanova, “On the geometry of hypersurfaces of quasi-Kählerian manifolds,” Usp. Mat. Nauk, 2, 213–214 (1995).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  130. V. F. Kiritchenko, “Sur la gèomètrie des variètès approximativement cosymplectiques,” C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. 1, 295, No. 12, 673–676 (1982).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  131. S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu, Foundations of Differential Geometry, Vol. 1, Interscience Publ., New York–London (1963).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  132. S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu, Foundations of Differential Geometry, Vol. 2, Interscience Publ., New York–London (1969).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  133. M. Kon, “Invariant submanifolds in Sasakian manifolds,” Math. Ann., 219, 277–290 (1976).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  134. M. Kon, “Hypersurfaces with almost complex structures in the real affine space,” Colloq. Math., 108, No. 2, 329–338 (2007).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  135. T. Korpinar and E. Turhan, “Weierstrass formula for minimal surface in the special three-dimensional Kenmotsu manifold with η-parallel Ricci tensor,” Int. J. Math. Combin., 4, 62–69 (2010).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  136. H. Kurihara, “On real hypersurfaces in a complex space form,” Math. J. Okayama Univ., 40, 177–186 (1998).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  137. H. Kurihara, “The type number on real hypersurfaces in a quaternionic space form,” Tsukuba J. Math., 24, 127–132 (2000).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  138. H. Kurihara and R. Takagi, “A note on the type number of real hypersurfaces in P n (C),” Tsukuba J. Math., 22, 793–802 (1998).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  139. G. F. Laptev, “Fundamental higher-order infinitesimal structures on smooth manifolds,” in: Tr. Geom. Semin., 1, All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (VINITI), Moscow (1966), pp. 139–189.

  140. H. Li, “The Ricci curvature of totally real 3-dimensional submanifolds of the nearly Kaehler 6-sphere,” Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin., 3, 193–199 (1996).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  141. H. Li and G. Wei, “Classification of Lagrangian Willmore submanifolds of the nearly Kähler 6-sphere S6 1 with constant scalar curvature,” Glasgow Math. J., 48, 53–64 (2006).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  142. M. Manev, “Classes of real isotropic hypersurfaces of a Kähler manifold with B-metric,” C. R. Acad. Bulgare Sci., 55, No. 4, 27–32 (2002).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  143. M. Manev, “Classes of real time-like hypersurfaces of a Kaehler manifold with B-metric,” J. Geom., 75, Nos. 1-2 113–122 (2002).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  144. K. Matsumoto and I. Mihai, “Warped product submanifolds in Sasakian space forms,” SUT J. Math., 38, No. 2, 135–144 (2002).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  145. K. Matsumoto, I. Mihai, and A. Oiaga, “Ricci curvature of submanifolds in complex space forms,” Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl., 46, 775–782 (2002).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  146. K. Matsumoto, I. Mihai, and R. Rosca, “A certain locally conformal almost cosymplectic manifold and its submanifolds,” Tensor (N.S.), 64, 295–296 (2003).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  147. P. Matzeu and M.-I. Munteanu, “Vector cross products and almost contact structures,” Rend. Mat. Appl., 22, 359–376 (2002).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  148. I. Mihai, “Ricci curvature of submanifolds in Sasakian space forms,” J. Austr. Math. Soc., 72, 247–256 (2002).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  149. A. S. Mishchenko and A. T. Fomenko, A Course in Differential Geometry and Topology [in Russian], Moscow (1980).

  150. R. S. Mishra, “Almost complex and almost contact submanifolds,” Tensor (N.S.), 51, 91–102 (1992).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  151. R. S. Mishra, “Normality of the hypersurfaces of almost Hermite manifolds,” J. Indian Math. Soc., 61, 71–79 (1995).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  152. A. Moroianu, “Spin C-manifolds and complex contact structures,” Commun. Math. Phys., 193, 661–674 (1998).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  153. S. Nakayama, “On a classification of almost contact metric structures,” Tensor (N.S.), 9, No. 1, 1–7 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  154. A. Nannicini, “Twistor methods in conformal almost symplectic geometry,” Rend. Inst. Mat. Univ. Trieste, 34, 215–234 (2002).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  155. A. P. Norden, Theory of Surfaces [in Russian], Moscow (1956).

  156. K. Okumura, “Odd-dimensional Riemannian submanifolds admitting the almost contact metric structure in a Euclidean sphere,” Tsukuba J. Math., 34, 117–128 (2010).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  157. M. Okumura, “Some remarks on spaces with a certain contact structure,” Tôhoku Math. J., 14, 135–145 (1962).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  158. M. Okumura, “Certain almost contact hypersurfaces in Euclidean spaces,” Kodai Math. Semin. Repts., 16, 44–54 (1964).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  159. M. Okumura, “Certain almost contact hypersurfaces in Kählerian manifolds of constant holomorphic sectional curvature,” Tôhoku Math. J., 16, 270–284 (1964).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  160. M. Okumura, “Totally umbilical submanifolds of a Kählerian manifold,” J. Math. Soc. Jpn., 19, 317–327 (1967).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  161. Z. Olszak, “On contact metric manifolds,” Tôhoku Math. J., 31, 247–253 (1979).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  162. G. Pitis, Geometry of Kenmotsu Manifolds, Publ. House Transilvania Univ., Brasov (2007).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  163. M. M. Postnikov, Lectures in Geometry. Semester IV. Differential Geometry [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  164. R. Prasad and M. M. Tripathi, “Transversal hypersurfaces of Kenmotsu manifold,” Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 34, No. 3, 443–452 (2003).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  165. P. K. Rashevskii, Riemannian Geometry and Tensor Analysis [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  166. S. Sasaki, Almost Contact Manifolds, Lect. Notes, 1 (1965); 2 (1967); 3 (1968).

  167. S. Sasaki and Y. Hatakeyama, “On differentiable manifolds with certain structures which are closely related to almost contact structures, II,” Tôhoku Math. J., 13, No. 2, 281–294 (1961).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  168. S. Sasaki and Y. Hatakeyama, “On differentiable manifolds with contact metric structures,” J. Math. Soc. Jpn., 14, 249–271 (1962).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  169. S. Sawaki and K. Sekigawa, “Almost Hermitian manifolds with constant holomorphic sectional curvature,” J. Differ. Geom., 9, 123–134 (1974).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  170. A. A. Shaikh and S. K. Hui, “On extended generalized ϕ-recurrent β-Kenmotsu manifolds,” Publ. Inst. Math., 89 (103), 77–88 (2011).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  171. R. Sharma, “Contact hypersurfaces of Kähler manifolds,” J. Geom., 78, 156–167 (2003).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  172. S. S. Shern, M. P. Do Carmo, and S. Kobayashi, “Minimal submanifolds of a sphere with second fundamental form of constant length,” in: Functional Analysis and Related Fields, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1970), pp. 59–75.

  173. S. S. Shukla and P. K. Rao, “On Ricci curvature of certain submanifolds in generalized complex space forms,” Tensor (N.S.), 72, 1–11 (2010).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  174. S. S. Shukla and M. K. Shukla, “On ϕ-Ricci symmetric Kenmotsu manifolds,” Novi Sad J. Math., 39, No. 2, 89–95 (2009).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  175. L. V. Stepanova, “A quasi-Sasakian structure on hypersurfaces of Hermitian manifolds,” in: Proc. Moscow Pedagogical Inst. [in Russian], Moscow (1995), pp. 187–191.

  176. L. V. Stepanova and M. B. Banaru, “On hypersurfaces of quasi-Kählerian manifolds,” in: Differential Geometry of Manifolds of Figures [in Russian], 31, Kaliningrad State Univ., Kaliningrad (2000), pp. 85–88.

  177. L. V. Stepanova and M. B. Banaru, “On quasi-Sasakian and cosymplectic hypersurfaces of special Hermitian manifolds,” Differential Geometry of Manifolds of Figures [in Russian], 32, Kaliningrad State Univ., Kaliningrad (2001), pp. 87–93.

  178. L. Stepanova and M. Banaru, “On hypersurfaces of quasi-Kählerian manifolds,” An. Ştinţ. Univ. Al. I. Cuza, Iaşi, 47, No. 1, 165–170 (2001).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  179. L. Stepanova and M. Banaru, “Some remarks on almost contact metric structures on hypersurfaces of a QK-manifold,” in: Webs and Quasigroups [in Russian], Tver State Univ., Tver (2002), pp. 92–96.

  180. R. Takagi, “On homogeneous real hypersurfaces in a complex projective space,” Osaka J. Math., 10, 495–506 (1973).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  181. R. Takagi, “Real hypersurfaces in a complex projective space with constant principal curvatures, I, II,” J. Math. Soc. Jpn., 27, 45–57, 507–516 (1975).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  182. R. Takagi, “A class of hypersurfaces with constant principal curvatures in a sphere,” J. Differ. Geom., 11, 225–233 (1976).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  183. R. Takagi, I.-B. Kim, and B. H. Kim, “The rigidity for real hypersurfaces in a complex projective space,” Tôhoku Math. J., 50, 531–536 (1998).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  184. T. Takahashi, “Sasakian ϕ-symmetric spaces,” Tôhoku Math. J., 29, 91–113 (1977).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  185. S. Tanno, “Sasakian manifolds with constant Φ-holomorphic sectional curvature,” Tˆohoku Math. J., 21, No. 3, 501–507 (1969).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  186. S. Tanno, “On the isometry groups of Sasakian manifolds,” J. Math. Soc. Jpn, 22, 579–590 (1970).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  187. S. Tanno, “Ricci curvature of contact Riemannian manifolds,” Tôhoku Math. J., 40, 441–448 (1988).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  188. Y. Tashiro, “On contact structures of hypersurfaces in almost complex manifolds, I,” Tôhoku Math. J., 15, No. 1, 62–78 (1963).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  189. Y. Tashiro, “On contact structures of tangent sphere bundles,” Tôhoku Math. J., 21, 117–143 (1969).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  190. M. M. Tripathi and S. S. Shukla, “Ricci curvature and k-Ricci curvature for submanifolds of generalized complex space forms,” Aligarh Bull. Math., 20, 143–156 (2001).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  191. Venkatesha and C. S. Bagewadi, “Some curvature tensors on a Kenmotsu manifold,” Tensor (N.S.), 68, 140–147 (2007).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  192. R. C. Voicu, “Ricci curvature properties and stability on 3-dimensional Kenmotsu manifolds,” Contemp. Math., 542, 273–278 (2011).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  193. B. Wu, “1-type minimal surfaces in complex Grassmann manifolds and its Gauss map,” Tsukuba J. Math., 26, 49–60 (2002).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  194. K. Yano, Differential Geometry on Complex and Almost Complex Spaces, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1965).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  195. K. Yano and S. Ishihara, “Almost contact structures induced on hypersurfaces in complex and almost complex spaces,” Kodai Math. Sem. Rep., 17, No. 3, 222–249 (1965).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  196. K. Yano and M. Kon, Structures on Manifolds, World Scientific, Singapore (1984).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  197. Yoon Dae Won, “Inequality for Ricci curvature of certain submanifolds in locally conformal almost cosymplectic manifolds,” Int. J. Math. Math. Sci., 10, 1621–1632 (2005).

  198. Xi Zhang, “Energy properness and Sasakian–Einstein metrics,” Commun. Math. Phys., 306, 229–260 (2011).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  199. Tongde Zhong, “The geometry of hypersurfaces in a Kähler manifold,” Acta Math. Sci., Ser. B, 21, 350–362 (2001).

  200. Zhenrong Zhou, “Spectral geometry of Sasakian submanifolds,” J. Math. (P.R. China), 20, No. 1, 83–86 (2000).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Smolensk State University, Smolensk, Russia

    M. B. Banaru

  2. Moscow Pedagogical State University, Moscow, Russia

    V. F. Kirichenko

Authors
  1. M. B. Banaru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. F. Kirichenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. B. Banaru.

Additional information

Translated from Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki, Seriya Sovremennaya Matematika i Ee Prilozheniya. Tematicheskie Obzory. Vol. 127, Geometry, 2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Banaru, M.B., Kirichenko, V.F. Almost Contact Metric Structures on the Hypersurface of Almost Hermitian Manifolds. J Math Sci 207, 513–537 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-015-2382-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-015-2382-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation