Abstract
This article contributes to the debate about the role of the region in the placement and coordination of research centers linking technology-led economic development and science, technology, and innovation policy. Through a comparison of how a “conscious geography” has informed the organization of innovation + development (I + D) research centers in the US and Canada, this analysis focuses on the variation in the models of multi-scalar policy coordination deployed through the I + D research center frameworks in the US and Canada. This article begins with a discussion of the theoretical arguments behind territorial innovation systems. It continues by describing the different models of I + D research centers in the US and Canada and the role of the region in each set of policy frameworks. The third section discusses ways policy outcomes are influenced by the initial consideration of the spatial distribution of production and innovation. The article concludes with the case for a policy model which prioritizes a role for the region as a site of economic and geographic analysis and a partner in the design of a multi-scalar innovation policy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaron, K. (2003). New York State’s centers of excellence win praise but no guarantee of new jobs. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News: 1.
Alder, G. M. (2006). State technology development and commercialization programs: A survey of the states, national centers of excellence. WestCamp Inc.
Asheim, B., & Coenen, L. (2006). Contextualising regional innovation systems in a globalising learning economy: On knowledge bases and institutional frameworks. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 163.
Asheim, B., Coenen, L., et al. (2007). Constructing knowledge-based regional advantage: Implications for regional innovation policy. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 7(2–5), 140.
Asheim, B., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: the integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77.
Atkinson-Grosjean, J. (2002). Canadian science at the public/private divide: The NCE experiment. Journal of Canadian Studies, 37(3), 71.
Bartik, T. (1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies? Kalamazoo. Michigan: The Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
Bell, S. (1996). University-industry interaction in the Ontario centres of excellence. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(3), 322.
Benner, C. (2003). Labor flexibility and regional development: The role of labour market intermediaries. Regional Studies, 37(6), 621.
Benneworth, P., & Charles, D. (2005). University spin-off policies and economic development in less successful regions: Learning from two decades of policy practice. European Planning Studies, 13(4), 537.
Blakely, E. J. (1994). Planning local economic development: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Bluestone, B., & Harrison, B. (1982). The deindustrialization of America: Plant closings, community abandonment, and the dismantling of basic industry. New York: Basic Books.
Boardman, P. C. (2008). Beyond the stars: The impact of affiliation with university biotechnology centers on the industrial involvement of university scientists. Technovation, 28(5), 291.
Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4,5), 627.
Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2004). The NSF engineering research centers and the university-industry research revolution: A brief history featuring an interview with Erich Bloch. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 365.
Bozeman, B., & Coker, K. (1991). Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer from U.S. government R&D laboratories: Impact of market orientation. Bellingham, Washington: SPIE Conference Proceedings: International Competitiveness and Business Techniques.
Bozeman, B., Laredo, P., et al. (2007). Understanding the emergence and deployment of “nano” S&T. Research Policy, 36(6), 807.
Braczyk, H.-J., Cooke, P., et al. (1998). Regional innovation systems: The role of governances in a globalized world. London; Bristol, Pa.: UCL Press.
Christopherson, S., & Clark, J. (2007a). Power in firm networks: What it means for regional innovation systems. Regional Studies, 41(9), 1223.
Christopherson, S., & Clark, J. (2007b). Remaking regional economies: Power, labor, and firm strategies in the knowledge economy. New York: Routledge.
Clark, J. (2004). Restructuring the region: The evolution of the optics and imaging industry in Rochester, New York. City and regional planning (p. 220). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Clark, J., & Christopherson, S. (2009). Integrating investment and equity: A critical regionalist agenda for a progressive regionalism. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(Spring):341–354.
Clarke, L. (1991). Centralizing optics and imaging: Monroe county economic development strategy. Bellingham, Washington: SPIE Conference Proceedings: International Competitiveness and Business Techniques.
Coburn, C. M., & Brown, D. M. (1997). Response: A state-federal partnership in support of science and technology. Economic Development Quarterly, 11(4), 296.
Cooke, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: The construction of advantage. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 5.
Crevoisier, O. (2004). The innovative Milieus approach: Toward a territorialized understanding of the economy? Economic Geography, 80(4), 367.
Dicken, P., & Malmberg, A. (2001). Firms in territories: A relational perspective. Economic Geography, 77(4), 345.
Doloreux, D. (2004). Regional innovation systems in Canada: A comparative study. Regional Studies, 38(5), 481.
Doloreux, D., & Dionne, S. (2008). Is regional innovation system development possible in peripheral regions? Some evidence from the case of La Pocatière, Canada. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20(3), 259.
Dreier, P., Mollenkopf, J., et al. (2001). Place matters: Metropolitics for the 21st century. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
Ehrenberg, R., Rizzo, M., et al. (2003). Who bears the cost of science at universities. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Higher Education Research Institute Working Paper.
Feldman, M., & Desrochers, P. (2003). Research universities and local economic development: Lessons from the history of the Johns Hopkins University. Industry and Innovation, 10(1), 5.
Feller, I. (1997a). Federal and state government roles in science and technology. Economic Development Quarterly, 11(4), 283.
Feller, I. (1997b). Manufacturing technology centers as components of regional technology infrastructures. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 27(2), 181.
Feller, I. (1997c). Rejoinder: Response to Coburn and Brown. Economic Development Quarterly, 11(4), 310.
Feller, I., Madden, P., et al. (1987). The new agricultural research and technology transfer policy agenda. Research Policy, 16(6), 315.
Florida, R. (2002). The learning region. In M. Gertler & D. Wolfe (Eds.), Innovation and social learning: Institutional adaptation in an era of technological change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gargano, C. A. (2006). Building the high-tech future. Economic Development Journal, 5(2), 47.
Gertler, M. S., & Wolfe, D. A. (2002). Innovation and social learning: Institutional adaptation in an era of technological change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Globerman, S. (2006). Canada’s regional innovation systems: The Science-based industries. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 432.
Godin, B., Dore, C., et al. (2002). The production of knowledge in Canada: Consolidation and diversification. Journal of Canadian Studies, 37(3), 56.
Gray, D. O., Lindblad, M., et al. (2001). Industry-university research centers: A multivariate analysis of member retention. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 247.
Harvey, A. B. (1991). NSF’s role in photonics (optoelectronics, optical communications, information processing and optical computing). Bellingham, Washington: SPIE Conference Proceedings: International Competitiveness and Business Techniques.
Kenney, M., & Patton, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial geographies: Support networks in three high-technology industries. Economic Geography, 81(2), 201.
KPMG, C. L. (2002). Evaluation of the networks of centres of excellence: Final report. N. Directorate.
Lin, M.-W., & Bozeman, B. (2006). Researchers’ industry experience and productivity in university-industry research centers: A “scientific and technical human capital” explanation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(2), 269.
Lowi, T. J. (1995). The end of the republican era. Norman [Okla.]. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.
Malecki, E. J. (2004). Jockeying for position: What it means and why it matters to regional development policy when places compete. Regional Studies, 38(9), 1101.
Markusen, A. (1996). Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts. Economic Geography, 72(3), 293.
Markusen, A. (2001). Regions as loci of conflict and change: The contributions of Ben Harrison to regional economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 15(4), 291.
Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395.
Massey, D. B., Quintas, P., et al. (1992). High-tech fantasies: Science parks in society, science, and space. London; New York: Routledge.
MNSCU. (2005). Examples of centers of excellence in other states and systems. Minnesota: Minnesota State College and University System.
Morgan, K. (2004). Sustainable regions: Governance, innovation and scale. European Planning Studies, 12(6), 871.
Moulaert, F., & Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289.
Noble, D. F. (1977). America by design: Science, technology, and the rise of corporate capitalism. New York: Knopf.
Noble, D. F. (1986). Forces of production: A social history of industrial automation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). The technological competencies of the world’s largest firms: Complex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Research Policy, 26(2), 141.
Peck, J. (1996). Work-place: The social regulation of labor markets. New York: Guilford Press.
Perry, B., & May, T. (2007). Governance, science policy and regions: An introduction. Regional Studies, 41(8), 1039–1050.
Perry, B., et al. (2007). Building Science regions in the European research area: Governance in the territorial Agora. Manchester, UK: Centre for Sustainable Urban and Regional Futures (SURF) at the University of Salford.
Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A., et al. (2006). Local and regional development. New York: Routledge.
Piore, M. J. (2002). Thirty years later: Internal labor markets, flexibility and the new economy. Journal of Management and Governance, 6(4), 271.
Ponomariov, B., & Boardman, P. C. (2008). The effect of informal industry contacts on the time university scientists allocate to collaborative research with industry. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 301.
Porter, M., Group, M., et al. (2001). Clusters of Innovation: Regional foundations of U.S. competitiveness. Washington, DC: Council on Competitiveness.
Rae-Dupree, J. (2009). Innovation should mean more jobs, not less. New York: The New York Times.
Rip, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems and the advent of strategic science. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 123.
Roessner, J. D. (1985). Prospects for a national innovation policy in the USA. Futures, 17(3), 224.
Rood, S. A. (2000). Government laboratory technology transfer: Process and impact. Aldershot [England] Burlington. USA: Ashgate.
Salazar, M., & Holbrook, A. (2007). Canadian science, technology and innovation policy: The product of regional networking? Regional Studies, 41(8), 1129.
Simmie, J. (2005). Innovations and space: A critical review of the literature. Regional Studies, 39(6), 789.
Steenhuis, H.-J., & Gray, D. O. (2006). The university as the engine of growth: an analysis of how universities can contribute to the economy. International Journal of Technology Transfer & Commercialisation, 5(4), 421.
Sternberg, E. (1991). Beyond the technology lists: Tracking advanced optics and other critical technologies. Bellingham, Washington: SPIE Conference Proceedings: International Competitiveness and Business Techniques.
Sternberg, E. (1992). Photonic technology and industrial policy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: Guilford Press.
Storper, M. (2002). Institutions of the learning economy. In M. Gertler & D. Wolfe (Eds.), Innovation and social learning: Institutional adaptation in an era of technological change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Trippl, M., & Tödtling, F. (2007). Developing biotechnology clusters in non-high technology regions-the case of Austria. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 47.
Vlannes, N. P. (1991). A national technology center and photonics. Bellingham, Washington: SPIE Conference Proceedings: International Competitiveness and Business Techniques.
Wilder, R. (2006). Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Centers of Excellence Program Evaluation.
Wolfe, D., & Holbrook, J. A. (2002). Knowledge, clusters and regional innovation: Economic development in Canada. Montréal: Published for the School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University by McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Zysman, J., & Tyson, L. D. A. (1983). American industry in international competition: Government policies and corporate strategies. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Acknowledgments
First, I would like to acknowledge the financial support for this project provided through a Faculty Research Award from the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Canada. Also, the special issue editors, Craig Boardman and Denis Gray, deserve special appreciation for their insights and advice. In addition, I would like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their comments on the manuscript. And finally, I thank several colleagues for comments on earlier versions of this manuscript: Aaron Levine, Carl DiSalvo, Benjamin Flowers, and Harley Etienne.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clark, J. Coordinating a conscious geography: the role of research centers in multi-scalar innovation policy and economic development in the US and Canada. J Technol Transf 35, 460–474 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9137-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9137-z
Keywords
- Centers of excellence
- Regional innovation systems
- National innovation policy
- Regional economic development
- Research centers
- North America