Abstract
Analysis of thermal and solutal energy transport phenomena in Maxwell fluid flow with the help of Cattaneo–Christov double diffusion theory is performed in this article. Unsteady 2D flow of Maxwell fluid with variable thermal conductivity over the stretching cylinder is considered here. We formulate the partial differential equations (PDEs) under given assumptions for the governing physical problem of heat and mass transport in Maxwell fluid by using double diffusion of Cattaneo–Christov model rather than classical Fourier’s and Fick’s law. Numerical technique bvp4c is employed for the solution of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) which are obtained from governing PDEs under the appropriate similarity transformations. In the view of acquired results, we observed that for convenient results the values of unsteadiness parameter should be less than one. The higher values of Maxwell parameter declines the flow field but increase the energy transport in the fluid flow. Both temperature and concentration distributions in Maxwell liquid decline for higher values of thermal and concentration relaxation time parameter. Moreover, small thermal conductivity parameter also enhances the temperature field. The validation of results is proved with the help of comparison Table 1 with previous articles. The present results are found with help of bvp4c scheme and homotopy analysis method (HAM).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cattaneo C. Sulla conduzione del calore. Atti Semin Mat Fis Univ Modena Rerrio Emilia. 1948;3:83–101.
Christov CI. On a higher-gradient generalization of Fourier’s law of heat conduction. In AIP Conference Proceedings 2007 (Vol. 946, pp. 11–22).
Yousif MA, Ismael HF, Abbas T, Ellahi R. Numerical study of momentum and heat transfer of MHD Carreau nanofluid over exponentially stretched plate with internal heat source/sink and radiation. Heat Transf Res. 2019;50(7):649–58.
Sarafraz MM, Pourmehran O, Yang B, Arjomandi M, Ellahi R. Pool boiling heat transfer characteristics of iron oxide nano-suspension under constant magnetic field. Int J Therm Sci. 2020;147:106131.
Han S, Zheng L, Li C, Zhang X. Coupled flow and heat transfer in viscoelastic fluid with Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model. Appl Math Lett. 2014;38:87–93.
Upadhya SM, Mahesha, Raju CSK. Cattaneo -Christov heat flux model for magnetohydrodynamic flow in a suspension of dust particles towards a stretching sheet. Nonlinear Eng. 2018;7:237–46.
Khan WA, Irfan M, Khan M. An improved heat conduction and mass diffusion models for rotating flow of an Oldroyd-B fluid. Results Phys. 2017;7:3583–9.
Ibrahim W. Three dimensional rotating flow of Powell-Eyring nanofluid with non-Fourier’s heat flux and non-Fick’s mass flux theory. Results Phys. 2018;8:569–77.
Farooq M, Ahmad S, Javed M, Anjum A. Analysis of Cattaneo–Christov heat and mass fluxes in the squeezed flow embedded in porous medium with variable mass diffusivity. Results Phys. 2017;7:3788–96.
Alamri SZ, Khan AA, Azeez M, Ellahi R. Effects of mass transfer on MHD second grade fluid towards stretching cylinder: a novel perspective of Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model. Phys Lett A. 2019;383:276–81.
Ahmed J, Khan M, Ahmad L. Effectiveness of homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions in Maxwell fluid flow between two spiraling disks with improved heat conduction features. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08712-9.
Saleem S, Awais M, Nadeem S, Sandeep N, Mustafa MT. Theoretical analysis of upper-convected Maxwell fluid flow with Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model. Chin J Phys. 2017;55:1615–25.
Reddy GK, Yarrakula K, Raju CSK. Mixed convection analysis of variable heat source/sink on MHD Maxwell, Jeffrey, and Oldroyd-B nanofluids over a cone with convective conditions using Buongiorno’s model. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7115-0.
Ellahi R, Zeeshan A, Shehzad N, Alamri SZ. Structural impact of kerosene-\(\text{ Al }_2\text{ O }_3\) nanoliquid on MHD Poiseuille flow with variable thermal conductivity: application of cooling process. J Mol Liq. 2018;264:607–15.
Tibullo V, Zampoli V. A uniqueness result for the Cattaneo–Christov heat conduction model applied to incompressible fluids. Mech Res Commun. 2011;38:77–9.
Bhattacharyya A, Seth GS, Kumar R. Simulation of Cattaneo–Christov heat flux on the flow of single and multi-walled carbon nanotubes between two stretchable coaxial rotating disks. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08644-4.
Ramadevi B, Kumar KA, Sugunamma V. Magnetohydrodynamic mixed convective flow of micropolar fluid past a stretching surface using modified Fourier’s heat flux model. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08477-1.
Kumar KA, Sugunamma V, Sandeep N. Influence of viscous dissipation on MHD flow of micropolar fluid over a slendering stretching surface with modified heat flux model. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08694-8.
Asadollahi A, Esfahani JA, Ellahi R. Evacuating liquid coatings from a diffusive oblique fin in micro-/mini-channels. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;138:255–63.
Rashidi S, Eskandarian M, Mahian O, Poncet S. Combination of nanofluid and inserts for heat transfer enhancement. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;135(1):437–60.
Khan LA, Raza M, Mir NA, Ellahi R. Effects of different shapes of nanoparticles on peristaltic flow of MHD nanofluids filled in an asymmetric channel. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08348-9.
Raju CSK, Sandeep N, Malvandib A. Free convective heat and mass transfer of MHD non-Newtonian nanofluids over a cone in the presence of non-uniform heat source/sink. J Mol Liq. 2016;221:108–15.
Hsiao KL. Combined electrical MHD heat transfer thermal extrusion system using Maxwell fluid with radiative and viscous dissipation effects. Appl Therm Eng. 2017;112:1281–8.
Hsiao KL. To promote radiation electrical MHD activation energy thermal extrusion manufacturing system efficiency by using Carreau–Nanofluid with parameters control method. Energy. 2017;130:486–99.
Ahmed J, Khan M, Ahmad L. Stagnation point flow of Maxwell nanofluid over a permeable rotating disk with heat source/sink. J Mol Liq. 2019;287:110853.
Moshkin NP, Pukhnachev VV, Bozhkov YD. On the unsteady, stagnation point flow of a Maxwell fluid in 2D. Int J Non-Linear Mech. 2019;116:32–8.
Hsiao KL. Stagnation electrical MHD nanofluid mixed convection with slip boundary on a stretching sheet. Appl Therm Eng. 2016;98:850–61.
Hsiao KL. Micropolar nanofluid flow with MHD and viscous dissipation effects towards a stretching sheet with multimedia feature. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;112:983–90.
Saif RS, Hayat T, Ellahi R, Muhammad T, Alsaedi T. Darcy–Forchheimer flow of nanofluid due to a curved stretching surface. Int J Numer Method Heat Fluid Flow. 2019;29(1):2–20.
Ahmed Z, Nadeem S, Saleem S, Ellahi R. Numerical study of unsteady flow and heat transfer CNT-based MHD nanofluid with variable viscosity over a permeable shrinking surface. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow. 2019;29(12):4607–23.
Rajagopal KR. A note on novel generalizations of the Maxwell fluid model. Int J Non-Linear Mech. 2012;47(1):72–6.
Abel MS, Tawade JV, Nandeppanavar MM. MHD flow and heat transfer for the upper-convected Maxwell fluid over a stretching sheet. Meccanica. 2012;47:385–93.
Waqas M, Khan MI, Hayat T, Alsaedi A. Stratified flow of an Oldroyd-B nanoliquid with heat generation. Results Phys. 2017;7:2489–96.
Irfan M, Khan M, Khan WA. Impact of homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions and non-Fourier heat flux theory in Oldroyd-B fluid with variable conductivity. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2019;. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1619-9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khan, M., Ahmed, A., Irfan, M. et al. Analysis of Cattaneo–Christov theory for unsteady flow of Maxwell fluid over stretching cylinder. J Therm Anal Calorim 144, 145–154 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09343-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09343-1