Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Matrix quality and habitat configuration interactively determine functional connectivity in a widespread bush cricket at a small spatial scale

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unlike rare or specialised species, widespread abundant species have often been neglected when studying effects of habitat fragmentation. However, recently, it was shown that in the widespread abundant bush cricket Pholidoptera griseoaptera gene flow becomes restricted when the share of suitable habitat dropped below a threshold of 20% at the landscape scale. Here, using the same highly fragmented landscape, we studied the impact of habitat configuration and matrix quality on genetic variation and population differentiation of P. griseoaptera at a small spatial scale. We investigated four clusters of three populations that were either disconnected or connected and had either low quality (arable land) or high quality (grassland) matrix. The number of alleles was significantly lower in disconnected than in connected clusters, irrespective of matrix quality. Genetic differentiation was equally high in the two disconnected clusters and in the connected cluster with low quality matrix (G ST ≥ 0.030; D ≥ 0.082), whereas it was significantly reduced when connected habitats were embedded in a high quality grassland matrix (G ST = 0.004; D = 0.011). Analyses of least-cost paths showed that grassy landscape elements in fact represent high quality matrix, but that linear grassy margins are costly for dispersal. The effect of habitat configuration on genetic diversity may be explained by lower effective population sizes in disconnected habitats. The fact that only the connected populations in high quality matrix were not differentiated indicates that landscape management should simultaneously consider habitat configuration and matrix quality to effectively promote small and dispersal-limited species, also at small spatial scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulinck H, Matthysen E (2003) The application of ‘least-cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model. Landsc Urban Plan 64:233–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arens P, Wernke-Lenting JH, Diekötter T, Rothenbuhle C, Speelmans M, Hendrickx F, Smulders MJM (2005) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in the dark bush cricket, Pholidoptera griseoaptera (Tettigoniidae). Mol Ecol Notes 5:413–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bender DJ, Fahrig L (2005) Matrix structure obscures the relationship between interpatch movement and patch size and isolation. Ecology 86:117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18:182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billeter R, Liira J, Bailey D, Bugter R, Arens P, Augenstein I, Aviron S, Baudry J, Bukacek R, Burel F, Cerny M, De Blust G, De Cock R, Diekotter T, Dietz H, Dirksen J, Dormann C, Durka W, Frenzel M, Hamersky R, Hendrickx F, Herzog F, Klotz S, Koolstra B, Lausch A, Le Coeur D, Maelfait JP, Opdam P, Roubalova M, Schermann A, Schermann N, Schmidt T, Schweiger O, Smulders MJM, Speelmans M, Simova P, Verboom J, van Wingerden WKRE, Zobel M, Edwards PJ (2008) Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan-European study. J Appl Ecol 45:141–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosi BJ, Daily GC, Shih TM, Oviedo F, Durán G (2008) The effects of forest fragmentation on bee communities. J Appl Ecol 45:773–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao A, Shen T-J (2003) Program SPADE (Species Prediction And Diversity Estimation). Program and user’s guide published. http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw. Accessed Aug 2011

  • Chao A, Jost L, Chiang SC, Jiang Y-H, Chazdon RL (2008) A two-stage probabilistic approach to multiple-community similarity indices. Biometrics 64:1178–1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapuis MP, Estoup A (2007) Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol Biol Evol 24:621–631

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devictor V, Julliard R, Jiguet F (2008) Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation. Oikos 117:507–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekötter T, Csencsics D, Rothenbühler C, Billeter R, Edwards PJ (2005) Movement and dispersal patterns in the bush cricket Pholidoptera griseoaptera: the role of developmental stage and sex. Ecol Entomol 30:419–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekötter T, Haynes KJ, Mazeffa D, Crist TO (2007a) Direct and indirect effects of habitat area and matrix composition on species interactions among flower-visiting insects. Oikos 116:1588–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekötter T, Speelmans M, Dusoulier F, van Wingerden WKRE, Malfait J-P, Crist TO, Edwards PJ, Dietz H (2007b) Effects of landscape structure on movement patterns of the flightless bush cricket Pholidoptera griseoaptera. Environ Entomol 36:90–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekötter T, Baveco H, Arens P, Rothenbühler C, Billeter R, Csencsics D, De Filippi R, Hendrickx F, Speelmans M, Opdam P, Smulders MJM (2010) Patterns of habitat occupancy, genetic variation and predicted movement of a flightless bush cricket, Pholidoptera griseoaptera, in an agricultural mosaic landscape. Landscape Ecol 25:449–461

    Google Scholar 

  • EFTAS Fernerkundung Technologietransfer GmbH (2007) High resolution land-cover map of the nidda catchment based on colour infrared photographs of 2005. EFTAS Fernerkundung Technologietransfer GmbH, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • El Mousadik A, Petit RJ (1996) High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree (Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels) endemic to Morocco. Theor Appl Genet 92:832–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evanno G, Castella E, Goudet J (2006) Evolutionary aspects of population structure for molecular and quantitative traits in the freshwater snail Radix balthica. J Evol Biol 19:1071–1082

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Res 10:564–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farwig N, Bailey D, Bochud E, Herrmann JD, Kindler E, Reusser N, Schüepp C, Schmidt-Entling MH (2009) Isolation from forest reduces pollination, seed predation and insect scavenging in Swiss farmland. Landscape Ecol 24:919–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Synder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach G, Jueterbock A, Kraemer P, Deppermann J, Harmand P (2010) Calculations of population differentiation based on GST and D: forget GST but not all of statistics. Mol Ecol 19:3845–3852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin M, Hanski I (eds) (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: empirical and theoretical investigations. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goslee SC, Urban DL (2007) The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J Stat Soft 22:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, version 2.9.3, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (updated from Goudet 1995). University of Lausanne, Lausanne. http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm. Accessed Aug 2011

  • Goudet J (2005) Hierfstat, a package for R to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Mol Ecol Notes 5:184–186. http://www.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/hierfstat.htm. Accessed Aug 2011

  • Goudet J, Raymond M, de-Meeus T, Rousset F (1996) Testing differentiation in diploid populations. Genetics 144:1933–1940

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guido M, Gianelle D (2001) Distribution patterns of four Orthoptera species in relation to microhabitat heterogeneity in an ecotonal area. Acta Oecol 22:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo SW, Thompson EA (1992) A monte-carlo method for combined segregation and linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 51:1111–1126

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartl DL, Clark AG (2007) Principles of population genetics. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes KJ, Cronin JT (2003) Matrix composition affects the spatial ecology of a prairie planthopper. Ecology 84:2856–2866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes KJ, Diekötter T, Crist TO (2007) Resource complementation and the response of an insect herbivore to habitat area and fragmentation. Oecologia 153:511–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick PW (2005) A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 59:1633–1638

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hein S, Gombert J, Hovestadt T, Poethke HJ (2003) Movement patterns of the bush cricket Platycleis albopunctata in different types of habitat: matrix is not always matrix. Ecological Entomology 28:432–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henle K, Davies KF, Kleyer M, Margules C, Settele J (2004) Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation. Biodivers Conserv 13:207–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingrisch S, Köhler G (1998) Die Heuschrecken Mitteleuropas. Westarp Wissenschaften, Magdeburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost L (2008) GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol 17:4015–4026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller I, Largiadèr CR (2003) Recent habitat fragmentation caused by major roads leads to reduction of gene flow and loss of genetic variability in ground beetles. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:417–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lang S, Tiede D (2003) vLATE Extension für ArcGIS – vektorbasiertes Tool zur quantitativen Landschaftsstrukturanalyse, ESRI Anwenderkonferenz 2003 Innsbruck, CDROM

  • Lange R, Durka W, Holzhauer SIJ, Wolters V, Diekötter T (2010) Differential threshold effects of habitat fragmentation on gene flow in two widespread species of bush crickets. Mol Ecol 19:4936–4948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Lapointe F-J, Casgrain P (1994) Brain evolution from behavior: a permutational regression approach. Evolution 48:1487–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichstein J (2007) Multiple regression on distance matrices: a multivariate spatial analysis tool. Plant Ecol 188:117–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas S, Detzel P, Staudt A (2002) Gefährdungsanalyse der Heuschrecken Deutschlands – Verbreitungsatlas, Gefährdungseinstufung und Schutzkonzepte. Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald DW, Tattersall FH, Service KM, Firbank LG, Feber RE (2007) Mammals, agri-environment schemes and set-aside—what are the putative benefits? Mammal Rev 37:259–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall EJP, West TM, Kleijn D (2006) Impacts of an agri-environment field margin prescription on the flora and fauna of arable farmland in different landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 113:36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marvier M, Kareiva P, Neubert MG (2004) Habitat destruction, fragmentation, and disturbance promote invasion by habitat generalists in a multispecies metapopulation. Risk Anal 24:869–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html. Accessed Aug 2011

  • Meirmans PG, Hedrick PW (2011) Assessing population structure: FST and related measures. Mol Ecol Res 11:5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R (1975) Bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neve G, Barascud B, Descimon H, Baguette M (2000) Genetic structure of Proclossiana eunomia populations at the regional scale (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Heredity 84:657–666

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nieminen M, Singer MC, Fortelius W, Schöps K, Hanski I (2001) Experimental confirmation that inbreeding depression increases extinction risk in butterfly populations. Am Nat 157:237–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pompanon F, Bonin A, Bellemain E, Taberlet P (2005) Genotyping errors: causes, consequences and solutions. Nat Rev Genet 6:847–859

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prevedello JA, Vieira MV (2010) Does the type of matrix matter? A quantitative review of the evidence. Biodivers Conserv 19:1205–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org

  • Ray N (2005) PATHMATRIX: a GIS tool to compute effective distances among samples. Mol Ecol Notes 5:177–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayfield B, Fortin M-J, Fall A (2010) The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values. Landscape Ecol 25:519–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 17:230–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158:87–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schlumprecht H, Waeber G (2003) Heuschrecken in Bayern. Eugen Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott DM, Brown D, Mahood S, Denton B, Silburn A, Rakotondraparany F (2006) The impacts of forest clearance on lizard, small mammal and bird communities in the arid spiny forest, southern Madagascar. Biol Conserv 127:72–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şekercioḡlu ÇH, Ehrlich PR, Daily GC, Aygen D, Goehring D, Sandi RF (2002) Disappearance of insectivorous birds from tropical forest fragments. PNAS 99:263–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kruess A, Thies C (2002) Characteristics of insect populations on habitat fragments: a mini review. Ecol Res 17:229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang R-C (1998) Estimating hierarchical F-statistics. Evolution 52:950–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Smith GM (2007) Analysing ecological data. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the German Research Foundation in context of the Collaborative Research Centre 299 (SFB 299). The authors would like to thank T. Reiners and J. Grosenick for field assistance and A. Shaver, I. Geier, M. Herrmann, G. Hornemann and S. Rauch for laboratory assistance and R. Klenke and G. Pe’er for helping with the least-cost path analysis. We also thank K. Scholz and J. Scholz for improving the English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Lange.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 272 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lange, R., Diekötter, T., Schiffmann, L.A. et al. Matrix quality and habitat configuration interactively determine functional connectivity in a widespread bush cricket at a small spatial scale. Landscape Ecol 27, 381–392 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9692-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9692-1

Keywords

Navigation