Skip to main content
Log in

A Positive Theory of Private Label: A Strategic Role of Private Label in a Duopoly National-Brand Market

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article offers an economic rationale for national brands to provide private labels to their retailers. We build a game-theoretic model that analyzes the interactions among two national brand manufacturers and one common retailer. In an interesting strategic role, the private label mitigates the promotion competition between the two national brands and provides benefits for all three members in the channel. Our analysis shows that offering a private label can be a credible commitment from a national brand manufacturer that it will not engage in promotions and decrease the incentive of the national brand rival to engage in promotions. In this way, we attempt to provide a reason for why national brand manufacturers provide retailers with private labels in practice. In addition, we discuss the optimal quality level of private labels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ailawadi Kusum L. and Bari Harlam. (2004). “An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Retail Margins: The Role of Store-Brand Share,” Journal of Marketing 68(1), 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ailawadi Kusum L., Scott A. Neslin, and Karen Gedenk. (2001). “ Pursuing The Value-Conscious Consumer: Store Brands Versus National Brand Promotions,” Journal of Marketing 65(1), 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apelbaum, Eidan, Eitan Gerstner, and Prasad A. Naik. (2003). “The Effects of Expert Quality Evaluations Versus Brand Name on Price Premiums,” The Journal of Product and Brand Management 12(2/3), 154–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergès-Sennou, Fabian, Philippe Bontems, and Vincent Réquillart. (2004). “Economics of Private Labels: A Survey of Literature,” Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization 2(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chintagunta, Pradeep K., André Bonfrer, and Inseong Song. (2002). “Investigating the Effects of Store-Brand Introduction on Retailer Demand and Pricing Behavior,” Management Science 48(10), 1242–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corstjens, M. and Rajiv Lal. (2000). “Building Store Loyalty Through Store Brands,” Journal of Marketing Research 37(August), 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotterill, Ronaldw, Williamp Putsis, JR, and Ravi Dhar (2000). “Assessing The Competitive Interaction Between Private Labels and National Brands,” The Journal of Business 73(1), 109–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, Preyas S. (2001), ”Quality Segmentation in Spatial Markets: When Dose Cannibalization Affect Product Line Design?rdquo; Marketing Science 20(3), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, David and Chakravarthi Narasimhan. (1999). “The New Appeal of Private Labels,” Harvard Business Review May-June, 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. (1929). “Stability in Competition,” Economic Journal 39, 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, Stephen J. and Shumeet Banerji. (1993). “When Do Private Label Succeed?rdquo; Sloan Management Review 34(Summer), 57–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, Stephen J. (1996). “How Should National Brands Thinks About Private Labels?rdquo; Sloan Management Review 37(Winter), 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Namwoon, and Philip M. Parker. (1999). “Collusive Conduct in Private Label Markets,” International Journal of Research in Marketing 16(2), 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, Rajiv. (1990). “Price Promotions: Limiting Competitive Encroachment,” Marketing Science 9(Summer), 247–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marketing week. (2000). “Private Labels on Parade,” 23(27), 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlister, L. (1982), “Marketing Response to Promotions: A Model,” Working Paper, Sloan School of Management, MIT.

  • Mills, David E. (1995). “Why Retailers Sell Private Labels,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 4, 509–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, David E. (1999). “Private Labels and Manufacturer Counterstrategies,” European review of Agricultural Economics 26, 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan, Chakravarthi and Ronald T. Wilcox. (1998). “Private Label and the Channel Relationship: A Cross-Category Analysis,” Journal of Business, 71(4), 573–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, Koen and Shuba Srinivasan (2004). “Who Benefits from Store Brand Entry?,” Marketing Science 23(3), 364–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perloff, J.M., Suslow, V.Y. and P.J. Seguin. (1996). “Higher Prices from Entry: Pricing of Brand-Name Drugs,” Mimeo, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Putsis Jr.,William P.and Dhar, Ravi. (1998). “The Many Faces of Competition,” Marketing Letters 9(3), 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quelch John A. and David Harding. (1996). “Brands Versus Private Labels: Fight to Win,” Harvard Business Review Jan-Feb, 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, Ram C. (1991). “Pricing and Promotions in Asymmetric Duopolies,” Marketing Science 10(2), 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayman, Serdar and Jagmohan S. Raju (2004). “How Category Characteristics Affect The Number of Store Brands Offered By The Retailer: A Model and Empirical Analysis,” Journal of Retailing 80, 279–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayman, Serdar, Stephen J. Hoch, and Jagmohan S. Raju. (2002). “Positioning of Store Brands,” Marketing Science 21(4), 378–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethuraman, Raj. (1995). “A Meta-Analysis of National Brand and Store Brand Cross-Promotional Price Elasticities,” Marketing Letters 6(4), 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, M. B., J. P. Shimshack, J. M. Perloff and M. J.Harris (2002). “Effects of the Private-Label Invasion in Food Industries,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84, 961–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winningham, Bruce. (1999). “Private Label Grows Up,” Discount Merchandiser 39(11), 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi-Cheng Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, CC., Wang, CJ. A Positive Theory of Private Label: A Strategic Role of Private Label in a Duopoly National-Brand Market. Market Lett 16, 143–161 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-005-3266-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-005-3266-4

Keywords

Navigation