Skip to main content
Log in

Toward understanding passive opportunism in dedicated channel relationships

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The investments made in an interfirm relationship have implications for the effectiveness of an agreement. In this study, we investigate whether these investments influence the level of passive opportunism observed in a relationship. Whereas transaction cost theory suggests that firms that make idiosyncratic investments are reluctant to engage in opportunism, reactance theory offers logic suggesting that such investments may increase the likelihood of opportunism. In addition, we investigate whether perceived justice influences the effect of investments on levels of passive opportunism. Data from 120 retail managers in the Norwegian consumer electronics industry support reactance theory predictions and indicate that interactional justice moderates the relationship between specific assets and passive opportunism. We conclude with a discussion of the implications for theory and research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Deleted items are available upon request.

  2. Although active opportunism is not the focus of this study, we found that retailer transaction specific investments are not significantly related to active opportunism in this sample (t = 1.118, p > 0.10).

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (volume 2). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E (1982) Contracting the selling function: the salesperson as outside agent or employee. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles

  • Anderson, E. (1985). The salesperson as outside agent or employee: a transaction cost analysis. Marketing Science, 4(3), 234–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (1988). Transaction costs as determinants of opportunism in integrated and independent sales force. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 9, 247–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., & Jap, S. D. (2005). The dark side of close relationships. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(3), 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1992). The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982). Representing and testing organizational theories: a holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 459–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barboza, D (2007, August 2). Mattel recalls toys made in China. Retrieved from New York Times website on October 21, 2011: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/02/business/worldbusiness/02iht-toys.4.6961912.html?pagewanted=all.

  • Bies, R. J. (1985) Individual reactions to corporate recruiting encounters: the importance of unfairness. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Bradach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G. (1989). Price, authority and trust: from ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Oxford, England: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: a theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J., Konovsky, M., Cooper-Schneider, R., Folger, R., Martin, C., & Bies, R. J. (1994). Interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on victims and survivors of job loss. Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), 397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R., Dev, C. S., & Lee, D.-J. (2000). Managing marketing channel opportunism: the efficacy of alternative governance mechanisms. Journal of Marketing, 64(2), 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. B., Grzeskawiak, S., & Dev, C. S. (2009). Using influence strategies to reduce marketing channel opportunism: the moderating effect of relational norms. Marketing Letters, 20(2), 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosno, J. L., & Dahlstrom, R. (2008). A meta-analytic review of opportunism in exchange relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bos, K. (2001). Uncertainty management: the influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 931–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social relationships (pp. 389–435). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1992). Do norms matter in marketing relationships? Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 32–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, P (2011). Alleging breach of contract, Kodak files suit against Collins Ink. Retrieved October 21, 2011: http://whattheythink.com/articles/54796-alleging-breach-contract-kodak-files-suit-against-collins-ink/

  • Ibeh, K. I. N., & Brock, J. K.-U. (2004). Conducting survey research among organisational populations in developing countries. International Journal of Market Research, 46(3), 375–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibeh, K. I. N., Brock, J. K.-U., & Zhou, Y. J. (2004). The drop and collect survey among industrial populations: theory and empirical evidence. Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jap, S. D. (2001). Perspectives on joint competitive advantages in buyer–supplier relationships. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 18(1/2), 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, G. (1984). An empirical investigation of some antecedents of opportunism in a marketing channel. Journal of Marketing Research, 21(3), 278–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perreault, W. D., Jr., & Leigh, L. E. (1989). Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(2), 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1991). Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 698–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N., Scheer, L. K., & Steenkamp, J. E. M. (1995). The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(1), 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindfleisch, A., & Heide, J. B. (1997). Transaction cost analysis: past, present, and future applications. Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 30–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindfleisch, A., Antia, K., Bercovitz, J., Brown, J. R., Cannon, J., Carson, S. J., Ghosh, M., Helper, S., Robertson, D. C., & Wathne, K. H. (2010). Transaction costs, opportunism, and governance: contextual consideration and future research opportunities. Marketing Letters, 21(3), 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, A. I., Heide, J. B., & Wathne, K. H. (2003). Specific investments in marketing relationships: expropriation and bonding effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(2), 210–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven, C. B. (1981). Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 349–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: the roles of distributive, procedural and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 434–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoking Protectionism (2007, August 16). Retrieved from The Economist website on October 21, 2011: http://www.economist.com/node/9657177.

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: a psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., William Walster, G., Berscheid, E., Austin, J. T. W., & Utne, M. K. (1978). Equity: theory and research. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wathne, K. H., & Heide, J. B. (2000). Opportunism in interfirm relationships: forms, outcomes, and solutions. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications, a study in economics of internal organization. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jody L. Crosno.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 3 The scale items

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crosno, J.L., Manolis, C. & Dahlstrom, R. Toward understanding passive opportunism in dedicated channel relationships. Mark Lett 24, 353–368 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9220-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9220-3

Keywords

Navigation