Abstract
While companies have recognized the perceived economic benefits of encouraging and managing electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM), the benefits may be understated. Companies take into account the influence on the audience. But, what about any effects on the person who communicates the eWOM? We explore the impact that incentivized eWOM has on communicator attitude. Using the saying is believing effect as our theoretical foundation, we suggest that providing eWOM induces a change in the communicator’s attitude. By generating and providing a biased recommendation, the communicator will believe the biased recommendation. Furthermore, the communicator is likely to remember the biased recommendation and will use it to update their attitude. We examine how valence of recommendations (negative versus positive) and the number of opportunities to recommend affect the change in attitude. Our findings indicate that providing recommendations changes communicator’s attitude. Implications of the results are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agarwal, A., Xie, B., Vovsha, I., Rambow, O., & Passonneau, R. (2011). Sentiment analysis of twitter data. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Language in Social Media, Portland, Oregon, 30–38.
Basuroy, S., Chatterjee, S., & Ravid, S. A. (2003). How critical are critical reviews? The box office effects of film critics, star power, and budgets. Journal of Marketing, 67(October), 103–117.
Berger, J. (2014). Word-of-mouth and interpersonal communication: a review and directions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 586–607.
Berger, J., & Iyengar, R. (2013). Communication channels and word of mouth: how the medium shapes the message. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 567–579.
Block, L. G., & Keller, P. A. (1995). When to accentuate the negative: the effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(2), 192–203.
Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(August), 345–354.
Deshpande, M., & Sarkar, A. (2010). BI and sentiment analysis. Business Intelligence Journal, 15(2), 41–49.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Chapter 12.
Fournier, S., & Avery, J. (2011). The uninvited brand. Business Horizons, 54(3), 193–207.
Garnefeld, I., Helm, S., & Eggert, A. (2011). Walk your talk: an experimental investigation of the relationship between word of mouth and communicators’ loyalty. Journal of Service Research, 93(1).
Gillig, P. M., & Greenwald, A. G. (1974). Is it time to lay the sleeper effect to rest? Journal of Persoanlity and Social Psychology, 29, 132–139.
Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: an accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(March), 454–462.
Higgins, E. T., & McCann, C. D. (1984). Social encoding and subsequent attitudes, impressions, and memory: “context-driven” and motivational aspects of processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(1), 26–39.
Higgins, E. T., & Rholes, W. S. (1978). “Saying is believing”: effects of message modification on memory and liking for the person described. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 363–378.
Hsu, C.-L., Lin, J. C.-C., & Chiang, H.-S. (2013). The effects of blogger recommendations on customers’ online shopping intentions. Internet Research, 23(1), 69–88.
Kardes, F. R., Cronley, M. L., Pontes, M. C., & Houghton, D. C. (2001). Down the garden path: the role of conditional inference processes in self-persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(3), 159–168.
Leeper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: a test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129–137.
Mayzlin, D., Dover, Y., & Chevalier, J. (2014). Promotional reviews: an empirical investigation of online review manipulation. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2421–2455.
McCann, C. D., Higgins, E. T., & Fondacaro, R. A. (1991). Primary and recency in communication and self-persuasion: how successive audiences and multiple encodings influence subsequent evaluative judgments. Social Cognition, 9(1), 47–66.
Merich, N. (2014). Negative thinking vs. positive thinking. http://insidetheathleticgrind.com/negative-thinking-vs-positive-thinking/. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
Miller, M.J. (2011). P&G’s secret weapon: word-of-mouth marketing. Brand Channel.com. http://www.brandchannel.com/home/post/PG-Word-of-Mouth-Vocalpoint.aspx. Accessed 27 Jan 2015.
Moore, S. G. (2012). Some things are better left unsaid: how word of mouth influences the storyteller. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(April), 1140–1154.
Posavac, S. S., Kardes, F. R., & Brakus, J. J. (2010). Focused induced tunnel vision in managerial judgment and decision making: the peril and the antidote. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113, 102–111.
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Posavac, S. S., Kardes, F. R., & Mantel, S. P. (1988). Selective hypothesis testing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(2), 197–220.
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Vanous, S., Hook, C., Posavac, S. S., & Kardes, F. R. (2011). Whither the alternatives: determinants and consequences of selective versus comparative judgemental processing. Thinking & Reasoning, 17(4), 367–386.
Sasson, R. (n.d.), The power of negative thinking and how to overcome it. http://www.successconsciousness.com/index_00002d.htm. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, J., Naylor, G., Sivadas, E. et al. The unrealized value of incentivized eWOM recommendations. Mark Lett 27, 411–421 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9360-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9360-3