Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Evaluation of Neural Network Learning Algorithms for Ore Grade Estimation

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

In this paper, comparative evaluation of various local and global learning algorithms in neural network modeling was performed for ore grade estimation in three deposits: gold, bauxite, and iron ore. Four local learning algorithms, standard back-propagation, back-propagation with momentum, quickprop back-propagation, and Levenberg–Marquardt back-propagation, along with two global learning algorithms, NOVEL and simulated annealing, were investigated for this purpose. The study results revealed that no benefit was achieved using global learning algorithms over local learning algorithms. The reasons for showing equivalent performance of global and local learning algorithms was the smooth error surface of neural network training for these specific case studies. However, a separate exercise involving local and global learning algorithms on a nonlinear multimodal optimization of a Rastrigin function, containing many local minima, clearly demonstrated the superior performance of global learning algorithms over local learning algorithms. Although no benefit was found by using global learning algorithms of neural network training for these specific case studies, as a safeguard against getting trapped in local minima, it is better to apply global learning algorithms in neural network training since many real-life applications of neural network modeling show local minima problems in error surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bishop, C. M., 1995, Neural networks for pattern recognition: Clarendon Press, Oxford, 482 p.

  • Gallagher, M. R., 1999, Multi-layer perceptron error surfaces: Visualization, structure and modeling: Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Queensland, 225 p.

  • Hagan, M. T., Demuth, H. B., and Beale, M., 1996, Neural network design: PWS Publishing Company, Boston, 19 chapters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haykins, S., 1999, Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation, 2nd ed: Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 824 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke, J., 2002, Neural network modeling of placer ore grade spatial variability: Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 251 p.

  • Kirkpatrick, S., Gerlatt, C. D., Jr., and Vecchi, M. P., 1983, Optimization by simulated annealing: Science, 220, p. 671–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koike, K., and Matsuda, S., 2003, Characterizing content distributions of impurities in A limestone mine using a feed forward neural network: Nat. Resour. Res., v. 12, no. 3, p. 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koike, K., Matsuda, S., and Gu, B., 2001, Evaluation of interpolation accuracy of neural kriging with application to temperature-distribution analysis: Math. Geol., 33, no. 4, p. 421–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koike, K., Matsuda, S., Suzuki, T., and Ohmi, M., 2002, Neural network-based estimation of principal metal contents in the Hokuroku district, Northern Japan, for exploring Kuroko-type deposits: Nat. Resour. Res., v. 11, no. 2, p. 135–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., and Teller, E., 1958, Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines: J. Chem. Phys., v. 21, p.1087–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, M., 1970, A Monte Carlo method for the approximate solution of certain types of constrained optimization problems, Oper. Res., v. 18, p. 1225–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, D. M., and Dougherty, D. E., 1994, Characterization of aquifer properties using artificial neural networks: Neural kriging: Water Resour. Res., v. 30, no. 2, p. 483–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samanta, B., Bandopadhyay, S., and Ganguli, R., 2004, Data segmentation and genetic algorithms for sparse data division in Nome placer gold grade estimation using neural network and geostatistics: Mining Exploration Geol., v. 11, nos. 1–4, p. 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samanta, B., Ganguli, R., and Bandopadhyay, S., 2003, Comparing the predictive performance of neural networks with ordinary kriging in a bauxite deposit: Transactions of Institute of Mining and Metallury, UK. (Under review).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shang, Yi, and Wah, B. W., 1996, Global optimization for neural network training: IEEE Comput., v. 29, no. 3, p. 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, D. A., and Kouda, R., 1996, Application of a feed forward neural network in the search for Kuroko deposits in the Hokuroku district, Japan: Math. Geol., v. 28, no. 8, p. 1017–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X., and Zhou, Y., 1993, Reserve estimation using neural network techniques: Comput. Geosci., v. 19, no. 4, p. 567–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yama, B. R., and Lineberry, G. T., 1999, Artificial neural network application for a predictive task in Mining: Mining Eng., v. 51, no. 2, p. 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Samanta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Samanta, B., Bandopadhyay, S. & Ganguli, R. Comparative Evaluation of Neural Network Learning Algorithms for Ore Grade Estimation. Math Geol 38, 175–197 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-005-9010-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-005-9010-z

KEY WORDS:

Navigation