Skip to main content
Log in

Iterative Construction of U q (s (n+1)) Representations and Lax Matrix Factorisation

  • Published:
Letters in Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The iterative construction of a generic representation of gℓ(n + 1) or of the trigonomentric deformation of its enveloping algebra is conveniently formulated in terms of Lax matrices. The Lax matrix of the constructed representation factorises into parts determined by the Lax matrix of a generic representation of the algebra with reduced rank and others appearing in the factorised expression of the Lax matrix of the special Jordan–Schwinger representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Awata H., Noumi M., Odake S.: Heisenberg realization for U-q(sl(n)) on the flag manifold. Lett. Math. Phys. 30, 35 (1993) arXiv:hep-th/9306010

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Biedenharn L.C., Lohe M.A.: An extension of the Borel–Weil construction to the quantum group U q (n). Commun. Math. Phys. 146, 483–504 (1992)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Biedenharn L.C., Lohe M.A.: Quantum group symmetry and q-tensor algebras. World Scientific, Singapore (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borel, A., Weil, A.: Representations lineaires et espaces homogenes Kählerians des groupes de Lie compactes. Sem. Bourbaki, May 1954, (expose J.-P. Serre)

  5. Derkachov, S.E.: Factorization of the R-matrix.I. Zapiski nauchn. sem. POMI, 335, p. 134. arXiv:math/0503396

  6. Derkachov S.E., Manashov A.N.: R-matrix and Baxter q-operators for the noncompact SL(N,C) invariant spin chain. SIGMA 2, 084 (2006) arXiv:nlin/0612003

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Derkachov S.E., Karakhanyan D., Kirschner R.: Yang–Baxter R operators and parameter permutations. Nucl. Phys. B 785, 263 (2007) arXiv:hep-th/0703076

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Dobrev V.K., Truini P., Biedenharn L.C.: Representation theory approach to the polynomial solutions of q difference equations: U − q(sl(3)) and beyond. J. Math. Phys. 35, 6058 (1994) arXiv:q-alg/9502001

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Dobrev V.K., Truini P.: Irregular U(q)(sl(3)) representations at roots of unity via Gelfand–(Weyl)–Zetlin basis. J. Math. Phys. 38, 2631 (1997)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Dobrev, V.K.: Q difference intertwining operators for U − q(sl(n)): general setting and the case n = 3. J. Phys. A 27, 4841 (1994). Erratum: J. Phys. A 27 (1994) 6633. arXiv:hep-th/9405150

    Google Scholar 

  11. Faddeev L.D., Reshetikhin N.Y., Takhtajan L.A.: Quantization of Lie groups and Lie algebras. Leningrad Math. J. 1, 193 (1990) [Alg. Anal. 1, 178 (1989)]

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Faddeev L.D.: How algebraic Bethe Ansatz works for integrable model. In: ConnesA. Gawedzki, K., Zinn-Justin, J. (eds) Quantum Symmetries/Symetries Quantiques, Proc. Les Houches summer school, vol. LXIV, pp. 149–211. Amsterdam, North-Holland (1998) arXiv:hep-th/9605187

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gelfand, I.M., Naimark, M.A.: Unitary representations of the classical groups. Trudy Math. Inst. Steklov, vol. 36. Moscow-Leningrad (1950) (German translation: Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1957)

  14. Hecht, K.T.: The vector coherent state method and its application to problems of higher symmetry. In: Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 290. Springer, Heidelberg (1987)

  15. Holstein T., Primakoff H.: Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. 58, 1098–1113 (1940)

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Isaev, A.P.: Quantum groups and Yang–Baxter equations. Sov. J. Part. Nucl. 26, 501 (1995). See also the extended version: preprint Bonn (2004) MPI 2004-132

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jimbo M.: A q difference analog of U(g) and the Yang–Baxter equation. Lett. Math. Phys. 10, 63 (1985)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Jimbo M.: A q analog of U (Gl (N + 1)), Hecke algebra and the Yang–Baxter equation. Lett. Math. Phys. 11, 247–252 (1986)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Kulish P.P., Reshetikhin N.Y., Sklyanin E.K.: Yang–Baxter equation and representation theory. 1. Lett. Math. Phys. 5, 393 (1981)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Kulish P.P., Sklyanin E.K.: Quantum spectral transform method. Recent developments. Lect. Notes Phys. 151, 61 (1982)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Klimyk A., Schmüdgen K.: Quantum groups and their representations. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. E. Derkachov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Derkachov, S.E., Karakhanyan, D.R., Kirschner, R. et al. Iterative Construction of U q (s (n+1)) Representations and Lax Matrix Factorisation. Lett Math Phys 85, 221–234 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-008-0268-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-008-0268-1

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Keywords

Navigation