Abstract
Taxed risk processes, i.e. processes which change their drift when reaching new maxima, represent a certain type of generalizations of Lévy and of Markov additive processes (MAP), since the times at which their Markovian mechanism changes are allowed to depend on the current position. In this paper we study generalizations of the tax identity of Albrecher and Hipp (2007) from the classical risk model to more general risk processes driven by spectrally-negative MAPs. We use the Sparre Andersen risk processes with phase-type interarrivals to illustrate the ideas in their simplest form.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrecher H, Hipp C (2007) Lundberg’s risk process with tax. Bl DGVFM 28:13–28
Albrecher H, Renaud J, Zhou X (2008) A Lévy insurance risk process with tax. J Appl Probab 45(2):363–375
Albrecher H, Borst S, Boxma OJ, Resing J (2009) The tax identity in risk theory—a simple proof and an extension. Insur, Math Econ 44(2):304–306
Albrecher H, Borst S, Boxma OJ, Resing J (2011) Ruin excursions, the G/G/∞ queue and tax payments in renewal risk models. J Appl Probab 48A:3–14
Asmussen S (1995) Stationary distributions for fluid flow models with or without Brownian noise. Stoch Models 11:21–49
Asmussen S (2003) Applied probability and queues. Springer, Berlin
Asmussen S, Albrecher H (2010) Ruin probabilities, 2nd edn. World Scientific, River Edge
Avram F, Usabel M (2004) Ruin probabilities for risk processes with phase-type waiting times. ASTIN Bull 34(2):315–332
Avram F, Pistorius MR, Usabel M (2003) The two barriers ruin problem via a Wiener Hopf decomposition approach. Ann Univ Craiova–Math Comp Sci 30:38–44
Barlow MT, Rogers LCG, Williams D (1980) Wiener–Hopf factorization for matrices. In: Séminaire de probabilites XIV, Lecture notes in math., vol 784. Springer, Berlin, pp 324–331
Breuer L (2012) Occupation times for Markov-modulated Brownian motion. J Appl Prob 49(2):549–565
Cheung ECK, Landriault D (2012) On a risk model with surplus-dependent premium and tax rates. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 14(2):233–251
D’Auria B, Ivanovs J, Kella O, Mandjes M (2012) First passage of a Markov additive process and generalized Jordan chains. J Appl Probab 47(4):1048–1057
Dobrušin RL (1953) Generalization of Kolmogorov’s equations for Markov processes with a finite number of possible states. Mat. Sb. N.S. 33(75):567–596
Gerber HU (1979) An introduction to mathematical risk theory. Heubner Foundation, Homewood
Goodman GS, Johansen S (1973) Kolmogorov’s differential equations for non-stationary, countable state Markov processes with uniformly continuous transition probabilities. Proc Camb Philos Soc 73:119–138
Ivanovs J (2011) One-sided Markov additive processes and related exit problems. Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam
Ivanovs J, Palmowski Z (2012) Occupation densities in solving exit problems for Markov additive processes and their reflections. Stochastic Process Appl 122(9):3342–3360
Kyprianou AE, Zhou X (2009) General tax structures and the Lévy insurance risk model. J Appl Probab 46(4):1146–1156
London RR, McKean HP, Rogers LCG, Williams D (1982) A martingale approach to some Wiener–Hopf problems II. In: Séminaire de probabilites XVI, Lecture notes in math., vol 920. Springer, Berlin, pp 68–90
Ren J (2007) The discounted joint distribution of the surplus prior to ruin and the deficit at ruin in a Sparre Andersen model. N Am Actuar J 11(3):128–136
Rogers LCG (1994) Fluid models in queueing theory. Adv Appl Probab 4:390–413
Wang W, Ming R, Hu Y (2010) On the expected discounted penalty function for risk process with tax. Stat Probab Lett 81(4):489–501
Wei J, Yang H, Wang R (2010) On the Markov-modulated insurance risk model with tax. Bl DGVFM 31(1):65–78
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
C. Constantinescu and J. Ivanovs were supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation Project 200021-124635/1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Albrecher, H., Avram, F., Constantinescu, C. et al. The Tax Identity For Markov Additive Risk Processes. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 16, 245–258 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-012-9310-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-012-9310-y