Skip to main content
Log in

The Tax Identity For Markov Additive Risk Processes

  • Published:
Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taxed risk processes, i.e. processes which change their drift when reaching new maxima, represent a certain type of generalizations of Lévy and of Markov additive processes (MAP), since the times at which their Markovian mechanism changes are allowed to depend on the current position. In this paper we study generalizations of the tax identity of Albrecher and Hipp (2007) from the classical risk model to more general risk processes driven by spectrally-negative MAPs. We use the Sparre Andersen risk processes with phase-type interarrivals to illustrate the ideas in their simplest form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecher H, Hipp C (2007) Lundberg’s risk process with tax. Bl DGVFM 28:13–28

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecher H, Renaud J, Zhou X (2008) A Lévy insurance risk process with tax. J Appl Probab 45(2):363–375

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecher H, Borst S, Boxma OJ, Resing J (2009) The tax identity in risk theory—a simple proof and an extension. Insur, Math Econ 44(2):304–306

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecher H, Borst S, Boxma OJ, Resing J (2011) Ruin excursions, the G/G/∞ queue and tax payments in renewal risk models. J Appl Probab 48A:3–14

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Asmussen S (1995) Stationary distributions for fluid flow models with or without Brownian noise. Stoch Models 11:21–49

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Asmussen S (2003) Applied probability and queues. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Asmussen S, Albrecher H (2010) Ruin probabilities, 2nd edn. World Scientific, River Edge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Avram F, Usabel M (2004) Ruin probabilities for risk processes with phase-type waiting times. ASTIN Bull 34(2):315–332

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Avram F, Pistorius MR, Usabel M (2003) The two barriers ruin problem via a Wiener Hopf decomposition approach. Ann Univ Craiova–Math Comp Sci 30:38–44

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow MT, Rogers LCG, Williams D (1980) Wiener–Hopf factorization for matrices. In: Séminaire de probabilites XIV, Lecture notes in math., vol 784. Springer, Berlin, pp 324–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuer L (2012) Occupation times for Markov-modulated Brownian motion. J Appl Prob 49(2):549–565

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung ECK, Landriault D (2012) On a risk model with surplus-dependent premium and tax rates. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 14(2):233–251

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • D’Auria B, Ivanovs J, Kella O, Mandjes M (2012) First passage of a Markov additive process and generalized Jordan chains. J Appl Probab 47(4):1048–1057

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dobrušin RL (1953) Generalization of Kolmogorov’s equations for Markov processes with a finite number of possible states. Mat. Sb. N.S. 33(75):567–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber HU (1979) An introduction to mathematical risk theory. Heubner Foundation, Homewood

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman GS, Johansen S (1973) Kolmogorov’s differential equations for non-stationary, countable state Markov processes with uniformly continuous transition probabilities. Proc Camb Philos Soc 73:119–138

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanovs J (2011) One-sided Markov additive processes and related exit problems. Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam

  • Ivanovs J, Palmowski Z (2012) Occupation densities in solving exit problems for Markov additive processes and their reflections. Stochastic Process Appl 122(9):3342–3360

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kyprianou AE, Zhou X (2009) General tax structures and the Lévy insurance risk model. J Appl Probab 46(4):1146–1156

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • London RR, McKean HP, Rogers LCG, Williams D (1982) A martingale approach to some Wiener–Hopf problems II. In: Séminaire de probabilites XVI, Lecture notes in math., vol 920. Springer, Berlin, pp 68–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren J (2007) The discounted joint distribution of the surplus prior to ruin and the deficit at ruin in a Sparre Andersen model. N Am Actuar J 11(3):128–136

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers LCG (1994) Fluid models in queueing theory. Adv Appl Probab 4:390–413

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Ming R, Hu Y (2010) On the expected discounted penalty function for risk process with tax. Stat Probab Lett 81(4):489–501

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wei J, Yang H, Wang R (2010) On the Markov-modulated insurance risk model with tax. Bl DGVFM 31(1):65–78

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corina Constantinescu.

Additional information

C. Constantinescu and J. Ivanovs were supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation Project 200021-124635/1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Albrecher, H., Avram, F., Constantinescu, C. et al. The Tax Identity For Markov Additive Risk Processes. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 16, 245–258 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-012-9310-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-012-9310-y

Keywords

AMS 2000 Subject Classifications

Navigation