The main disadvantage of the existing sampling method of metal for hydrogen content analysis is the contact of metal with air moisture during an open overpour from a metal scoop to the ingot mold. In response, a novel method is proposed for sampling molten aluminum and its alloys for hydrogen content analysis by dipping a conical ingot mold sampler into the melt. The work was performed at the Sayanogorsk aluminum plant UC RUSAL in the technological workflow from a transport ladle to the casting machine. Hydrogen analysis results using the proposed method are compared to those of the sampling method using the Rensley chill mold. The error in the hydrogen content measurement of the sample under the existing sampling scheme with overpour of metal from a metal scoop into the ingot mold was confirmed. The hydrogen concentration in the samples taken in the Rensley chill mold is less, on average, by 0.019 cm3/100 g Al, than in the samples obtained using the newly developed ingot mold sampler. Results of the study reveal that the proposed sampling method provides an additional advantage when sampling molten metal.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
F. M. Kotlyarsky, Hydrogen in Aluminum Alloys and Castings [in Russian], Izdatel’stvo Osvita Ukrainy, Kiev (2011).
E. G. Partyko, M. I. Gubanova, D. V. Tolkachyova, and V. B. Deev, “Influence of the shape of hydrogen-containing inclusions on the intergranular corrosion process of the Al-Si alloy system,” Non-Ferrous Metals, 45, No. 2, 16–21 (2018).
V. N. Baranov, V. B. Deev, E. G. Partyko, S. V. Belyaev, P. O. Yuriev, and E. S. Prusov, “Influence of atomic and molecular hydrogen in the melt of silumins on their mechanical properties,” Metallurg, No. 5, 81–86 (2019).
V. D. Belov, M. V. Pikunov, E. B. Ten, et al., Foundry Production: Textbook, ed. V. D. Belov, third edition, ID MISiS, Moscow (2015).
A. V. Kurdyumov, V. D. Belov, M. V. Pikunov, et al., Production of Castings from Non-Ferrous Metal Alloys: Textbook, ed. V. D. Belov, third edition, ID MISiS, Moscow (2011).
H. Wang, G. Fu, C. Cheng, et al., “Molecular mechanics and dynamics simulation of hydrogen diffusion in aluminum melt,” China Foundry, 14, No. 6, 478–484 (2017).
E. Mosisa, V. Yu. Bazhin, and S. A. Savchenkov, “Review on nano particle reinforced aluminum metal matrix composites,” Res. J. Appl. Sci., 11, No. 5, 188–196 (2016).
GOST R 50965–96, Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys. Method for Determination of Hydrogen in Solid Metal.
V. F. Pilipenko, A. F. Bukina, and G. A. Chikalenko, USSR Certificate of Authorship 778481, G 01 N 1/10, published 10/15/1982, Bul. No. 38.
P. G. Tishin, USSR Certificate of Authorship 887987, G 01 N 1/10, published 12/07/1981, Bul. No. 45.
V. F. Pilipenko, V. B. Gavrilov, A. S. Kharitonov, et al., USSR Certificate of Authorship 558196, G 01 N 1/10, published 05/15/1977, Bul. No. 18.
N. V. Azorkin and N. A. Azorkina, USSR Certificate of Authorship 981858, G 01 N 1/10, published 12/15/1982, Bul. No. 46.
O. V. Sotsenko, Yu. P. Martynov, N. G. Pletneva, and A. P. Kovalenko, USSR Certificate of Authorship 1093386, B22D 2/00; G 01 N 1/10, published 05/23/1984, Bul. No. 19.
A. E. Raskidkin, R. A. Duplenko, and R. V. Starov, USSR Certificate of Authorship 1718000, G 01 N 1/10, published 03/07/1992, Bul. No. 9.
Electronic resource; URL: https://www.bruker.com/ru/products/x-ray-diffraction-and-elemental-analysis/csonh-analysis/g8-galileoonh.html (accessed: 07/20/2020).
B. P. Kulikov, V. F. Frolov, S. V. Belyaev, et al., Patent RF 2651031, Method of Sampling Molten Metal, declared 06/08/2017; published 04/18/2018, Bul. No. 11.
The work was performed as part of the state assignment for science of the Siberian Federal University; project number FSRZ-2020–0013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Metallurg, Vol. 64, No. 12, pp. 56–59, December, 2020.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kulikov, B.P., Baranov, V.N., Partyko, E.G. et al. Improved Molten Metal Sampling Method for Hydrogen Content Analysis. Metallurgist 64, 1295–1299 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-021-01118-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-021-01118-9