Abstract
Humans grasp discrete infinities within several cognitive domains, such as in language, thought, social cognition and tool-making. It is sometimes suggested that any such generative ability is based on a computational system processing hierarchical and recursive mental representations. One view concerning such generativity has been that each of the mind’s modules defining a cognitive domain implements its own recursive computational system. In this paper recent evidence to the contrary is reviewed and it is proposed that there is only one supramodal computational system with recursion in the human mind. A recursion thesis is defined, according to which the hominin cognitive evolution is constituted by a recent punctuated genetic mutation that installed the general, supramodal capacity for recursion into the human nervous system on top of the existing, evolutionarily older cognitive structures, and it is argued on the basis of empirical evidence and theoretical considerations that the recursion thesis constitutes a plausible research program for cognitive science.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The conceptual leap from Descartes’ dualistic theory of creativity to the present day naturalism was made by Alan Turing, who designed a physically implementable model of an effective algorithmic process that could be implemented in entirely mechanical terms and which could, in principle, handle computational processes that are creative in Descartes’ sense. Turing’s work can be understood against the background of a larger mathematical effort to make mathematics more rigorous, but it was precisely the work of Turing and his colleagues involved in the same project that delivered us the rigorous understanding of what recursion is and how it works. Still today, the explanation of the origins and nature of human creativity is based on the resulting concept of recursion.
In the first formulation of the generative grammar (Chomsky 1955), recursion was implemented by “generalized transformation” that combined linguistic phrase-structures together at special junctions. This device reincarnates in the more recent minimalist program, now called Merge (Chomsky 2006, pp. 3-4). Newell and Simon’s original attempts at modeling human problem solving were based on an idea that there exists a general problem solver, a recursive search algorithm that could apply to any conceptual material (Newell & Simon 1963).
References
Bickerton, D. (1990). Language & species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bickerton, D. (1995). Language and human behavior. Seattle: Washington University Press.
Bickerton, D. (2007). Language evolution: A brief guide for linguists. Lingua, 117, 510–526.
Boeckx, C. (2006). Linguistic minimalism: Origins, concepts, methods, and aims. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boeckx, C. (2008). Bare syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brattico, P. (2005). Karteesiolaisen kieliteorian paluu kognitiotieteeseen. Kieli & Puhe, 25, 211–225.
Brattico, P. (2009). A biolinguistic framework. Biolinguistica Fennica Working Papers, 1, 3–20.
Brattico, P., & Huhmarniemi, S. (2006). Finnish Negation, EPP-principle and the valuation theory of morphosyntax. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 29(1), 5–44.
Brattico, P., & Liikkanen, L. (2009). Rethinking cartesian theory of linguistic productivity. Philosophical Psychology, 22(3), 251–279.
Bratto, A. M. (2001). Half a brain is enough: The story of Nico. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, S., Martinez, M. J., & Parsons, L. M. (2006). Music and language side by side in the brain: A PET study of the generation of melodies and sentences. European Journal of Neuroscience, 23(10), 2791–2803.
Carroll, S. B. (2003). Genetics and the making of Homo sapiens. Nature, 422, 849–857.
Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (1990). How monkeys see the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (2007). Baboom metaphysics: The evolution of a social mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Chimpanzee Sequencing Analysis Consortium. (2005). Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature, 437, 69–87.
Chomsky, N. (1955). Logical structure of linguistic theory, unpublished ms. Parts of revised 1956 version published in 1975 (Chicago: Plenum).
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures in government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, N. (1988). Language and problems of knowledge. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1993). Language and thought. London: Moyer Bell.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2000). The architecture of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2004). Beyond explanatory adequacy. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, N. (2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 1–22.
Chomsky, N. (2006). Approaching UG from below. Manuscript, MIT.
Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero, & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Corballis, M. (1991). The lopsided ape: Evolution of the generative mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Corballis, M. (2002). From hand to mouth: The origins of language. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Daltrozzo, J., & Schön, D. (2009). Conceptual processing in music as revealed by N400 effects on words and musical targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(10), 1882–1892.
Darwin, C. (1879/2004). The descent of Man. London: Penguin Books.
Davidson, E. H. (2006). The regulatory genome. Gene regulatory networks in development and evolution. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
Dawkins, R. (1996). The blind watchmaker. Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. New York & London: Norton.
Descartes, R. (1997). Descartes. Key philosophical writings (E. Haldane & G. R. T. Ross, Trans.). Hertfordshire: Wordsworth.
Diamond, J. (1992). The third chimpanzee. The evolution and future of the human animal. New York: HarperCollins.
Dietrich, M. R. (2002). Richard Goldschmidt: hopeful monsters and other ‘heresies’. Nature Reviews: Genetics, 4, 68–74.
Enard, W., Przeworski, M., Fisher, S. E., Lai, C. S. L., Wiebe, V., Kitano, T., et al. (2002). Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language. Nature, 418, 869–872.
Evans, P. D., Gilbert, S. L., & Mekel-Bobrov, N. (2005). Microcephalin, a gene regulating brain size, continues to evolve adaptively in humans. Science, 309, 1717–1720.
Fisher, S. E., & Marcus, G. F. (2006). The eloquent ape: Genes, brains and the evolution of language. Nature reviews: Genetics, 7, 9–20.
Fitch, W., & Hauser, H. (2004). Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science, 303, 377–380.
Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. A. (2003). Hume variations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fodor, J., & Pylyshyn, Z. (1988). Connectionism and the cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28, 3–71.
Friederici, A. (2003). Processing local transitions versus long-distance syntactic hierarchies. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 245–247.
Friederici, A. D., Bahlman, J., Heim, S., Schubotz, R. I., & Anwander, A. (2006). The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity. PNAS, 103, 2458–2463.
Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.) (1999). The new cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gentner, T., Fenn, K. M., Margoliash, D., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2006). Recursive syntactic pattern learning by song birds. Nature, 440(27), 1204–1207.
Goldschmidt, R. (1940). The material basis of evolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Goodall, J. (1964). Tool-using and aimed throwing in a community of freeliving chimpanzees. Nature, 201, 1264–1266.
Goodall, J. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of behavior. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Gould, S. J. (1977). The return of hopeful monster. Natural History, 86, 22–30.
Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Habgood, P. J., & Franklin, N. R. (2008). The revolution that didn’t arrive: A review of Pleistocene Sahul. Journal of Human Evolution, 55, 187–222.
Hauser, M. (1996). The evolution of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hauser, M. (2001). Wild minds: What animals really think. New York: Owl Books.
Hauser, M. D. (2009). The possibility of impossible cultures. Nature, 460, 190–196.
Hauser, M. D., Barner, D., & O’Donnell, T. (2007). Evolutionary linguistics: A new look at an old landscape. Language Learning and Development, 3, 101–132.
Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579.
Hauser, M., & Fitch, W. T. (2003). Uniquely human components? In M. H. Christiansen & S. Kirby (Eds.), Language evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Henshilwood, C., d’Errico, F., Marean, C. W., Milo, R. G., & Yates, R. (2001). An early bone tool industry from the middle stone age at Blombos Cave, South Africa: Implications for the origins of modern human behaviour, symbolism and language. Journal of Human Evolution, 41, 631–678.
Hinzen, W. (2006). Mind design and minimal syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johanson, D., & Edgar, B. (1996). From lucy to language. UK: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Klein, R. (1999). The human career: Human biological and cultural origins (2nd ed.). Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Klein, R. (2005). Hominin dispersals in the old world. In C. Scarre (Ed.), The human past: World prehistory & the development of human societies. London: Thames & Hudson.
Klein, R. G., & Edgar, B. (2002). The dawn of human culture. New York: Wiley.
Koelsch, S., Kasper, E., Sammler, D., Schulze, K., Hunter, T., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Music, language and meaning: Brain signatures of semantic processing. Nature Neuroscience, 7(3), 302–307.
Lai, C. S. L., Fisher, S. E., Hurst, J. A., Vargha-Khadem, F., & Monace, A. P. (2001). A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nature, 413, 519–523.
Lebeaux, D. (2009). Where does binding theory apply? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lerdahl, F., & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lewis-Williams, J. D. (2004). The mind in the cave: Consciousness and the origins of art. London: Thames & Hudson.
Macdonald, C., & Macdonald, G. (Eds.) (1995). Connectionism. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Maess, B., Koelsch, S., Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Musical syntax is processed in Broca’s area: An MEG study. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 540–545.
McBrearty, S., & Brooks, A. (2000). The revolution that wasn’t: A new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. Journal of Human Evolution, 39, 453–563.
Mekel-Bobrov, N., Gilbert, S. L., & Evans, P. D. ym. (2005). Ongoing adaptive evolution of ASPM, a brain size determinant in Homo sapiens. Science, 309, 1720–1722.
Moro, A. (2000). Dynamic antisymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nunes, J. (2004). Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Patel, A. D. (2003). Language, music, syntax and the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 674–681.
Patel, A. D. (2008). Music, language, and the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peretz, I., & Coltheart, M. (2003). Modularity of music processing. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 688–691.
Pettitt, P. (2005). The rise of modern humans. In C. Scarre (Ed.), The human past: World prehistory & the development of human societies. London: Thames & Hudson.
Pinker, S., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: What’s special about it? Cognition, 95, 201–236.
Raffmann, D. (1993). Language, music, and mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Semenza, C., Delazer, M., Bertella, L., Grana, A., Mori, I., Conti, F. M., et al. (2006). Is math lateralised on the same side as language? Right hemisphere aphasia and mathematical abilities. Neuroscience Letters, 406(3), 285–288.
Shea, J. J. (2008). The middle stone age archaeology of the lower Omo Valley Kibish formation: Excavations, lithic assemblages, and inferred patterns of early Homo sapiens behavior. Journal of Human Evolution, 55, 448–485.
Smolensky, P. (1987). The constituent structure of mental states: A reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 26, 137–160.
Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 1–23.
Smolensky, P. (1990). Tensor product variable binding and the representation of structure in connectionist systems. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 159–216.
Swain, J. (1997). Musical languages. New York: Norton.
Tettamanti, M., & Weniger, D. (2006). Broca’s area: A supramodal hierarchical processor? Cortex, 42.4, 491–494.
Tillmann, B., Koelsch, S., Escoffier, N., Bigand, E., Lalitte, P., Friederici, A. D., et al. (2006). Cognitive priming in sung and instrumental music: Activation of inferior frontal cortex. Neuroimage, 31(4), 1771–1782.
Ullman, M. T. (2001). A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 2, 717–721.
Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuit to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231–270.
Ullman, M. T. (2006). Is broca’s area part of a basal ganglia thalamocortical circuit? Cortex, 42.4, 480–485.
Varley, R. A., Klessinger, N. J., Romanowski, C. A. J., & Siegal, M. (2005). Agrammatic but numerate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102, 3519–3524.
Wesson, R. (1993). Beyond natural selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Whiting, M. F., Bradler, S., & Maxwell, T. (2003). Loss and recovery of wings in stick insects. Nature, 421, 264–267.
Williams, E. (2003). Representational theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brattico, P. Recursion Hypothesis Considered as a Research Program for Cognitive Science. Minds & Machines 20, 213–241 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-010-9189-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-010-9189-8