Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Modern Biomass Conversion Technologies

  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article gives an overview of the state-of-the-art of key biomass conversion technologies currently deployed and technologies that may play a key role in the future, including possible linkage to CO2 capture and sequestration technology (CCS). In doing so, special attention is paid to production of biofuels for the transport sector, because this is likely to become the key emerging market for large-scale sustainable biomass use. Although the actual role of bio-energy will depend on its competitiveness with fossil fuels and on agricultural policies worldwide, it seems realistic to expect that the current contribution of bio-energy of 40–55 EJ per year will increase considerably. A range from 200 to 300 EJ may be observed looking well into this century, making biomass a more important energy supply option than mineral oil today. A key issue for bio-energy is that its use should be modernized to fit into a sustainable development path. Especially promising are the production of electricity via advanced conversion concepts (i.e. gasification and state-of-the-art combustion and co-firing) and modern biomass derived fuels like methanol, hydrogen and ethanol from ligno-cellulosic biomass, which can reach competitive cost levels within 1–2 decades (partly depending on price developments with petroleum). Sugar cane based ethanol production already provides a competitive biofuel production system in tropical regions and further improvements are possible. Flexible energy systems, in which biomass and fossil fuels can be used in combination, could be the backbone for a low risk, low cost and low carbon emission energy supply system for large scale supply of fuels and power and providing a framework for the evolution of large scale biomass raw material supply systems. The gasification route offers special possibilities to combine this with low cost CO2 capture (and storage), resulting in concepts that are both flexible with respect to primary fuel input as well as product mix and with the possibility of achieving zero or even negative carbon emissions. Prolonged RD&D efforts and biomass market development, consistent policy support and international collaboration are essential to achieve this.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biewinga, E.E. and van der Bijl, G.: 1996, ‘Sustainability of energy crops in Europe, a methodology developed an applied’, Centre for Agriculture and Environment, CLM 234-1996, Utrecht, February.

  • Braber, K.: 1995, ‘Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste: A modern waste disposal option on the verge of breakthrough’, Biomass and Bioenergy 9(1–5), 365–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgewater, A.V.: 1998, ‘The status of fast pyrolysis of biomass in Europe’, In Proceedings of the 10th European Biomass Conference and Technology Exhibition, Wurzburg, Germany, pp. 268–271.

  • Broek, R., van den, A. Faaij, and van Wijk, A.: 1996, ‘Biomass combustion power generation technologies’, Biomass and Bioenergy 11(4), 271–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calis, H.P., Haan, J.P., Peppink, G., Boerigter, H., Van der Drift, B., Venderbosch, R.J., Faaij, A.P.C. and Van den Broek, R.: 2003, ‘Technical and economic feasibility of large scale synthesis gas production in the Netherlands from imported biomass feedstock – a Strategic Decision Analysis study’, Report prepared by: Shell Global Solutions International B.V., Energy Research Center of the Netherlands, Biomass Technology Group B.V., Department of Science, Technology and Society – Utrecht University, Ecofys B.V., sponsored by the Agency for Research in Sustainable Energy (SDE project number P2001-008), p. 50.

  • Celik, F., Larson, E.D. and Williams, R.H.: 2004, ‘Transportation fuel from coal with low CO2 emissions’, In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5–9.

  • Commission of the European Communities: 2001, ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on alternative fuels for road transportation and on a set of measures to promote the use of biofuels’, COM, p. 547, Brussels.

  • Consonni, S. and Larson, E.D.: 1994, ‘Biomass-gasifier/aeroderivative gas turbine combined cycles, part A: technologies and performance modelling’, Prepared for Cogen Turbo Power ‘94, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers’ 8th congress & exposition on gas turbines in cogeneration and utility, industrial and independent power generation, Portland, Oregon, 25–27.

  • Consonni, S. and Larson, E.D.: 1994, ‘Biomass-gasifier/aeroderivative gas turbine combined cycles, part B: performance calculations and economic assessment’, Prepared for Cogen Turbo Power ‘94, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers’ 8th congress & exposition on gas turbines in cogeneration and utility, industrial and independent power generation, Portland, Oregon, 25–27.

  • Damen, K.: 2001, ‘Future prospects for biofuel production in Brazil – a chain analysis comparison of ethanol from sugarcane and methanol from Eucalyptus in Sao Paulo State’, Department of Science, Technology & Society, Utrecht University, NW&S-E-2001-31, p. 68.

  • Dornburg, V. and Faaij, A.: 2001, ‘Efficiency and economy of wood-fired biomass energy systems in relation to scale regarding heat and power generation using combustion and gasification technologies’, Biomass & Bioenergy 21(2), 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, P. and Booth, R.: 1993, ‘Brazilian biomass power demonstration project’, Special project brief, Shell, London.

  • Faaij, A.: 2004, ‘Bio-energy in Europe: Changing technology choices’ (Energy Policy; Special on Renewable Energy in Europe, in Press, available on line).

  • Faaij, A., Hekkert, M., Worrell, E. and van Wijk, A.: 1998, ‘Optimization of the final waste treatment system in the Netherlands’, Resources, Conservation and Recycling (22), 47–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faaij, A., van Ree, R., Waldheim, L., Olsson, E., Oudhuis, A., van Wijk, A., Daey Ouwens, C., and Turkenburg, W.: 1997, ‘Gasification of biomass wastes and residues for electricity production’, Biomass and Bioenergy 12(6).

  • Faaij, A., Meuleman, B. and Van Ree, R.: 1998, ‘Long term perspectives of BIG/CC technology, performance and costs’, Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University and the Netherlands Energy Research Foundation (ECN), report prepared for NOVEM (EWAB 9840).

  • Faaij, A. and Hamelinck, C.: 2002, ‘Long term perspectives for production of fuels from biomass; Integrated assessment and RD&D priorities’, Paper prepared for: The 12th European Conference on Biomass for Energy, Industry and Climate Protection, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 17–21.

  • Hamelinck, C.N.: 2004, ‘Outlook for advanced biofuels’, Ph.D.-thesis, Copernicus Institute, Utrecht University, p. 232.

  • José Goldemberg, Suani Teixeira Coelho, Plinio Mário Nastari and Oswaldo Lucon: 2004, ‘Ethanol learning curve – the Brazilian experience’, Biomass and Bioenergy 26(3) 301–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamelinck, C.N. and Faaij, A.: 2002, ‘Future prospects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass’, Journal of Power Sources 111(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamelinck, C., Faaij, A., den Uil, H. and Boerrigter, H.: 2004, ‘Production of FT transportation fuels from biomass; technical options, process analysis and optimisation and development potential’, Energy, the International Journal 29(11), 1743–1771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo N. Hamelinck, Geertje van Hooijdonk and André P.C. Faaij: 2004, ‘Future prospects for the production of ethanol from ligno-cellulosic biomass’, Biomass & Bioenergy (In Press).

  • Harmelinck, M., Voogt, M., Joosen, S., de Jager, D., Palmers, G., Shaw, S. and Cremer, C.: 2002, ‘PRETIR, Implementation of Renewable Energy in the European Union until 2010’, Report executed within the framework of the ALTENER programme of the European Commission, DG-TREN. ECOFYS BV, 3E, Fraunhofer-ISI, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 2002+various country reports.

  • Hoogwijk, M., Faaij, A., van den Broek, R., Berndes, G., Gielen, D. and Turkenburg, W.: 2003, ‘Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy’, Biomass and Bioenergy 25(2), 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogwijk, M., Faaij, A., Eickhout, B., de Vries, B. and Turkenburg, W.: 2005, ‘Global potential of biomass for energy from energy crops under four GHG emission scenarios Part A: The geographical potential’ (accepted for publication in the Journal: Biomass & Bioenergy, 2005).

  • Hoogwijk, M., Faaij, A., de Vries, B. and Turkenburg, W.: ‘Global potential of biomass for energy from energy crops under four GHG emission scenarios Part B: The economic potential’ (submitted for publication in the Journal: Global Environmental Change).

  • Hillring, B.: 2002, ‘Rural development and bioenergy – experiences from 20 years of development in Sweden’, Biomass and Bioenergy 23(6), 443–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency: 1994, ‘Biofuels’, Energy and Environment Policy Analysis Series, OECD/IEA, Paris.

  • International Energy Agency: 2004, ‘Biofuels for transport – an international perspective’, Office of Energy Efficiency, Technology and R&D, OECD/IEA, Paris.

  • IEA Task 40: 2005, Sustainable International Bio-energy Trade, under the IEA Bio-energy Agreement: www.fairbiotrade.org.

  • De Jager, Faaij, A. and Troelstra, W.P.: 1998, ‘Cost-effectiveness of transportation fuels from biomass’, ECOFYS, Dept. Of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Innas B.V., Report prepared for NOVEM (EWAB rapport 9830).

  • Kaltschmitt, M., Reinhardt, G.A. and Stelzer, T.: 1996, ‘LCA of biofuels under different environmental aspects’, Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung (IER) Universität Stuttgart.

  • Kaltschmitt, M., Rosch, C. and Dinkelbach, L. (eds.): 1998, ‘Biomass Gasification in Europe’, Institute of Energy Economics and the Rational Use of Energy (IER), University of Stuttgart. Report prepared for the European Commission, DG XII, EUR 18224.

  • Loo, van, S. and Koppjan, J. (eds.): 2002, Handbook Biomass Combustion and Co-firing, Twente University Press, Enschede, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynd, L.R.: 1996, ‘Overview and evaluation of fuel ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: Technology, economics, the environment and policy’, Annual review Energy Environment 21, 403-465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marrison, C.I. and Larson, E.D.: 1995, Cost versus scale for advanced plantation-based biomass energy systems in the US; EOA Symposium on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mitigation Research, Washington D.C., 27–29.

  • Meuleman, B. and Faaij, A.: 1999, ‘Overview of Co-combustion options for coal fired power plants’, report prepared within the framework of the JOULEIII COBIOCOWA project Dept. of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University.

  • Kenneth Möllersten, Jinyue Yan and Jose R. Moreira: 2003, ‘Potential market niches for biomass energy with CO2 capture and storage – Opportunities for energy supply with negative CO2 emissions’, Biomass and Bioenergy 25(3), 273–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möllersten, K., Yan, J. and Westermark, M.: 2003, ‘Potential and cost-effectiveness of CO2 reductions through energy measures in Swedish pulp and paper mills’, Energy 28(7), 691–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M., Waldheim, L., Faaij, A. and Stahl, K.: 2005, ‘Status of large-scale biomass gasification and prospects’, in Handbook Biomass Gasification, Kurkela, Bridgewater, Knoef (eds.), (forthcoming).

  • Naber, J.E., Goudriaan, F. and Louter, A.S.: 1997, ‘Further development and commercialisation of the small scale Hydro-Thermal Upgrading Process for Biomass Liquefaction’, in Proceedings of the Thrid Biomass Conference of the America's. Montreal.

  • Nikolaisen, L. (ed.) et al.: 1998, ‘Straw for Energy Production’, Centre for Biomass Technology, Denmark, (available at: http://www.videncenter.dk).

  • Ogden, J.M., Steinbugler, M.M. and Kreutz, T.G.: 1999, ‘A comparison of hydrogen, methanol and gasoline as fuels for fuel cell vehicles: Implications for vehicle design and infrastructure development’, Journal of Power Sources 79, 143–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosillo-Calle, F. and Cortez, L.A.B.: 1998, ‘Towards Pro-Alcool II – a review of the Brazilian bioethanol programme’, Biomass and Bioenergy 14(2), 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, M., Faaij, A. and Walter, A.: 2003, ‘Techno-economic analysis of co-fired Biomass Integrated Gasification/Combined Cycle systems with inclusion of economies of scale’, Energy, The International Journal 28(12), 1229–1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serup, H. (ed.) et al.: 1999, ‘Wood for Energy production’, Centre for Biomass Technology, Denmark (available at: http://www.videncenter.dk).

  • Smeets, E., Faaij, A. and Lewandowski, I.: 2004, ‘A quickscan of global bio-energy potentials to 2050 – an analysis of the regional availability of biomass resources for export in relation to underlying factors’, Report prepared for NOVEM and Essent, Copernicus Institute – Utrecht University, NWS-E-2004-109, p.67 + Appendices.

  • Solantausta, Y., Bridgewater, T. and Beckman, D.: 1996, ‘Electricity production by advanced biomass power systems’, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland (report no. 1729).

  • Stassen, H.E.: 1995, ‘Small scale biomass gasification for heat and power production: A global review’, World Bank Technical paper number 296, Energy Series, Washington D.C.

  • Turkenburg, W.C. (Convening Lead Author), Faaij, A. (Lead Author), et al.: 2000, ‘Renewable Energy Technologies’, Chapter 7 of the World Energy Assessment of the United Nations, UNDP, UNDESA/WEC, Published by: UNDP, New York.

  • Tijmensen, M.J.A., Faaij, A.P.C., Hamelinck, C.N. and van Hardeveld, M.R.M.: 2002, ‘Exploration of the possibilities for production of Fischer Tropsch liquids via biomass gasification’, Biomass & Bioenergy 23(2), 129–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Energy, Office of Utility Technologies: 1998, Renewable Energy Technology Characterizations, Washington DC, USA.

  • Williams, R.H. and Larson, E.D.: 1996, ‘Biomass gasifier gas turbine power generating technology’, Biomass and Bioenergy 10, 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R.H., Larson, E.D., Katofsky, R.E. and Chen, J.: 1995, ‘Methanol and hydrogen from biomass for transportation, with comparisons to methanol and hydrogen from natural gas and coal’, Centre for Energy and Environmental Studies, Princeton University, reportno. 292.

  • Wyman, C.E., Bain, R.L., Hinman, N.D. and Stevens, D.J.: 1993, ‘Ethanol and methanol from cellulosic biomass’, in Renewable Energy, Source for Fuels and Electricity, Island Press, Washington DC.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Copernicus Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Andre Faaij

Authors
  1. Andre Faaij
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andre Faaij.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Faaij, A. Modern Biomass Conversion Technologies. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 11, 343–375 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-9004-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-9004-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation