Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

White certificates and domestic offset schemes: possible synergies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Next to energy efficiency, in the context of GHG reductions, additional policy mechanisms to the incumbent EU Emissions Trading scheme (EU ETS) are discussed. Such is the case of Non-ETS Domestic Offset (DO) schemes, which can reduce CO2-eq.emissions in the non-ETS sectors and trade these as CO2 credits on the ETS market. Taking into account that the EU’s “Linking Directive” (EC 2004) creates the conditions to use credits generated by emission reduction projects certified by the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Kyoto Protocol (KP) within the EU ETS market, in this paper we employ the institutional analysis method of interactions in order to provide insight of a combined White Certificates (WhC) and DOs cheme. Special attention is paid to the parameters that seem to hamper harmonization of WhC and DO. Aim of this paper is to discuss whether smart market- based instruments, such as WhC, can be complementary to the effectiveness of mechanisms fostering energy efficiency such as DOs projects and vice versa. In this respect, the potential combined scheme is assessed (ex-ante) with the help of standard criteria that refer to the triptych energy, environment & society. Given the outcome of the study made, it is fair to say that such a DO/WhC combined scheme could be selected if the additionality concern is to minimize short term social costs of reaching a certain goal. However recent information and research conducted so far cannot yet uphold an ambition that a WhC/DO scheme of this kind could also drive technical change, keep consumer costs down and be equitable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. JI is the project based mechanism under the KP that targets emission reductions in Annex 1 or developed country economies, including the EU, Australia, Belarus,1 Canada, Croatia, Japan, Kazakhstan, Lichtenstein, Monaco, New Zealand, Norway, Russia, Switzerland, Turkey and Ukraine.

  2. More information on the DO schemes globally can be found in the NEON network webpage (http://www.jiqweb.org/index.php/domestic-offsets/non-ets-offset-workshop)

  3. Meaning the net present value of total kWh of final energy over the life of a product (or in other words cumac=Annual Energy Savings * Lifetime of energy saving actions (discounted at a rate of 4%)).

References

  • Bertoldi P, Rezessy S (2006) Tradable certificates for energy savings (White Certificates). European Commission Joint Research Center

  • Bertoldi P, Rezessy S, Langniss O, Voogt M (2005) White, green and brown certificates: how to make the most of them? Paper 7203, EC Joint Research Center

  • Bertoldi P, Rezessy S, Lees E, Baudry P, Jeandel A, Labanca N (2010) Energy supplier obligations and white certificate schemes: comparative analysis of experiences in the European Union. Energy Policy 38(3):1455–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betz R, Karoline R, Schoen M (2006) Domestic offset projects: limited opportunities in Germany but example for others? Energ Environ 17(4)

  • Binswanger M (2001) Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? Ecol Econ 36(1):119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ClimateFocus (2010) Domestic offset projects in Denmark: an assessment of JI host experiences. ClimateFocus report [available at: http://www.jiqweb.org/images/stories/mifiles/projects/Non_ETS_Offsets/Reports/denmark_ji_country_assessment_v2_13dec10.pdf]

  • Ebbeking E, Van der Gaast W, Spijker E (2009). ‘Domestic offsets’ als aanvulling op het nederlandse klimaat- en energiebeleid. VROM, Energy Valley (in dutch) [available at: http://www.jiqweb.org/images/stories/mifiles/projects/Non_ETS_Offsets/Reports/ebbekink.pdf.]

  • EC (2003) Directive 2003/87/EC of the European parliament and of the council establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC, Official Journal of the European Union, 25.10.2003

  • EC (2004) Directive 2004/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2993/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community, in respect of the Kyoto Protocol’s project mechanisms, Official Journal of the European Union, 13.11.2004

  • EC (2005) Doing more with less: green paper on energy efficiency, COM(2005) 265, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

  • EC (2006a) Directive 2006/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on energy end-use efficiency and energy services and repealing Council Directive 93/76/EEC, Official Journal of the European Union 27.4.2006

  • EC (2006b) Communication from the Commission—action plan for energy efficiency: realising the potential, COM(2006) 545, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

  • EC (2011) Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on energy efficiency and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC, COM(2011) 370, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

  • Farinelli U, Johansson T, McCormick K, Mundaca L, Oikonomou V, Örtenvik M, Patel M, Santi F (2005) “White and Green”: comparison of market-based instruments to promote energy efficiency. J Clean Prod 13(10–11):1015–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine N (2003) Livre Blanc sur les Energies, Ministry of Industry, 7 November 2003, France

  • Greening LA, Greene DL, Difligio C (2000) Energyefficiency and consumption-the rebound effect- a survey. Energy Policy 28:389–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2006) Market mechanisms for white certificates trading—task XIV final report. Implementing Agreement on Demand-Side Management Technologies and Programmes. A. Capozza. Milano, Italy, CESI Ricerca

  • Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007, Mitigation, Contribution of Working Group III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

  • Lees E (2006) Evaluation of the energy efficiency commitment 2002–05. Prepared for DEFRA, Oxon, Eoin Lees Energy

  • Michaelowa A, Stronzik M, Eckermann F, Hunt A (2003) Transaction costs of the KP mechanisms. Clim Policy 3(3):261–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundaca L (2007) Transaction costs of tradable white certificate schemes: the energy efficiency commitment as case study. Energy Policy 35(8):4340–4354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundaca L (2008) Markets for energy efficiency: exploring the implications of an EU-wide Tradable White Certificate’ scheme. Energ Econ 30(6):3016–3043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OFGEM (2003) A review of the first year of the Energy Efficiency Commitment. A report for the Secretary of State for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs. London

  • Oikonomou V (2010) Interactions of white certificates for energy efficiency and other energy and climate policy instruments. Dissertation thesis, SOM Research Institute, University of Groningen

  • Oikonomou V, Jepma C (2007) A framework on interactions of climate and energy policy instruments. J Mitigation Adapt Strat Glob Change 13(2):131–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oikonomou V, Van der Gaast W (2008) Integrating joint implementation projects for energy efficiency on the built environment with white certificates in The Netherlands. J Mitigation Adapt Strat Glob Change 13(1):61–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oikonomou V, Rietbergen M, Patel M (2007) An ex-ante evaluation of a White Certificates scheme in the Netherlands: a case study for the household sector. Energy Policy 35(2):1147–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oikonomou V, Flamos A, Gargiulo M, Giannakidis G, Kanudia A, Spijker E, Grafakos S (2011a) Linking least-cost energy system costs models with MCA: an assessment of the EU Renewable Energy targets and supporting policies. Energy Policy 39(5):2786–2799, Elsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oikonomou V, Flamos A, Grafakos S (2011b) “Combination of energy policy instruments: creation of added value or overlapping?” International scientific Journal: Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy, Taylor & Francis, in press

  • Samuelson PA (1947, Enlarged ed. 1983) Welfare economics, foundations of economic analysis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, ch. VIII, pp. 203–53.

  • Sorrell S, Harrison D, Radov D, Klevnas P, Foss A (2009a) White certificate schemes: economic analysis and interactions with the EU ETS. Energy Policy 37(1):29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorrell S, Dimitropoulos J, Sommerville M (2009b) Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: a review. Energy Policy 37:1356–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuerk A, Prettenthaller F, Steiner D, Niederl A, Schule R, Sterk W, Wang H (2009) Possibilities for domestic offset projects in Austria. Joanneum Research Report, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Twomey P, Betz R, MacGill I, Passey R (2010) Additional action reserve: a proposed mechanism to facilitate additional voluntary and policy emission reductions efforts in emissions trading schemes. Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Report

  • UNDP (2003) The clean development mechanism: a user’s guide. Bureau for Development Policy, Energy & Environment Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Gaast W, Oikonomou V, Flamos A (2011) Domestic offsets in practice: modalities & implications. Energy Source Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy, in press

  • Vine E, Hamrin J (2008) Energy savings certificates: a market-based tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy 36(1):467–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2010) World Development Report 2010: development and climate change. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington DC 20433. Retrieved 2010-04-06

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is a joint effort of the expert NEON (Non-ETS Offset Projects) network, which is a think tank on the promotion of domestic offset projects for climate change mitigation. More in detail, the authors would like to thank their co-members of NEON: Andreas Tuerk and Daniel Steiner (Joanneum Institute, Austria), Daniele Russolillo (Fondazione per l’Ambiente, Italy), Liviu Gheorghe (eco2ro, Romania), Fabio Iraldo (CE.SI.SP, Italy), Lorena Jurado (General Council of Catalan Chambers of Commerce, Spain), Benoit Leguet, Ariane de Dominicis and Elise Stoffaes (CDC Climat, France), Jos Cozijnsen (Emissierechten, the Netherlands), Andrew Prag (Carbon Markets and Investors Association), Adriaan Perrels (VATT, Finland), Zsolt Lengyel (SQS), and Benet Hermind (Danish Energy Agency). Furthermore, the authors would like to thank Prof. Catrinus Jepma for the review of our article and the provision of fruitful comments and useful suggestions. Finally, the authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers who have contributed significantly to the quality improvement of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vlasis Oikonomou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oikonomou, V., Flamos, A., Spyridaki, NA. et al. White certificates and domestic offset schemes: possible synergies. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 17, 187–205 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9320-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9320-z

Keywords

Navigation