Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On Throughput Efficiency of Geographic Opportunistic Routing in Multihop Wireless Networks

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geographic opportunistic routing (GOR) has shown throughput efficiency in coping with unreliable transmissions in multihop wireless networks. The basic idea behind opportunistic routing is to take advantage of the broadcast nature and spacial diversity of the wireless medium by involving multiple neighbors of the sender into the local forwarding, thus improve transmission reliability. The existing GOR schemes typically involve as many as available next-hop neighbors into the local forwarding, and give the nodes closer to the destination higher relay priorities. In this paper, we show that it is not always the optimal way to achieve the best throughput. We introduce a framework to analyze the one-hop throughput of GOR, provide a deeper insight into the trade-off between the benefit (packet advancement and transmission reliability) and cost (medium time delay) associated with the node collaboration, and propose a local metric named expected one-hop throughput (EOT) to balance the benefit and cost. We also identify an upper bound of EOT and its concavity, which indicates that even if the candidate coordination delay were negligible, the throughput gain would become marginal when the number of forwarding candidates increases. Based on the EOT, we also propose a local candidate selection and prioritization algorithm. Simulation results validate our analysis and show that the EOT metric leads to both better one-hop and path throughput than the corresponding pure GOR and geographic routing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The node location information can be obtained by prior configuration, by the Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver, or through some sensor self-configuring localization mechanisms such as [4, 12].

  2. In this paper, we set the threshold as 0.1.

  3. Due to space limit, we only provide a sketch of the proof.

  4. In this paper, an ordered node set \(\mathcal{A}\) containing another ordered node set \(\mathcal{B}\) means \(\mathcal{A}\) is obtained by inserting a new node into \(\mathcal{B}\) but keeping the priority relationship of nodes in \(\mathcal{B}\) unchanged. It’s not necessary for \(\mathcal{B}\) being a subsequence of \(\mathcal{A}\).

References

  1. IEEE Std 802.11b-1999. http://standards.ieee.org/

  2. Awerbuch B, Holmer D, Rubens H (2006) The medium time metric: high throughput route selection in multi-rate ad hoc wireless networks. MONET 11(2):253–266

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biswas S, Morris R (2005) Exor: opportunistic multi-hop routing for wireless networks. In: SIGCOMM’05, Philadelphia, August 2005

  4. Bulusu N, Heidemann J, Estrin D (2000) Gps-less low cost outdoor localization for very small devices. IEEE Pers Commun 7(5):28–34, October

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chachulski S, Jennings M, Katti S, Katabi D (2007) Trading structure for randomness in wireless opportunistic routing. In: ACM SIGCOMM, Kyoto, 27–31 August 2007

  6. Couto D, Aguayo D, Bicket J, Morris R (2003) A high-throughput path metic for multi-hop wireless routing. In: ACM MobiCom’03, San Diego, September 2003

  7. Dubois-Ferriere H, Grossglauser M, Vetterli M (2007) Least-cost opportunistic routing. Technical Report LCAV-REPORT-2007-001, School of Computer and Communication Sciences, EPFL

  8. Fussler H, Widmer J, Kasemann M, Mauve M, Hartenstein H (2003) Contention-based forwarding for mobile ad-hoc networks. Elseviers Ad Hoc Netw 1(4):351–369, November

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta P, Kumar PR (2000) The capacity of wireless networks. Trans Inform Theory 46(2):388–404, March

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Keshavarzin A, Uysal-Biyikoglu E, Herrmann F, Manjeshwar A (2004) Energy-efficient link assessment in wireless sensor networks. In: IEEE Infocom, Hong Kong, 7–11 March 2004

  11. Lee S, Bhattacharjee B, Banerjee S (2005) Efficient geographic routing in multihop wireless networks. In: MobiHoc, Urbana-Champaign, 25–27 May 2005

  12. Savvides A, Han C, Strivastava MB (2001) Dynamic finegrained localization in ad-hoc networks of sensors. In: IEEE/ACM MobiCom, Rome, July 2001

  13. Seada K, Zuniga M, Helmy A, Krishnamachari B (2004) Energy efficient forwarding strategies for geographic routing in wireless sensor networks. In: ACM Sensys’04, Baltimore, November 2004

  14. Shah RC, Bonivento A, Petrovic D, Lin E, van Greunen J, Rabaey J (2004) Joint optimization of a protocol stack for sensor networks. In: IEEE Milcom, Monterey, November 2004

  15. Simon MK, Alouini M-S (2005) Digital communication over fading channels, 2nd edn. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zeng K, Lou W, Yang J, Brown DR (2007) On geographic collaborative forwarding in wireless ad hoc and sensor networks. In: WASA’07, Chicago, August 2007

  17. Zeng K, Lou W, Yang J, Brown DR (2007) On throughput efficiency of geographic opportunistic routing in multihop wireless networks. In: QShine’07, Vancouver, August 2007

  18. Zeng K, Lou W, Zhai H (2008) On end-to-end throughput of opportunistic routing in multirate and multihop wireless networks. In: IEEE, Infocom, Phoenix, 15–17 April 2008

  19. Zeng K, Lou W, Zhang Y (2007) Multi-rate geographic opportunistic routing in wireless ad hoc networks. In: Milcom’07, Orlando, October 2007

  20. Zhao J, Govindan R (2003) Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks. In: ACM Sensys’03, Los Angeles, November 2003

  21. Zhong Z, Wang J, Nelakuditi S (2006) Opportunistic any-path forwarding in multi-hop wireless mesh networks. Technical Report TR-2006-015, USC-CSE

  22. Zorzi M, Armaroli A (2003) Advancement optimization in multihop wireless networks. In: Proc. of VTC, Orlando, October 2003

  23. Zorzi M, Rao RR (2003) Geographic random forwarding (geraf) for ad hoc and sensor networks: energy and latency performance. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 2(4):349–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zorzi M, Rao RR (2003) Geographic random forwarding (geraf) for ad hoc and sensor networks: multihop performance. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 2(4):337–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai Zeng.

Additional information

This work was supported in part by the US National Science Foundation under grants CNS-0626601, CNS-0716306 and CCF-0447743.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zeng, K., Lou, W., Yang, J. et al. On Throughput Efficiency of Geographic Opportunistic Routing in Multihop Wireless Networks. Mobile Netw Appl 12, 347–357 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-008-0051-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-008-0051-7

Keywords

Navigation