Abstract
Classical trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) are believed to represent the most dynamically pristine population in the trans-Neptunian belt (TNB) offering unprecedented clues about the formation of our Solar System. The long term dynamical evolution of classical TNOs was investigated using extensive simulations. We followed the evolution of more than 17000 particles with a wide range of initial conditions taking into account the perturbations from the four giant planets for 4 Gyr. The evolution of objects in the classical region is dependent on both their inclination and semimajor axes, with the inner (a<45 AU) and outer regions (a>45 AU) evolving differently. The reason is the influence of overlapping secular resonances with Uranus and Neptune (40–42 AU) and the 5:3 (a∼ ∼42.3 AU), 7:4 (a∼ ∼43.7 AU), 9:5 (a∼ ∼44.5 AU) and 11:6 (a∼ ∼ 45.0 AU) mean motion resonances strongly sculpting the inner region, while in the outer region only the 2:1 mean motion resonance (a∼ ∼47.7 AU) causes important perturbations. In particular, we found: (a) A substantial erosion of low-i bodies (i<10°) in the inner region caused by the secular resonances, except those objects that remained protected inside mean motion resonances which survived for billion of years; (b) An optimal stable region located at 45 AU<a<47 AU, q>40 AU and i>5° free of major perturbations; (c) Better defined boundaries for the classical region: 42–47.5 AU (q>38 AU) for cold classical TNOs and 40–47.5 AU (q>35 AU) for hot ones, with i=4.5° as the best threshold to distinguish between both populations; (d) The high inclination TNOs seen in the 40–42 AU region reflect their initial conditions. Therefore they should be classified as hot classical TNOs. Lastly, we report a good match between our results and observations, indicating that the former can provide explanations and predictions for the orbital structure in the classical region.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen R. L., Bernstein G. M., Malhotra R. (2001). Astroph. J. 549:L241–L244
Brown M. E. (2001). Astron. J. 121:2804–2814
Brunini A. and Melita M. D. (2002). Icarus 160:32–43
Chiang E. I., and Jordan A. B. (2002). Astron. J. 124:3430–3444
Doressoundiram A. (2003). Earth, Moon, and Planets 92:131–144
Duncan M. J. and Levison H. F. (1997). Science 276:1670–1672
Emel’yanenko V. V., Asher D. J., Bailey M. E. (2005). MNRAS 361:1345–1351
Gladman B., Holman M., Grav T., Kaavelars J. J., Nicholson P., Aksnes K., Petit J. M. (2002). Icarus 157:269–279
Gomes R. S. (2003). Icarus 161:404–418
Gomes R. S., Morbidelli A. and Levison H. F. (2004). Planetary migration in a planetesimal disk: why did Neptune stop at 30AU? Icarus 170:492–507
Horner J., Evans N. W., Bailey M. E. and Asher D. J., (2003). MNRAS 343:1057–1066
Jewitt D. C., Luu J. X., (1993). Nature 362: 730–732
Knezevic Z., Milani A., Farinella P., Froeschle Ch., Froeschle Cl., (1991). Icarus 93:316–330
Kuchner M. J., Brown M. E. and Holman M. (2002). Astron. J. 124:1221–1230
Levison H. F., Stern A. S. (2001). Astron. J. 121:1730–1735
Levison H. F., Morbidelli A. (2003). Nature 426:419–421
Lykawka P .S., Mukai T. (2005). Plan. and Space Sci. 53:1175–1187
Malhotra R., (1995). Astron. J. 110: 420–429
Morbidelli A., Brown M. E. and Levison H. F. (2003). Earth, Moon, and Planets 92:1–27
Nesvorny D. and Roig F. (2001). Icarus 150:104–123
Peixinho N., Boehnhardt H., Belskaya I., Doressoundiram A., Barucci M. A., Delsanti A. (2004). Icarus 170:153–166
Trujillo C. A., Brown M. E. (2001). Astroph. J. 554:L95–L98
Yu Q., Tremaine S. (1999). Astron. J. 118:1873–1881
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank very much Jonathan Horner for a dedicated review that greatly improved both the readability and science of this paper. This research was supported by “The 21st Century COE Program of Origin and Evolution of Planetary Systems” of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lykawka, P.S., Mukai, T. Long term dynamical evolution and classification of classical TNOs . Earth Moon Planet 97, 107–126 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11038-005-9056-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11038-005-9056-4