Skip to main content
Log in

Image sharpening detection based on multiresolution overshoot artifact analysis

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the wide use of sophisticated photo editing tools, digital image manipulation becomes very convenient, which makes the detection of image tampering significant. Image sharpening, which aims to enhance the contrast of edges in an image, is a ubiquitous image tampering operation. The detection of image sharpening can serve as a reliable clue for image forgery. In this paper, we propose a novel image sharpening detection method based on multiresolution overshoot artifact analysis (MOAA). By building the relationship between the overshoot artifact strength and the slope of a sharpened edge, we find that although undergoing the same sharpening operation, the edge with large slope will present a stronger overshoot artifact than the one with small slope. Based on this finding, we use the nonsubsampled contourlet transform (NSCT) to classify the image edge points into three categories, i.e., weak, middle and strong edge points and measure the overshoot artifact of each category respectively. A cascaded decision strategy is adopted to decide an image is sharpened or not. Experimental results on digital images with various sharpening operators demonstrate the superiority of our proposed method when compared with state-of-the-art approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arbelaez P, Maire M, Fowlkes C, Malik J (2011) Contour detection and hierarchical image segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 33(5):898–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bahrami K, Kot AC, Li L, Li H (2015) Blurred image splicing localization by exposing blur type inconsistency. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 10(5):999–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bas P, Furon T (2007) Break our watermarking system [online]. Available: http://bows2.gipsa-lab.inpg.fr

  4. Bianchi T, Piva A (2012) Detection of non-aligned double jpeg compression based on integer periodicity maps. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 7(2):842–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Birajdar GK, Mankar VH (2013) Digital image forgery detection using passive techniques: a survey. Digit Investig 10(3):226–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cao G, Zhao Y, Ni R (2009) Detection of image sharpening based on histogram aberration and ringing artifacts. In: Proc. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, pp. 1026–1029

  7. Cao G, Zhao Y, Ni R, Kot AC (2011) Unsharp masking sharpening detection via overshoot artifacts analysis. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 18(10):603–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cao G, Zhao Y, Ni R, Li X (2014) Contrast enhancement-based forensics in digital images. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 9(3):515–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen M, Fridrich J, Goljan M, Lukas J (2008) Determining image origin and integrity using sensor noise. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 3(1):74–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi CH, Lee HY, Lee HK (2013) Estimation of color modification in digital images by CFA pattern change. Forensic Sci Int 226(1):94–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Da Cunha AL, Zhou J, Do MN (2006) The nonsubsampled contourlet transform: theory, design, and applications. IEEE Trans Image Process 15(10):3089–3101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Deng C, Gao X, Li X, Tao D (2010) Local histogram based geometric invariant image watermarking. Signal Process 90(12):3256–3264

  13. Ding F, Zhu G, Shi YQ (2013) A novel method for detecting image sharpening based on local binary pattern. In: Proc. International Workshop on Digital-Forensics and Watermarking, pp. 180–191

  14. Fan S, Wang R, Zhang Y, Guo K (2012) Classifying computer generated graphics and natural imaged based on image contour information. Int J Inf Comput Sci 9(10):2877–2895

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrara P, Bianchi T, De Rosa A, Piva A (2012) Image forgery localization via fine-grained analysis of CFA artifacts. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 7(5):1566–1577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao X, Deng C, Li X, Tao D (2010) Geometric distortion insensitive image watermarking in affine covariant regions. IEEE Trans Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C 40(3):278–286

  17. Gao L, Song J, Nie F, Zou F, Sebe N, Shen HT (2016). Graph-without-cut: An Ideal Graph Learning for Image Segmentation. In: Proc. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1188–1194

  18. Gloe T, Borowka K, Winkler A (2010) Efficient estimation and large-scale evaluation of lateral chromatic aberration for digital image forensics. In: Proc. SPIE Conference on Media Forensics and Security, p. 754107

  19. Hou X, Zhang T, Xiong G, Zhang Y, Ping X (2014) Image resampling detection based on texture classification. Multimed Tools Appl 72(2):1681–1708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hsu YF, Chang SF (2010) Camera response functions for image forensics: an automatic algorithm for splicing detection. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 5(4):816–825

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson MK, Farid H (2007) Exposing digital forgeries in complex lighting environments. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 2(3):450–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kang X, Li Y, Qu Z, Huang J (2012) Enhancing source camera identification performance with a camera reference phase sensor pattern noise. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 7(2):393–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu Q, Cao X, Deng C, Guo X (2011) Identifying image composite through shadow matte consistency. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 6(3):1111–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu G, Wang J, Lian S, Dai Y (2013) Detect image splicing with artificial blurred boundary. Math Comput Model 57(11):2647–2659

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Lu L, Yang G, Xia M (2013) Anti-forensics for unsharp masking sharpening in digital image. Int J Digital Crime Forensics 5(3):53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mahdian B, Saic S (2008) Blind authentication using periodic properties of interpolation. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 3(3):529–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Muammar H, Dragotti PL (2013) An investigation into aliasing in images recaptured from an LCD monitor using a digital camera. In: Proc. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 2242–2246

  28. Natural resource conservation service photo gallery [online]. Available: http://photogallery.nrcs.usda.gov/res/sites/PhotoGallery/index.html.

  29. Ojala T, Pietikainen M, Maenpaa T (2002) Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 24(7):971–987

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Redi JA, Taktak W, Dugelay JL (2011) Digital image forensics: a booklet for beginners. Multimed Tools Appl 51(1):133–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Schaefer G, Stich M (2004) UCID: an uncompressed color image database. In: Proc. SPIE, Storage and Retrieval Methods and Applications for Multimedia, pp. 472–480

  32. Shen Z, Ni J, Chen C (2016) Blind detection of median filtering using linear and nonlinear descriptors. Multimed Tools Appl 75(4):2327–2346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stamm MC, Liu KJR (2010) Forensic detection of image manipulation using statistical intrinsic fingerprints. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 5(3):492–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Thongkamwitoon T, Muammar H, Dragotti PL (2015) An image recapture detection algorithm based on learning dictionaries of edge profiles. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 10(5):953–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang X, Liu Y, Xu B, Li L, Xue J (2014) A statistical feature based approach to distinguish PRCG from photographs. Comput Vis Image Underst 128:84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang R, Wang RD (2015) In-camera jpeg compression detection for doubly compressed images. Multimed Tools Appl 74(15):5557–5575

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Editor-in-Chief, the handling associate editor and all anonymous reviewers for their considerations and suggestions. This work was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2013AA01A602), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61432014 and 61572388) and Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (No. IRT13088).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng Deng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, N., Deng, C. & Gao, X. Image sharpening detection based on multiresolution overshoot artifact analysis. Multimed Tools Appl 76, 16563–16580 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3938-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3938-5

Keywords

Navigation