Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Synthetic minority oversampling in addressing imbalanced sarcasm detection in social media

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent developments in sarcasm detection have been emerged as extremely successful tools in Social media opinion mining. With the advent of machine learning tools, accurate detection has been made possible. However, the social media data used to train the machine learning models is often ill suited due to the presence of highly imbalanced classes. In absence of any thorough study on the effect of imbalanced classes in sarcasm detection for social media opinion mining, the current article proposed synthetic minority oversampling based methods to mitigate the issue of imbalanced classes which can severely effect the classifier performance in social media sarcasm detection. In the current study, five different variants of synthetic minority oversampling technique have been used on two different datasets of varying sizes. The trustworthiness is judged by training and testing of six well known classifiers and measuring their performance in terms of test phase confusion matrix based performance measuring metrics. The experimental results indicated that SMOTE and BorderlineSMOTE – 1 are extremely successful in improving the classifier performance. A thorough analysis has been performed to better understand the effect of imbalanced classes in social media sarcasm detection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abercrombie G, Hovy D (2016) Putting sarcasm detection into context: the effects of class imbalance and manual Labelling on supervised machine classification of twitter conversations. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2016 Student Research Workshop, pp 107–113, Germany

  2. Alboaneen DA, Tianfield H, Zhang Y (2017) Sentiment analysis via multi-layer perceptron trained by meta-heuristic optimisation. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). IEEE:4630–4635

  3. Alcaide JM, Justo R, Torres MI (2015) Combining statistical and semantic knowledge for sarcasm detection in online dialogues. In: Paredes R, Cardoso J, Pardo X (eds) Pattern recognition and image analysis. IbPRIA 2015. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9117. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ali A, Ghazali R, Deris MM (2011) The wavelet multilayer perceptron for the prediction of earthquake time series data. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services (iiWAS’11). ACM, Vietnam, pp 138–143

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anjuman P, Vikas Khullar V (2017) Sentiment classification on big data using Naïve Bayes and logistic regression. In: (2017) International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI), pp. 1–5. IEEE, 2017.

  6. Bamman D, Smith NA (2014) Contextualized sarcasm detection on twitter. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International AAAI conference on Web and Social Media, UK, pp 574–577

  7. Banfield SR, Richmond VP, McCroskey JC (2006) The effect of teacher misbehaviors on teacher credibility and affect for the teacher. Commun Educ 55(1):63–72

    Google Scholar 

  8. Basu S, Das N, Sarkar R, Kundu M, Nasipuri M, Basu DK (2005) Handwritten ‘bangla’ alphabet recognition using an MLP based classifier. In: Proceedings of the 2nd National Conf. on computer processing of Bangla, Dhaka, pp 285–291

  9. Bharti SK, Babu KS, Jena SK (2015) Parsing-based sarcasm sentiment recognition in twitter data. In: Proceeding ASONAM ‘15 Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2015, France, pp 1373–1380

  10. Bharti SK, Vachha B, Pradhan RK, Babu KS, Jena SK (2016) Sarcastic sentiment detection in tweets streamed in real time: a big data approach. Digital Communications and Network 2(3):108–121

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bharti SK, Babu KS, Raman R (2017) Context-based sarcasm detection in Hindi tweets. 2017 Ninth International Conference on Advances in Pattern Recognition (ICAPR), Bangalore, pp 1–6

  12. Bharti SK, Sathya BK, Jena SK (2017) Harnessing online news for sarcasm detection in hindi tweets. In: Shankar B, Ghosh K, Mandal D, Ray S, Zhang D, Pal S (eds) Pattern recognition and machine intelligence. PReMI 2017. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Cham

  13. Bharti SK, Pradhan R, Babu KS, Jena SK (2017) Sarcasm analysis on twitter data using machine learning approaches. In: Missaoui R, Abdessalem T, Latapy M (eds) Trends in social network analysis. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Springer, Cham

  14. Bouazizi M, Ohtsuki T (2015) Sarcasm detection in twitter: “All your products are incredibly amazing!!!” - Are they really? 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), San Diego, CA, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bouazizi M, Ohtsuki T (2015) Opinion mining in Twitter: How to make use of sarcasm to enhance sentiment analysis. 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), Paris, pp 1594–1597

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bouazizi M, Otsuki Ohtsuki T (2016) A pattern-based approach for sarcasm detection on twitter. IEEE Access 4:5477–5488

    Google Scholar 

  17. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Bunkhumpornpat C, Sinapiromsaran K, Lursinsap C (2009) Safe-level- SMOTE: safe-level-synthetic minority over-sampling technique for handling the class imbalanced problem. Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Springer:475–482

  19. Bunkhumpornpat C, Sinapiromsaran K, Lursinsap C (2012) DBSMOTE: density-based synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Appl Intell Springer 36(3):664–684

  20. Burez J, Van den Poel D (2009) Handling class imbalance in customer churn prediction. Expert Syst Appl Elsevier 36(3)Part 1:4626–4636

  21. Chatterjee S, Sarkar S, Hore S, Dey N, Ashour AS, Balas VE (2017) Particle swarm optimization trained neural network for structural failure prediction of multistoried RC buildings. Neural Comput & Applic 28(8):2005–2016

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall OH, Kegelmeyer WP (2002) SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. J Artif Intell Res 16:321–357 (AI Access Foundation and Morgan Kaufmann Publishers)

  23. Dashtipour K, Gogate M, Adeel A, Ieracitano C, Larijani H, Hussain A (2018) Exploiting deep learning for persian sentiment analysis. In: International conference on brain inspired cognitive systems. Springer, Cham, pp 597–604

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dave AD, Desai NP (2016) A comprehensive study of classification techniques for sarcasm detection on textual data. 2016 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, And Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT), Chennai, pp 1985–1991

    Google Scholar 

  25. Davidov D, Tsur O, Rappoport A (2010) Enhanced sentiment learning using twitter hashtags and smileys. In proceedings of the 23rd international conference on computational linguistics: posters (COLING ‘10). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, pp 241–249

    Google Scholar 

  26. Davidov D, Tsur O, Rappoport A (2010) Semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in Twitter and Amazon. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL ‘10). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, pp 107–116

    Google Scholar 

  27. del Pilar Salas-Zárate M, Paredes-Valverde MA, Rodriguez-García MÁ, Valencia-García R, Alor-Hernández G (2017) Automatic detection of satire in Twitter: A psycholinguistic-based approach. Knowl-based Syst Elsevier 128:20–33

  28. Fersini E, Pozzi FA, Messina E (2015) Detecting irony and sarcasm in microblogs: The role of expressive signals and ensemble classifiers. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), Paris, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  29. Filatova E (2012) Irony and sarcasm: corpus generation and analysis using crowdsourcing. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2012). European Languages Resources Association (ELRA), pp 392–398

  30. Filatova E (2017) Sarcasm detection using sentiment flow shifts. Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, pp 264–269

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ghosh D, Guo W, Muresan S (2015) Sarcastic or not: Word embeddings to predict the literal or sarcastic meaning of words. In: Proceedings of the (2015) conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pp 1003–1012

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gibbs RW (1986) On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. J Exp Psychol: General 115(1):3

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ghosh K, Banerjee A, Chatterjee S, Sen S (2019) Imbalanced twitter sentiment analysis using minority oversampling. In: IEEE 10th International Conference on Awareness Science and Technology (iCAST). IEEE, pp 1–5

  34. Gokulakrishnan B, Priyanthan P, Ragavan T, Prasath N, Perera A (2012) Opinion mining and sentiment analysis on a Twitter data stream. International Conference on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions (ICTer2012), Colombo, pp 182–188

    Google Scholar 

  35. González-Ibánez R, Muresan S, Wacholder N (2011) Identifying sarcasm in Twitter: a closer look. In: Proceedings of the 49th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies: short papers-volume 2. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 581–586

  36. Greiner R, Xiaoyuan S, Shen B, Zhou W (2005) Structural extension to logistic regression: discriminative parameter learning of belief net classifiers. Mach Learn 59(3):297–322

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Han H, Wang W-Y, Mao B-H (2005) Borderline-SMOTE: a new over-sampling method in imbalanced data sets learning. International Conference on Intelligent computing, Springer, pp 878–887

  38. Han J, Kamber M, Pei J (2012) Data mining concepts and techniques, third edn. Morgan Kaufmann publishers. Elsevier, pp 330–343

  39. Hazarika D, Poria S, Gorantla S, Cambria E, Zimmermann R, Mihalcea R (2018) CASCADE: Contextual sarcasm detection in online discussion forums. arXiv preprint arXiv 1805:06413

    Google Scholar 

  40. He H, Bai Y, Garcia EA, Li S (2008) ADASYN: Adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning. 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence), Hong Kong, pp 1322–1328

    Google Scholar 

  41. Irani D, Webb S, Calton P, Li K (2010) Study of trend-stuffing on twitter through text classification. Collaboration, Electronic messaging, Anti-Abuse and Spam Conference (CEAS)

  42. Japkowicz N (2000) The class imbalance problem: significance and strategies, Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IC-AI’2000): special track on inductive learning, Las Vegas, Nevada

  43. Joshi A, Agrawal S, Bhattacharyya P, Carman MJ (2018) Expect the unexpected: harnessing sentence completion for sarcasm detection. In: Hasida K, Pa W (eds) Computational linguistics. PACLING 2017. Communications in computer and information science, vol 781. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  44. Joshi A, Bhattacharyya P, Carman MJ (2018) Sarcasm detection using contextual incongruity. In: Investigations in computational sarcasm. Cognitive systems monographs, vol 37. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  45. Justo R, Corcoran T, Lukin SM, Walker M, Inés Torres M (2014) Extracting relevant knowledge for the detection of sarcasm and nastiness in the social web. Knowl-Based Syst 69:124–133

  46. Keerthi SS, Shevade SK, Bhattacharyya C, Murthy KRK (2001) improvements to Platt’s SMO algorithm for SVM classifier design. Neural Comput 13(3):637–649

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Khattri A, Joshi A, Bhattacharyya P, Carman MJ (2015) Your sentiment precedes you: using an author’s historical tweets to predict sarcasm. In: Proceedings of the 6th workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity, sentiment and social media analysis, Portugal, pp 25–30

  48. Khokhlova M, Patti V, Rosso P (2016) Distinguishing between irony and sarcasm in social media texts: linguistic observations. 2016 international FRUCT conference on intelligence, Social Media and Web (ISMW FRUCT), St. Petersburg, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kirchhoff K, Bilmes JA (1999) Dynamic classifier combination in hybrid speech recognition systems using utterance-level confidence values. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No. 99CH36258), vol 2. IEEE, pp 693–696

  50. Kreuz RJ, Glucksberg S (1989) How to be sarcastic: the echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. J Exp Psychol Gen 118(4):374–386

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kubat M, Matwin S (1997) Addressing the curse of imbalanced training sets: one sided selection. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on machine learning. Nashville, Tennesse, pp 179–186

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kubat M, Holte R, Matwin S (1997) Learning when negative examples abound. In: van Someren M, Widmer G (eds) Machine Learning: ECML-97. ECML 1997. Lecture notes in computer science (lecture notes in artificial intelligence), vol 1224. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kubat M, Holte RC, Matwin S (1998) Machine learning for the detection of oil spills in satellite radar images. Machine Learning 30(2–3):195–215, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  54. Larkey LS, Ballesteros L, Connell ME (2002) Improving stemming for Arabic information retrieval: light stemming and co-occurrence analysis. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pp 275–282

    Google Scholar 

  55. Last F, Douzas G, Bacao F (2017) Oversampling for imbalanced learning based on K-Means and SMOTE. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.00837

  56. Li F, Yang Y (2003) A loss function analysis for classification methods in text categorization. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on machine learning (ICML-03), pp 472–479

    Google Scholar 

  57. Li Y, Guo Z, Yang J, Fang H, Yongwu H (2018) Prediction of ship collision risk based on CART. IET Intell Transp Syst 12(10):1345–1350

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ling CX, Li C (1998) Data mining for direct marketing: problems and solutions. Proceeding of KDD'98 Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp 73–79

  59. Ling J, Klinger R (2016) An empirical, quantitative analysis of the differences between sarcasm and irony. In: Sack H, Rizzo G, Steinmetz N, Mladenić D, Auer S, Lange C (eds) The semantic web. ESWC 2016. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9989. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  60. Liu P, Chen W, Ou G, Wang T, Yang D, Lei K (2014) Sarcasm detection in social media based on imbalanced classification. In: Li F, Li G, Hwang S, Yao B, Zhang Z (eds) Web-age information management. WAIM 2014. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 8485. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  61. Liu S, Wang Y, Zhang J, Chen C, Xiang Y (2017) Addressing the class imbalance problem in Twitter spam detection using ensemble learning. Computers & Security 69:35–49, Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ludwig SA, Picek S, Jakobovic D (2018) Classification of cancer data: Analyzing gene expression data using a fuzzy decision tree algorithm. In: Operations research applications in health care management. Springer, Cham, pp 327–347

    Google Scholar 

  63. Maciejewski T, Stefanowski J (2011) Local neighbourhood extension of SMOTE for mining imbalanced data. In: 2011 IEEE symposium on computational intelligence and data mining (CIDM). IEEE, pp 104–111

  64. Mazurowski MA, Habas PA, Zurada JM, Lo JY, Baker JA, Tourassi GD (2008) Training neural network classifiers for medical decision making: the effects of imbalanced datasets on classification performance. Neural Netw 21(2-3):427–536

  65. McDonald S, Pearce S (1996) Clinical insights into pragmatic theory: frontal lobe deficits and sarcasm. Brain Lang 53(1):81–104

    Google Scholar 

  66. Medhaffar S, Bougares F, Estève Y, Hadrich-Belguith L (2017) Sentiment analysis of Tunisian dialects: Linguistic ressources and experiments. Proceedings of the third Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop:55–61

  67. Moskovitch R, Stopel D, Feher C, Nissim N, Elovici Y (2008) Unknown malcode detection via text categorization and the imbalance problem. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, Taipei:156–161

  68. Mukherjee S, Bala PK (2017) Sarcasm detection in microblogs using Naïve Bayes and fuzzy clustering. Journal of Technology in Society 48:19–27, Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  69. Muniyandi AP, Rajeswari R, Rajaram R (2012) Network anomaly detection by cascading k-means clustering and C4. 5 decision tree algorithm. Procedia Engineering 30:174–182

    Google Scholar 

  70. Nguyen HM, Cooper EW, Kamei K (2009) Borderline over-sampling for imbalanced data classification. Proceedings: Fifth International Workshop on Computational Intelligence & Applications 2009(1):24–29. IEEE SMC Hiroshima Chapter

    Google Scholar 

  71. Nijhawan VK, Madan M, Dave M (2019) An Analytical Implementation of CART Using RStudio for Churn Prediction. In: Information and communication technology for competitive strategies. Springer, Singapore, pp 109–120

    Google Scholar 

  72. Oghina A, Breuss M, Tsagkias M, de Rijke M (2012) Predicting IMDB movie ratings using social media. European Conference on Information Retrieval. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 503–507

  73. Olanow CW, Watts RL, Koller WC (2001) An algorithm (decision tree) for the management of Parkinson’s disease (2001): treatment guidelines. Neurology 56(5):S1-S88.

  74. Pang B, Lee L (2008) Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval 2(1–2):1–135

    Google Scholar 

  75. Parde N, Nielsen R (2018) Detecting sarcasm is extremely easy. Proceedings of the workshop on computational semantics beyond events and roles:21–26, Louisiana

  76. Plisson J, Lavrac N, Mladenic D (2004) A rule based approach to word lemmatization. Proceedings of IS 3:83–86

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ptáček T, Habernal I, Hong J (2014) Sarcasm detection on Czech and english twitter. In: Proceedings of COLING (2014), The 25th international conference on computational linguistics: technical papers, Dublin, pp 213–223

  78. Rajadesingan A, Zafarani R, Liu H (2015) Sarcasm detection on twitter: a behavioral modeling approach. In: WSDM ‘15 Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, China, pp 97–106

    Google Scholar 

  79. Ramentol E, Caballero Y, Bello R, Herrera F (2011) SMOTE-RSB *: a hybrid preprocessing approach based on oversampling and under sampling for high imbalanced data-sets using SMOTE and rough sets theory. Knowledge and Information Systems 33(2):245–265, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  80. Ray P, Chakrabarti A (2017) Twitter sentiment analysis for product review using lexicon method. International Conference on Data Management, Analytics and Innovation (ICDMAI), Pune:211–216

  81. Ren Y, Ji D, Ren H (2018) Context-augmented convolutional neural networks for twitter sarcasm detection. Neurocomputing, Elsevier 308:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  82. Reyes A, Rosso P, Buscaidi D (2012) From humor recognition to irony detection: the figurative language of social media. Journal of Data & Knowledge Engineering, Elsevier 74:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  83. Salzberg S (1995) Locating protein coding regions in human DNA using a decision tree algorithm. J Comput Biol 2(3):473–485

    Google Scholar 

  84. Schifanella R, de Juan P, Tetreault J, Cao LL (2016) Detecting Sarcasm in Multimodal Social Platforms. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM international conference on Multimedia (MM ‘16). ACM, USA, pp 1136–1145

    Google Scholar 

  85. Singh A, Blanco E, Jin W (2019) Incorporating Emoji descriptions improves tweet classification. In: Proceedings of the 2019 conference of the North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: human language technologies, volume 1 (long and short papers), Minnesota, pp 2096–2101

  86. Song J, Kim KT, Lee BJ, Kim S-Y, Youn HY (2017) A novel classification approach based on Naïve Bayes for Twitter sentiment analysis. TIIS 11(6):2996–3011

    Google Scholar 

  87. Sulis E, Farías DIH, Rosso P, Patti V, Ruffoa G (2016) Figurative messages and affect in twitter: differences between #irony, #sarcasm and #not. Knowl-Based Syst 108:132–143

    Google Scholar 

  88. Takeshi S, Okazaki M, Matsuo Y (2010) Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on world wide web. ACM, pp 851–860

  89. Tan S (2006) An effective refinement strategy for KNN text classifier. Expert Syst Appl 30(2):290–298

    Google Scholar 

  90. Tsur O, Davidov D, Rappoport A (2010) ICWSM – a great catchy name: semi- supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in product reviews. In AAAI-ICWSM.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Viloria A, Wang G, Gaitan M (2020) Segmentation of sales for a mobile phone service through CART classification tree algorithm. In: Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Big Data and Cloud Computing Challenges, pp. 77–85. Springer, Singapore

  92. Wakade S, Shekar C, Liszka KJ, Chan C-C (2012) Text mining for sentiment analysis of Twitter data. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge Engineering (IKE), p. 1. The Steering Committee of the World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldComp)

  93. Wilbur WJ, Sirotkin K (1992) The automatic identification of stop words. J Inf Sci 18(1):45–55

    Google Scholar 

  94. Woolson RF (2007) Wilcoxon signed-rank test. In: Wiley encyclopedia of clinical trials, pp 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  95. Yan H, Hu H, Ping Y (2019) A study on push technology of intelligent agriculture service information based on CART algorithm. In: International Conference on Robots & Intelligent System (ICRIS). IEEE, pp 258–260

  96. Zhang M, Zhang Y, Guohong F (2016) Tweet sarcasm detection using deep neural network. In: Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: technical papers, pp 2449–2460

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Engineering & Management, Kolkata, India

    Arghasree Banerjee, Mayukh Bhattacharjee, Kushankur Ghosh & Sankhadeep Chatterjee

Authors
  1. Arghasree Banerjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mayukh Bhattacharjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kushankur Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sankhadeep Chatterjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arghasree Banerjee.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Banerjee, A., Bhattacharjee, M., Ghosh, K. et al. Synthetic minority oversampling in addressing imbalanced sarcasm detection in social media. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 35995–36031 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09138-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09138-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation