Skip to main content
Log in

The subjective mode of comparison: Metalinguistic comparatives in Greek and Korean

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present a striking parallel between Greek and Korean in the formation and interpretation of metalinguistic comparatives. The initial observation is that both languages show an empirical contrast between ordinary and metalinguistic comparatives realized in two places: (a) in the form of a designated metalinguistic comparative MORE, and (b) in the form of THAN employed. We propose (building on earlier ideas in Giannakidou and Stavrou 2009; Giannakidou and Yoon 2009) that the metalinguistic comparative is subjective and attitudinal, i.e. it introduces the point of view of an individual towards a sentence—and argue that the individual expresses invariably an attitude of preference: she prefers one sentence (the sentence itself, or the proposition it expresses) in a given context over another. The preference may come out as completely negative in certain cases, and this is manifested as yet another MORE lexicalization in Korean (charari), which selects nuni-THAN, which itself carries a negative expressive index (in the sense of Potts 2007b), we will claim. Expressive negativity is not equivalent to negation in syntax, as nuni alone cannot license NPIs that need negation.

If our analysis is correct, it has one important implication that goes beyond just the metalinguistic comparatives in the individual languages we are considering. It allows the generalization that metalinguistic functions in language are indeed part of the grammar. In particular, they are reflexes of grammaticalization of perspective and subjective mode, on a par with predicates of personal taste discussed by Lasersohn (2005, 2008, 2009), mood choice, and similar phenomena. In comparatives, subjective mode is manifested as an attitude of preference, with possible addition of expressive meaning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhatt, Rajesh, and Roumyana Pancheva. 2004. Late merger of degree clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan. 1973. Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 275–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canstant, Noah, Christopher Davis, Christopher Potts, and Florian Schwarz. 2009. The pragmatics of expressive content: Evidence from large corpora. Sprache und Datenverarbeitung 33: 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choe, Jae-Woong. 2004. Obligatory honorification and the honorific feature. Studies in Generative Grammar 14: 545–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Incheol. 2003. A constraint-based approach to Korean partial honorific agreement. In The role of agreement in natural language: TLS 5 Proceedings, ed. William Earl Griffin, 157–166. Austin: Department of Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dictionary of the National Institute of Korean Language. 2008. National Institute of Korean Language.

  • Drozd, Kenneth F. 1995. Child English pre-sentential negation as metalinguistic exclamatory sentence negation. Journal of Child Language 22: 583–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embick, David. 2007. Blocking effects and analytic/synthetic alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, Donka F. 1992. On the semantics of subjunctive complements. In Romance languages and linguistic theory, eds. Paul Hirschbühler and Konrad Koerner, 69–104. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1999. Affective dependencies. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 367–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2000. Negative…concord? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 457–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2001. The meaning of free choice. Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 659–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2006. Only, emotive factives, and the dual nature of polarity dependency. Language 82: 575–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2011. Positive polarity items and negative polarity items: Variation, licensing, and compositionality. In Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, eds. Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, and Paul Portner. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Melita Stavrou. 2009. Metalinguistic comparatives and negation in Greek. In Proceedings of the 2007 workshop on Greek syntax and semantics (MIT working papers in linguistics 57), eds. Claire Halpert, Jeremy Hartman, and David Hill, 57–74. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Suwon Yoon. 2009. Metalinguistic functions and the expressive dimension in Greek and Korean: Attitude semantics, expressive meaning and NPI licensing. In Proceedings of the 13 th Sinn und Bedeutung, eds. Ljudmila Geist, Klaus von Heusinger, Hans Kamp, Udo Klein, Fabienne Martin, Edgar Onea, Arndt Riester, and Torgrim Solstad, 141–156. Stuttgart: Online Publikationsverbund der Universität Stuttgart (OPUS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Suwon Yoon. 2010. No NPI licensing in clausal comparatives. In Proceedings of the 46th Chicago Linguistic Society, eds. Timothy Grinsell, Adam Baker, Julia Thomas, Rebekah Baglini, and Jon Keane. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, Eunjoo. 1991. Honorification in Korean. Ms. Stanford University.

  • Hankamer, Jorge. 1973. Why there are two than’s in English. In Papers from the 9th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, eds. Claudia Corum, Cedric Smith-Stark, and Ann Weiser, 179–191. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene. 1992. Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs. Journal of Semantics 9: 183–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene. 2000. Degree operators and scope. In Proceedings of SALT X, eds. Brendan Jackson and Tanya Matthews, 40–64. Ithaca: CLC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hila-Markopoulou, Despoina. 2007. Apo tin exelixi ton grammatikon kategorion: i periptosi tu sigkritiku para [From the evolution of grammatical categories: the comparative para]. Talk at the Linguistics Department, University of Ioannina, Greece.

  • Holton, David, Peter Mackridge, and Irene Philippaki-Warburton. 1997. Greek: A comprehensive grammar of the modern language. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Laurence R. 1989. A natural history of negation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Laurence R. 2000. Pick a theory (Not just any theory): Indiscriminatives and the free-choice indefinite. In Negation and polarity: Syntactic and semantic perspectives, eds. Laurence R. Horn and Yasuhiko Kato, 147–192. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Laurence R. 2002. Assertoric inertia and NPI-licensing. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS 38), eds. Mary Andronis, Erin Debenport, Anne Pycha, and Keiko Yoshimura, 55–82. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joe, Jieun, and Chungmin Lee. 2002. A ‘removal’ type of negative predicates. In Proceedings of the 10th Japanese Korean linguistics conference. CSLI Publication.

  • Kennedy, Chris. 1997. Projecting the adjective. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.

  • Kennedy, Chris. 2007. Modes of comparison. In Papers from the 43rd annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, eds. Malcolm Elliott, James Kirby, Osamu Sawada, and Eleni Staraki, Suwon Yoon. Chicago: Chicago Linguitics Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Jong-Bok, and Jaehyung Yang. 2005. Parsing Korean honorification in a typed feature structure grammar. Paper presented at CLS 41, April 2005.

  • Kim, Jong-Bok, and Peter Sells. 2007. Korean honorification: A kind of expressive meaning. Journal of East Asian Linguistics Journal 16: 303–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Richard. 1988. Scope of comparatives. Linguistics & Philosophy 11: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasersohn, Peter. 1999. Pragmatic halos. Language 75: 522–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasersohn, Peter. 2005. Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 643–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasersohn, Peter. 2008. Quantification and perspective in relativist semantics. Paper presented at the University of Chicago Compositionality Workshop, May 2008.

  • Lasersohn, Peter. 2009. Relative truth, speaker commitment, and control of implicit arguments. Synthese 166: 359–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, Winfried. 2007. Comments on ‘metalinguistic contrast in the grammar of Greek. Handout, Workshop on Greek Syntax and Semantics, MIT.

  • Lechner, Winfried. 2009. Metametacomparatives: Comments on “Metalinguistic contrast in the grammar of Greek. In Proceedings of the 2007 workshop on Greek syntax and semantics (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 57), eds. Claire Halpert, Jeremy Hartman, and David Hill, 75–90. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Iksop, and Robert Ramsey. 2000. The Korean language. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, Jim. 1968. The role of semantics in a grammar. In Universals in linguistic theory, eds. Emmon Bach, and Robert Harms, 124–69. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, Jim. 1988. The syntactic phenomena of English. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Jason. 2009. Phrasal and clausal comparatives in Greek and the abstractness of syntax. Journal of Greek Linguistics 9: 134–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morzycki, Marcin. 2009. Metalinguistic Comparison in an alternative semantics for imprecision. In Proceedings of NELS 38, eds. Muhammad Abdurrahman, Anisa Schardl, and Martin Walkow. Amherst: GLSA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parl, Byung-Soo. 1992. The semantic and pragmatic nature of honorific agreement in Korean: An information-based approach. Ms., Kyung-Hee University, South Korea, and Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

  • Park, Eun-Hae. 2009. Free choice and wh-indeterminate quantification in Korean. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago.

  • Pollard, Carl, and Ivan Sag. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, Paul. 2002. The structure of one type of American English vulgar minimizer. In Skeptical linguistic essays. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, Christopher, and Shigeto Kawahara. 2004. Japanese honorifics as emotive definite descriptions. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 14, eds. Kazuha Watanabe, and Robert B. Young, 235–254. Ithaca: CLC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, Christopher. 2005. The logic of conventional implicature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, Christopher. 2007a. The dimensions of quotation. In Direct compositionality, eds. Chris Barker, and Pauline Jacobson, 405–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, Christopher. 2007b. The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 7: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rullmann, Hotze. 1995. Maximality in wh-quantification. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA.

  • Stalnaker, Robert. 1984. Inquiry. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavrou, Melita. 1982. Some remarks on comparative complements in Modern Greek [in Greek]. In Studies in Greek linguistics, 73–105. Thessaloniki: Kyrjakides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, Tamina. 2007. Judge dependence, epistemic modals, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 487–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalta, Elisabeth. 2008. Mood and gradability: An investigation of the subjunctive mood in Spanish. Linguistics and Philosophy 31: 467–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Stechow, Arnim. 1984. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3: 1–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, In-Seok. 1973. Semantics of delimiters. Language Research 9: 84–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, James. 2005. Non-morphological determination of nominal affix ordering in Korean. In Clitic and affix combinations: Theoretical perspectives, eds. Lorie Heggie, and Francisco Ordóñez, 239–282. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwarts, Frans. 1995. Nonveridical contexts. Linguistic Analysis 25: 286–312.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anastasia Giannakidou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giannakidou, A., Yoon, S. The subjective mode of comparison: Metalinguistic comparatives in Greek and Korean. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 29, 621–655 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9133-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9133-5

Keywords

Navigation