Skip to main content
Log in

Alternate space–times in Robert Coover’s texts: some ontological questions

  • Published:
Neohelicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our reality or actual space–time is composed of highly complex and indeterminate but interconnected structures, and both natural sciences and contemporary literature refer to it as a world of pluralized rhythms and emergent potentialities, always becoming, in which values are relative and process-dependent. Aware of the discontinuity and relativity of any space–time creation, including our experiential reality and fictive realities generated by our minds, this article attempts to discern potential space-times in Robert Coover’s texts and depict their ontological landscapes. These ontological realms are often presented as characters’ self-generated fictions into which they get so immersed that they lose the ability to discern the real from the fictive, as they switch from one world to the other. This permits the protagonists’ momentary escape, but also causes their psychic fragmentation, blurring the distinction between fiction and reality. In the form of stories within stories or as representations, such as descriptions of photographs, games, movies, and TV programs, Coover’s texts demonstrate interconnections of fictional and real space-times, blurring their borderlines, and even collapsing into one another. Throughout his opus, Coover is raising questions about the nature of reality, being and becoming, including the query that concerns ontological issues of text and world, fact and fiction, creator and creature, and how does a specific space-time emerge, solidify, and evolve. Thus, the purpose of this article is to examine the specificity of alternate space-times in Robert Coover’s most challenged texts in terms of ontology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This is Einstein’s famous remark in the debate with Heisenberg, precipitated by the Solvay Conference regarding the uncertainty principle and the probabilistic knowledge implied by quantum theory.

References

  • Baudrillard, J. (1981/1994). Simulacra and simulation (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

  • Conte, J. M. (2002). Design and debris: A chaotics of postmodern American fiction. Tuscaloosa/London: The University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coover, R. (1963). The second son. Evergreen Review, 31, 72–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coover, R. (1966). The origin of the Brunists. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coover, R. (1968). The universal baseball association, inc. J. Henry Waugh, PROP. New York: A Plume Book, New American Library.

  • Coover, R. (1969). Pricksongs & descants. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co. inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coover, R. (1977). The public burning. New York: A Richard Seaver Book/The Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coover, R. (1985). Gerald’s party. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coover, R. (1987). A night at the movies, or, you must remember this: Fictions. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coover, R. (1996). John’s wife. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coover, R. (1998). Ghost town: A novel. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1992). Consciousness explained. New York: Back Bay Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1962). Opera aperta: forma e indeterminazione delle poetiche contemporanee. Milano: Bompiani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1984). The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenson, B. (2003). Understanding Robert Coover. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, H. (1957). Relative state formulation of quantum mechanics. Review of Modern Physics, 29, 454–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federman, R. (1975). Surfiction—Four propositions in form of an introduction. In R. Federman (Ed.), Surfiction: Fiction now … and tomorrow (pp. 5–15). Chicago: Swallow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1969/1972). The archeology of knowledge and the discourse of language (A.M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In M. Foucault, Language, counter-memory, practice (Ed. D. Bouchard, pp. 140–153). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, M. (2004). You might be able to get there from here: Reconsidering Borges and the postmodern. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosh, S., & Baraitser, L. (2009). Goodbye to identity? In A. Elliot & P. du Gay (Eds.), Identity in question (pp. 158–169). Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gado, F. (Ed.) (1973). Robert Coover. In First person: Conversations on writers & writing (pp. 142–159). Schenectady: Union College Press.

  • Genette, G. (1980). Narrative discourse: An essay in method (J. E. Lewin, Trans.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  • Gerrig, R. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. (1983). Robert Coover: The universal fictionmaking process. Carbondale/Evansville: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossberg, L. (1986/1996). On postmodernism and articulation: An interview with Stuart Hall. In D. Morley & K. H. Chen (Eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies (pp. 131–150). London: Routledge.

  • Grossberg, L. (1992a). We gotta get out of this place: Popular conservatism and postmodern culture. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossberg, L. (1992b). Is there a fan in the house? The affective sensibility of fandom. In L. A. Lewis (Ed.), The adorning audience: Fan culture and popular media (pp. 50–60). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruić-Grmuša, L. (2013). The transformations in the understanding of temporality in postmodern literature. Americana 9 (1). Accessed December 12, 2013, from http://americanaejournal.hu/vol9no1/gruic-grmusa.

  • Hansen, A. (1982). The meeting of parallel lines: Science, fiction, and science fiction. In G. E. Slusser, E. S. Rabkin, & R. Scholes (Eds.), Bridges to fantasy (pp. 51–58). Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, P. B. (1994). Framing the margins: The social logic of postmodern culture. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (2006). Everything bad is good for you: How today’s popular culture is actually making us smarter. New York: Riverhead Trade Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1978). Truth in fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly, 15(1), 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (Ed.) (1999). Philosophy and the politics of spatiality. In Power-geometries and the politics of space-time: Hettner lecture 1998 (pp. 25–42). Heidelberg: University of Heidelberg.

  • McCaffery, L. (1981). Robert Coover on his own and other fictions: An interview. In J. I. Cope & G. Green (Eds.), Novel vs. fiction: The contemporary reformation (pp. 45–63). Norman: Pilgrim Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaffery, L. (1982). The metafictional muse: The works of Robert Coover, Donald Barthelme, and William H. Gass. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHale, B. (1987). Postmodernist fiction. New York: Methuen.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pavel, T. G. (1986). Fictional worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M. L. (1991). Possible worlds, artificial intelligence, and narrative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack, J. D. (1996). The theory and method of articulation in cultural studies. In. D. Morley & K. H. Chen (Eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies (pp. 112–127). London: Routledge.

  • Soja, E. (1989/1999). History: Geography: Modernity. In S. During (Ed.), The cultural studies reader (2nd ed.) (pp. 113–125). London: Routledge.

  • Turner, M. (1991). Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1986). Historical pluralism. Critical Inquiry, 12(3), 480–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1929/1978). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology. Gifford lectures delivered in the University of Edinburgh, 1927–1928. Corrected and edited by D. R. Griffin & D. W. Sherburne. New York: Free Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lovorka Gruić-Grmuša.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gruić-Grmuša, L. Alternate space–times in Robert Coover’s texts: some ontological questions. Neohelicon 42, 255–282 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-014-0260-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-014-0260-y

Keywords

Navigation