Skip to main content
Log in

On monetary and literary fictions

  • Published:
Neohelicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the various ways in which nineteenth century monetary theory and the novel addressed the questions of reality and fiction with regard to the ontological status and social function of money. Departing from Walter Bagehot’s insistence on the reality and realism of finance, and surveying examples of how novels by Dickens, Balzac, Trollope, or Zola represented, or avoided representing, financial realities, I deal with the various notions of money seen either as a neutral or abstract medium facilitating wealth-creating commodity exchange or as an active but mystical agent blurring the division of fiction and fact (Mill, Marx, Simmel). After that the paper gives an overview of economic oriented literary criticism with regard to its investment in relating and/or distinguishing monetary and literary notions of fiction. The essay ends by returning to Bagehot’s argument and raises the question of the appropriation of reality by an increasingly fictitious finance, problematizing the distinction between expedient fictions and deceitful lies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. On the Lockean theory of language and its nineteenth-century afterlife: Keach (1993).

  2. On the role of the Real (along with the Imaginary and the Symbolic) in Lacan’s psychoanalysis as the ever-occurring limit of experience excluded from the realm of fantasy: Libbrecht (2001).

  3. During the 18th century aesthetics and economy belonged to the same intellectual endeavor, the complex of moral philosophy, but romanticism introduced a growing hostility towards political economy and its practitioners, opposing imagination to calculation, fancy to fact, humanistic benevolence to mechanical-utilitarian thinking: Connell (2001).

  4. On ghostliness in the iconography of paper money: Shell (1999). On the role of the supernatural in Victorian “gothic economies”, especially Marx and Bagehot: Houston (2005), 25–48.

  5. On the alternating dominance of the theories of neutral and active money in the history of economic analysis: Schumpeter (2006, 264–265).

  6. On shifts in economic theory coinciding with those in aesthetics: Gagnier (2000). On how a new, organicist concept of biology provided common ground for early nineteenth-century economic theory and the types of plots and heroes employed in the novels of the age: Gallagher (2006a, b).

  7. A very fragile nexus indeed, the unreliability of which was revealed by the South Sea Bubble and John Law’s failed scheme in France as early as the 1710–1720s. See Brantlinger 48–87.

  8. On complementary, supplemental, or competitive positions between the eighteenth- and nineteenth-century histories of economics and the novel: Nicholson (1994), Kaufmann (1995), Sherman (1996), Thompson (1996), Ingrassia (1998), Lynch (1998).

  9. One might add, however, that the realist intentions of monetary theory did not pass with the dismissal of the thesis of money`s neutrality. If money is a transparent veil on commodities, then the reader of economic signs has to look through it to get a glimpse of the “real economy” of exchange underneath. When, in turn, Keynes suggests that it is precisely the “monetary economy” that coincides with the “real world” in which “we actually live,” then his argument, in an equally realistic manner, implies that we have to look at (and not through) money to be true realists.

  10. The “willing suspension of disbelief”, the phrase Coleridge coined in 1817, that is, still under the rule of the Suspension Act, that Gallagher reinterprets here has been utilized to interpret monetary representation: Brantlinger (1996, 78).

  11. This neglect of risk in the favor of political self-enjoyment, of course, proved to be very fragile. Partly because its psychology was maintained imaginatively: national propaganda, partly carried out by novelists, channeled the suspicion towards the Austrian money formerly in circulation into an enthusiasm about the new Hungarian money. And the monetary enthusiasm of this kind was never a free imaginative play: political and military forces brought it about and put an end to it.

  12. On recent attempts to radically undermine the reality-claim of economic analysis by a “rhetoric of economics” and the concurrent attempts to rescue economics’ “scientific realism”: Boylan and O’Gorman (1995), Mäki (2002).

  13. On the economics of deception: Akerlof and Shiller (2015).

References

  • Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2015). Phishing for phools: The economics of manipulation and deception. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bagehot, W. (1920). Lombard street: A description of the money market [1873]. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boylan, T. A., & O’Gorman, P. F. (1995). Beyond rhetoric and realism in economics. Towards a reformulation of economic methodology. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brantlinger, P. (1996). Fictions of state: Culture and credit in Britain, 1694–1994. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, P. (2005). Realist vision. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobbett, W. (2003). Paper against gold [1810]. In M. Poovey (Ed.), The financial system in nineteenth-century Britain (pp. 39–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, P. (2001). Romanticism, economics and the question of “culture”. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, C. (1999). Financial. In H. F. Tucker (Ed.), A companion to Victorian literature & culture (pp. 225–243). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Goede, M. (2005). Virtue, fortune, and faith. A genealogy of finance. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, A. (2013). Romanticism and the gold standard. Money, literature and economic debate in Britain 1790–1830. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, C. (2008). Dombey and son [1846–48]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiPiero, T. (1988). Buying into fiction. Diacritics, 18, 2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedgood, E. (2000). Victorian writing about risk. Imagining a safe England in a dangerous world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnier, R. (2000). The insatiability of human wants: Economics and aesthetics in market society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, C. (2000). The novel and other discourses of suspended disbelief. In C. Gallagher & S. Greenblatt (Eds.), Practicing new historicism (pp. 163–210). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, C. (2006a). The rise of fictionality. In F. Moretti (Ed.), The novel, volume 1: History, geography, and culture (pp. 336–363). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, C. (2006b). The body economic. Life, death, and sensation in political economy and the Victorian novel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goux, J.-J. (1994). The coiners of language (J. C. Gage, Trans.) [1984]. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

  • Goux, J.-J. (2001). Ideality, symbolicity, and reality in postmodern capitalism. In S. Cullenberg, J. Amariglio, & D. F. Ruccio (Eds.), Postmodernism, economics and knowledge (pp. 166–181). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. T. (2008). Money matters. Economics and the German cultural imagination, 1770–1850. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, J. (1995). Skin shows: Gothic horror and the technology of monsters. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helleiner, E. (2003). The making of national money. Territorial currencies in historical perspective. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, G. T. (2005). From Dickens to Dracula. Gothic, economics, and Victorian fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ingham, G. (2000). Babylonian madness: on the historical and sociological origins of money. In J. Smithin (Ed.), What is money? (pp. 16–41). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingrassia, C. (1998). Authorship, commerce, and gender in early eighteenth-century England: A culture of paper credit. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D. (1995). The business of common life: Novels and classical economics between revolution and reform. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keach, W. (1993). Romanticism and language. In S. Curran (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to British Romanticism (pp. 103–126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1973). A monetary theory of production [1933]. In E. Johnson & D. Moggridge (Eds.), The collected writings of John Maynard Keynes (Vol. XIII, pp. 408–411). London: Macmillan.

  • Klaver, C. C. (2003). A/Moral economics: Classical political economy & cultural autonomy in nineteenth-century England. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libbrecht, K. (2001). The real. In H. Glowinski, Z. M. Marks, & S. Murphy (Eds.), A compendium of lacanian terms (pp. 154–159). London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, D. (1998). The economy of character: Novels, market culture, and the business of inner meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäki, U. (Ed.). (2002). Fact and fiction in economics. Models, realism, and social construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1990). Capital (B. Fowkes, Trans.). (Vol. 1). London: Penguin.

  • Marx, K. (2012). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844 (M. Milligan, Trans.). New York: Dover Publications.

  • McGann, T. (2006). A fever of speculation: Narrating finance in the nineteenth-century novel. PhD-dissertation at Columbia University.

  • Meikle, S. (2000). Quality and quantity in economics: The metaphysical construction of the economic realm. New Literary History, 31, 247–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1909). Principles of political economy with some of their applications to social philosophy [1848] (III.7.8., III.7.9.). London: Longmans, Green. http://www.econlib.org/library/Mill/mlP36.html.

  • Nicholson, C. (1994). Writing and the rise of finance: Capital satires of the early eighteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poovey, M. (2002). Writing about finance in Victorian England: Disclosure and secrecy in the culture of investment. Victorian Studies, 45(1), 17–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poovey, M. (2005). Discriminating reading. Victorian Review, 31(2), 10–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poovey, M. (2008). Genres of the credit economy. Mediating value in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Britain. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (2006). History of economic analysis [1954]. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shell, M. (1982). Money, language, and thought: Literary and philosophical economies from the medieval to the modern era. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shell, M. (1999). The issue of representation. In M. Woodmansee & M. Osteen (Eds.), The new economic criticism. Studies at the intersection of literature and economics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, S. (1996). Finance and fictionality in the early eighteenth century: Accounting for Defoe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shonkwiler, A., & La Berge, L. C. (Eds.). (2014). Reading capitalist realism. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (2011). The philosophy of money. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithin, J. (2000). What is money? Introduction. In J. Smithin (Ed.), What is money? (pp. 1–15). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. (1996). Models of value: Eighteenth-century political economy and the novel. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van, A. (2006). Realism, speculation, and the gold standard in Harriet Martineau’s ‘Illustrations of political economy’. Victorian Literature and Culture, 34(1), 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, J. (1984). Money and fiction: Literary realism in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacks, R. (2012). Understanding jurisprudence: An introduction to legal theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, T. S. (2010). Financial speculation in Victorian fiction. Plotting money and the novel genre. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sándor Hites.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hites, S. On monetary and literary fictions. Neohelicon 43, 427–443 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-016-0354-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-016-0354-9

Keywords

Navigation