Skip to main content
Log in

Complex Network Phenomena in Telecommunication Systems

  • Published:
Networks and Spatial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many networks such as the Internet have been found to possess scale-free and small-world network properties reflected by power-law distributions. Scale-free properties evolve in large complex networks through self-organizing processes and, more specifically, preferential attachment. New nodes in a network tend to attach to other vertices that are already well-connected. Because traffic is routed mainly through a few highly connected and concentrated vertices, the diameter of the network is small in comparison to other network structures, and movement through the network is therefore efficient. At the same time, this efficiency feature puts scale-free networks at risk for becoming disconnected or significantly disrupted when super-connected nodes are removed, either unintentionally or through a targeted attack or external force.

The present paper will examine and compare properties of telecommunication networks for both the United States and Europe. Both types of networks will be examined in terms of their network topology and specifically, whether or not they are scale-free networks to be further explored by identifying and plotting power-law

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, R. and A.-L. Barabasi. (2000). “Topology of Evolving Networks.” Physical Review Letters 85, 5234–5237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, R. and A.-L. Barabasi. (2002). “Statistical Mechanics of Complex Networks.” Review of Modern Physics 74, 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. (1996). “Dynamic Industry Structure as Policy? Three Alliances and World Telecommunications.” In: A. Bianchi and G. Richeri, (Eds.) Telecommunication: New Dynamics and Driving Forces, Amsterdam, IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, L.A.N., A. Scala, M. Barthélémy, and H.E. Stanley. (2000). “Classes of Small-World Networks.” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11149–11152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderberg, M.R. (1973). Cluster Analysis for Applications. New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balbi, A. (2004). Banda larga: è boom in Italia e in Europa. www.repubblica.it. http://www.repubblica.it/2004/c/sezioni/scienza_e_tecnologia/bandalarga/bandalarga/bandalarga.html.

  • Ballou, R.H. (2004). Business Logistics / Supply Chain Management: Planning, Organizing, and Controlling the Supply Chain. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabasi, A.-L. (2001). The Physics of the Web. Physics World July 2001.

  • Barabasi, A.-L. (2002). Linked: the New Science of Network. New York, Perseus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabasi, A.-L. and R. Albert. (1999). “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks.” Science 286, 509–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthelemy, M. (2003). “Crossover from Scale-Free to Spatial Networks.” Europhysics Letters 63(6), 915–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, L., C. Doyle, J. Gual, L. Hultkrantz, D. Neven, L.-H. Róller, and L. Waverman. (1998). Europe's Network Industries: Conflicting Priorities. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research.

  • Bittlingmayer, G. and T.W. Hazlett. (2002). ‘The Political Economy of Cable ‘Open Access’. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Working Paper 01–06.

  • Bowen, J. (2002). “Network Change, Deregulation, and Access in the Global Airline Industry.” Economic Geography 78(4), 425–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave, M. and R.W. Crandall, Eds. (2001). Telecommunications Liberalization on Two Sides of the Atlantic. Washington, D.C., AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Q., C. Hyunseok, R. Govindan, J. Sugih, S. Schenker, and W. Willinger. (2001). The Origin of Power Laws in Internet Topologies Revisited. IEEE Infocom, 2002.

  • Crandall, R.W. (1997). Are Telecommunications Facilities “Infrastructure”? If They Are, So What? Regional Science and Urban Economics 27, 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist. (2003). Unfixing Fixed Wireless. http://www.economist.com/science/tq/displayStory.cfm?story_id=1620752.

  • El-Hamdouchi, A. and P. Willett. (1986). Hierarchic document classification using Ward's clustering method. Proceedings of The 9th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Pisa, Italy, ACM Press, New York, USA.

  • Erdos, P. and A. Renyi. (1960). On the Evolution of Random Graphs, Publication of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Science.

  • Garrison, W. (1968). “Connectivity of the Interstate Highway System.” In: B.J.L. Berry and D.F. Marble (Eds.), Spatial analysis; a reader in statistical geography, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, pp. 239–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, J. and E.L. Glaeser. (1998). “Information Technology and the Future of Cities.” Journal of Urban Economics 43, 136–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, A. and K. Robins. (1989). “Geographical Inequalities: The Spatial Bias of the New Communications Technologies.” Journal of Communication 39.

  • Gorman, S.P. (2002). The Network Advantage of Regions: The Case of the USA, Europe and China. School of Public Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, S.P. and R. Kulkarni. (2000). “The Networks of the Internet.” Telecommunications Policy 26, 113–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, S.P. and R. Kulkarni. (2004). “Spatial Small Worlds.” Environment & Planning B 31, 273–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggett, P. and R.J. Chorley. (1969). Network analysis in geography. New York, St. Martin's.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatigan, J.A. (1975). Clustering Algorithms. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepworth, M. (1987). Geography of the Information Economy. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • INA. (2004). Market Overview. Southeast Europe ICT Weekly Update, 23 January 2004. Thessaloniki.

  • Kalakota, R., P. Gundepudi, and J. Wareham. (2002). “The Economics of DSL Regulation.” Computer 35 (10).

  • Kansky, K. (1963). Structure of Transportation Networks: Relationships between Network Geometry and Regional Characteristics. University of Chicago, Department of Geography, Research papers.

  • Malecki, E.J. (2002). “The Economic Geography of the Internet's Infrastructure.” Economic Geography 78, 399–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malecki, E.J. and S.P. Gorman. (2001). “Maybe the Death of Distance but not the End of Geography.” In: S.D. Brunn and T.R. Leinbach (Eds.), The Worlds of Electronic Commerce, New York, John Wiley, pp. 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, M. (1998). “Technology and Cities.” Cityscape 3, 107–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, M.L. and A. Townsend. (2000). “The Internet Backbone and the American Metropolis.” The Information Society 16, 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2002). Information Technology Outlook 2002. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/63/60/1933354.pdf.

  • Oum, T.H., A. Zhang, and Y. Zhang. (1995). “Airline Network Rivalry.” Canadian Journal of Economics 28 (4a), 836–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxman, J. (1999). The FCC and the unregulation of the Internet. OPP Working Paper No. 31, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C.

  • Pehrsson, A. (2001). Strategy in Emerging Markets : Telecommunications Establishments in Europe. London; New York, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reggiani, A. and L.A. Schintler, Eds. (2005). Methods and Models in Transport and Communications. Cross Atlantic Perpectives. Berlin, Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi, S.M., J.P. Peerenboom, and T.K. Kelley. (2001). “Identifying, Understanding, and Analyzing Critical Infrastructure Interdependencies.” Control Systems Magazine 21(6), 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, J., A. Gillespie, and R. Richardson. (2004). “The Territoriality of pan-European Telecommunications Backbone Networks.” Journal of Urban Technology 11 (3).

  • Schiller, D. (1999). Digital Capitalism: Networking the Global Market System. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2002). Human Development Report 2002. New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinciguerra, S. (2005). Modelli di rete: sviluppi metodologici ed applicazioni empiriche con riferimento al settore delle telecomunicazioni, Degree Thesis, Faculty of Statistics, University of Bologna (in Italian, forthcoming).

  • Ward, J.H. (1963). “Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 58, 236–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D.J. and S.H. Strogatz. (1998). “Collective Dynamics of Small-World Networks.” Nature 363, 202–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojahn, O.W. (2001). “Airline Network Structure and the Gravity Model.” Transportation Research: Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 37(4), 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurie A. Schintler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schintler, L.A., Gorman, S.P., Reggiani, A. et al. Complex Network Phenomena in Telecommunication Systems. Netw Spat Econ 5, 351–370 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-005-6208-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-005-6208-z

Keywords

Navigation