Abstract
Many networks such as the Internet have been found to possess scale-free and small-world network properties reflected by power-law distributions. Scale-free properties evolve in large complex networks through self-organizing processes and, more specifically, preferential attachment. New nodes in a network tend to attach to other vertices that are already well-connected. Because traffic is routed mainly through a few highly connected and concentrated vertices, the diameter of the network is small in comparison to other network structures, and movement through the network is therefore efficient. At the same time, this efficiency feature puts scale-free networks at risk for becoming disconnected or significantly disrupted when super-connected nodes are removed, either unintentionally or through a targeted attack or external force.
The present paper will examine and compare properties of telecommunication networks for both the United States and Europe. Both types of networks will be examined in terms of their network topology and specifically, whether or not they are scale-free networks to be further explored by identifying and plotting power-law
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert, R. and A.-L. Barabasi. (2000). “Topology of Evolving Networks.” Physical Review Letters 85, 5234–5237.
Albert, R. and A.-L. Barabasi. (2002). “Statistical Mechanics of Complex Networks.” Review of Modern Physics 74, 47.
Allen, D. (1996). “Dynamic Industry Structure as Policy? Three Alliances and World Telecommunications.” In: A. Bianchi and G. Richeri, (Eds.) Telecommunication: New Dynamics and Driving Forces, Amsterdam, IOS Press.
Amaral, L.A.N., A. Scala, M. Barthélémy, and H.E. Stanley. (2000). “Classes of Small-World Networks.” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11149–11152.
Anderberg, M.R. (1973). Cluster Analysis for Applications. New York, Academic Press.
Balbi, A. (2004). Banda larga: è boom in Italia e in Europa. www.repubblica.it. http://www.repubblica.it/2004/c/sezioni/scienza_e_tecnologia/bandalarga/bandalarga/bandalarga.html.
Ballou, R.H. (2004). Business Logistics / Supply Chain Management: Planning, Organizing, and Controlling the Supply Chain. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Pearson Prentice Hall.
Barabasi, A.-L. (2001). The Physics of the Web. Physics World July 2001.
Barabasi, A.-L. (2002). Linked: the New Science of Network. New York, Perseus Publishing.
Barabasi, A.-L. and R. Albert. (1999). “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks.” Science 286, 509–512.
Barthelemy, M. (2003). “Crossover from Scale-Free to Spatial Networks.” Europhysics Letters 63(6), 915–921.
Bergman, L., C. Doyle, J. Gual, L. Hultkrantz, D. Neven, L.-H. Róller, and L. Waverman. (1998). Europe's Network Industries: Conflicting Priorities. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
Bittlingmayer, G. and T.W. Hazlett. (2002). ‘The Political Economy of Cable ‘Open Access’. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Working Paper 01–06.
Bowen, J. (2002). “Network Change, Deregulation, and Access in the Global Airline Industry.” Economic Geography 78(4), 425–439.
Cave, M. and R.W. Crandall, Eds. (2001). Telecommunications Liberalization on Two Sides of the Atlantic. Washington, D.C., AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.
Chen, Q., C. Hyunseok, R. Govindan, J. Sugih, S. Schenker, and W. Willinger. (2001). The Origin of Power Laws in Internet Topologies Revisited. IEEE Infocom, 2002.
Crandall, R.W. (1997). Are Telecommunications Facilities “Infrastructure”? If They Are, So What? Regional Science and Urban Economics 27, 161–179.
Economist. (2003). Unfixing Fixed Wireless. http://www.economist.com/science/tq/displayStory.cfm?story_id=1620752.
El-Hamdouchi, A. and P. Willett. (1986). Hierarchic document classification using Ward's clustering method. Proceedings of The 9th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Pisa, Italy, ACM Press, New York, USA.
Erdos, P. and A. Renyi. (1960). On the Evolution of Random Graphs, Publication of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Science.
Garrison, W. (1968). “Connectivity of the Interstate Highway System.” In: B.J.L. Berry and D.F. Marble (Eds.), Spatial analysis; a reader in statistical geography, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, pp. 239–249.
Gasper, J. and E.L. Glaeser. (1998). “Information Technology and the Future of Cities.” Journal of Urban Economics 43, 136–156.
Gillespie, A. and K. Robins. (1989). “Geographical Inequalities: The Spatial Bias of the New Communications Technologies.” Journal of Communication 39.
Gorman, S.P. (2002). The Network Advantage of Regions: The Case of the USA, Europe and China. School of Public Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
Gorman, S.P. and R. Kulkarni. (2000). “The Networks of the Internet.” Telecommunications Policy 26, 113–134.
Gorman, S.P. and R. Kulkarni. (2004). “Spatial Small Worlds.” Environment & Planning B 31, 273–296.
Haggett, P. and R.J. Chorley. (1969). Network analysis in geography. New York, St. Martin's.
Hatigan, J.A. (1975). Clustering Algorithms. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Hepworth, M. (1987). Geography of the Information Economy. New York: Guilford Press.
INA. (2004). Market Overview. Southeast Europe ICT Weekly Update, 23 January 2004. Thessaloniki.
Kalakota, R., P. Gundepudi, and J. Wareham. (2002). “The Economics of DSL Regulation.” Computer 35 (10).
Kansky, K. (1963). Structure of Transportation Networks: Relationships between Network Geometry and Regional Characteristics. University of Chicago, Department of Geography, Research papers.
Malecki, E.J. (2002). “The Economic Geography of the Internet's Infrastructure.” Economic Geography 78, 399–424.
Malecki, E.J. and S.P. Gorman. (2001). “Maybe the Death of Distance but not the End of Geography.” In: S.D. Brunn and T.R. Leinbach (Eds.), The Worlds of Electronic Commerce, New York, John Wiley, pp. 87–105.
Moss, M. (1998). “Technology and Cities.” Cityscape 3, 107–127.
Moss, M.L. and A. Townsend. (2000). “The Internet Backbone and the American Metropolis.” The Information Society 16, 35–47.
OECD. (2002). Information Technology Outlook 2002. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/63/60/1933354.pdf.
Oum, T.H., A. Zhang, and Y. Zhang. (1995). “Airline Network Rivalry.” Canadian Journal of Economics 28 (4a), 836–857.
Oxman, J. (1999). The FCC and the unregulation of the Internet. OPP Working Paper No. 31, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C.
Pehrsson, A. (2001). Strategy in Emerging Markets : Telecommunications Establishments in Europe. London; New York, Routledge.
Reggiani, A. and L.A. Schintler, Eds. (2005). Methods and Models in Transport and Communications. Cross Atlantic Perpectives. Berlin, Springer Verlag.
Rinaldi, S.M., J.P. Peerenboom, and T.K. Kelley. (2001). “Identifying, Understanding, and Analyzing Critical Infrastructure Interdependencies.” Control Systems Magazine 21(6), 11–25.
Rutherford, J., A. Gillespie, and R. Richardson. (2004). “The Territoriality of pan-European Telecommunications Backbone Networks.” Journal of Urban Technology 11 (3).
Schiller, D. (1999). Digital Capitalism: Networking the Global Market System. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
UNDP. (2002). Human Development Report 2002. New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Vinciguerra, S. (2005). Modelli di rete: sviluppi metodologici ed applicazioni empiriche con riferimento al settore delle telecomunicazioni, Degree Thesis, Faculty of Statistics, University of Bologna (in Italian, forthcoming).
Ward, J.H. (1963). “Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 58, 236–244.
Watts, D.J. and S.H. Strogatz. (1998). “Collective Dynamics of Small-World Networks.” Nature 363, 202–204.
Wojahn, O.W. (2001). “Airline Network Structure and the Gravity Model.” Transportation Research: Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 37(4), 267–279.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schintler, L.A., Gorman, S.P., Reggiani, A. et al. Complex Network Phenomena in Telecommunication Systems. Netw Spat Econ 5, 351–370 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-005-6208-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-005-6208-z