Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A qualitative Natech damage scale for the impact of floods on selected industrial facilities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that natural disasters can trigger technological accidents and damage. These so-called Natech accidents can pose a significant risk to regions that are unprepared for responding to them. The European Commission’s Joint Research Centre has recognised the risk associated with Natech events and has started systematic research into Natechs and their underlying dynamics. This work investigates the risk associated with the flooding of industrial installations through an analysis of past case histories and using expert judgement. The potential impact of three levels of flood severity on selected industrial facilities storing and/or processing (eco-)toxic, flammable or explosive materials is analysed qualitatively and a scale is developed that links the flood intensity to the level of potential damage. Our analysis indicates that natural disasters have the potential for triggering hazmat releases and other types of technological accidents. Hence, natural disasters should be considered as separate accident-triggering events in the planning, design and operating stages of industrial facilities that process or store hazardous substances. Our work revealed a lack of detailed information on the occurrence of Natech events which indicates not necessarily a scarcity of Natechs but rather a lack of standardised reporting and record keeping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ARIA (2006) Analyse, Recherche et Information sur les Accidents. French Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable Development. http://www.aria.ecologie.gouv.fr/barpi_635.jsp. Cited 14 November 2006

  • Benckert A, Eurenius J (2001) Tailings dam constructions. In: Seminar on safe tailings dam constructions, Gällivare, Sweden, 20–21 September 2001

  • Benfield Hazard Research Centre (2004) Climate Change 2004. Technical Paper 02, University College London

  • Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières France (2001) Management of mining, quarrying and ore-processing waste in the European Union. BRGM/RP-50319-FR

  • Chang JI, Lin C-C (2006) A study of storage tank accidents. J Loss Prev 19:51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christou M, Porter S (eds) (1999) Guidance on land-use planning as required by Council Directive 96/82/EC (Seveso II). Report EUR 18695 EN, European Communities

  • Cruz AM, Steinberg LJ, Luna R (2001) Identifying hurricane-induced hazardous material release scenarios in a petroleum refinery. Nat Hazards Rev 2(4):203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz AM et al (2004) State of the art in Natech risk management. Report EUR 21292 EN, European Communities

  • Cruz AM, Steinberg LJ, Vetere Arellano AL (2006) Emerging issues for Natech disaster risk management in Europe. J Risk Res 9(5):483–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danihelka P (2006) Technological disasters triggered by natural events—case studies in Czech Republic. Paper presented at the General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union 2006, Vienna, Austria, 2–7 April 2006

  • European Fertiliser Manufacturer’s Association (2000) Best available techniques for pollution prevention and control in the European fertiliser industry. Booklet Nos. 1–8, Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (1997) Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances. Official J of the European Communities L10

  • European Union (2003) Directive 2003/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2003 amending Council Directive 96/82/EC. Official J of the European Communities L345/97

  • Explosives Incidents Database Advisory Service (EIDAS) (2006) Health and Safety Executive, United Kingdom. http://www.hse.gov.uk/explosives/eidas.htm. Cited 30 October 2006

  • Fabbri L, Struckl M, Wood M (eds) (2005) Guidance on the preparation of a safety report to meet the requirements of Directive 96/82/EC as amended by Directive 2003/105/EC (Seveso II), Report EUR 22113 EN, European Communities

  • French Ministry of the Environment (2005) The impact of floods on Seveso establishments—series of events from 1993 to 2003. http://www.ec.europa.eu/environment/impel/pdf/lesson/fiche16.pdf. Cited 24 October 2006

  • Guillande R, Buton JM (2006) Damage assessment based on damage intensity scales—forest fires and floods—product specifications (version 2). Project report PREVIEW-D7200–2-SPE-GSC-001-02

  • Health and Safety Executive (2002) Controlling risks around explosive stores: review of the requirements on separation distances, Crown Copyright

  • Health and Safety Executive (2005) The manufacture and storage of explosives regulations 2005. Statutory instrument 2005 No. 1082. http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2005/20051082.htm. Cited 30 October 2006

  • Hickey JT, Salas JD (1995) Environmental effects of extreme floods. Paper presented at the US–Italy workshop on the hydrometeorology, impacts, and management of extreme floods, Perugia, Italy, 13–17 November 1995

  • International Commission on Large Dams (2001) Tailings dams, risk of dangerous occurrences—lessons learnt from practical experiences. Bulletin 121

  • Krausmann E, Mushtaq F (2006) A methodology for learning lessons–experiences at the European level. In: Birkmann J (ed) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards—towards disaster resilient societies, United Nations University Press

  • Major Accident Reporting System (MARS) (2006) European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen, Major Accident Hazards Bureau. http://mahbsrv.jrc.it/. Cited 29 August 2006

  • Mara S (2004) Lessons learnt from the Baia Mare cyanide spill (January 30, 2000, North-Western Romania). In: Arrelano Vetere AL et al. (eds) Proceedings of the NEDIES workshop on analysis of Natech (natural hazard triggering technological disasters) disaster management, Ispra, Italy, 20–21 October 2003

  • Mannan S (eds) (2005) Lees’ loss prevention in the process industries—hazard identification, assessment and control, vol 2, 3rd edn. Elsevier Butterworth–Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mileti DS (1999) Disasters by design: a reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchison N, Porter S (eds) (1998) Guidelines on a major accident prevention policy and safety management system as required by Council Directive 96/82/EC (Seveso II). Report EUR 18123 EN, European Communities

  • Morgenstern NR (2001) Geotechnics and mine waste management—update. In: Seminar on safe tailings dam constructions, Gällivare, Sweden, 20–21 September 2001, Technical Papers, Swedish Mining Association, Naturvårdsverket, European Commission

  • Munich Re Group (2006) Topics geo—Annual review: natural catastrophes 2005. Munich

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2006) OECD studies in risk management—Italy—industrial hazards triggered by floods. Available from www.oecd.org. Cited 27 September 2006

  • Sales J, Mushtaq F, Christou MD, Nomen R (2007) Study of major accidents involving chemical reactive substances: analysis and lessons learned. Trans IChemE 85(B3):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Scawthorn C, Flores P, Blais N, Seligson H, Tate E, Chang S, Mifflin E, Thomas W, Murphy J, Jones C, Lawrence M (2006) HAZUS-MH flood loss estimation methodology. II. Damage and loss assessment. Nat Hazards Rev 7(2):72–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengül H, Steinberg LJ, Cruz AM (2006) Oil spills and hazardous material releases from industrial facilities due to Hurricane Katrina, Paper presented at the 6th annual IIASA-DPRI forum on disaster risk management: risks and challenges for business and industry, Istanbul, Turkey, 13–17 August, 2006

  • Showalter PS, Myers MF (1994) Natural disasters in the United States as release agents of oil, chemicals, or radiological materials between 1980–9: analysis and recommendations. Risk Anal 14(2):169–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon GM, Rotkin-Ellman M (2006) Contaminants in New Orleans sediment—an analysis of EPA data. Natural Resources Defense Council, February 2006

  • The Accident Database (2004) Version 4.1, Institution of Chemical Engineers (ICHEME), United Kindgdom

  • United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (2006) Morocco—Floods OCHA Situation Report No. 1. Available from http://www.reliefweb.int. Cited 27 March 2006

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (1994) Design and evaluation of tailings dams. Technical Report EPA 530-R-94–038

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (2006) Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program. http://www.epa.gov/tri/. Cited 26 October 2006

  • United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2006) Petroleum refining processes, OSHA Technical Manual, Section IV, Chapter 2. Available from http://www.osha.gov. Cited 27 March 2006

  • Vallee A, Dolladille O (2003) Analyse des risques et prévention des accidents majeurs (DRA-34), Impact des inundations du Sud-Est (septembre 2002) sur les activités présentant un risque technologique. Institut national de l’environnement industriel et des risques (INERIS), INERIS Report DRA-2003-AVa/ODo-46054, December 2003

  • World Bank Group (1999) Pollution prevention and abatement handbook 1998: toward cleaner production. World Bank Group Report 19128

  • Young S, Balluz L, Malilay J (2004) Natural and technologic hazardous material releases during and after natural disasters: a review. Sci Tot Env 322: 3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Part of this work was undertaken as JRC contribution to the European 6th Framework Programme Integrated Project PREVIEW (Prevention, Information and Early Warning).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen, TP 670, 21020, Ispra (VA), Italy

    Elisabeth Krausmann & Fesil Mushtaq

Authors
  1. Elisabeth Krausmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fesil Mushtaq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth Krausmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krausmann, E., Mushtaq, F. A qualitative Natech damage scale for the impact of floods on selected industrial facilities. Nat Hazards 46, 179–197 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9203-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9203-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation