Skip to main content
Log in

First-order regional seismotectonic model for South Africa

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A first-order seismotectonic model was created for South Africa. This was done using four logical steps: geoscientific data collection, characterisation, assimilation and zonation. Through the definition of subunits of concentrations of earthquake foci and large neotectonic and structural domains, seismotectonic structures, systems and domains were created. Relatively larger controls of seismicity exist between the Great Escarpment and the coast. In the south, this region is characterised by large aeromagnetic anomalies and large EW trending faults. In the west, it is characterised by the NW–SE trending Wegener stress anomaly, radial-trending dykes and earthquake clusters. In the east, it is characterised by a large neotectonic domain where several large historical earthquakes occurred. In the centre of South Africa, several clusters of earthquake activity are found, often related to mining activity. Further north, seismicity is related to both mining activity and neotectonic deformation. This work contributes to the development of a seismotectonic model for South Africa by (1) bringing together, digitally, several data sets in a common GIS platform (geology, geophysics, stress, seismicity, neotectonics, topography, crustal and mantle structure and anisotropy), (2) understanding the significance of data sets for seismotectonic zonation and limitations thereof and (3) obtaining a reasonable regional model for use in seismic hazard assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreoli MAG, Doucoure M, Van Bever Donker J, Brandt D, Andersen NJB (1996) Neotectonics of southern Africa: a review. Afr Geosci Rev 3:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker A (2004) Proceedings of the landslides and seismicity course, Geoscience Africa. University of the Witwatersrand

  • Bird P, Ben-Avraham Z, Schubert G, Andreoli M, Viola G (2006) Patterns of stress and strain rate in southern Africa. J Geophys Res 111:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell DH, Thomas RJ, Moen HFG, Reid DL, Moore JM, Gibson RL (2006) The Namaqua-Natal Province. In: Johnson MR, Anhaeusser CR, Thomas RJ (eds) The geology of South Africa. Geological Society of South Africa, Johannesburg/Council for Geoscience, Pretoria, pp 325–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis J (2002) Recommended criteria for delineating seismic hazard zones in California. Department of Conservation Guideline 118

  • Eglington BM, Armstrong RA (2004) The Kaapvaal Craton and adjacent orogens, southern Africa: a geochronological database and overview of the geological development of the Craton. S Afr J Geol 107:13–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdik M, Alpay Biro Y, Onur T, Sesetyan K and Birgoren G (1991) Assessment of earthquake hazard in Turkey and neighboring regions. The Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program. Retrieved from http://kandilli.koc.net/gshap.html, 1999

  • Fouch MJ, James DE, VanDecar JC, Van Der Lee S, Kaapvaal Seismic Group (2004) Mantle seismic structure beneath the Kaapvaal and Zimbabwe cratons. S Afr J Geol 107:33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasperini P, Bernardini F, Valensise G, Boschi E (1998) Defining seismogenic sources from historical earthquake felt reports. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89(1):94–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez DV, Skipp BO (1980) Hazard mapping in risk evaluation for engineering structures. Bull Int As Eng Geol 21:118–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattingh J, Goedhart ML (1997) Neotectonic control on drainage evolution in the Algoa basin, Eastern Cape. S Afr J Geol 100(1):43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks EC, Bungum H, Linholm CD (2000) Seismic activity, inferred crustal stresses and seismotectonics in the Rana region, Northern Norway. Quat Sci Rev 19:1423–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill RS (1988) Quarternary faulting in the south-eastern Cape Province. S Afr J Geol 91:399–403

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (2002) Safety standards series, NS-G-3.3. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram B (2008) The seismotectonic map of africa (SeTMA) project, second progress report. Council for Geoscience, Report No: 2008–0201

  • James DE, Fouch MJ, VanDecar JC, van der Lee S, Kaapvaal Seismic Group (2001) Tectospheric structure beneath southern Africa. Geophys Res Lett 28:2485–2488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston AC (1996) Seismic moment assessment of earthquakes in stable continental regions—I. Instrumental seismicity. Geophys J Int 124:381–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent LE (1981) The thermal springs of south-eastern Transvaal and northern Natal. Ann Geol Surv S Afr 15:51–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Meletti C, Patacca E, Scandone P (2000) Construction of a seismotectonic model: the case of Italy. Pure Appl Geophys 157:11–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty WK, Walling MY (2008) First order seismic microzonation of Haldia, Bengal Basin (India) using a GIS platform. Pure Appl Geophys 165:1325–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguuri T, Gore J, James DE, Webb SJ, Wright C, Zengeni TG, Gwavava O, Snoke A, Kaapvaal Seismic Group (2001) Crustal structure beneath southern Africa and its implications for the formation and evolution of the Kaapvaal and Zimbabwe cratons. Geophys Res Lett 28(13):2501–2504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinecker J, Heidbach O, Tingay M, Connolly P and Muller B (2004) The 2004 release of the World Stress Map, World Stress Map Project. (Available online at www.world-stress-map.org)

  • Schlüter T (2006) Geological atlas of Africa, with notes on stratigraphy, tectonics, economic geology, geohazards and geosites of each country. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver PG, Fouch M, Gao S, Schmitz M (2004) Seismic anisotropy, mantle fabric, and the magmatic evolution of Precambrian southern Africa. S Afr J Geol 107:45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh M, Hattingh E (2009) Collection of isoseismal maps for South Africa. Nat Hazards 50:403–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh M, Kijko A, Durrheim R (2009) Seismotectonic models for South Africa. Synthesis of geoscientific information, problems and way forward. Seismol Res Lett 80:70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperner B, Müller B, Heidbach O, Delvaux D, Reinecker J, Fuchs K (2003) Tectonic stress in the earth’s crust: advances in the World Stress Map Project. In: Nieuwland D (ed) New insights in structural interpretation and modelling. Geological Society Special Publication 212, London, pp 101–116

  • Terrier M, Blès JL, Godefroy P, Dominique M, Bour M, Martin C (2000) Zonation of metropolitan France for the application of earthquake-resistant building regulations to critical facilities. Part 1: seismotectonic zonation. J Seismol 4:215–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer S (2001) A software package to analyse seismicity: ZMAP. Seismol Res Lett 3:373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson MGC (2005) Simplified geology, selected mines and mineral deposits-South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Council for Geoscience, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoback MD, Zoback ML (1991) Tectonic stress field of North America and relative plate motions. In: Slemmons DB, Engdahl ER, Zoback MD, Blackwell DD (eds) Neotectonics of North America decade map, vol I. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 339–366

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work forms part of a M.Sc. dissertation at the University of Witwatersrand and is funded by the Council for Geoscience (CGS) and the National Research Foundation as part of the Africa Array Project. Prof. Artur Cichowicz is thanked for his encouragement and ongoing mentorship. The manager of the Seismology Unit of the Council for Geoscience, Michelle Grobbelaar, is thanked for her continued support. The Council for Geoscience supplied the base data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mayshree Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, M., Kijko, A. & Durrheim, R. First-order regional seismotectonic model for South Africa. Nat Hazards 59, 383–400 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9762-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9762-3

Keywords

Navigation