Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrated risk assessment of multi-hazards in China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Maps of population exposure, vulnerability and risk to natural hazards are useful tools for designing and implementing disaster risk mitigation programs in China. The ranking of provinces by relative risk to natural hazards would provide a metric for prioritizing risk management strategies. Using provinces as our study unit, from the perspectives of hazard exposure, susceptibility, coping capacity and adaptive capacity, this study first constructed China’s disaster risk index for five types of major natural hazards: earthquakes, floods, droughts, low temperatures/snow and gale/hail. Then, the relative risk level at the provincial scale in China was assessed. Finally, the hotspots with the highest hazard exposure, vulnerability and risk were identified. The results showed that high exposure was a significant risk driver in China, whereas high vulnerability, especially social vulnerability, amplified the risk levels. Similar to the population exposure to disasters, the relative risk levels in the southwestern, central and northeastern regions of China were significantly higher than those in the eastern, northern and western regions. The high-risk regions or hotspots of multi-hazards were concentrated in southern China (less-developed regions), while the low-risk regions were mainly distributed in the eastern coastal areas (well-developed regions). Furthermore, a nonlinear relationship existed between the disaster risk level and poverty incidence as well as per capita GDP, demonstrating that disaster losses in middle-income areas are likely to increase if economic policies are not modified to account for the rising disaster risk. These findings further indicated that research on disaster risk should focus not only on hazards and exposure but also on the vulnerability to natural disasters. Thus, reducing vulnerability and population exposure to natural hazards would be an effective measure in mitigating the disaster risk at hotspots in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The five types of natural hazards accounted for 91.75, 97.22 and 90.51 % of the affected population, death toll and direct economic losses, respectively, in China for the period of 2002–2011 (MCAC 2012).

  2. The eastern region of China includes Liaoning, Hebei, Beijing, Tianjin, Shangdong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shanghai, Fujian, Guangdong and Hainan; the western region includes Shannxi, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, Xinjiang, Sichuan, Chongqing, Yunnan, Guizhou, Guangxi and Tibet; and the central region are Shanxi, Jilin, Heilongjiang, Inner Mongolia, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henai, Hubei and Hunan.

  3. Ecological footprint is a negative indicator in terms of capacity for adaptation. The higher the value of ecological footprint, the more resource the human required, which results in more serious impacts on ecology and environment. Therefore, the value of ecological footprint was multiplied by a negative one when calculating the adaptive capacity index.

References

  • Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: Are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24(3):347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16(3):268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Rckstrom J (2005) Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science 309:1036–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

  • Alliance Development Works (2012) Environmental degradation and disasters: World Risk Report 2012. Alliance Development Works, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold M, Chen RS, Deichmann U, Dilley M, Lerner-Lam AL, Pullen RE, Trohanis Z (2006) Natural disasters hotspots case studies. Disaster risk management series no. 6. The World Bank Hazard Management Unit, Washington, DC

  • Bell R, Glade T (2004) Multi-hazard analysis in natural risk assessments. Risk Anal 9:197–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann J (2006) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University Press, Tokyo

  • Birkmann J (2007) Risk and vulnerability indicators at different scales: applicability, usefulness and policy implications. Environ Hazards 7(1):20–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann J (2011) Regulation and coupling of society and nature in the context of natural hazards. In: Brauch HG, Oswald Spring U, Mesjasz C, Grin J, Kameri-Mbote P, Chourou B, Dunay P, Birkmann J (eds) Coping with global environmental change, disasters and security. Springer, Berlin, pp 1103–1127

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann J, Welle T, Krause D, Wolfertz J, Catalina S, Neysa S (2011a) World Risk Index: concept and results. In: World Risk Report 2011. Alliance Development Works, pp 13–42. ISBN 978-3-9814495-1-8

  • Birkmann J, Cardona OD, Carreno ML, Barbat AH, Barbat AH, Pelling M, Schneiderbauer S, Kienberger S, Keiler M, Alexander D, Zeil P, Welle T (2013) Framing vulnerability, risk and societal response: the MOVE framework. Nat Hazards 67(2):193–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borden KA, Schmidtlein MC, Emrich CT, Piegorsch WW, Cutter SL (2007) Vulnerability of US cities to environmental hazards. J Homel Secur 4(2):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardona OD (2011) Disaster risk and vulnerability: notions and measurement of human and environmental insecurity. In: Brauch HG, Oswald Spring U, Mesjasz C, Grin J, Kameri-Mbote P, Chourou B, Dunay P, Birkmann J (eds) Coping with global environmental change, disasters and security—threats, challenges, vulnerabilities and risks. Springer, Berlin, pp 107–122

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Finch C (2008) Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(7):2301–2306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das S, Vincent J (2009) Mangroves protected villages and reduced death toll during Indian super cyclone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(18):7357–7360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilley M, Chen RS, Deichmann U, Lerner-Lam AL, Arnold M, Agwe J, Buys P, Kjekstad O, Lyon B, Yetman G (2005) Natural disaster hotspots: a global risk analysis, Synthesis Report. Center for Hazards & Risk Research at Columbia University

  • Dong B, Torgler B (2013) Causes of corruption: evidence from China. China Econ Rev 26:152–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs S, Keiler M, Sokratov SA (2013) Spatiotemporal dynamics: the need for an innovative approach in mountain hazard risk management. Nat Hazards 68(3):1217–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao JM, Zhang W, Yang J (2011) Study on Shaanxi provincial total expenditure on health’s financing level and proportion. Chin Health Econ 30(5):19–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge L, Xie G, Zhang C, Li S, Qi Y, Cao S, He T (2011) An evaluation of China’s water footprint. Water Resour Manag 25:2633–2647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New York

  • Kaiser W (1974) The spectral sensitivity of the honeybee’s optomotor walking response. J Comp Physiol A 90(4):405–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappes M, Keiler M, von Elverfeldt K, Glade T (2012) Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review. Nat Hazards 64(2):1925–1958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellenberg D, Mobark A (2007) Does rising income increase or decrease damage risk from natural disasters? J Urban Econ 63(3):788–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keys N, Bussey M, Thomsen DC, Lynam T, Simth TF (2014) Building adaptive capacity in South East Queensland, Australia. Reg Environ Change 14:501–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner-Lam A (2007) Assessing global exposure to natural hazards: progress and future trends. Environ Hazards 7(1):10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li KM (2011) Yearbook of China’s Insurance 2007–2011. China Insurance Yearbook Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnerooth-Bayer J, Amendola A, Okada N, Shi P (2007) Disaster risk management: pro-active financing to reduce vulnerability. Environ Hazards 7(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Dong S, Mao Q (2012) Comprehensive evaluation of the water resources carrying capacity for China. Geogr Nat Resour 33(1):92–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CP, Zeng Y, Huang X, Zhou H, Wu L, Li GG (2013) Financing level and structure of total health expenditure in Hainan province. Chin Health Econ 32(2):54–56 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo WC, Tsao TC, Hus CH (2012) Building vulnerability to debris flows in Taiwan: a preliminary study. Nat Hazards 64(3):2107–2128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Civil Affairs of China (MCAC) (2012) China civil affairs’ statistical yearbook 1981–2012. China Statistics Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education of China (MEC) (2011) Educational development statistics bulletin for 31 provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions 2011. (http://www.moe.gov.cn) (in Chinese)

  • Ministry of Health of China (MHC) (2011) China health statistics yearbook. China Union Medical University Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell T, Mechler R, Harris K (2012) Tackling exposure: placing disaster risk management at the heart of national economic and fiscal policy. Climate and Development Knowledge Network, London

  • Næss L, Bang O, Eriksen S, Vevatne J (2005) Institutional adaptation to climate change: flood responses at the municipal level in Norway. Glob Environ Change 15(2):125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation (NASMG) (2013) Disaster statistics for 2008–2011, 2013. http://zaiqing.casm.ac.cn. Access date: 20 Aug 2013) (in Chinese)

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC) (2011) China statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics Research Institute (NBSRI) (2011) Regional Comprehensive Development Index Report 2010. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjfx/fxbg/t20111222_402774765.htm (in Chinese)

  • National Survey Research Center at Renmin University of China (NSRCRUC) (2012) Renmin University-China Development Index (RCDI). http://www.nsrcruc.org/index/rcdi (in Chinese)

  • Papathoma-Köhle M, Kappes M, Keiler M, Glade T (2011) Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards: state of the art and future needs. Nat Hazards 58(2):645–680

  • Peduzzi P, Dao H, Herold C, Mouton F (2009) Assessing global exposure and vulnerability towards natural hazards: the Disaster Risk Index. Nat Hazard Earth Syst 9(4):1149–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Population and Employment Statistics Division of National Bureau of Statistics (PESDNBS) (2011) China population & employment statistics yearbook 2000–2011. China Statistics Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Raschky PA (2008) Institutions and the losses from natural disasters. Nat Hazard Earth Syst 8(4):627–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers D, Tsirkunov V (2010) Costs and benefits of early warning systems. Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction and World Bank, Geneva, Switzerland and Washington, DC

  • Rural Socioeconomic Investigation Division of National Bureau of China (RSIDNBC) (2011) China rural statistical yearbook 2006–2011. China Statistics Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtlein MC, Deutsch RC, Piegorsch WW, Cutter SL (2008) A sensitivity analysis of the social vulnerability index. Risk Anal 28(4):1099–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher I, Strobl E (2008) Economic development and losses due to natural disasters: the role of risk. Work. Pap. hal-00356286, Dep. Econ., E´ c. Polytech

  • Shi P (2011) Atlas of natural disaster risks of China. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y, Wang RS, Huang JL (2012) An analysis of the spatial and temporal changes in Chinese terrestrial ecosystem service functions. Chin Sci Bull 57(17):2120–2131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16(3):282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Pilifosova O, Burton I, Challenger B, Huq S, Klein RJT, Yohe G, Adger N, Downing T, Harvey E, Kane S, Parry M, Skinner M, Smith J, Wandel J (2001) Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity. In: McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

  • State Census Office, National Bureau of Statistics of China (SCO) (2011) Tabulation the 2010 population census of the Peoples Republic of China. China Statistics Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • State Council Leading Group Office (SCLGO) (2010) China’s second national agricultural census data compilation. China Statistics Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Strunz G, Post J, Zosseder K, Wegscheider S, Muck M, Riedlinger T, Mehl H, Dech S, Birkmann J, Gebert N, Harjono H, Anwar HZ, Sumaryono Khomarudin RM, Muhari A (2011) Tsunami risk assessment in Indonesia. Nat Hazard Earth Syst 11:67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun C, Chen S, Zhao S (2013) Spatial correlation pattern analysis of water footprint intensity based on ESDA model at provincial scale in China. J Nat Resour 28(4):571–582 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) (2010) Procuratorial yearbook of China 1989–2010. Chinese Procuratorate Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian WM (2012) Provincial income Gini coefficient estimates change and trend analysis. Econ Sci 2:48–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsao TC, Hsu WK, Cheng CT, Lo WC, Chen CY, Chang YL, Ju JP (2010) A preliminary study of debris flow risk estimation and management in Taiwan. In: Chen S-C (ed) Internationales Symposion Interpraevent in the Pacific Rim—Taipei. Internationales Forschungsgesellschaft Interpraevent, Klagenfurt, pp 930–939

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Schiller A (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8074–8079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO-IOC (2009) Hazard awareness and risk mitigation in Integrated Coastal Management (ICAM), IOC Manuals and Guides. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2004) Reducing disaster risk. A challenge for development. A global report, UNDP, Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery (BRCP), New York. http://www.undp.org/bcpr/disred/rdr.htm

  • United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) (2004) Living with risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives, vol 1. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) (2009) Terminology on disaster risk reduction. UNISDR, Geneva, Switzerland

  • United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) (2011) Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction: revealing risk, redefining development. Geneva, pp 178. www.preventionweb.net/gar

  • Wang YX, Mu YY (2009) The practice and adjustment of China’s agricultural subsidies since entered WTO. Chin Agric Sci Bull 25(6):278–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Shi P, Zhu J (1994) A research on regional distribution of major natural hazards in China. J Geogr Sci 49(1):19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Shi P, Wang P, Wang Y (2006) Spatio-temporal pattern of natural disasters in China. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang LN, Jin CL, Li F, Lin H (2012a) Analysis on the provider distribution of Shanghai total expenditure on health. Chin Health Econ 31(11):11–14 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Song Y, Liu J, Wang J (2012b) Exploring the anthropogenic driving forces of China’s provincial environmental impacts. Int J Sustain Dev World 19(5):442–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Liao C, Yang S, Zhao W, Liu M, Shi P (2012c) Are people willing to buy natural disaster insurance in China? Risk awareness, insurance acceptance, and willingness to pay. Risk Anal 32(10):1717–1740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao LH, Lei HC (2012) Approach on rapid calculation of provincial total health expenditure and its application. Chin Health Econ 31(5):14–19 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Li N, Wu W, Wu J, Gu X, Ji Z (2013) Exploring the characteristics of major natural disasters in China and their impacts during the past decades. Nat Hazards 69(1):829–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Li N, Wu W, Shi P (2014a) Local spatial and temporal factors influencing population and societal vulnerability to natural disasters. Risk Anal 34(4):614–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Li N, Wu W, Liu H, Wang L, Liu G, Wu J (2014b) Socioeconomic development and the impact of natural disasters: some empirical evidences from China. Nat Hazards 74:541–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (2012CB955402) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (41130748). The authors would like to acknowledge anonymous reviewers for their useful comments which have greatly improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ning Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Liu, Y., Wu, W. et al. Integrated risk assessment of multi-hazards in China. Nat Hazards 78, 257–280 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1713-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1713-y

Keywords

Navigation