Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of seismic hazard and potential of earthquake-induced landslides of the Nilgiris, India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Nilgiris district in the Tamilnadu state of India is frequented by many landslides in the recent past. Though many of these landslides are rainfall-induced, there is a need to evaluate the potential of earthquake-induced landslides considering seismicity of the region. In this paper, deterministic seismic hazard of Nilgiris is carried out by considering a study area of 350 km radius around Nilgiris. Seismotectonic map of the Nilgiris, showing the details of faults and past earthquakes, is prepared. The peak ground acceleration (PGA) at bed rock level and response spectrum are evaluated. The potential sources for Nilgiris are Moyar and Bhavani shears. The PGA at bed rock level is 0.156 g corresponding to maximum considered earthquake 6.8. Ground response analysis for seven sites, in the Nilgiris, is carried out by one-dimensional equivalent linear method using SHAKE 2000 program after considering the effect of topography. PGA of surface motion got amplified to 0.64 g in Coonoor site and 0.44 g in Ooty site compared to 0.39 g of the input motion. The bracketed duration of time history of surface acceleration has increased to 20 s in Coonoor site and 18 s in Ooty site compared to that of 8 s of input motion. Results from seismic displacement analysis using Newmark’s method revealed that out of seven sites investigated, five sites have moderate seismic landslide hazard and two sites (Coonoor and Ooty) have high hazard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anbazhagan P, Vinod JS, Sitharam TG (2009) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Bangalore. Nat Hazards 48:145–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbazhagan P, Parihar A, Rashmi HN (2012) Review of correlations between SPT N and shear modulus: a new correlation applicable to any region. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 36:52–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansal A (2004) Recent advances in earthquake geotechnical engineering and microzonation. Kluwer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ArcGIS 9 Geographic information system (GIS) for working with maps and geographic information. ESRI

  • ASTM D2487-11 (2011) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM International, PA, United States

  • Basu S, Nigam SC (1977) Seismic risk analysis of Indian peninsula. In: Proceedings of the 6th World conference on earthquake engineering, New Delhi, India, vol 1, pp 782–788

  • Bhandari RK (2006) The Indian landslide scenario, strategic issues and action points. In: India Disaster management Congress, New Delhi 29–30 November 2006, Session A2, Keynote address, pp 1–18

  • Bolt BA (1969) Duration of strong motion. In: Proceedings of the 4th national conference on earthquake engineering. Santiago, Chile, pp 37–50

  • Boominathan A, Dodagoudar GR, Suganthi A, Uma Maheswari R (2008) Seismic hazard assessment of Chennai city considering local site effects. J Earth Syst Sci 117:853–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budimir MEA, Atkinson PM, Lewis HG (2014) Earthquake-and-landslide events are associated with more fatalities than earthquakes alone. Nat Hazards 72:895–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran SS, Boominathan A, Dodagoudar GR (2013a) Dynamic response of laterally loaded pile groups in clay. J Earthq Eng 17(1):33–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran SS, Sayed Owaise R, Ashwin S, Jain Rayansh M, Prasanth S, Venugopalan RB (2013b) Investigation on infrastructural damages by rainfall-induced landslides during November 2009 in Nilgiris India. Nat Hazards 65(3):1535–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chethanamba KR, Dodagoudar GR (2012) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis using kernel density estimation technique for Chennai India. Georisk Assess Manag Risk Eng Syst Geohazards 6(1):1–15

  • Durukal E (2002) Critical evaluation of strong motion in Kocaeli and Duzce (Turkey) earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(7):589–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccioli E (1991) Seismic amplification in the presence of geological and topographic irregularities. In: Proceedings of 2nd international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering, pp 1779–1797

  • Finn WD, Wu G, Thavaraj T (1997) Soil–pile–structure interactions. Seismic analysis and design for soil–pile–structure interactions. ASCE National convention, Minneapolis, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganapathy GP, Rajarathnam S (2010) Use of remote sensing and seismotectonic parameters to identify seismogenic sources of Tamilnadu state. Int J Appl Eng Res 1(1):59–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganapathy GP, Rajawat AS (2015) Use of hazard and vulnerability maps for landslide planning scenarios: a case study of the Nilgiris, India. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1587-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazetas G, Mylonakis G (2005) Seismic soil–structure interaction: new evidence and emerging issues. In: Proceedings of international conference on geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics III, Berkley, USA, pp 1119–1173

  • Geli L, Bard PY, Jullien B (1988) The effect of topography on earthquake ground motion: a review and new results. Bull Seismol Soc Am 78:42–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston SL, HoustonWN, Padilla JM (1987) Microcomputer-Aided evaluation of earthquake induced permanent slope displacement. Microcomputers in civil Engineering, pp  207–222

  • IMD (2012) Indian Meteorological Department, Ministry of earth sciences. http://www.imd.gov.in/section/seismo/dynamic/last-monthNov12.htm. Accessed 25 Dec 2012

  • IS 2131 (2002) Method for standard penetration test for soils. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

  • IS 1893–Part I (2002) Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures part I general provisions and buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal K, Sinha R (2007) Probabilistic seismic hazard estimation for peninsular India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97(1):318–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal P, van Westen C, Jetten V (2011) Quantitative assessment of landslide hazard along transportation lines using historical records. Landslides 8(3):279–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jibson R (1987) Summary of research on the effects of topographic amplification of earthquake shaking on slope stability. Open-File Report 87-268, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California.

  • Jibson RW (2011) Methods for assessing the stability of slopes during earthquakes—a retrospective. Eng Geol 122(1):43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jibson RW, Michael JA (2009) Maps showing seismic landslide hazards in Anchorage, Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey, Scientific Investigations Map 3077 (scale 1:25000) pamphlet, pp 1–11

  • Joyner W, Boore D (1981) Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 imperial valley California Earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71:2011–2038

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaila KL, Rao NM (1979) Seismic zoning maps of the Indian subcontinent. Geophys Res Bull, NGRI, Hyderabad 17:293–301

  • Kalyan Kumar G, Dodagoudar GR (2011) Seismic input motion for Kanchipuram, South India. Int J Earth Sci Eng 4:189–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayal JR (2008) Microearthquake seismology and seismotectonics of south Asia. Capital Publishing Company, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Khattri KN et al (1984) Seismic hazard map of India and adjoining areas. Tectonophysics 108:93–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kijko A, Graham G (1998) Parametric-historic procedure for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: part I—estimation of maximum regional magnitude. Pure appl Geophys 152:413–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Pearson Education Ptd, Ltd, New Delhi, India, (Reprinted 2003)

  • Krinitzsky EL (1995) Deterministic versus probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for critical structures. Int J Eng Geol 40:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai CG, Menon A, Corigliano M, Ornthamarrath T, Sanchez HL, Dodagoudar GR (2009) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment and stochastic site response analysis at the archaeological site of Kancheepuram in southern India. Research Report EUCENTRE 2009/01, IUSS Press, Pavia, ISBN 978-88-6198-037-2, pp 250

  • Lomnitz C (1970) The Peru earthquake of May 31, 1970. Bull Seismol Soc Am 60:1413–1416

  • Mandal P, Rastogi BK, Gupta Harsh K (2000) Recent Indian earthquakes. Curr Sci 79(9):1334–1346

    Google Scholar 

  • Martha TR, Govindharaj KB, Kumar KV (2014) Damage and geological assessment of the 18 September 2011 Mw 6.9 earthquake in Sikkim, India using very high resolution satellite data, Geoscience Frontiers. doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2013.12.011

  • Menon A, Ornthammarath T, Corigliano M, Lai CG (2010) Probabilistic seismic hazard macrozonation of Tamil Nadu in southern India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100(3):1320–1341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MoES (2009) Report on seismic microzonation of Bangalore. Urban Centre Seismology Division, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • NDMA (2010) Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of India. Technical report of the working committee of experts constituted by the National Disaster Management Authority, Government of India, New Delhi

  • NDMG (2009) National disaster management guidelines—management of landslides and snow avalanches. A publication of the National Disaster Management Authority, Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Parvez AI, Vaccari F, Panza GF (2003) A deterministic seismic hazard map of India and adjacent areas. Int J Geophys 155:489–508

  • Raghu Kanth STG, Iyengar RN (2006) Seismic hazard estimation for Mumbai city. Curr Sci 91(11):1486–1494

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajakumar R, Sanjeevi S, Jayaseelan S, Isakkipandian G, Edwin M, Balaji P, Ehanthalingam G (2007) Landslide susceptibility mapping in a hilly terrain using remote sensing and GIS. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 35(1):31–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez CE, Bommer JJ, Chandler RJ (1999) Earthquake—induced landslides, 1980–1997. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 18:325–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romeo R, Prestininzi A (2000) Probabilistic versus deterministic seismic hazard analysis: an integrated approach for siting problems. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 20:75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Sesma FJ, Herrera I, Aviles J (1982) A boundary method for elastic wave diffraction: application to scattering of SH waves by topographic irregularities. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:473–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel PB (1973) Effects of Local Geology and Distance from Source on Earthquake Ground Motion, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, California

  • Seed HB and Idriss IM (1970) Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis. Report EERC 70-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley

  • Seed HB, Murarka R, Lysmer J, Idriss IM (1976) Relationships of maximum acceleration, maximum velocity, distance from source and local site conditions for moderately strong earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 66(4):1323–1342

  • SEISAT (2000) Seismotectonic atlas of India. Geological Survey of India, International Print-O-Pac Limited, B-202-206, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi

  • Sepulveda SA, Serey A, Pavez A, Barrientes S, Lara M (2008) Analysis of earthquake-induced landslides during the 2007 Aysen Fjord seismic swarm, Chilean Patagonia (45.5°S). International Geological Congress, No. 33. Proceedings, paper GHZ04203L

  • Seshagiri DN, Badrinarayanan S, Upendran R, Lakshmikantham CB, Srinivasan V (1982) The Nilgiri landslides—results of geotechnical and geological investigations. Miscellaneous Publication No. 57, Geological Survey of India, pp 1–41

  • SHAKE 2000 User manual: a computer program for the 1-D analysis of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Problems. GeoMotions LLC, Washington, U.S.A.

  • Singh SK, Pacheco JF, Bansal BK, Campos P, Dattatrayam RS, Suresh G (2004) A source study of the Bhuj, India, Earthquake of 26 January 2001 (Mw 7.6). Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:1195–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitharam TG, Anbazhagan P (2007) Seismic hazard analysis for the Bangalore region. Nat Hazards 40:261–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsapanos TM, Koravos GC, Zygouri V, Tsapanos MT, Kortsari AN, Kijko A, Kalogirou EE (2011) Deterministic seismic hazard analysis for the city of Corinth-central Greece. J Balkan Geophys Soc 14(1):1–14

  • Trifunic MD, Hudson DE (1971) Analysis of the Pacoima Dam accelerogram—San Fernando, California, Earthquake of 1971. Bull Seismol Soc Am 61(5):1393–1411

    Google Scholar 

  • Uma Maheswari R, Boominathan A, Dodagoudar GR (2010) Seismic Site classification and site period mapping for Chennai City using geophysical and geotechnical data. J Geophys 72:152–168

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. S. S. Chandrasekaran thanks Department of Science and Technology (DST-NRDMS Division), Government of India, New Delhi, for sponsoring the study reported in this paper through the project “Geotechnical Investigation on Landslide in Nilgiris district of Tamilnadu” (Project sanction order NRDMS/11/2003/012 dt: 25/09/2014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geotechnical Engineering, SMBS, VIT University, Vellore, 632014, India

    S. Elayaraja & S. S. Chandrasekaran

  2. CDMM, VIT University, Vellore, 632014, India

    G. P. Ganapathy

Authors
  1. S. Elayaraja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. S. Chandrasekaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. P. Ganapathy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. S. Chandrasekaran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elayaraja, S., Chandrasekaran, S.S. & Ganapathy, G.P. Evaluation of seismic hazard and potential of earthquake-induced landslides of the Nilgiris, India. Nat Hazards 78, 1997–2015 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1816-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1816-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation