Skip to main content
Log in

Examining the role of social media in California’s drought risk management in 2014

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social media creates an interactive information communication platform for disaster preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery. Recent research has analyzed the participation of social media in natural disasters, such as the Haiti Earthquake in 2010, Queensland floods from 2010 to 2011, Hurricane Sandy in 2012, and Colorado flood in 2013, but little research has paid attention to drought risk management. In this study, the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis method is used to evaluate the social media sites of governmental agencies that were directly involved in California’s Drought Task Force in the historic drought in 2014. The results show that state governmental agencies have used the popular social media platforms (Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter) as communication channels with professional stakeholders and the general public. The major functions of social media in the California drought risk management process included one-way information sharing, two-way information sharing, situational awareness, rumor control, reconnection, and decision making. However, social media was not active in donation solicitation and volunteer management. The two-way communication still stayed in relatively surficial levels with limited comments and inadequate conversations. A gap existed to reconnect public social media domain and personal social networks, even though drought risk was closely related to everyone’s daily life. During the California drought in 2014, Facebook worked actively in two-way information sharing for drought risk information and water conservation strategies; YouTube was a robust platform that attracted large number of views on drought videos; and Twitter played an effective role in reconnection of social networks to expedite drought risk information dissemination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bird D, Ling M, Haynes K (2012) Flooding Facebook—the use of social media during the Queensland and Victorian floods. Aust J Emerg Manag 27(1):27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Briones RL, Kuch B, Liu BF, Jin Y (2011) Keeping up with the digital age: how the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships. Public Relat Rev 37(1):37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunce S, Partridge H, Kate D (2012) Exploring information experience using social media during the 2011 Queensland Floods: a pilot study. Aust Libr J 61(1):34–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California-Nevada Climate Applications Program (CNAP) (2014) http://www.drought.gov/media/images/CNAP-Drought-Newsletter-Aug-2014.pdf. Visited on Dec 29, 2014

  • Chan JC (2013) The role of social media in crisis preparedness, response and recovery. http://www.oecd.org/governance/risk/The%20role%20of%20Social%20media%20in%20crisis%20preparedness,%20response%20and%20recovery.pdf. Visited on Dec 29, 2014

  • Connors JP, Lei S, Kelly M (2012) Citizen science in the age of neogeography: utilizing volunteered geographic information for environmental monitoring. Ann Ass Am Geogr 102(6):1267–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollan J, Bruyn LL, Reid N, Wilkie L (2012) Can volunteers collect data that are comparable to professional scientists? A study of variables used in monitoring the outcomes of ecosystem rehabilitation. Environ Manag 50:969–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild MF, Glennona JA (2010) Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: a research frontier. Int J Digit Earth 3(3):231–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill T, Westbrook R (1997) SWOT analysis: it’s time for a product recall. Long Range Plan 30(1):46–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung JY, Moro M (2014) Multi-level functionality of social media in the aftermath of the Great East Japan Earthquake. Disasters 38:s123–s143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim T (2014) Observation on copying and pasting behavior during the Tohoku earthquake: retweet pattern changes. Int J Inf Manag 34(4):546–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay BR (2011) Social media and disasters: current uses, future options, and policy considerations. Congressional Research Service 7-5700, R41987, Sept 6, 2011

  • Mersham G (2010) Social media and public information management: the September 2009 tsunami threat to New Zealand. Media Int Aust 137:130–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Poser K, Dransch D (2010) Volunteered geographic information for disaster management with application to rapid flood damage estimation. Geomatica 64(1):89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzer B, Williams R (2013) Visualization and harvesting of hurricane sandy geo-tagged tweets. Rochester Institute of Technology, Golisano College of Computing and Information, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab JC (2013) Planning and Drought (PAS 574), American Planning Association. Planning Advisory Service, 2013, Chicago, IL

  • Sinoga JDR, Gross TL (2013) Droughts and their social perception in the mass media (southern Spain). Int J Climatol 33(3):709–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavkovikj V, Verstockt S, Hoecke SV, Van De Walle R (2014) Review of wildfire detection using social media. Fire Saf J 68:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnett J, Morehouse BJ, Finger TD, Garfin G, Rattray N (2006) Drought and declining reservoirs: comparing media discourse in Arizona and New Mexico, 2002–2004. Glob Environ Change-Hum Policy Dimens 16(1):95–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. Dennis LA, Palen L, Anderson KM (2013) Mastering social media: an analysis of Jefferson County’s communications during the 2013 Colorado Floods. Retrieved August 26, 2014, from University of Colorado: https://www.cs.colorado.edu/~palen/palen_papers/StDenisPalenAnderson-jeffco-iscram2014.pdf

  • Starbird K, Dailey D, Walker AH, Leschine TM, Pavia R, Bostrom A (2015) Social media, public participation, and the 2010 BP deepwater horizon oil spill. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 21(3):605–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang JJ, Folmer H, Xue J (2013) Estimation of awareness and perception of water scarcity among farmers in the Guanzhong Plain, structural equation model. J Environ Manag 126:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Homeland Security (USDHS) (2013) Lessons learned: Social media and hurricane Sandy, Virtual social media working group and DHS first responders group, June, 2013, United States Department of Homeland Security—Science and Technology Directorate

  • United States Department of Homeland Security (USDHS) (2014) Using social media for enhanced situational awareness and decision support, Virtual social media working group and DHS first responders group, June 2014, United States Department of Homeland Security—Science and Technology Directorate

  • Wilhite DA, Hayes MJ, Knutson C, Smith KH (2000) Planning for drought: moving from crisis to risk management. J Am Water Resour Ass 36(4):697–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates D, Paquette S (2011) Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: a case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. Int J Inf Manag 31(1):6–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenghong Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, Z., Zhang, L., Xu, F. et al. Examining the role of social media in California’s drought risk management in 2014. Nat Hazards 79, 171–193 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1835-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1835-2

Keywords

Navigation