Skip to main content
Log in

Co-seismic and post-seismic behavior of a wall type breakwater on a natural ground composed of liquefiable layer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tsunami disaster countermeasures such as breakwaters might be damaged or lose their capacity to resist tsunami after a strong earthquake. Therefore, not only the co-seismic behaviors of a breakwater and its foundation system during earthquake loading, but also the post-seismic behavior after the earthquake loading should be investigated and estimated for future tsunami preparation, especially when the foundation ground is composed of liquefiable layer, which may cause large amount of displacement to the breakwater. In this study, the co-seismic and post-seismic behavior of an existing wall type breakwater on a natural ground which is composed of nonuniform liquefiable layer and thick cohesive layer with low permeability is investigated using an effective stress-based soil–water coupling numerical method. In the calculation, the complicated nonlinear dynamic behavior of the foundation soil is described by an advanced elasto-plastic soil constitutive model. A real recorded seismic wave, which consists of a major shock and two aftershocks from the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake, is adopted as the input earthquake loading. The calculation results indicate that the used numerical method is capable of capturing the progressive liquefaction and consolidation process of the foundation soil, as well as the subsidence and differential settlement of the breakwater during and after earthquake loading. The influence of earthquake loading can significantly reduce the capacity of breakwater to resist tsunami which may arrive within 1 h after earthquake; therefore, anti-seismic design should be taken into consideration in future tsunami preparation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asaoka A, Noda T, Yamada E, Kaneda K, Nakano M (2002) An elasto-plastic description of two distinct volume change mechanisms of soils. Soils Found 42(5):47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao XH, Morikawa Y, Kondo Y, Nakamura K, Zhang F (2012) Shaking table test on reinforcement effect of partial ground improvement for group-pile foundation and its numerical simulation. Soils Found 52(6):1043–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao XH, Ye GL, Ye B (2014) Explanation of liquefaction in the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake using numerical analysis. Nat Hazard 74(3):1881–1897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao XH, Ye GL, Ye B, Zhang F (2016) Co-seismic and post-seismic behavior of an existed shallow foundation and super structure system on a natural sand/silt layered ground. Eng Comput 33(1):288–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertalot D, Brennan AJ, Villalobos FA (2013) Influence of bearing pressure on liquefaction induced settlement of shallow foundations. Geotechnique 63(5):391–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biot MA (1941) General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J Appl Phys 12(2):155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZY, Yu HT, Yuan Y (2014) Full 3D seismic analysis of a long-distance water conveyance tunnel. Struct Infrastruct Eng 10(1):128–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dashti S, Bray JD, Pestana JM, Riemer M, Wilson D (2010) Mechanisms of seismically induced settlement of buildings with shallow foundations on liquefiable soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 136(1):151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ergin A, Balas CE (2006) Damage risk assessment of breakwaters under tsunami attack. Nat Hazards 39:231–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujima K (2006) Effect of a submerged bay-mouth breakwater on tsunami behavior analyzed by 2D/3D hybrid model simulation. Nat Hazards 39(2):179–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha IS, Olson SM, Seo MW, Kim MM (2011) Evaluation of reliquefaction resistance using shaking table tests. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31(4):682–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashiguchi K, Ueno M (1977) Elastoplastic constitutive laws of granular material, constitutive equations of soils. In: Murayama S, Schofield AN (eds) Proceedings of 9th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Spec Ses 9. JSSMFE, Tokyo, pp 73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Jiang XM (2010) Field-observed phenomena of seismic liquefaction and subsidence during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China. Nat Hazards 54(3):839–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Yu M (2013) Review of soil liquefaction characteristics during major earthquakes of the twenty-first century. Nat Hazards 65:2375–2384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Zhang F, Yashima A, Ye W (2008) Numerical simulation of mitigation for liquefaction-induced soil deformations in a sandy ground improved by cement grouting. Environ Geol 55(6):1247–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Zhang WJ, Mao WW, Chen J (2011) Flow analysis of liquefied soils based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Nat Hazards 59(3):1547–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Bao YJ, Zhang M, Liu C, Lu P (2015) Analysis of the mechanism of seabed liquefaction induced by waves and related seabed protection. Nat Hazards 79:1399–1408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iai S, Ichii K, Liu HL (1998) Effective stress analysis of port structures. Soils Found (Special Issue of Geotechnical Aspects of the January 17, 1995 Hyogoken Nambu Earthquake) 2:97–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Imase T, Maeda K, Miyake M, Sawada Y, Sumida H, Tsurugasaki K (2012) Destabilization of a caisson-type breakwater by scouring and seepage failure of the seabed due to a tsunami. In: Proceedings of international conference on scour and erosion, pp 128–135

  • Isobe K, Ohtsuka S, Nunokawa H (2014) Field investigation and model tests on differential settlement of houses due to liquefaction in the Niigata-ken Chuetsu-Oki earthquake of 2007. Soils Found 54(4):675–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafarian Y, Alielahi H, Abdollahi AS, Vakili B (2010) Seismic numerical simulation of breakwater on a liquefiable layer: Iran LNG port. Electron J Geotech Eng 15D:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin Y, Bao X, Kondo Y, Zhang F (2010) Soil–water coupling analysis of real-scale field test for 9-pile foundation subjected to cyclic horizontal loading. Geotechnical special publication, deep foundation and geotechnical in situ test ASCE GSP, vol 205, pp 111–118

  • Kawai H, Satoh M, Kawaguchi K, Seki K (2011) Characteristics of the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami. Report of Port and Airport Research Institute, vol 50(4), pp 1–64

  • Kazama M, Noda T (2012) Damage statistics (Summary of the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake damage). Soils Found 52(5):780–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiara A, Memos C, Tsiachris A (2001) Some practical aspects on the seismic behavior of rubble-mound breakwaters. In Ports 2001: America’s ports–gateways to the global economy—Proceedings of the ports 2001 conference, vol 108, pp 1–10

  • Memos C, Bouckovalas G, Tsiachris A (2000) Stability of rubble-mound breakwaters under seismic action. In: Coastal engineering 2000—Proceedings of the 27th international conference on coastal engineering ICCE 2000, vol 276, pp 1585–1598

  • Memos C, Kiara A, Pavlidis E (2003) Coupled seismic response analysis of rubble-mound breakwater. Water Marit Eng ICE 156(1):23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirjalili M, Kimoto S, Oka F, Hattori T (2012) Long-term consolidation analysis of a large-scale embankment construction on soft clay deposits using an elasto-viscoplastic model. Soils Found 52(1):18–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori N, Cox DT, Yasuda T, Mase H (2013) Overview of the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami damage and relation with coastal protection along the Sanriku coast. Earthq Spectra 29(S1):S127–S143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori N, Yoneyama N, Pringle W (2015) Effects of the offshore barrier against the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami and lessons learned, post-tsunami hazard. Adv Nat Technol Hazards Res 44:121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhari A, Charvet I, Tsuyoshi F, Suppasri A, Imamura F (2015) Assessment of tsunami hazards in ports and their impact on marine vessels derived from tsunami models and the observed damage data. Nat Hazards 78:1309–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakai T (1989) An isotropic hardening elastoplastic model for sand considering the stress path dependency in three-dimensional stresses. Soils Found 29(1):119–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakai T, Mihara Y (1984) A new mechanical quantity for soils and its application to elastoplastic constitutive models. Soils Found 24(2):82–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noda T, Takeuchi H, Nakai K, Asaoka A (2009) Co-seismic and post-seismic behavior of an alternately layered sand-clay ground and embankment system accompanied by soil disturbance. Soils Found 49(5):739–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED) (2011) K-NET WWW service, Japan. http://www.k-net.bosai.go.jp

  • Okimura T, Takada S, Koid TH (1996) Outline of the Great Hanshin earthquake, Japan 1995. Nat Hazards 14:39–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onoue A, Cai F, Nakajima M, Nishikawa M, Torigoe T, Yoneda K (2012) Behavior of liquefied soil at brink of backfilled basin. Jpn Geotech J 7(1):175–184 (in Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibayama T, Esteban M, Nistor I et al (2013) Classification of tsunami and evacuation areas. Nat Hazards 67:365–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su D, Ming HY, Li XS (2013) Effect of shaking strength on the seismic response of liquefiable level ground. Eng Geol 166:262–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susumu I (2012) Combined failure mechanism of a breakwater subject to tsunami during 2011 East Japan earthquake. Geol Earthq Eng 37:177–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi H, Sassa S, Morikawa Y, Takano D, Maruyama K (2014) Stability of caisson-type breakwater foundation under tsunami-induced seepage. Soils Found 54(4):789–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomoya S, Esteban M, Nistor I et al. (2013) Classification of Tsunami and evacuation areas. Nat Hazards 67:365–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia ZF, Ye GL, Wang JH, Ye B, Zhang F (2010) Fully coupled numerical analysis of repeated shake-consolidation process of earth embankment on liquefiable foundation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:1309–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye GL (2011) DBLEAVES: user’s manual Version 1.6. Shanghai Jiaotong University, China (In Japanese and Chinese)

  • Ye JH, Jeng DS (2011) Effects of bottom shear stresses on the wave-induced dynamic response in a porous seabed: PORO-WSSI (shear) model. Acta Mech Sin 27(6):898–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye JH, Wang G (2015) Seismic dynamics of offshore breakwater on liquefiable seabed foundation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 76:86–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye B, Ye GL, Zhang F, Yashima A (2007) Experiment and numerical simulation of repeated liquefaction-consolidation of sand. Soils Found 47(3):547–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye B, Ye GL, Zhang F (2012) Numerical modeling of changes in anisotropy during liquefaction using a generalized constitutive model. Comput Geotech 42:62–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye GL, Ye B, Zhang F (2013) Strength and dilatancy of overconsolidated clays in drained true triaxial tests. J Geotech Geo-environ Eng 140(4):06013006. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuksel Y, Alpar B, Yalciner AC, Cevik E, Ozguven O, Celikoglu Y (2003) Effects of the Eastern Marmara earthquake on the marine structures and coastal areas. J Water Marit Eng ICE 156:147–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuksel Y, Cetin KO, Ozguven O, Isik NS, Cevik E, Sumer BM (2004) Seismic response of a rubble mound breakwater in Turkey. Proc Inst Civil Eng Marit Eng 157(4):151–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Ye B, Noda T, Nakano M, Nakai K (2007) Explanation of cyclic mobility of soils: approach by stress-induced anisotropy. Soils Found 47(4):635–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Jin Y, Ye B (2010) A try to give a unified description of Toyoura sand. Soils Found 50(3):679–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Ye B, Ye GL (2011) Unified description of sand behavior. Front Archit Civil Eng China 5(2):121–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41472249 and 51308346), Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 2014A030313551), Natural Science Foundation of SZU (Grant No. 201420), Foundation of Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering (KLE-TJGE-B1504) and Scientific and Technical Innovation Foundation of Shenzheng (Grant No. JCYJ20150324140036839).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Ye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bao, X., Ye, B., Ye, G. et al. Co-seismic and post-seismic behavior of a wall type breakwater on a natural ground composed of liquefiable layer. Nat Hazards 83, 1799–1819 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2401-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2401-2

Keywords

Navigation