Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of boundary condition nonlinearities on free large-amplitude vibrations of rectangular plates

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of boundary condition nonlinearities on free nonlinear vibrations of thin rectangular plates is analyzed. The method for analysis of the plate vibrations with geometrical nonlinearity and the boundary condition nonlinearity is suggested. The nonlinear boundary conditions for membrane forces are transformed into linear ones using the in-plane stress function. Additional boundary conditions for the in-plane displacements vanishing on the clamped edge of the plate are imposed on the stress function. Simply supported and cantilever plates are analyzed. The backbone curves obtained by satisfying linear and nonlinear boundary conditions are compared. It is shown that the results of the calculations with nonlinear boundary conditions differ essentially from the data obtained without these boundary conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leissa, A.W., Kadi, A.S.: Curvature effects on shallow shell vibrations. J. Sound Vib. 16, 173–187 (1971)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Sathyamoorthy, M., Pandalai, K.A.V.: Vibration of simply supported-clamped skew plates at large amplitudes. J. Sound Vib. 27, 37–46 (1973)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Prabhakara, M.K., Chia, C.Y.: Non-linear flexural vibrations of orthotropic rectangular plates. J. Sound Vib. 52, 511–518 (1977)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Sathyamoorthy, M.: Vibration of skew plates at large amplitudes including shear and rotatory inertia effects. Int. J. Solids Struct. 14, 869–880 (1978)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Stavridis, L.T., Armenakas, A.E.: Analysis of shallow shells with rectangular projection: theory. J. Eng. Mech. 114, 923–942 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nguyen, H., Ostiguy, G.L.: Effect of boundary conditions on the dynamic instability and non-linear response of rectangular plates, part I: theory. J. Sound Vib. 133, 381–400 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ostiguy, G.L., Sassi, S.: Effects of initial geometric imperfections on dynamic behavior of rectangular plates. Nonlinear Dyn. 3, 165–181 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sassi, S., Ostiguy, G.L.: Effects of initial geometric imperfections on the interaction between forced and parametric vibrations. J. Sound Vib. 187, 41–54 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Sassi, S., Ostiguy, G.L.: On the interaction between forced and combination resonances. J. Sound Vib. 188, 51–67 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Asik, M.Z., Vallabhan, C.V.G.: On the convergence of nonlinear plate solutions. Comput. Struct. 65, 225–229 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Stavridis, L.T.: Dynamic analysis of shallow shells of rectangular base. J. Sound Vib. 218, 861–882 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Touze, C., Thomas, O., Amabili, M.: Transition to chaotic vibrations for harmonically forced perfect and imperfect circular plates. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 46, 234–246 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Touze, C., Thomas, O., Chaigne, A.: Asymmetric non-linear forced vibrations of free-edge circular plates, part I: theory. J. Sound Vib. 258, 649–676 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Amabili, M.: Nonlinear vibrations of rectangular plates with different boundary conditions: theory and experiments. Comput. Struct. 52, 2587–2605 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Amabili, M.: Theory and experiments for large-amplitude vibrations of rectangular plates with geometric imperfections. J. Sound Vib. 291, 539–565 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Amabili, M.: Nonlinear Vibrations and Stability of Shells and Plates. Cambridge University Press, New York (2008)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Woo, J., Meguid, S.A., Ong, L.S.: Nonlinear free vibration behavior of functionally graded plates. J. Sound Vib. 289, 595–611 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Amabili, M.: Non-linear vibrations of doubly curved shallow shells. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 40, 683–710 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Amabili, M.: Theory and experiments for large-amplitude vibrations of circular cylindrical panels with geometric imperfections. J. Sound Vib. 298, 43–72 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meirovitch, L.: Elements of Vibration Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mushtari, Kh.M., Galimov, K.Z.: In: Nonlinear Theory of Thin Elastic Shells. NSF-NASA, Washington (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Grigoluk, E.I., Kabanov, V.V.: Buckling of Shells. Nauka, Moscow (1978) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chia, C.Y.: Non-Linear Analysis of Plates. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Parker, T.S., Chua, L.O.: Practical Numerical Algorithms for Chaotic Systems. Springer, New York (1989)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Filippov, A.P.: Vibrations of Deformable Systems. Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1970) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Barton, C.W.: Vibration of rectangular and screw cantilever plates. J. Appl. Mech. 18, 129–134 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. V. Avramov.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Displacement-based method

The projections of middle plane points’ displacements u(x,y,t);v(x,y,t);w(x,y,t) are used as the main unknowns in this appendix. The plate kinetic energy takes the following form [16]:

$$K = \frac{\rho h}{2}\int_{\varLambda} \bigl( \dot{w}^{2} + \dot{u}^{2} + \dot{v}^{2} \bigr) \,\mathrm{d}x\,\mathrm{d}y. $$

The expression for the potential energy is published in [16]. The nonlinear oscillations are expanded in the truncated series [16]:

$$\begin{aligned} &{w ( x,y,t ) = \sum_{i = 1}^{N_{w}} \varphi_{i} ( t )W_{i} ( x,y );} \\ &{u ( x,y,t ) = \sum_{i = 1}^{N_{u}} \varphi_{N_{w} + i} ( t )U_{i} ( x,y );} \\ &{v ( x,y,t ) = \sum_{i = 1}^{N_{v}} \varphi_{N_{w} + N_{u} + i} ( t )V_{i} ( x,y ),} \end{aligned}$$
(33)

where W i , U i , V i are eigenmodes of linear vibrations. Note that the eigenmodes satisfy the geometric boundary conditions and the linearized boundary conditions for the membrane forces.

The expressions (33) are substituted into the kinetic and potential energies. The kinetic and potential energies are obtained as functions of the generalized coordinates and velocities. Then the Lagrange equations are derived. As eigenfrequencies of longitudinal vibrations are significantly higher than the eigenfrequencies of bending vibrations, the longitudinal inertia is not taken into account [23]. The Lagrange equations take the form (26), (27) with N=N w +N u +N v . The algebraic equations (27) are linear with respect to the generalized coordinates \(\varphi_{N_{w} + 1},\ldots,\varphi_{N}\). The solutions of these equations are expressed as a quadratic form with respect to the generalized coordinates φ i ,i=1,…,N w . These solutions are substituted into the Lagrange equations (26), and the dimensionless variables (28) are used. As a result, the dynamical system in the form (29) is obtained.

The eigenmodes of cantilever plate that are used in expansion (33) are obtained by the Rayleigh–Ritz method (Appendix 3).

Exact eigenmodes of simply supported plate are well known. They have the following form [16]:

$$\begin{aligned} &{W_{n,m} ( x,y ) = \sin \biggl( \frac{n\pi x}{a} \biggr)\sin \biggl( \frac{m\pi y}{b} \biggr);} \\ &{U_{n,m} ( x,y ) = \cos \biggl( \frac{n\pi x}{a} \biggr)\sin \biggl( \frac{m\pi y}{b} \biggr);} \\ &{V_{n,m} ( x,y ) = \sin \biggl( \frac{n\pi x}{a} \biggr)\cos \biggl( \frac{m\pi y}{b} \biggr).} \end{aligned}$$
(34)

Appendix 2: Mixed formulation neglecting the clamped edge boundary conditions u=v=0

The model of the plate vibrations that does not satisfy two boundary conditions (22) and (23) is considered. This is the main difference between this model and the one considered in Sect. 3. The main unknowns of the problem are w(x,y,t) and Φ(x,y,t), which are presented in the form of the expansions (19) and (20). In the considered case the trial functions F i of the expansion (20) satisfy only the boundary conditions for the membrane forces. We emphasize that the boundary condition (9) is ignored. The approach from Sect. 3 is used to derive a system of ordinary differential equations of plate vibrations. The geometric boundary conditions for w(x,y,t) and all force boundary conditions are satisfied.

Now the vibrations of the cantilever rectangular plate are considered. The trial functions of the expansion (20) take the following form:

$$ F_{i} ( x,y ) = x^{2} ( x - a )^{2} ( y - b )^{2}\varPhi_{i} ( x,y ). $$
(35)

The functions Φ i are chosen from the orthogonality conditions of F i . The functions Φ i are polynomials. We emphasize that the functions Φ i (x,y) do not satisfy the boundary conditions (22) and (23).

The trial functions Φ i (x,y) for the cantilever plate are considered. Numerical calculations show that it is enough to take the following two trial functions:

$$\begin{aligned} &{\varPhi_{1} ( x,y ) = 15\sqrt{\frac{14}{b^{5}\Re (a)}};}\\ &{\varPhi_{2} ( x,y ) = 6\sqrt{\frac{7}{b^{7}\Re (a)}} \biggl( y - \frac{b}{6} \biggr),} \end{aligned}$$

where

$$\Re (a) = \frac{a^{5}}{5} - \frac{2a^{6}}{3} + \frac{6a^{7}}{7} - \frac{a^{8}}{2} + \frac{a^{9}}{9}. $$

We want to underline that Φ 1 does not depend on both x and y. Φ 2(y) is a linear function of y and does not depend on x.

Appendix 3: Analysis of plate linear vibrations

Nonlinear dynamics of the plate is expanded into series with eigenmodes (19) and (20). The eigenmodes of the simply supported plate W i (x,y), U i (x,y), V i (x,y) are well known. The Rayleigh–Ritz method is applied to obtain approximate eigenmodes of the cantilever plate. The linear periodic vibrations are presented in the following form:

$$\begin{aligned} &{\bigl[ u ( x,y,t ),v ( x,y,t ),w(x,y,z) \bigr]}\\ &{\quad = \bigl[ U ( x,y ),V(x,y),W(x,y) \bigr]\exp ( i\omega t ).} \end{aligned}$$

The minimum value of the Lagrange functional L=KΠ is determined to obtain the parameters of the plate linear vibrations. In order to obtain this minimum, the eigenmodes of the plate vibrations are expanded into the truncated series of the trial functions:

$$\begin{aligned} &{W ( x,y ) = \sum_{i = 1}^{N_{1}} a_{i}w_{i} ( x,y );} \\ &{U(x,y) = \sum_{i = N_{1} + 1}^{N_{2}} a_{i}u_{i}(x,y);} \\ &{V(x,y) = \sum_{i = N_{2} + 1}^{N_{3}} a_{i}v_{i}(x,y),} \end{aligned}$$
(36)

where w i ,u i ,v i are trial functions. The expressions (36) are substituted into the Lagrange functional, and the following function is obtained: \(L = L(a_{1},\ldots,a_{N_{3}})\). The determination of the Lagrange functional minimum is reduced to the following system: ∂L/∂a j =0, j=1,…,N 3. These equations can be presented in the form of the eigenvalue problem:

$$\bigl( K - \omega^{2}M \bigr)\tilde{A} = 0, $$

where \(\tilde{A} = ( a_{1},\ldots,a_{N_{3}} )\), M is the mass matrix, and K is the stiffness matrix.

The trial functions of the expansion (3.1) are considered. These functions are taken in the form of the product of the orthonormalized polynomials w i (x,y)=T i (x)P i (y), where

$$\begin{aligned} \mathbf{T} =& \biggl\{ \frac{1}{\sqrt{a}},\frac{2\sqrt{3}}{\sqrt{a^{3}}} \biggl( - \frac{a}{2} + x \biggr),\\ &{}\frac{6\sqrt{5}}{\sqrt{a^{5}}} \biggl( \frac{a^{2}}{6} - ax + x^{2} \biggr),\ldots \biggr\}; \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned} \mathbf{P} =& \biggl\{ \frac{\sqrt{5} y^{2}}{\sqrt{b^{5}}},\frac{6\sqrt{7}}{ \sqrt{b^{7}}} \biggl( - \frac{5b}{6}y^{2} + y^{3} \biggr),\\ &{}\frac{84}{\sqrt{b^{9}}} \biggl( \frac{15b^{2}}{28}y^{2} - \frac{3b}{2}y^{3} + y^{4} \biggr),\ldots \biggr\}. \end{aligned}$$

The trial functions of the expansions (36) for u,v are taken as u i (x,y)=v i (x,y)=T i (x)M i (y). The orthonormalized polynomials M i (y) are the following:

$$\begin{aligned} \mathbf{M} =& \biggl\{ \frac{\sqrt{3} y}{\sqrt{b^{3}}},\frac{4\sqrt{5}}{ \sqrt{b^{5}}} \biggl( - \frac{3b}{4}y + y^{2} \biggr),\\ &{}\frac{15\sqrt{7}}{ \sqrt{b^{7}}} \biggl( \frac{2b^{2}}{5}y - \frac{4b}{3}y^{2} + y^{3} \biggr), \ldots \biggr\}. \end{aligned}$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Breslavsky, I.D., Avramov, K.V. Effect of boundary condition nonlinearities on free large-amplitude vibrations of rectangular plates. Nonlinear Dyn 74, 615–627 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-013-0993-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-013-0993-6

Keywords

Navigation