Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transmissibility function-based fault diagnosis methods for beam-like engineering structures: a review of theory and properties

  • Review
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The beam-like structures commonly exist in engineering systems and there are many critical issues relevant to fault diagnosis of those structures. Noticeably, among all other existing methods, transmissibility function-based diagnostic methods, providing much more sensitive damage indexes, are frequently applied and extensively studied, and it is thus meaningful to have a thorough review on most recent advance and related technical difficulties. This paper is, therefore, to present a comprehensive review on this topic for those engineering-oriented beam-like structures, focusing on fundamental theory, critical fault properties and potential applications, respectively. According to different transmissibility function-based features, existing methods are classified into several categories, i.e. general linear transmissibility function, general nonlinear transmissibility function, generalized frequency response function and the second-order output spectrum. With a chain-type multi-degree-of-freedom model with additional connections used for analysing dynamics of beam-like engineering structures, essential topics of these methods including types of transmissibility functions, damage indexes and procedures are discussed in detail. Moreover, the effectiveness, merits and demerits are illustrated by the numerical and experimental results, respectively. It should be noted that some methods discussed here can be readily extended and applied to diagnosis of other plate-like and rotor-like, etc., engineering structures. Apart from fault detection and localization, more sensitive transmissibility function-based damage indicators providing severity and residual life of damaged structures would be further development topics in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Bickford, J.H., Nassar, S.: Handbook of Bolts and Bolted Joints. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bickford, J.H.: Introduction to the Design and Behaviour of Bolted Joints: Nongasketed Joints. CRC Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kakirde,A., Dravid, S.: Study of vibration loosening of bolted joints: a review. Int. J. Adv. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Special (6), (2017)

  4. 5 disasters caused by material fatigue and what we learned from them. Element, 2016. https://www.element.com/nucleus/2016/06/10/5-disasters-caused-by-material-fatigue-and-what-we-learned-from-them. Accessed July 2021

  5. Mclaren,N.: Undetected stress fatigue crack caused wing to break off in water bombing plane crash that killed pilot David Black. ABC Illawarra, 2016. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-16/south-coast-dromader-crashfinal-reportrelease/7170920. Accessed July 2021

  6. Los Alamos National Laboratory: A Review of Structural Health Monitoring Literature: 1996–2001. Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Worden, K., Dulieu-Barton, J.M.: An overview of intelligent fault detection in systems and structures. Struct. Health Monit. 3(1), 85–98 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Farrar, C.R., Worden, K.: An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 365(1851), 303–315 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Catbas, F.N.: Structural health monitoring: applications and data analysis. In: Structural Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructure Systems, pp. 1–39. Woodhead Publishing (2009)

  10. Balageas, D., Fritzen, C.P., Güemes, A.: Structural Health Monitoring. Iste, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Abid, A., Khan, M.T., Iqbal, J.: A review on fault detection and diagnosis techniques: basics and beyond. Artif. Intell. 54(5), 3639–3664 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, H.P., Ni, Y.Q.: Structural Health Monitoring of Large Civil Engineering Structures. Wiley, Hoboken (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rytter,A.: Vibrational based inspection of civil engineering structures. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Building Technology and Structural Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg (1993)

  14. Boscato, G., Fragonara, L.Z., Cecchi, A., Reccia, E., Baraldi, D.: Structural health monitoring through vibration-based approaches. Shock Vib. 2019, 2380616 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2380616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Los Alamos National Laboratory: Linear and Nonlinear Methods for Detecting Cracks in Beams. Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Krawczuk, M., Ostachowicz, W.: Damage indicators for diagnostic of fatigue cracks in structures by vibration measurements: a survey. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 34(2), 307–326 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Los Alamos National Laboratory: Damage Identification and Health Monitoring of Structural and Mechanical Systems from Changes in Their Vibration Characteristics: A Literature Review. Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Farrar, C.R., Doebling, S.W., Nix, D.A.: Vibration-based structural damage identification. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 359(1778), 131–149 (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Carden, E.P., Fanning, P.: Vibration based condition monitoring: a review. Struct. Health Monit. 3(4), 355–377 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nikravesh, S.M.Y., Goudarzi, M.: A review paper on looseness detection methods in bolted structures. Latin Am. J. Solids Struct. 14(12), 2153–2176 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Avci, O., Abdeljaber, O., Kiranyaz, S., Hussein, M., Gabbouj, M., Inman, D.J.: A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: from traditional methods to machine learning and deep learning applications. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 147, 107077 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mottershead, J.: On the zeros of structural frequency response functions and their sensitivities. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 12(12), 591–597 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson,T.J.: Analysis of dynamic transmissibility as a feature for structural health monitoring. Master thesis, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University (2001)

  24. Maia, N.M., Urgueira, A.P.V., Almeida, R.A.B.: An overview of the transmissibility concept and its application to structural damage detection. Top. Modal Anal. I(5), 137–151 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chesné, S., Deraemaeker, A.: Damage localization using transmissibility functions: a critical review. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 38(2), 569–584 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou, Y.L., Hon, C.Y., Zhen, N., Wahab, M.A.: Review on structural damage assessment via transmissibility with vibration based measurements. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 842(1), 012016 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yan, W.J., Zhao, M.Y., Sun, Q., Ren, W.X.: Transmissibility-based system identification for structural health monitoring: fundamentals, approaches, and applications. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 117, 453–382 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou,Y.L.: Structural health monitoring by using transmissibility. Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2015)

  29. Schallhorn,C.J.: Coherence-based transmissibility as a damage indicator for highway bridges. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Iowa (2015)

  30. Zhao,X.Y.: New methods for structural health monitoring and damage localization. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Sheffield (2015)

  31. Li,Q.K.: Frequency domain methods for fault diagnosis in complex structures with inherent nonlinearities. Ph.D. dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (2020)

  32. Cheng, P., Chen, M., Stojanovic, V., He, S.: Asynchronous fault detection filtering for piecewise homogenous Markov jump linear systems via a dual hidden Markov model. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 151, 107353 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stojanovic, V., He, S., Zhang, B.: State and parameter joint estimation of linear stochastic systems in presence of faults and non-Gaussian noises. Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 30(16), 6683–6700 (2020)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Dong, X., He, S., Stojanovic, V.: Robust fault detection filter design for a class of discrete-time conic-type non-linear Markov jump systems with jump fault signals. IET Control Theory Appl. 14(14), 1912–1919 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stojanovic, V., Prsic, D.: Robust identification for fault detection in the presence of non-Gaussian noises: application to hydraulic servo drives. Nonlinear Dyn. 100(3), 2299–2313 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tao, H., Li, X., Paszke, W., Stojanovic, V., Yang, H.: Robust PD-type iterative learning control for discrete systems with multiple time-delays subjected to polytopic uncertainty and restricted frequency-domain. Multidimens. Syst. Signal Process. 32(2), 671–692 (2021)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Ewins, D.J.: Modal Testing: Theory and Practice. Research studies press, Letch worth (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Maia, N.M.M., Silva, J.: Theoretical and Experimental Modal Analysis. Research Studies Press LTD, Hertfordshire (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Li, X., Zhang, Y.W., Ding, H., Chen, L.Q.: Integration of a nonlinear energy sink and a piezoelectric energy harvester. Appl. Math. Mech. 38(7), 1019–1030 (2017)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Yao, H.L., Cao, Y.B., Wang, Y.W., Wen, B.C.: A tri-stable nonlinear energy sink with piecewise stiffness. J. Sound Vib. 463, 114971 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Xue, J.R., Zhang, Y.W., Hu, D., Chen, L.Q.: Vibration reduction evaluation of a linear system with a nonlinear energy sink under a harmonic and random excitation. Appl. Math. Mech. 41(1), 1–14 (2020)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu,W., Ewins, D.J.: Transmissibility properties of MDOF systems. Presented at the proceedings of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering (1998)

  43. Zhu, D.P., Yi, X.H., Wang, Y., Lee, K.M., Guo, J.J.: A mobile sensing system for structural health monitoring: design and validation. Smart Mater. Struct. 19, 055011 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhu, D.P., Yi, X.H., Wang, Y.: A local excitation and measurement approach for decentralized damage detection using transmissibility functions. Struct. Control. Health Monit. 23(3), 487–502 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Johnson, T.J., Adams, D.E.: Transmissibility as a differential indicator of structural damage. J. Vib. Acoust. 124(4), 634–641 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Peng, Z.K., Lang, Z.Q., Billings, S.A.: Non-linear output frequency response functions of MDOF systems with multiple non-linear components. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 42(7), 941–958 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jing, X.J., Li, Q.K.: A nonlinear decomposition and regulation method for nonlinearity characterization. Nonlinear Dyn. 83(3), 1355–1377 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Sun, K., Liu, L., Qiu, J., Feng, G.: Fuzzy adaptive finite-time fault-tolerant control for strict-feedback nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 29(4), 786–796 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sun, K., Qiu, J., Karimi, H.R., Fu, Y.: Event-triggered robust fuzzy adaptive finite-time control of nonlinear systems with prescribed performance. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 29(6), 1460–1471 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sun, K., Qiu, J., Karimi, H.R., Gao, H.: A novel finite-time control for nonstrict feedback saturated nonlinear systems with tracking error constraint. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 51(6), 3968–3979 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Schulz,M.J.: Health monitoring of composite material structures using a vibrometry technique. NASA: Report for the grant (NAG8-1247) (1998)

  52. Zhou, Y.L., Figueiredo, E., Maia, N., Perera, R.: Damage detection and quantification using transmissibility coherence analysis. Shock Vib. 2015, 290714 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/290714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Luo, J., Liu, G., Huang, Z.: Damage detection for shear structures based on wavelet spectral transmissibility matrices under nonstationary stochastic excitation. Struct. Control. Health Monit. 24(1), 2017 (1862)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Li, X.Z., Yue, X.B., Huang, W.: Crack localization using transmissibility of operational deflection shape and its application in cantilever beam. J. Appl. Math. Phys. 6, 2352–2361 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wiener, N.: Nonlinear Problems in Random Theory. Wiley, Cambridge (1958)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Schetzen, M.: The Volterra and Wiener Theories of Nonlinear Systems. Wiley, Hoboken (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Rugh, W.J.: Nonlinear System Theory. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Jing, X.J., Lang, Z.Q.: Frequency Domain Analysis and Design of Nonlinear Systems Based on Volterra Series Expansion in a Parametric Characteristic Approach. Springer, Cham (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhang, Y.W., Xu, K.F., Zang, J., Ni, Z.Y., Zhu, Y.P., Chen, L.Q.: Dynamic design of a nonlinear energy sink with NiTiNOL-steel wire ropes based on nonlinear output frequency response functions. Appl. Math. Mech. 40(12), 1791–1804 (2019)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  60. Worden, K.: Nonlinearity in Structural Dynamics: Detection, Identification and Modelling. CRC Press, New York (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. Chen,Q., Chan, Y.W., Worden, K., Tomlinson, G.R.: Structural fault detection using neural networks trained on transmissibility functions. Presented at the proceedings of the International Conference on Vibration Engineering, Beijing, China, 456–646 (1994)

  62. Worden, K.: Structural fault detection using a novelty measure. J. Sound Vib. 201(1), 85–101 (1997)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  63. Chen, Q., Chan, Y.W., Worden, K.: Structural fault diagnosis and isolation using neural networks based on response-only data. Comput. Struct. 81(22–23), 2165–2172 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Worden, K., Manson, G., Fieller, N.R.: Damage detection using outlier analysis. J. Sound Vib. 229(3), 647–667 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Papatheou, E., Manson, G., Barthorpe, R.J., Worden, K.: The use of pseudo-faults for novelty detection in SHM. J. Sound Vib. 329(12), 2349–2366 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Bu,N., Ichiki, M., Ueno, N., Fukuda, O., Akiyama, M.: A flexible piezoelectric film sensor for fault diagnosis of pipe systems. Presented at the 33rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2181–2186 (2007)

  67. Khalil, A., Aljanaideh, K.F.: Aircraft structural health monitoring using transmissibility identification. IFAC-Papers Online 51(15), 969–974 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Yang, W., Lang, Z., Tian, W.: Condition monitoring and damage location of wind turbine blades by frequency response transmissibility analysis. IEEE Trans. Indus. Electron. 62(10), 6558–6564 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Zhou,Y.L., Wahab, M.A., Perera, R.: Damage detection by transmissibility conception in beam-like structures. Presented at the 4th International Conference on Fracture Fatigue and Wear, 254–259 (2015)

  70. Maia, N.M., Almeida, R.A., Urgueira, A.P., Sampaio, R.P.: Damage detection and quantification using transmissibility. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 25(7), 2475–2483 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Zhang, L., Lang, Z.Q., Papaelias, M.: Generalized transmissibility damage indicator with application to wind turbine component condition monitoring. IEEE Trans. Indus. Electron. 63(10), 6347–6359 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sampaio,R.C., Maia, N.M.M., Ribeiro, A.M.R., Silva, J.M.M.: Transmissibility techniques for damage detection. Presented at the 19th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMACXIX), Florida, USA (2001)

  73. Li, J., Hao, H., Xia, Y., Zhu, H.P.: Damage detection of shear connectors in bridge structures with transmissibility in frequency domain. Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 14(2), 1350061 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Feng, L., Yi, X.H., Zhu, D.P., Xie, X.Y., Wang, Y.: Damage detection of metro tunnel structure through transmissibility function and cross correlation analysis using local excitation and measurement. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 60–61, 59–74 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Kong, X., Cai, C.S., Kong, B.: Damage detection based on transmissibility of a vehicle and bridge coupled system. J. Eng. Mech. 141(1), 1–1 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Schulz, M.J., Pai, P.F., Inman, D.J.: Health monitoring and active control of composite structures using piezoceramic patches. Compos. B 30, 713–725 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  77. Zhou, Y.L., Figueiredo, E., Maia, N.M., Sampaio, R.P., Perera, R.: Damage detection in structures using a transmissibility-based Mahalanobis distance. Struct. Control Health Monit. 22(10), 1209–1222 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Ren, T., Hui, M., Liang, J., Wang, D., He, L., Chen, Y.: Structural state detection using transmissibility and non-negative matrix factorization. Int. J. Signal Process. Image Process. Pattern Recognit. 8(11), 309–318 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Zhou, Y.L., Maia, N.M., Abdel, W.M.: Damage detection using transmissibility compressed by principal component analysis enhanced with distance measure. J. Vib. Control 24(10), 2001–2019 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  80. Zhou, Y.L., Cao, H.Y., Liu, Q.M., Wahab, M.A.: Output-based structural damage detection by using correlation analysis together with transmissibility. Materials 10, 866 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10080866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Zhou,Y.L., Perera, R.: Damage localization via transmissibility power mode shape. Presented at the 5th European-American Workshop on Reliability of NDE (2013)

  82. Schulz, M.J., Naser, A.S., Pai, P.F., Linville, M.S.: Detecting structural damage using transmittance functions. Mater. Sci. 3089, 638–644 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  83. Zhang, H., Schulz, M.J., Naser, A., Ferguson, F., Pai, P.F.: Structural health monitoring using transmittance functions. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 13(5), 765–787 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  84. Zhou, Y.L., Maia, N.M., Sampaio, R.P., Wahab, M.A.: Structural damage detection using transmissibility together with hierarchical clustering analysis and similarity measure. Struct. Health Monit. 16(6), 711–731 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  85. Diao, Y., Men, X., Sun, Z., Guo, K., Wang, Y.: Structural damage identification based on the transmissibility function and support vector machine. Shock. Vib. 2018(4892428), 1–13 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  86. Brown, R.L., Adams, D.E.: Equilibrium point damage prognosis models for structural health monitoring. J. Sound Vib. 262(3), 591–611 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  87. Johnson, T.J., Brown, R.L., Adams, D.E., Schiefer, M.: Distributed structural health monitoring with a smart sensor array. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 18(3), 555–572 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  88. Johnson,T.J., Adams, D.E.: Rolling tire diagnostic experiments for identifying incipient bead damage using time, frequency, and phase plane analysis. Presented at the proceedings of the SAE 2006 World Congress (2006)

  89. Haroon, M., Adams, D.E.: Development of component-level damage evolution models for mechanical prognosis. J. Appl. Mech. 75(2), 021017 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  90. Chu, F.L., Peng, Z.K., Lang, Z.Q.: An effective method for locating nonlinear components in periodic structures. Presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series (2008)

  91. Lang, Z.Q., Peng, Z.K.: A novel approach for nonlinearity detection in vibrating systems. J. Sound Vib. 314(3–5), 603–615 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  92. Chen, M.Y., Sun, F., Zhai, J.Q., Luo, T.: The online monitoring method of power transmission line fault based non-linear frequency response function. J. Chongqing Univ. 33(1), 54–60 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  93. Lang, Z.Q., et al.: Transmissibility of non-linear output frequency response functions with application in detection and location of damage in MDOF structural systems. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 46, 841–853 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  94. Li,Z.Z., Zhao, D.Z., Liu, J.R.: Location of crack faults of hydraulic pipelines based on nonlinear output frequency response function. Presented at the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA), IEEE, 522–525 (2015)

  95. Zhao, X.Y., et al.: A new transmissibility analysis method for detection and location of damage via nonlinear features in MDOF structural systems. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 20(4), 1933–1947 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  96. Liu, Y., Zhao, Y., Han, J., Meng, Q., Yao, H.: Combination algorithm for cracked rotor fault diagnosis based on NOFRFs and HHR. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 33(4), 1585 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  97. Jing, X.J.: Truncation order and its effect in a class of nonlinear systems. Automatica 48(11), 2978–2985 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  98. Jing, X.J.: Nonlinear characteristic output spectrum for nonlinear analysis and design. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 19(10), 171–183 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  99. Li, Q.K., Jing, X.J.: A second-order output spectrum approach for fault detection of bolt loosening in a satellite-like structure with a sensor chain. Nonlinear Dyn. 89(1), 587–606 (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  100. Li, Q.K., Jing, X.J.: Fault diagnosis of bolt loosening in structures with a novel second-order output spectrum based method. Struct. Health Monit. 19(1), 123–141 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  101. Li, Q.K., Jing, X.J.: A novel second-order output spectrum based local tuning method for locating bolt-loosening faults. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 147, 107104 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  102. Li, Q.K., Jing, X.J., Guo, Y.Q.: The second-order output spectrum based method for fault localization in ring type structures. Nonlinear Dyn. 98(3), 1935–1955 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  103. Li, Q.K., Jing, X.J.: A systematic second-order output spectrum based method for fault diagnosis with a local tuning approach. J. Sound Vib. 475, 115283 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  104. Data Physics, Electrodynamic shakers, SignalForce Inertial. https://www.elstar.com/images/MechanicalShockVibration/DataPhysics/Downloads/Modal_Inertial.pdf. Accessed July 2021

  105. Product specification sheet. PCB PIEZOTRONICS MTS STSTEMS CORPORATION, http://www.pcb.com/Products.aspx?m=356M41. Accessed July 2021

  106. Wang, H., Jing, X.J.: A sensor network based virtual beam-like structure method for fault diagnosis and monitoring of complex structures with improved bacterial optimization. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 84, 15–38 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  107. Kess, H.R., Adams, D.E.: Investigation of operational and environmental variability effects on damage detection algorithms in a woven composite plate. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 21(6), 2394–2405 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  108. Jaques, J., Adams, D.E.: Using impact modulation to detect loose bolts in a satellite. In: Topics in Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 3, pp. 29–43. Springer, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  109. Yao, H.L., Cao, Y.B., Ding, Z.Y., Wen, B.C.: Using grounded nonlinear energy sinks to suppress lateral vibration in rotor systems. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 124, 237–253 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  110. Lu,B., Li, Y., Wu, X., Yang, Z.: A review of recent advances in wind turbine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. Presented at the IEEE power electronics and machines in wind applications, 1–7 (2009)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 3102020OQD705)”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Power and Energy, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, 710129, Shaanxi, People’s Republic of China

    Quankun Li & Mingfu Liao

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, 999077, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China

    Xingjian Jing

Authors
  1. Quankun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mingfu Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xingjian Jing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Quankun Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflict of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Q., Liao, M. & Jing, X. Transmissibility function-based fault diagnosis methods for beam-like engineering structures: a review of theory and properties. Nonlinear Dyn 106, 2131–2163 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-021-06883-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-021-06883-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation