Skip to main content
Log in

Techniques for exploring the suboptimal set

  • Published:
Optimization and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ε-suboptimal set \(\mathcal{X}_{\epsilon}\) for an optimization problem is the set of feasible points with objective value within ε of optimal. In this paper we describe some basic techniques for quantitatively characterizing \(\mathcal{X}_{\epsilon}\) , for a given value of ε, when the original problem is convex, by solving a modest number of related convex optimization problems. We give methods for computing the bounding box of \(\mathcal{X}_{\epsilon}\) , estimating its diameter, and forming ellipsoidal approximations.

Quantitative knowledge of \(\mathcal{X}_{\epsilon}\) can be very useful in applications. In a design problem, where the objective function is some cost, large \(\mathcal{X}_{\epsilon}\) is good: It means that there are many designs with nearly minimum cost, and we can use this design freedom to improve a secondary objective. In an estimation problem, where the objective function is some measure of plausibility, large \(\mathcal{X}_{\epsilon}\) is bad: It means that quite different parameter values are almost as plausible as the most plausible parameter value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (2001) Lectures on modern convex optimization: Analysis, algorithms, and engineering applications. MPS-SIAM Series on Optimization

  • Bertsekas D, Nedić A, Ozdaglar A (2003) Convex analysis and optimization. Athena Scientific, Belmont

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnans J, Shapiro A (2000) Perturbation analysis of optimization problems. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Borwein J, Lewis A (2000) Convex analysis and nonlinear optimization: theory and examples. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd S, El Ghaoui L, Feron E, Balakrishnan V (1994) Linear matrix inequalities in systems and control theory. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd S, Vandenberghe L (2004) Convex optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Eldar Y, Beck A, Teboulle M (2007) A minimax Chebyshev estimator for bounded error estimation. CCIT Report, 617, EE Department, Technion

  • Fisher N, Hall P, Turlach B, Watson G (1997) On the estimation of a convex set from noisy data on its support function. Am Stat Assoc 92:84–91

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Grötschel M, Lovasz L, Schrijver A (1988) Geometric algorithms and combinatorial optimization. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lucchetti R (2006) Convexity and well-posed problems. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Markovitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7(1):77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesterov Y (2003) Introductory lectures on convex optimization: a basic course. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Polyak B (1987) Introduction to optimization. Optimization Software, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince J, Willsky A (1990) Reconstructing convex sets from support line measurements. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12(4):377–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar R (1970) Convex analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman BW, Titterington DM (1980) Minimum covering ellipses. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 1(4):401–409

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Skiena S (1991) Probing convex polygons with half-planes. J Algorithms 12(3):359–374

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sun P, Freund R (2004) Computation of minimum-volume covering ellipsoids. Oper Res 52(5):690–706

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1997) Primal-dual interior-point methods. SIAM, Philadelphia

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim E, Wright S (2002) Warm-start strategies in interior-point methods for linear programming. SIAM J Optim 12(3):782–810

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joëlle Skaf.

Additional information

This material is based upon work supported by the Focus Center Research Program Center for Circuit & System Solutions award #2003-CT-888, by JPL award #I291856, by Army award #W911NF-07-1-0029, by NSF award #ECS-0423905, by NSF award #0529426, by DARPA award #N66001-06-C-2021, by NASA award #NNX07AEIIA, by AFOSR award #FA9550-06-1-0514, and by AFOSR award #FA9550-06-1-0312.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skaf, J., Boyd, S. Techniques for exploring the suboptimal set. Optim Eng 11, 319–337 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-009-9101-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-009-9101-7

Navigation