Abstract
The transformations of the electron energy distribution (EEDF), their concentration, and plasma space potential along the discharge gap between the hollow rectangular cathode and the mesh anode were experimentally studied. The discharge was 3 cm long, with a cross-section of 10 cm2. A new version of measurements with several single probes with the formation of current-voltage characteristics (IVC) in the probe circuit was proposed with the simultaneous application of voltages in the form of a combination of periodic and noise signals. The proportions of the signals were varied for different sections of the current-voltage characteristics. Measurements along the central axis of the discharge were taken. The dynamic range of the EEDF was not less than 4 orders of magnitude at the electron concentrations of 2–13 × 1010 cm−3, which exceeds the best known achievements. Measurements for discharge in helium at reduced pressures of 1–1.2 mbar and currents of 150–400 mA showed that the EEDFs differ from Maxwell ones, with an excess of fast electrons in the region of 10–20 eV at medium energies 4–6 eV. The fraction of fast electrons decreased in regions closer to the anode, which is associated with the nonlocality of the mechanism of the spectrum formation of free electrons. EEDFs transformations led to the space dependence of electron drift velocities on the plasma area. The dependence of the voltage drop across the cathode on the gas pressure and discharge current was noted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ITER Final Design Report No. G 31 DDD 14 01.07.19 W 0.1. (2001). Section 3.1: Vacuum pumping and fuelling stems
Durocher A, Bruno A, Chantant M, Gargiulo L, Gherman T, Hatchressian JC, Houry M, Le R, Mouyon D (2013) Fusion Eng Des 88:1390–1394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.02.078
Bernatskiy AV, Ochkin VN, Kochetov IV (2016) J Phys D Appl Phys 49:395204. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/49/39/395204
Bernatskiy AV, Kochetov IV, Ochkin VN (2019) Plasma Sources Sci Technol 28:105002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6595/ab4301
Bernatskiy AV, Kochetov IV, Ochkin VN (2020) Plasma Phys Rep 46:874–919. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063780X20090020
Bernatskiy AV, Ochkin VN, Afonin ON, Antipenkov AB (2015) Plasma Phys Rep 41:705–714. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063780X15090032
Bernatskiy AV, Ochkin VN, Bafoev RN (2016) Bull Lebedev Phys Inst 43:195–198. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068335616060038
Schott L (1968) Plasma diagnostics. North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam
Lua X, Naidis GV, Laroussi M, Reuter S, Graves DB, Ostrikov K (2016) Phys Rep 630:1–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2016.03.003
Hori M, Goto T (2002) Appl Surf Sci 192:135–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4332(02)00024-7
Lopaev DV, Volynets AV, Zyryanov SM, Zotovich AI, Rakhimov AT (2017) J Phys D Appl Phys 50:075202. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/50/7/075202
Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (2007) Numerical recipes: The art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, New York
Golubovskii YB, Nekuchaev VS, Ponomarev NS (1998) Tech Phys 43:288–295 https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1258912
Godyak VA, Piejak RB, Alexandrovich BM (1992) Plasma Sources Sci Technol 1:36–58. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/1/1/006
Godyak VA, Demidov VI (2011) J Phys D Appl Phys 44:233001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/44/23/233001
Godyak VA, Alexandrovich BM (2015) J Appl Phys 118:233302. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4937446
Godyak VA, Alexandrovich BM, Kolobov VI (2019) Phys Plasmas 26:033504. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5088706
Mott-Smith HM, Langmuir I (1926) Phys Rev 28:727–763. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.28.727
Druyvesteyn MJ (1930) Z Phys 64:781–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01773007
Cherrington BE (1982) Plasma Chem Plasma Process 2:113–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00633129
Mizeraczyk J (1987) J Phys D Appl Phys 20:429–437. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/20/4/006
Bazhenov VY, Ryabtsev AV, Soloshenko IA, Terent'eva AG, Khomich VA, Tsiolko VV, Shchedrin AI (2001) Plasma Phys Rep 27:813–818. https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1401944
Jiang X, Li W, Xu S, He F, Chen Q (2017) Plasma Chem Plasma Process 37:1281–1290 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-016-9770-x
Andreev SN, Bernatskiy AV, Ochkin VN (2019) J Phys Conf Ser 1370:012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1370/1/012011
Sigeneger F, Dyatko NA, Winkler R (2003) Plasma Chem Plasma Process 23:103–116. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022420920041
Winkler R, Petrov G, Sigeneger F, Uhrlandt D (1997) Plasma Sources Sci Technol 6:118. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/6/2/005
Savitzky A, Golay MJE (1964) Anal Chem 36:1627–1639 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60214a047
Tsendin LD (2010) Phys-Usp 53:133–157. https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNe.0180.201002b.0139
Lukovnikov AI, Novgorodov MZ (1971) Sov Phys Lebedev Inst Rep 1:27
Demidov VI, Koepke ME, Kurlyandskaya IP, Malkov MA (2020) Phys Plasmas 27:020501. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5127749
Granovskiy VL (1971) Elektricheskiy tok v gaze: Ustanovivshiysya tok. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian)
Arslanbekov RR, Kudryatsev AA, Tobin RC (1998) Plasma Sources Sci Technol 7:310–322. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/7/3/009
Hagelaar GJM, Mihailova DB, Dijk J (2010) J Phys D Appl Phys 43:465204. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/43/46/465204
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to I. V. Kochetov and V. V. Lagunov for a discussion of the work. This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, Grant No. 19-12-00310.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andreev, S.N., Bernatskiy, A.V. & Ochkin, V.N. Spatial Variations of Plasma Parameters in a Hollow Cathode Discharge. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 41, 659–672 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-020-10137-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-020-10137-4