ABSTRACT
Much research has been done over the past years on self-emulsifying drug delivery systems, their main interest being the simplicity of the formulation processes, the great stability of the systems and their high potential in pharmaceutical applications and industrial scaling-up. Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems are generally described in the literature indiscriminately as either nano-emulsions or micro-emulsions. Although this misconception appears to be common, these two systems are fundamentally different, based on very different physical and physicochemical concepts. Their differences result in very different stability behaviors, which can have significant consequences regarding their applications and administration as nanomedicines. This paper aims at clarifying the problem, first by reviewing all the physical and physicochemical fundamentals regarding these two systems, using a quantitative thermodynamic approach for micro-emulsions. Following these clarifications, we show how the confusion between nano-emulsions and micro-emulsions appears in the literature and how most of the micro-emulsion systems referred to are actually nano-emulsion systems. Finally, we illustrate how to clear up this misconception using simple experiments. Since this confusion is well established in the literature, such clarifications seem necessary in order to improve the understanding of research in this important field.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anton N, Vandamme T. The universality of low-energy nano-emulsification. Int J Pharm. 2009;377:142–7.
Anton N, Benoit J, Saulnier P. Design and production of nanoparticles formulated from nano-emulsion templates—a review. J Control Release. 2008;128:185–99.
Antonietti M, Landfester K. Polyreactions in miniemulsions. Prog Polym Sci. 2002;27:689–757.
Asua JM. Miniemulsion polymerization. Prog Polym Sci. 2002;27:1283–346.
Hallouard F, Anton N, Choquet P, Constantinesco A, Vandamme T. Iodinated blood pool contrast media for preclinical x-ray imaging applications—a review. Biomaterials. 2010;31:6249–68.
Izquierdo P, Esquena J, Tadros TF, Dederen C, Garcia MJ, Azemar N, et al. Formation and stability of nano-emulsions prepared using the phase inversion temperature method. Langmuir. 2002;18:26–30.
Kahlweit M, Strey R. Phase behavior of quinary mixtures of the type water-oil-nonionic amphiphile-ionic amphiphile-salt. J Phys Chem. 1988;92:1557–63.
Kahlweit M, Strey R, Firman P, Haase D, Jen J, Schomaecker R. General patterns of the phase behavior of mixtures of water, nonpolar solvents, amphiphiles, and electrolytes. 1. Langmuir. 1988;4:499–511.
Kahlweit M, Strey R, Schomaecker R, Haase D. General patterns of the phase behavior of mixtures of water, nonpolar solvents, amphiphiles, and electrolytes. 2. Langmuir. 1989;5:305–15.
Kahlweit M, Strey R, Busse G. Microemulsions: a quantitative thermodynamic approach. J Phys Chem. 1990;94:3881–94.
Kahlweit M, Strey R, Busse G. Weakly to strongly structured mixtures. Phys Rev E. 1993;47:4197–209.
Kahlweit M, Busse G, Faulhaber B. Weakly to strongly structured mixtures. 2. Ionic amphiphiles. Langmuir. 1994;10:1134–9.
Kahlweit M, Busse G, Faulhaber B, Jen J. Shape changes of globules in nonionic microemulsions. J Phys Chem. 1996;100:14,991–4.
Klibanov A. Long circulating liposomes old drugs new therapeutics. Berlin: Springer; 1998.
Klibanov A, Maruyama K, Torchilin V, Huang L. Amphipathic polyethyleneglycols effectively prolong the circulation time of liposomes. FEBS Lett. 1990;268:235–7.
Pouton C. Formulation of self-emulsifying drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1997;25:47–58.
Ramana Rao S, Agarwal P, Shao J. Self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (snedds) for oral delivery of protein drugs: 2. in vitro transport study. Int J Pharm. 2008;362:10–5.
Salager JL, Forgiarini A, Marquez L, Pena A, Pizzino M, Rodriguez P, et al. Using emulsion inversion in industrial processes. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;108–109:259–72.
Solans C, Izquierdo P, Nolla J, Azemar N, Garcia-Celma MJ. Nano-emulsions. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2005;10:102–10.
Tadros TF, Izquierdo P, Esquena J, Solans C. Formation and stability of nanoemulsions. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;108–109:303–18.
Thi T, Van Speybroeck M, Barillaro V, Martens J, Annaert P, Augustijns P, et al. Formulate-ability of ten compounds with different physicochemical profiles in smedds. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2009;38:479–88.
Torchilin V, Trubetskoy V. Which polymers can make nanoparticulates drug carriers long circulating? Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1995;16:141–55.
Yi T, Wan J, Xu H, Yang X. Controlled poorly soluble drug release from solid self-microemulsifying formulations with high viscosity hydroxypropylmethylcellulose. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2008;34:274–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anton, N., Vandamme, T.F. Nano-emulsions and Micro-emulsions: Clarifications of the Critical Differences. Pharm Res 28, 978–985 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-010-0309-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-010-0309-1