Abstract
Over the past decades research on travel mode choice has evolved from work that is informed by utility theory, examining the effects of objective determinants, to studies incorporating more subjective variables such as habits and attitudes. Recently, the way people perceive their travel has been analyzed with transportation-oriented scales of subjective well-being, and particularly the satisfaction with travel scale. However, studies analyzing the link between travel mode choice (i.e., decision utility) and travel satisfaction (i.e., experienced utility) are limited. In this paper we will focus on the relation between mode choice and travel satisfaction for leisure trips (with travel-related attitudes and the built environment as explanatory variables) of study participants in urban and suburban neighborhoods in the city of Ghent, Belgium. It is shown that the built environment and travel-related attitudes—both important explanatory variables of travel mode choice—and mode choice itself affect travel satisfaction. Public transit users perceive their travel most negatively, while active travel results in the highest levels of travel satisfaction. Surprisingly, suburban dwellers perceive their travel more positively than urban dwellers, for all travel modes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For a given variable, the BMSS is based on the distance of the cluster means from the grand mean. Because the clusters are constructed precisely to maximize the distinctiveness between clusters (as well as to maximize the homogeneity within clusters), standard statistical tests are not appropriate for judging the differences between clusters. However, it is appropriate to note that the larger the BMSS, the more strongly the associated variable contributes to the distinction between clusters (Mokhtarian et al. 2009).
Bus, tram and train are combined because train use is low, especially in suburban neighborhoods.
It has to be borne in mind that the remembered utility may also be affected by trips preceding the most recent one. The relative importance of the most recent trip is likely to differ across different types of trips, as well as the intensity of experienced events during the most recent trip (cf. peak end rule).
References
Abou-Zeid, M.: Measuring and modeling activities and travel well-being. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2009)
Abou-Zeid, M., Witter, R., Bierlaire, M., Kaufmann, V., Ben-Akiva, M.: Happiness and travel mode switching: findings from a Swiss public transportation experiment. Transp. Policy 19(1), 93–104 (2012)
Bagley, M.N., Mokhtarian, P.L.: The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: a structural equations modeling approach. Ann. Reg. Sci. 36(2), 279–297 (2002)
Ben-Elia, E., Alexander, B., Hubers, C., Ettema, D.: Activity fragmentation, ICT and travel: an exploratory path analysis of spatiotemporal interrelationships. Transp. Res. Part A 68, 56–74 (2014)
Bentham, J.: An Introduction to The Principles of Morals and Legislations. Blackwell, Oxford (1789/1948)
Bergstad, C.J., Gamble, A., Gärling, T., Hagman, O., Polk, M., Ettema, D., Friman, M., Olsson, L.E.: Subjective well-being related to satisfaction with daily travel. Transportation 38(1), 1–15 (2011)
Cao, J.: The relationships between e-shopping and store shopping in the shopping process of search goods. Transp. Res. Part A 46(7), 993–1002 (2012)
Cao, J.: The association between light rail transit and satisfactions with travel and life: evidence from Twin Cities. Transportation 40(5), 921–933 (2013)
Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L., Handy, S.L.: Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior? A structural equations modeling approach. Transportation 34(5), 535–556 (2007)
Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L., Handy, S.L.: Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: a focus on empirical findings. Transp. Rev. 29(3), 359–395 (2009)
Cervero, R.: Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework. Transp. Res. Part D 7(4), 265–284 (2002)
Cervero, R.: Traditional neighborhoods and commuting in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation 23(4), 373–394 (1996)
Cervero, R., Kockelman, K.: Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity and design. Transp. Res. Part D 2(3), 199–219 (1997)
Chen, C., Gong, H., Paaswell, R.: Role of the built environment on mode choice decisions: additional evidence on the impact of density. Transportation 35(3), 285–299 (2008)
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R.: Validity and reliability of the experience sampling method. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 175(9), 526–537 (1987)
De Vos, J., Derudder, B., Van Acker, V., Witlox, F.: Reducing car use: changing attitudes or relocating? The influence of residential dissonance on travel behavior. J. Transp. Geogr. 22, 1–9 (2012)
De Vos, J., Schwanen, T., Van Acker, V., Witlox, F.: Travel and subjective wellbeing: a focus on findings, methods and future research needs. Transp. Rev. 33(4), 421–442 (2013)
De Vos, J., Schwanen, T., Van Acker, V., Witlox, F.: Searching for a satisfying scale for travel satisfaction. Transp. Res. Part F 33(4), 421–442 (2014)
Diener, E.: The Science of Well-Being: The Collected Works of Diener, 1st edn. Springer, Dordrecht (2009)
Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., Griffen, S.: The satisfaction with life scale. J. Personal. Assess. 49(1), 71–75 (1985)
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D.-W., Oishi, S., Diener-Biswar, R.: New well-being measures: short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Soc. Indic. Res. 97(2), 143–156 (2010)
Domencich, T.A., McFadden, D.: Urban Travel Demand: A behavioral Analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1975)
Duarte, A., Garcia, C., Giannarakis, G., Limão, S., Polydoropoulou, A., Litinas, N.: New approaches in transportation planning: happiness and transport economics. Netnomics 11(1), 5–32 (2010)
Ettema, D., Friman, M., Gärling, T., Olsson, L.E., Fujii, S.: How in-vehicle activities affect work commuters’ satisfaction with public transport. J. Transp. Geogr. 24, 215–222 (2012)
Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Eriksson, L., Friman, M., Olsson, L.E., Fujii, S.: Satisfaction with travel and subjective well-being: development and test of a measurement tool. Transp. Res. Part F 14(3), 167–175 (2011)
Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Olsson, L.E., Friman, M.: Out-of-home activities, daily travel, and subjective well-being. Transp. Res. Part A 44(9), 723–732 (2010)
Ettema, D., Smajic, I.: Walking, places and wellbeing. Geogr. J. (2014). doi:10.1111/geoj.12065
Ewing, R., Cervero, R.: Travel and the built environment. A meta-analysis. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 76(3), 265–294 (2010)
Friman, M., Fujii, S., Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Olsson, L.E.: Psychometric analysis of the satisfaction with travel scale. Transp. Res. Part A 48, 132–145 (2013)
Groves, R.M.: Survey Errors and Survey Costs. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1989)
Handy, S.L., Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L.: Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transp. Res. D 10(6), 427–444 (2005)
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A.B.: Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. J. Econ. Perspect. 20(1), 3–24 (2006)
Kahneman, D., Wakker, P.P., Sarin, R.: Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quart. J. Econ. 112(2), 375–405 (1997)
Kamruzzaman, M., Baker, D., Washington, S., Turrell, G.: Residential dissonance and mode choice. J. Transp. Geogr. 33, 12–28 (2013)
Karsten, L.: Family gentrifiers: challenging the city as a place simultaneously to build a career and to raise children. Urban Stud 40(12), 2573–2584 (2003)
Kwan, M.-P.: Gender and individual access to opportunities: a study of space-time measures. Prof. Geogr. 51(2), 210–227 (1999)
Lenntorp, B.: Paths in space-time environment: a time-geographic study of movement possibilities of individuals. Environ. Plan. A 9(8), 961–972 (1977)
McFadden, D.: The choice theory approach to market research. Mark. Sci. 5(4), 275–297 (1986)
McFadden, D.: Economic choices. Am. Econ. Rev. 91(3), 351–378 (2001)
Mokhtarian, P.L., Ory, D.T., Cao, X.: Shopping-related attitudes: a factor and cluster analysis of Northern California shoppers. Environ. Plan. B 36, 204–228 (2009)
Mokhtarian, P.L., Salomon, I.: How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transp. Res. Part A 35(8), 695–719 (2001)
Olsson, L.E., Gärling, T., Ettema, D., Friman, M., Fujii, S.: Happiness and satisfaction with work commute. Soc. Indic. Res. 111(1), 255–263 (2013)
Ory, D.T., Mokhtarian, P.L.: When is getting there half the fun? Modeling the liking for travel. Transp. Res. Part A 39(2–3), 97–123 (2005)
Pirie, G.H.: Measuring accessibility: a review and proposal. Environ. Plan. A 11(3), 299–312 (1979)
Ritsema van Eck, J., Burghouwt, G., Dijst, M.: Lifestyles, spatial configurations and quality of life in daily travel: an explorative simulation study. J. Transp. Geogr. 13(2), 123–134 (2005)
Russell, J.A.: A circumplex model of affect. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 39, 1161–1178 (1980)
Russell, J.A.: Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychol. Rev. 110, 145–172 (2003)
Schwanen, T., Lucas, K.: Understanding auto motives. In: Lucas, K., Blumenberg, E., Weinberger, R. (eds.) Auto Motives: Understanding Car Use Behaviours, pp. 3–38. Emerald Publishing Ltd, Bradford (2011)
Schwanen, T., Mokhtarian, P.L.: The extent and determinants of dissonance between actual and preferred residential neighborhood type. Environ. Plan. B 31(5), 759–784 (2004)
Schwanen, T., Mokhtarian, P.L.: What affects commute mode choice, neighbourhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods? J. Transp. Geogr. 13(1), 83–99 (2005)
Scollon, C.N., Kim-Prieto, C., Diener, E.: Experience sampling: promises and pitfalls, strengths and weaknesses. J. Happiness Stud. 4(1), 5–34 (2003)
Stone, A.A., Shiffman, S.S., Devries, M.W.: Ecological momentary assessment. In: Kahneman, D., Diener, E., Schwarz, N. (eds.) Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, pp. 26–39. Russel Sage Foundation, New York (1999)
Stutzer, A., Frey, B.S.: Stress that doesn’t pay: the commuting paradox. Scand. J. Econ. 110(2), 339–366 (2008)
Van Acker, V., van Wee, B., Witlox, F.: When transport geography meets social psychology: toward a conceptual model of travel behaviour. Transp. Rev. 30(2), 219–240 (2010)
van Wee, B.: Self-selection: a key to a better understanding of location choices, travel behaviour and transport externalities? Transport Reviews 29(3), 279–292 (2009)
Västfjäll, D., Friman, M., Gärling, T., Kleiner, M.: The measurement of core affect: a Swedish self-report measure. Scand. J. Psychol. 43(1), 19–31 (2002)
Västfjäll, D., Gärling, T.: Validation of a Swedish short self-report measure. Scand. J. Psychol. 48(3), 233–238 (2007)
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 54(6), 1063–1070 (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Vos, J., Mokhtarian, P.L., Schwanen, T. et al. Travel mode choice and travel satisfaction: bridging the gap between decision utility and experienced utility. Transportation 43, 771–796 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9619-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9619-9