Abstract
This article utilizes feminist and postcolonial scholarship to shed light on the affective governmentality that takes place in the context of both liberal democracy and right-wing populism. In particular, it articulates a political grammar of feelings that makes visible in democratic education how affective modes of governing operate and what consequences they have. The pedagogical and political approach suggested here advocates nurturing a political sensitivity that identifies, critiques, and challenges modes of affective governmentality so that possibilities for solidarity emerge. This approach focuses on illuminating the twofold logic of the political grammar of feelings, namely, affects and emotions are not universal but are historically situated and that they are ambivalent rather than exclusively positive or negative forces. This twofold logic is a stark reminder that affects and emotions offer both political and pedagogical insights while broadening our understanding of the affective modalities of power.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Åhäll, L. (2018). Affect as methodology: Feminism and the politics of emotion. International Political Sociology, 12(1), 36–52.
Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. London: Duke University Press.
Anderson, B. (2017). “We will win again. We will win a lot”. The affective styles of Donald Trump. Society and Space. https://societyandspace.org/2017/02/28/we-will-win-again-we-will-win-a-lot-the-affective-styles-of-donald-trump/.
Anwaruddin, S. (2016). Why critical literacy should turn to “the affective turn”: Making a case for critical affective literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(3), 381–396.
Bargetz, B. (2015). The distribution of emotions: Affective politics of emancipation. Hypatia, 30(3), 580–596.
Bargetz, B. (2019). A political grammar of feelings: Thinking the political through sensitivity and sentimentality. In T. Bedorf & S. Herrmann (Eds.), Political phenomenology: Experience, ontology, episteme (pp. 52–70). New York, NY: Routledge.
Bargetz, B. (2020). The sentimental contract: Ambivalences of affective politics and publics. In A. Fleig & C. von Scheve (Eds.), Public spheres of resonance: Constellations of affect and language (pp. 63–80). London: Routledge.
Bargetz, B. (2021). Haunting sovereignty and the neurotic subject: Contemporary constellations of fear, anxiety and uncertainty. Citizenship Studies, 25(1), 20–35.
Berlant, L. (2008). The female complaint: The unfinished business of sentimentality in American culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Charalambous, C., Zembylas, M., & Charalambous, P. (2020). Reconciliation pedagogies and critical ambivalence in teacher professional development: Insights from a case study in Cyprus. Journal of Peace Education, 17(2), 208–233.
Clough, P. T. (2007). Introduction. In P. T. Clough (Ed.), The affective turn theorizing the social (pp. 1–33). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Cvetkovich, A. (2003). An archive of feelings: Trauma, sexuality, and lesbian public cultures. Raleigh, NC: Duke University Press.
Cvetkovich, A. (2012). Depression: A public feeling. Durham: Duke University Press.
D’Aoust, A.-M. (2014). Ties that bind? Engaging emotions, governmentality and neoliberalism: Introduction to the special issue. Global Society, 28(3), 267–276.
Fischer, C. (2016). Feminist philosophy, pragmatism, and the “turn to affect”: A genealogical critique. Hypatia, 31(4), 810–826.
Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the College de France, 1977–1978 (Trans. G. Burchell). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction (Vol. 1). London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (2003). Society must by defended: Lectures at the College de France 1975–1976. London: Penguin.
Garrett, J., Segall, A., & Crocco, M. S. (2020). Accommodating emotion and affect in political discussions in classrooms. The Social Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2020.1758015.
Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 1–51). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hemmings, C. (2005). Invoking affect: Cultural theory and the ontological turn. Cultural Studies, 19(5), 548–567.
Hochschild, A. (2016). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. New York, NY: New Press.
Holland, E. (2008). Schizoanalysis, nomadology, fascism. In I. Buchanan & N. Thoburn (Eds.), Deleuze and politics (pp. 74–98). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Keegan, P. (2020). Critical affective civic literacy: A framework for attending to political emotion in the social studies classroom. The Journal of Social Studies Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr2020.06.003.
Kemmer, L., Peters, C. H., Weber, V., Anderson, B., & Mühlhoff, R. (2019). On right-wing movements, spheres, and resonances: An interview with Ben Anderson and Rainer Mühlhoff. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 20(1), 25–41.
Kinnvall, C. (2018). Ontological insecurities and postcolonial imaginaries: The emotional appeal of populism. Humanity and Society, 42(4), 523–543.
Koivunen, A. (2010). An affective turn? Reimagining the subject of feminist theory. In M. Liljeström & S. Paasonen (Eds.), Working with affect in feminist readings: Disturbing differences (pp. 8–28). London: Routledge.
Leys, R. (2011). The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry, 37(3), 434–472.
Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (Eds.) (2012). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Payne, K., & Journell, W. (2019). “We have those kinds of conversations here…”: Addressing contentious politics with elementary students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 73–82.
Penz, O., & Sauer, B. (2020). Governing affects: Neo-liberalism, neo-bureaucracies, and service work. London: Routledge.
Peters, C. H., & Protevi, J. (2017). Affective ideology and Trump’s popularity. Unpublished paper. http://www.protevi.com/john/TrumpAffect.pdf.
Protevi, J. (2009). Political affect: Connecting the social and the somatic. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Ruitenberg, C. W. (2009). Educating political adversaries: Chantal Mouffe and radical democratic citizenship education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 28(3), 269–281.
Salmela, M., & von Scheve, C. (2017). Emotional roots of right-wing political populism. Social Science Information, 56(4), 567–595.
Sauer, B. (2020). Authoritarian right-wing populism as masculinist identity politics: The role of affects. In G. Dietze & J. Roth (Eds.), Right-wing populism and gender: European perspectives and beyond (pp. 23–39). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Sauer, B., & Penz, O. (2017). Affective governmentality—A feminist perspective. In C. Hudson, M. Rönnblom, & K. Teghtsoonian (Eds.), Gender, governance and feminist analysis: Missing in action? (pp. 39–58). London, New York: Routledge.
Schuller, K. (2018). The biopolitics of feeling: Race, sex, and science in the nineteenth century. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Seigworth, G. J., & Gregg, M. (2010). An inventory of shimmers. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 2–25). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Slaby, J., & Bens, J. (2019). Political affect. In J. Slaby & C. von Scheve (Eds.), Affective societies: Key concepts (pp. 340–351). New York, NY: Routledge.
Sondel, B., Baggett, H., & Dunn, A. (2018). “For millions of people, this is real trauma”: Pedagogy of political trauma in the wake of the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 175–185.
Stoler, A. (2002). Carnal knowledge and imperial power: Race and the intimate in colonial rule. University of California Press.
Tryggvason, A. (2018). Democratic education and agonism. Democracy and Education, 26(1), 1–9.
Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2018). Media coverage of shifting emotional regimes: Donald Trump’s angry populism. Media, Culture and Society, 40(5), 766–778.
Wetherell, M. (2013). Affect and discourse—What’s the problem? From affect as excess to affective/discursive practice. Subjectivity, 6(4), 349–368.
Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. London: Sage.
Zembylas, M. (2020). The affective modes of right-wing populism: Trump pedagogy and lessons for democratic education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 39(2), 151–166.
Zembylas, M. (2020). The affective atmospheres of democratic education: Pedagogical and political implications for challenging populism. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1858401.
Zembylas, M. (2020). Affective ideology and education policy: Implications for critical policy research and practice. Journal of Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1861339.
Zembylas, M. (2021). Affect, biopower, and “the fascist inside you”: The (un)making of microfascism in schools and classrooms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(1), 1–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Zembylas, M. Affective governmentality, political sensitivity, and right-wing populism: Toward a political grammar of feelings in democratic education. Prospects 53, 325–339 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09569-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09569-3