Skip to main content
Log in

Affective governmentality, political sensitivity, and right-wing populism: Toward a political grammar of feelings in democratic education

  • Open File
  • Published:
PROSPECTS Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article utilizes feminist and postcolonial scholarship to shed light on the affective governmentality that takes place in the context of both liberal democracy and right-wing populism. In particular, it articulates a political grammar of feelings that makes visible in democratic education how affective modes of governing operate and what consequences they have. The pedagogical and political approach suggested here advocates nurturing a political sensitivity that identifies, critiques, and challenges modes of affective governmentality so that possibilities for solidarity emerge. This approach focuses on illuminating the twofold logic of the political grammar of feelings, namely, affects and emotions are not universal but are historically situated and that they are ambivalent rather than exclusively positive or negative forces. This twofold logic is a stark reminder that affects and emotions offer both political and pedagogical insights while broadening our understanding of the affective modalities of power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Åhäll, L. (2018). Affect as methodology: Feminism and the politics of emotion. International Political Sociology, 12(1), 36–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (2017). “We will win again. We will win a lot”. The affective styles of Donald Trump. Society and Space. https://societyandspace.org/2017/02/28/we-will-win-again-we-will-win-a-lot-the-affective-styles-of-donald-trump/.

  • Anwaruddin, S. (2016). Why critical literacy should turn to “the affective turn”: Making a case for critical affective literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(3), 381–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargetz, B. (2015). The distribution of emotions: Affective politics of emancipation. Hypatia, 30(3), 580–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargetz, B. (2019). A political grammar of feelings: Thinking the political through sensitivity and sentimentality. In T. Bedorf & S. Herrmann (Eds.), Political phenomenology: Experience, ontology, episteme (pp. 52–70). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargetz, B. (2020). The sentimental contract: Ambivalences of affective politics and publics. In A. Fleig & C. von Scheve (Eds.), Public spheres of resonance: Constellations of affect and language (pp. 63–80). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargetz, B. (2021). Haunting sovereignty and the neurotic subject: Contemporary constellations of fear, anxiety and uncertainty. Citizenship Studies, 25(1), 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L. (2008). The female complaint: The unfinished business of sentimentality in American culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charalambous, C., Zembylas, M., & Charalambous, P. (2020). Reconciliation pedagogies and critical ambivalence in teacher professional development: Insights from a case study in Cyprus. Journal of Peace Education, 17(2), 208–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, P. T. (2007). Introduction. In P. T. Clough (Ed.), The affective turn theorizing the social (pp. 1–33). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvetkovich, A. (2003). An archive of feelings: Trauma, sexuality, and lesbian public cultures. Raleigh, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvetkovich, A. (2012). Depression: A public feeling. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aoust, A.-M. (2014). Ties that bind? Engaging emotions, governmentality and neoliberalism: Introduction to the special issue. Global Society, 28(3), 267–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. (2016). Feminist philosophy, pragmatism, and the “turn to affect”: A genealogical critique. Hypatia, 31(4), 810–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the College de France, 1977–1978 (Trans. G. Burchell). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction (Vol. 1). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2003). Society must by defended: Lectures at the College de France 1975–1976. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, J., Segall, A., & Crocco, M. S. (2020). Accommodating emotion and affect in political discussions in classrooms. The Social Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2020.1758015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 1–51). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmings, C. (2005). Invoking affect: Cultural theory and the ontological turn. Cultural Studies, 19(5), 548–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (2016). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. New York, NY: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, E. (2008). Schizoanalysis, nomadology, fascism. In I. Buchanan & N. Thoburn (Eds.), Deleuze and politics (pp. 74–98). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keegan, P. (2020). Critical affective civic literacy: A framework for attending to political emotion in the social studies classroom. The Journal of Social Studies Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr2020.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmer, L., Peters, C. H., Weber, V., Anderson, B., & Mühlhoff, R. (2019). On right-wing movements, spheres, and resonances: An interview with Ben Anderson and Rainer Mühlhoff. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 20(1), 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnvall, C. (2018). Ontological insecurities and postcolonial imaginaries: The emotional appeal of populism. Humanity and Society, 42(4), 523–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivunen, A. (2010). An affective turn? Reimagining the subject of feminist theory. In M. Liljeström & S. Paasonen (Eds.), Working with affect in feminist readings: Disturbing differences (pp. 8–28). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leys, R. (2011). The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry, 37(3), 434–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (Eds.) (2012). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, K., & Journell, W. (2019). “We have those kinds of conversations here…”: Addressing contentious politics with elementary students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penz, O., & Sauer, B. (2020). Governing affects: Neo-liberalism, neo-bureaucracies, and service work. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, C. H., & Protevi, J. (2017). Affective ideology and Trump’s popularity. Unpublished paper. http://www.protevi.com/john/TrumpAffect.pdf.

  • Protevi, J. (2009). Political affect: Connecting the social and the somatic. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruitenberg, C. W. (2009). Educating political adversaries: Chantal Mouffe and radical democratic citizenship education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 28(3), 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmela, M., & von Scheve, C. (2017). Emotional roots of right-wing political populism. Social Science Information, 56(4), 567–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, B. (2020). Authoritarian right-wing populism as masculinist identity politics: The role of affects. In G. Dietze & J. Roth (Eds.), Right-wing populism and gender: European perspectives and beyond (pp. 23–39). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, B., & Penz, O. (2017). Affective governmentality—A feminist perspective. In C. Hudson, M. Rönnblom, & K. Teghtsoonian (Eds.), Gender, governance and feminist analysis: Missing in action? (pp. 39–58). London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuller, K. (2018). The biopolitics of feeling: Race, sex, and science in the nineteenth century. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seigworth, G. J., & Gregg, M. (2010). An inventory of shimmers. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 2–25). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaby, J., & Bens, J. (2019). Political affect. In J. Slaby & C. von Scheve (Eds.), Affective societies: Key concepts (pp. 340–351). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sondel, B., Baggett, H., & Dunn, A. (2018). “For millions of people, this is real trauma”: Pedagogy of political trauma in the wake of the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 175–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoler, A. (2002). Carnal knowledge and imperial power: Race and the intimate in colonial rule. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tryggvason, A. (2018). Democratic education and agonism. Democracy and Education, 26(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2018). Media coverage of shifting emotional regimes: Donald Trump’s angry populism. Media, Culture and Society, 40(5), 766–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. (2013). Affect and discourse—What’s the problem? From affect as excess to affective/discursive practice. Subjectivity, 6(4), 349–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zembylas, M. (2020). The affective modes of right-wing populism: Trump pedagogy and lessons for democratic education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 39(2), 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zembylas, M. (2020). The affective atmospheres of democratic education: Pedagogical and political implications for challenging populism. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1858401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zembylas, M. (2020). Affective ideology and education policy: Implications for critical policy research and practice. Journal of Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1861339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zembylas, M. (2021). Affect, biopower, and “the fascist inside you”: The (un)making of microfascism in schools and classrooms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michalinos Zembylas.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zembylas, M. Affective governmentality, political sensitivity, and right-wing populism: Toward a political grammar of feelings in democratic education. Prospects 53, 325–339 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09569-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09569-3

Keywords

Navigation