Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deletion, Bell’s inequality, teleportation

  • Published:
Quantum Information Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this letter we analyze the efficacy of the entangled output of Pati-Braunstein (arxiv:quant-ph/0007121v1, 2000) deletion machine as a teleportation channel. We analyze the possibility of it violating the Bell’s inequality. Interestingly we find that for all values of the input parameter α the state does not violate the Bell’s inequality but when used as a teleportation channel can give a fidelity higher than the classical optimum \({({\rm i.e.}\,\frac{2}{3})}\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wootters W.K., Zurek W.H.: A single quantum cannot be cloned. Nature 299, 802 (1982)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pati A.K., Braunstein S.L.: Impossibility of deleting an unknown quantum state. Nature 404, 164 (2000)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pati, A.K., Braunstein, S.L.: arxiv:quant-ph/0007121v1 (2000)

  4. Qiu D.: Non-optimal universal quantum deleting machine. Phys. Lett. A 301, 112 (2002)

    Article  MATH  CAS  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Adhikari S.: Quantum deletion: beyond the no-deletion principle. Phys. Rev. A 72, 052321 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Adhikari S., Choudhury B.S.: Improving the fidelity of deletion. Phys. Rev. A 73, 054303 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bell J.S.: On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Physics 1, 195 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Werner R.F.: Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model. Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277 (1989)

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Benett C., Brassard G., Crepeau C., Jozsa R., Peres A., Wootters W.K.: Teleporting an unknown qunatum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Popescu S.: Bell’s inequalities versus teleportation: what is nonlocality?. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 797 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Horodecki R., Horodecki M., Horodecki P.: Teleportation, Bell’s inequalities and inseparability. Phys. Lett. A 222, 21 (1996)

    Article  MATH  CAS  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Buzek V., Hillery M.: Quantum copying: beyond the no-cloning theorem. Phys. Rev. A 54, 1844 (1996)

    Article  CAS  MathSciNet  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Adhikari S., Ganguly N., Chakrabarty I., Choudhury B.S.: Quantum cloning, Bell’s inequality and teleportation. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 41, 415302 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Peres A.: Separability criterion for density matrices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996)

    Article  MATH  CAS  MathSciNet  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Horodecki M., Horodecki P., Horodecki R.: Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions. Phys. Lett. A 223, 1 (1996)

    Article  MATH  CAS  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Indranil Chakrabarty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chakrabarty, I., Ganguly, N. & Choudhury, B.S. Deletion, Bell’s inequality, teleportation. Quantum Inf Process 10, 27–32 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-010-0167-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-010-0167-0

Keywords

Navigation