Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Explaining Income Nonresponse – A Case Study by means of the British Household Panel Study (BHPS)

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many validation studies deal with item nonresponse and measurement error in earning data. In this paper, we explore motives of respondents for the failure to reveal earnings using the British Household Panel Study (BHPS). The BHPS collects socio-economic information of private households in Great Britain. We explain the evolution of income-nonresponse in the BHPS and demonstrate the importance of a discrimination between refusing the income-statement or don’t know.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • C.R. Bollinger M.H. David (2001) ArticleTitleEstimation with response error and nonresponse: food-stamp participation in the SIPP Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 19 IssueID2 129–141 Occurrence Handle10.1198/073500101316970368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J., Laurie, H. and Moon, N. (1999). Don’t ask me nothin’ about nothin’, I just might tell you the truth. The Interaction between unit non-response and item non-response’. Paper presented on the International Conference on Survey Nonresponse 1999, Portland, Oregon.

  • P. Campanelli C. O’Muircheartaigh (1999) ArticleTitleInterviewers, interviewer continuity, and panel survey nonresponse Quality and Quantity 33 59–76 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004357711258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Campanelli C. O’Muircheartaigh (2002) ArticleTitleThe importance of experimental control in testing the impact of interviewer continuity on panel survey nonresponse Quality and Quantity 36 129–144 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1014928107205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esser, H. (1993). Response set: habit, frame or rational choice? In: D. Krebs andP. Schmidt (eds.), New Directions in Attitude Measurement. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter, pp. 293–314.

  • Hill, D.H. (1991). Interviewer, respondent, and regional office effects on response variance: a statistical decomposition. In: P. Biemer, R. Groves, L. Lyberg, N. Mathiowetz andS. Sudman (eds.), Measurement Errors in Surveys. New York: Wiley, pp. 463–483.

  • J.J. Hox (1994) ArticleTitleHierarchical regression models for interviewer and respondents effects Sociological Methods and Research 22 IssueID3 300–318

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Kalton D. Kasprzyk R. Santos (1981) Issues of nonresponse and imputation in the survey of income and program participation D. Krewski R. Platek J. Rao (Eds) Current Topics in Survey Sampling Academic Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Laurie R. Smith L. Scott (1999) ArticleTitleStrategies for reducing nonresponse in a longitudinal panel survey Journal of Official Statistics 15 IssueID2 269–282

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Longford (1999) ArticleTitleStandard Errors in Multilevel Analysis Multilevel Modelling Newsletter 11 10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Loosveldt, G., Carton, A. and Billet, J. (1999a). Evaluation of the relationship between data quality and interviewer behavior during doorstep contact in face-to-face interviews. Paper presented at the International Conference on Survey Non-response, Portland, Oregon, USA.

  • Loosveldt, G., Pickery, J. and Billet, J. (1999b). Item non-response as a predictor of unit non-response in a panel survey. Paper presented at the International Conference on Survey Non-response, Portland, Oregon, USA.

  • J.C. Moore L.L. Stinson J. Edward J. Welniak (2000) ArticleTitleIncome measurement error in surveys: a review Journal of Official Statistics 16 IssueID4 331–362

    Google Scholar 

  • C. O’Muircheartaigh P. Campanelli (1998) ArticleTitleThe relative impact of interviewer effects and sample design effects on survey precision Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 161 63–77 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-985X.00090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. O’Muircheartaigh P. Campanelli (1999) ArticleTitleA multilevel exploration of the role of interviewers in survey non-response Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 162 437–446 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-985X.00147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Pannekoek (1991) A mixed model for analyzing measurement errors for dichotomous variables P. Biemer R. Groves L. Lyberg N. Nathiowtz S. Sudman (Eds) Measurement Errors in Surveys Wiley New York 517–531

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Pickery G. Loosveldt A. Carton (2001) ArticleTitleThe effects of interviewer and respondent characteristics on response behavior in panel surveys Sociological Methods and Research 29 IssueID4 509–523

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Rasbash W. Browne H. Goldstein M. Yang D. Draper I. Plewis M. Healy G. Woodhouse (1999) MLwiN User’s guide Institute of Education London

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuband, K.-H. (1984). Dritte personen beim interview – zuhörer, adressaten oder katalysatoren der kommunikation. In: H. Meulemann and K.-H. Reuband (eds.), Soziale im Interview. Frankfurt/Main - New York: Campus, pp. 117–157.

  • Schräpler, J.-P. (2003). Respondent behavior in panel studies – a case study for income-nonresponse by means of the British household panel study (BHPS). Working Papers of the Institute for Social and Economic Research, paper 2003-8. Colchester: University of Essex.

  • J.-P. Schräpler (2004) ArticleTitleRespondent behavior in panel studies – a case study for income-nonresponse by means of the German socio-economic panel (SOEP) Sociological Methods and Research 33 IssueID1 118–156 Occurrence Handle10.1177/0049124103262689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Singer N. Mathiowetz M. Couper (1993) ArticleTitleThe impact of privacy and confidentiality concers on survey participation: The case of the 1990 U.S. census Public Opinion Quarterly 57 465–482 Occurrence Handle10.1086/269391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirken, M.G., Jabine, T., Willis, G. B., Martin, E. and Tucker, C. (1999). A new agenda for interdisciplinary survey research methods. Proceedings of the CASM II Seminar. Hyattsville, MD. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

  • M.G. Sirken G.B. Willis G. Nathan (1991) Cognitive aspects of answering sensitive questions. Proceedings of the International Association of Survey Statisticans International Statistical Institute Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T.W. (1991). An Analysis of Missing Income Information on the General Social Surveys GSS Methodological Report No. 71.

  • S. Sudman N. Bradburn (1974) Response Effects in Surveys Aldine Publishing Company Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Tourangeau (1984) Cognitive science and survey methods T. Jabine M. Straf J. Tanur R. Tourangeau (Eds) Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge Between Disciplines National Academic Press Washington, DC 73–100

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Tourangeau L.J. Rips K. Rasinski (2000) The psychology of survey response Cambridge University Press Cambridge – New York

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Wagner A. Motel (1996) ArticleTitleDie Qualität der einkommensmessung bei alten menschen Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 48 IssueID3 493–512

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ruhr-University Bochum and DIW, Berlin, Germany

    Jörg-Peter Schräpler

Authors
  1. Jörg-Peter Schräpler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg-Peter Schräpler.

Additional information

This study is done during my fellowship at the University Essex and is part of the ECASS Project “Respondent Behaviour in Panel Studies”. In particular I would like to thank Heather Laurie, Cheti Nicoletti and Peter Lynn (ISER, Essex) as well as Gert G. Wagner (DIW Berlin and Berlin University of Technology, TUB) for helpful comments. The usual disclaimer applies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schräpler, JP. Explaining Income Nonresponse – A Case Study by means of the British Household Panel Study (BHPS). Qual Quant 40, 1013–1036 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-5429-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-5429-z

Keywords

Jel Classification

Search

Navigation