Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theorizing in Grounded Theory and creative abduction

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article aims to contribute to the analysis of the logical arguments in Grounded Theory (GT), both in the version of Glaser (Basics of Grounded Theory analysis: emergence versus forcing, 1992) and of Strauss and Corbin (Basics of qualitative research, 1990). The article will focus both on stages of the coding process—that could be considered the core of the overall process of theorizing in GT—both on logic of GT, analysing in particular whether GT makes use of abductive thinking. The article outlines the distinction between different modes of abductive reasoning, and focuses specifically on one of them: the “creative abduction” (Eco and Sebeok, The sign of three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, 1983). The distinction between different forms of abductive argument appears especially useful to explore the logic of GT. By introducing this distinction, the article discuss how theorizing in GT makes use—both in Glaser and in Strauss and Corbin—of the same type of abductive reasoning: the creative abduction. According to this analysis, the differences between the two versions of GT turn out to be much less severe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bryant, A., Charmaz, K.: Grounded theory in historical perspective: an epistemological account. In: Bryant, A., Charmaz, K. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, pp. 31–57. Sage, London (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bruschi, A.: Metodologia delle scienze sociali. Bruno Mondatori, Milano (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonfantini, M. A., Proni G.: To guess or not to guess? In: Eco, U., Sebeok, T. A.: The sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce (Italian Trans., Il segno dei tre, Milano, Holmes, Dupin, Peirce, Bompiani, Milano). Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 137–156 (1983)

  • Charmaz, K.: Costructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A.E.: Situational analyses. Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symb Interact 26(4), 553–576 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A.: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn. Sage, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin J.: Going from raw data to theory. Paper presented at the 2nd Global Congress of Qualitative Health Research. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Milano (2012)

  • Eco, U., Sebeok, T. A.: The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce (Italian Trans., Il segno dei tre, Milano, Holmes, Dupin, Peirce, Bompiani, Milano). Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1983)

  • Eco U.: Corna, zoccoli e scarpe: tre tipi di abduzione, In: I limiti dell’interpretazione. Milano, Bompiani (1990)

  • Glaser, B.G.: Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Sociology Press, Mill Valley (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G.: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence Versus Forcing. Sociology Press, Mill Valley (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.: Examples of Grounded Theory, a Reader. Sociology Press, Mill Valley (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.: Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Sociology Press, Mill Valley (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.: Staying open: the use of theoretical codes in GT. Grounded Theory Rev 12(1 (3)), 3–8 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Awareness of Dying. Aldine de Gruyter, Chicago (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Gruyter, Chicago (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley M.: A Historical and comparative note on the relationship between analytic induction and grounded theorising. Forum Qual Soc Res, vol. 6, issue 2, article no. 4 (2010)

  • Kelle U.: Emergence versus forcing of empirical data? A crucial. Problem of Grounded Theory. Forum Qual Soc Res, vol. 6, issue 2. Article no. 27 (2005)

  • Losee, J.: A historical introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1972)

  • Marradi, A.: Metodologia delle scienze sociali. Il Mulino, Bologna (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marradi, A.: Misurazione, esperimenti, leggi: il sillogismo scientista. Quaderni di sociologia 3, 101–139 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton R. K.: The travels and adventures of serendipity: a study in sociological semantics and the sociology of science. Manuscript version (1992), (Italian Trans., Viaggi e avventure della Serendipity. Saggio di semantica sociologica e sociologia della scienza). Il Mulino, Bologna (2002)

  • Morse, J.: Developing Grounded Theory. The Second Generation. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce C.S.: Collected Paper. In: Weiss, P.H.C., The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1974, 1979)

  • Platt, J.: A History of Sociological Research Method in America, 1920–1960. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichertz, J.: Abduction: the logic of discovery of grounded theory. In: Bryant, A., Charmaz, K. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, pp. 214–228. Sage, London (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reichertz J.: Abduction: the logic of discovery of grounded theory. Forum Qual Soc Res, vol. 11, issue 1, Article no. 13 (2010)

  • Sacchetti, F.: Processi di categorizzazione in etnografia. Il ruolo degli impliciti e delle categorie ex ante. Bonanno, Catania (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S.L.: Living grounded theory: cognitive and emotional forms of pragmatism. In: Bryant, A., Charmaz, K. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, pp. 75–94. Sage, London (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strati, A.: La grounded theory. In: Ricolfi, L. (ed.) La ricerca qualitativa. Carocci, Roma (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A.: Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientist. University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A.: Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide. Sage, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strübing, J.: Research as pragmatic problem-solving: the pragmatist routs of empirical-grounded theorizing. In: Bryant, A., Charmaz, K. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, pp. 580–602. Sage, London (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tarozzi, M.: Che cos’è la Grounded Theory. Carocci, Roma (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D.: Abductive Reasoning. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Scienze Politiche e Sociali, Università di Firenze, Via delle Pandette 21, Florence, Italy

    Livia Bruscaglioni

Authors
  1. Livia Bruscaglioni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Livia Bruscaglioni.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Human and animal informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bruscaglioni, L. Theorizing in Grounded Theory and creative abduction. Qual Quant 50, 2009–2024 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0248-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0248-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation