Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Elementary Science Indoors and Out: Teachers, Time, and Testing

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we present the results from a mixed-methods research study aimed to document indoor and outdoor fifth grade science experiences in one school in the USA in the context of accountability and standardized testing. We used quantitative measures to explore students’ science knowledge, environmental attitudes, and outdoor comfort levels, and via qualitative measures, we examined views on science education and environmental issues from multiple sources, including the school’s principal, teachers, and students. Students’ science knowledge in each of the four objectives specified for grade 5 significantly improved during the school year. Qualitative data collected through interviews and observations found limited impressions of outdoor science. Findings revealed that, despite best intentions and a school culture that supported outdoor learning, it was very difficult in practice for teachers to supplement their classroom science instruction with outdoor activities. They felt constrained by time and heavy content demands and decided that the most efficient way of delivering science instruction was through traditional methods. Researchers discuss potentials and obstacles for the science community to consider in supporting teachers and preparing elementary school teachers to provide students with authentic experiential learning opportunities. We further confront teachers’ and students’ perceptions that science is always best and most efficiently learned inside the classroom through traditional text-driven instruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2001). Atlas of science literacy. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved from http://www.project2061.org/tools/atlas/default.htm.

  • Archer, L., Dewitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASE. (2011). Outdoor science: A coordinated approach to high-quality teaching and learning in fieldwork for science education. Association for Science Education, Outdoor Science Working Group. Retrieved from http://www.ase.org.uk/documents/ases-oswg-report/.

  • ASE. (2006). Science education in schools: Issues, evidence, and proposals. London: Teaching and Learning Research Programme, Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auer, M. R. (2010). Sense of place and the physical senses in outdoor environmental learning. In H. L. Reynolds, E. S. Brondizio, & J. M. Robinson (Eds.), Teaching environmental literacy: Across campus and across the curriculum (pp. 142–149). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(497), 497–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bas, M., Teksoz, G. T., & Entepinar, H. (2011). Emphasizing local features for effective environmental education: Environmental attitudes of elementary school students living in ancient Halicarnassus (Turkey). Science Education International, 22(2), 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bixler, R. D. (1994). Observed fears and discomforts among urban students on field trips to wildland areas. The Journal of Environmental Education, 26(1), 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, D. (2009). The child in the garden: An evaluative review of the benefits of school gardening. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(2), 15–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulunuz, M., & Jarrett, O. (2010). Developing an interest in science: Background experiences of preservice elementary teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(1), 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier Martin, S. (2003). The influence of outdoor schoolyard experiences on students’ environmental knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and comfort levels. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15(2), 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center on Education Policy (CEP). (2007). Choices, changes, and challenges, curriculum and instruction in the NCLB era. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited: A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. Environmental Education Research, 4(4), 369–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobern, W. W., & Loving, C. C. (2002). Investigation of preservice elementary teachers’ thinking about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 1016–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cocke, E.F., Buckley, J., & Scott, M.A. (2011). Accountability and teacher practice: Investigating the impact of a new state test and the timing of state test adoption on teacher time use. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED518221.

  • Coyle, K. (2005). Environmental literacy in America: What ten years of NEETF/Roper research and related studies say about environmental literacy in the U.S. The National Environmental Education & Training Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.neetf.org/pubs/ELR2005.pdf.

  • Coyle, K. J. (2010). Back to school: Back outside! Reston: National Wildlife Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1988/1925) Experience and nature. The later works of John Dewey (vol. 1). In J.A. Boydston (Ed.). Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

  • Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., et al. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87(320), 107–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Disinger, J. F., & Roth, C. E. (1992). Environmental education research news. Environmentalist, 12(3), 165–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyment, J. (2005). Green school grounds as sites for outdoor learning: Barriers and opportunities. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 14(1), 28–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, D. (2000). Cognitive and affective learning in outdoor education. Dissertation Abstracts International—Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 60(10-A), 3595

  • Etherington, M. B. (2011). Investigative primary science: A problem-based learning approach. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(9), 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finson, K. D., Lisowski, M., Fitch, T., & Foster, G. (1996). The status of science education in K-6 Illinois schools. School Science and Mathematics, 96(3), 120–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, T. (2007). Growing up in a risk adverse society. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorley, T., Marshall, S. J., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2004). Couch kids: Correlates of television viewing among youth. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 11(3), 152–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, D. (2003). Foundations of place: A multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious education. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ham, S.H., & Sewing, D.R. (1987/1988). Barriers to environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 19(2), 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haras, K. (2010). Overcoming fear: Helping decision makers understand risk in outdoor education. Pathways: The Ontario Journal of Outdoor Education, 22(2), 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, J.M., Hungerford, H.R., & Tomera, A.N. (1986–1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible pro-environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, O. S. (1999). Science interest and confidence among preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11(1), 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, O. S., & Burnley, P. C. (2003). Engagement in authentic geoscience research: Evaluation of research experiences of undergraduates and secondary teachers. Journal of Geoscience Education, 5(1), 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. (2007). Outdoor education and environmental (make that nature) learning. The Ontario Journal of Outdoor Education, 19(4), 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. G., & Edmunds, J. (2005). Models of elementary science instruction: Roles of science resource teachers. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education: Contemporary issues and practice. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum in association with AETS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser Family Foundation. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8–18 year olds. Retrieved from http://www.kff.org/entmedia/8010.cfm.

  • Kaiser, F. G., Woelfing, S., & Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S. (2005). Building for life: Designing and understanding the human–nature connection. Washington: Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirikkaya, E. B. (2011). Grade 4 to 8 primary school students’ attitudes towards science: Science enthusiasm. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(4), 374–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlstedt, S. (2010). Teaching children science: Hands-on nature study in North America, 1890–1930. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D.A., Boyatzis, R.E., & Mainemelis, C. (2000). In R.J. Sternberg & L.F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive, learning, and thinking styles. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Lawrence Hall of Science 2011. Retrieved from http://lawrencehallofscience.org/about/our_challenge.

  • Kuo, F., & Taylor, A. (2004). A potential natural treatment for attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder: Evidence from a national study. American Journal of Public Health, 94(9), 1580–1586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmey, R. (1999). The scope for provision of outdoor education in primary schools—An English case study. Outdoor education and experiential learning in the U.K. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED471725.

  • Lindahl, B. (2007). A longitudinal study of students’ attitudes towards science and choice of career. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.

  • Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008). Exploring pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1301–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louv, R. (2008). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature deficit disorder. Chapel Hill: Algonquin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 517–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, T. (2006). Different countries, same science classes: Students’ experiences of school science in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 591–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, S. J. (2011). Equity and U.S. science education policy from the GI bill to NCLB. In G. DeBoer (Ed.), The role of public policy in K-12 science education (pp. 305–354). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, K. (2008). Every experience matters: An evidence based research report on the role of learning outside the classroom for children’s whole development from birth to eighteen years. Report commissioned by Farming and Countryside Education for UK Department Children, School and Families, Wollongong, Australia.

  • Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 669–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansour, N. (2009). Science teachers’ beliefs and practices: Issues, implications and research agenda. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(1), 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzo, K. K. (2008). Schools adapting curriculum to the outdoors. Education Week, 28(15), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRae, K. (1990). Development, implementation and evaluation of a secondary school outdoor education programme: A case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2005). Primary science in the UK: A scoping study. Final report to the Wellcome Trust. London: Wellcome Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2003). Children’s perceptions of school science. School Science Review, 84(308), 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musser, L., & Malkus, A. (1994). The children’s attitudes toward the environment scale. The Journal of Environmental Education, 23(3), 22–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutisya, S. M., & Barker, M. (2011). Pupils’ environmental awareness and knowledge: A springboard for action in primary schools in Kenya’s rift valley. Science Education International, 22(1), 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Committee on Highly Successful Science Programs for K-12 Science Education, Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

  • Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NSB. (2004). Science and engineering indicators 2004 (NSB 04-01). Arlington: National Science Board, National Science Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents/reports.htm.

  • Office of Public Management for the Royal Society. (2006). Taking a leading role: A good practice guide (scientist survey).Retrieved from http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/page.asp?id=2903.

  • Palmer, J., Suggate, J., Robottom, I., & Hart, P. (1999). Significant life experiences and formative influences on the development of adults’ environmental awareness in the UK, Australia and Canada. Environmental Education Research, 5(2), 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penfield, R. D., & Lee, O. (2010). Test based accountability: Potential benefits and pitfalls of science assessment with student diversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 6–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1964/2003). Development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(S1), S8–S18. (Original work published in 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J., Peacock, J., Sellens, M., & Griffin, M. (2005). The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 15(5), 319–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, R. M., & Carrier Martin, S. (2005). The potential of upcoming high-stakes testing on the teaching of science in elementary classrooms. Research in Science Education, 35, 347–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., et al. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. Shrewsuby: National Foundation for Educational Research and King’s College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin, M. (1997). The schoolyard habitat movement. Early Childhood Education Journal, 25(1), 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, C.E. (1992). Environmental literacy: Its roots, evolution, and direction in the 1990s. Columbus: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED348-235

  • Sahin, H., & Erkal, S. (2010). The attitudes of middle school students toward the environment. Social Behavior and Personality, 38(8), 1061–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, J., & Ringstaff, C. (2011). Reversing the downward spiral of science instruction in K-2 classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(6), 513–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (2000). The effectiveness of elementary science specialists in promoting science literacy. School Science and Mathematics, 100(4), 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S., Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., & Tai, R. H. (2009). Depth versus breadth: How content coverage in high school science courses relates to later success in college science coursework. Science Education, 93(5), 798–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P. (1987). A constructivist view of learning and teaching in science. Leeds: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • State of Education and Environment Roundtable (SEER). (2000). The effects of environment-based education on student achievement. Retrieved on March 10, 2010 from http://www.seer.org/pages/csap.pdf.

  • Shapiro, B. (1994). What children bring to light: A constructivist perspective on children’s learning science. New York: Teacher College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, J. G., Hopkin, R., & Lewthwaite, B. (2011). Teacher perceptions of science in the National Curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 33(17), 2407–2436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, D. (1998). Using natural settings for environmental education: Perceived benefits and barriers. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R.P. (1983). Wilderness experience: How can we assess its value? Paper presented at the 3rd National Conference in Outdoor Education, Maroon, Queensland, Australia.

  • Smith, L. K., & Southerland, S. A. (2007). Reforming practice or modifying reforms? Elementary teachers’ response to the tools of reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 396–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanich, G. P. (1992). Reflections on elementary school science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 4(2), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutterby, J. (2009). What kids don’t get to do anymore and why. Childhood Education, 85(5), 289–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, T. (1980). Significant life experience: A new research area in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 11(4), 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. F., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2001). Coping with ADD: The surprising connection to green play settings. Environment and Behavior, 33(1), 54–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. W., Aspinall, P., & Montarzino, A. (2008). The childhood factor: Adult visits to green places and the significance of childhood experience. Environmentand Behavior, 40(1), 111–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilgner, P. J. (1990). Avoiding science in elementary school. Science Education, 74(4), 421–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. (2002). Nested epistemologies: Science teachers’ beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 771–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1977). The Tibilsi Declaration. Retrieved from http://www.gdrc.org/uem/ee/tbilisi.html.

  • Valentine, G. (1997). A safe place to grow up? Parenting, perceptions of children’s safety and the rural idyll. Journal of Rural Studies, 13(2), 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaske, J. J., & Kobrin, K. C. (2001). Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(4), 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, N. M. (2000). At home with nature: Effects of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), 775–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, N. M., & Lekies, K. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, M. (2007). Testing, learning, and teaching: The effects of test-based accountability on student achievement and instructional time in core academic subjects. In C. Finn & D. Ravitch (Eds.), Beyond the basics: Achieving a liberal education for all children (pp. 45–62). Washington: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, H., Turkmen, H., Pedersen, J. E., & Huyuguzel Cavas, P. (2007). Evaluation of pre-service teachers’ images of science teaching in Turkey. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

    Sarah J. Carrier, Linda P. Tugurian & Margareta M. Thomson

Authors
  1. Sarah J. Carrier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Linda P. Tugurian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Margareta M. Thomson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah J. Carrier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carrier, S.J., Tugurian, L.P. & Thomson, M.M. Elementary Science Indoors and Out: Teachers, Time, and Testing. Res Sci Educ 43, 2059–2083 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9347-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9347-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation