Abstract
Over the last decade and a half, in a literature otherwise obsessed with citizenship in all its forms, a broad array of scholars has downplayed, criticized, and at times trivialized national citizenship. The assault on citizenship has had both an expansionary and a contractionary thrust. It is expansionary in that the language of citizenship is no longer linked with nationality, but rather protest politics. An earlier generation of social scientists would have described these actions as lobbying; they have now become “citizenship practice.” It is contractionary in that what one might have thought to be the core of citizenship; nationality, the possession of a nation-state’s passport is viewed as less and less relevant to citizenship. Scholars have dislodged both the substance of citizenship, what it is, and the location of citizenship, where it “happens,” from the nation-state and national citizenship. The article challenges this devaluation of citizenship and the nation-state on empirical, conceptual, and normative grounds. Empirically, scholars, whom I link together under the umbrella term “postnationalists,” have based their anti-statist arguments on evidence that, when subjected to further inspection, wholly fails to support the arguments advanced. Conceptually, postnationalists rely on categories that are confused and untenable, being that national variables are cited as evidence of transnational developments. Normatively, postnationalists have lost the emancipatory thrust that once gave concerns with citizenship real-world purchase.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A similar trend is easily detected in works on “diaspora,” in which an apparently endless number of ethnic, religious, sexual and other groups—Francophone, Anglophone, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Confucian, Huguenot, Muslim, Catholic, Belarusian, Latvian, Soviet, Tutsi, Dixie, Yankee, white, queer, deaf, redneck, terrorist, and fundamentalist—are now defined as “diasporas.” See Brubaker (2005:2–4).
I owe these categories to Bosniak 2006.
On this, see Favell (2005).
R. Brubaker, In the Name of the Nation, 118, Alan Milward (1992).
Ash (1992)
The same is true of the US. See David Abraham (2002), 28 on the equal protection clause.
Brubaker, The ‘diaspora diaspora, 10.
As argued by critics of transnationalism. See in particular Waldinger and Fitzgerald (2004).
As conceded by Sassen (2002:278).
For a touching description of one Jewish émigré’s attachment to his native Stuttgart, see Fred Uhlman (1997).
See the forthcoming Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies special issue on citizenship and integration in Europe.
The example is a contentious one, but prayer groups that require women to have separate entrances and/or to sit at the back behind men are no different than clubs requiring separate entrances and rooms for black people. Both practices have their particularistic justifications; both are illiberal.
References
Abraham, D. (2002). Citizenship solidarity and rights individualism: On the decline of national citizenship in the US, Germany, and Israel. San Diego: Centre for Comparative Immigration Studies Working Papers.
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verson.
Ash, T. G. (1992). In Europe’s name. London: Vintage.
Barry, B. (2001). Culture and equality: An egalitarian critique of multiculturalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bauböck, R. (2007). Citizenship policies in the new Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Bosniak, L. (2006). The citizens and the alien: Dilemmas of contemporary membership. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Breuilly, J. (1992). Nationalism and the state. New York: St. Martin’s.
Brubaker, R. (1992). Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Brubaker, R. (2001). The return of assimilation? Changing perspective on immigration and its sequels in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(4), 531–548.
Brubaker, R. (1996). Nationalism reframed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brubaker, R. (2004). In the name of the nation: Reflections on nationalism and patriotism. Citizenship Studies, 8(2), 115–227.
Brubaker, R. (2005). The ‘diaspora’ diaspora. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(1), 1–19 2–4.
Buruma, I. (2006). Murder in Amsterdam: The death of Theo van Gogh and the limits of tolerance. New York: Penguin.
Dobson, A. (2003). Citizenship and the environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dodd, V. (2005). Guantánamo inmate tells of Libyan death threat. The Guardian, February 17, 2005.
Entzinger, H. (2003). The rise and fall of multiculturalism: the case of the Netherlands. In C. Joppke, & E. Morawska (Eds.), Toward assimilation and citizenship: immigrants in liberal nation-states, (pp.59–86). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Evans, D. T. (1993). Sexual citizenship: The material construction of sexualities. London: Routledge.
Favell, A. (2005). Assimilation/Integration. In R. Hansen, & M. Gibney (Eds.), Immigration and asylum from 1900 to the present Santa Barbara: ABC-CL10.
Favell, A. (2006). The nation-centred perspective. In M. Giugni, & F. Passy (Eds.), Dialogues on migration policy. New York: Lexington.
Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the ‘postsocialist’ condition. London: Routledge.
Freeman, G. P. (1995). Modes of immigration politics in liberal democracies. International Migration Review, 29, 881–902.
Freeman, G. P. (1998). The decline of sovereignty? politics and immigration restriction in liberal states. In C. Joppke (Ed.), Challenge to the nation-state: Immigration in Western Europe and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Gibney, M., & Hansen, R. (2003). Deportation and the liberal state: the forcible return of asylum seekers and unlawful migrants in Canada, Germany and the United Kingdom. New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper No. 77. Geneva: UNHCR. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/research/opendoc.pdf?tbl=RESEARCH&id=3e59de764 (accessed April 7, 2008).
Green, S. (2005). Between ideology and pragmatism: The politics of dual nationality in Germany. International Migration Review, 39(4), 921–952.
Hansen, R. (1998). A European citizenship or a Europe of citizens? Third-country nationals in the EU. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 24(4), 751–768.
Hansen, R. (1999). Migration, citizenship and race in the EU: Between incorporation and exclusion. European Journal of Political Research, 35(4), 415–444.
Hansen, R. (2000). Citizenship and immigration in Postwar Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hansen, R., & Weil, P. (2001). Towards a European nationality: Citizenship, immigration and nationality law in the EU. Houndmills: Palgrave.
Hansen, R., & Weil, P. (2002). Dual citizenship, social rights & federal citizenship in the US and Europe. Oxford: Berghahn.
Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the global order: From the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Morjé Howard, M. (2006). Comparative citizenship: An agenda for cross-national research. Perspectives in Politics, 4(3), 443–455.
Jacobson, D. A. (1997). Rights across borders: Immigration and the decline of citizenship. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jacobson, D., & Kilic, Z. (2003). European citizenship and the republican tradition. The Good Society, 12(1), 31–34.
Joppke, C. (1998). Challenge to the nation-state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Joppke, C. (1999). Immigration challenges the nation-state. In C. Joppke (Ed.), Challenge to the nation-state: Immigration in western Europe and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Joppke, C. (2005). Citizenship. In R. Hansen, & M. Gibney (Eds.), Immigration and asylum from 1900 to the present. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
Kedourie, E. (1983). Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwells.
Koopmans, R. (2005). Tradeoffs between equality and difference–The failure of Dutch multiculturalism in cross-national perspective. Paper for the conference “Immigrant Political Incorporation.” Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, April 22–23.
Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (1999). Challenging the liberal nation-state? Postnationalism, multiculturalism, and the collective claims making of migrants and ethnic minorities in Britain and Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 203–221.
Macmillan, M. (2003). Peacemakers. Six months that changed the world: The Paris peace conference of 1919 and its attempt to end war. London: John Murray.
Milward, A. (1992). The European rescue of the nation-state. Berkeley: UC Press.
Parekh, B. (2000). The future of multi-ethnic Britain: The Parekh report. London: Profile Books.
Praak, M. (1999). Burghers into citizens: Urban and national citizenship in the Netherlands during the revolutionary Era. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Sassen, S. (1996). Losing Control. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sassen, S. (2002). Towards post-national and denationalized citizenship. In E. F. Isin, & B. S. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of citizenship studies (pp. 277–291). London: Sage.
Sassen, S. (2003). The repositioning of citizenship: Emergent subjects and spaces for politics. The New Centennial Review, 3(2), 41–66.
Sassen, S. (2006). Commentary. In M. Giugni, & F. Passy (Eds.), Dialogues on migration policy. New York: Lexington.
Schnepf, S. V. (2008). ‘Inequality of Learning amongst Immigrant Children in Industrialised Countries’ Southampton: University of Southampton Discussion Paper No. 3337. Available at: http://www.iza.org/index_html?lang=en&mainframe=http%3A//www.iza.org/en/webcontent/personnel/photos/index_html%3Fkey%3D1757&topSelect=personnel&subSelect=affiliates. (accessed May 1, 2008). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Soysal, Y. (1994). The limits of citizenship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Soysal, Y. (1998). Towards a postnational model of membership. In G. Shafir (Ed.), The citizenship debates: A reader. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Spencer, I. (1997). British immigration policy since 1939. London: Routledge.
Spiro, P. (2002). Embracing dual nationality. In R. Hansen, & P. Weil (Eds.), Dual nationality, social rights and federal citizenship in the U.S. and Europe. Oxford: Berghahn.
Stevenson, N. (2006). European cosmopolitan solidarity: Questions of citizenship, difference, and post-materialism. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(4), 485–500.
Süssmuth, R. (2001). Zuwanderung gestalten—Integration fördern (Bericht der Unabhängigen Kommission Zuwanderung. Berlin: Ministry of Interior Affairs.
Tilly, C. (1997). A Primer on Citizenship. Theory and Society, 26, 599–602.
Torpey, J. (2000). The invention of the passport. surveillance, citizenship and the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Triadafilopoulos, P. (2008). Becoming multicultural: Immigration and the transformation of citizenship in Canada and Germany. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Uhlman, F. (1997). Reunion. London: HarperCollins.
Waldinger, R., & Fitzgerald, D. (2004). Transnationalism in question. American Journal of Sociology, 109(5), 1177–1195.
Wiener, A. (1997). Making sense of the new geography of citizenship: Fragmented citizenship in the European Union. Theory & Society, 26(4), 529–560.
Weil, P. (1995). La France et ses etrangers. Paris: Gallimard.
WRR (1989). Allochtonenbeleid. Den Haag: Sdu.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hansen, R. The poverty of postnationalism: citizenship, immigration, and the new Europe. Theor Soc 38, 1–24 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-008-9074-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-008-9074-0