Skip to main content
Log in

Patterns of engagement: identities and social movement organizations in Finland and Malawi

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on interviews with climate-change activists and NGO workers in Finland and Malawi, this article reconsiders the ways in which the coordination of identity projects and action is approached in social movement scholarship. Rather than beginning with personal and collective identities, we take our cue from recent work by Laurent Thévenot and trace actors’ forms of engagement—the various ways actors produce commonality. As we show, doing so in vastly different social contexts allows us to see permutations in such forms afforded by participation in a transnational social movement and to identify patterns of collective action that we would otherwise be apt to miss. Finnish activists narrated their activities by way of engaging in the forms of the common good driving the climate movement, but coordinated various situations also through engagement in familiarity, comfort, and ease. Malawian activists and NGO employees also spoke of the common good the movements worked to achieve, but principally created common ground by engaging in shared individual choices and projects, which were jointly consecrated by fellow NGO participants. Ultimately, we argue that tracing forms of engagement enables more in-depth understanding of what is at stake when people act together in social movement organizations: moving away from collective and personal identity to patterns of engagement allows a vantage point into the processes through which commonality is created and generates new hypotheses regarding the coordination of action in social movement organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The study is part of a larger comparative effort, Climate Change and Civil Society (CLIC), in which the civil society’s participation in the politics of climate change is analyzed and compared from the perspectives of media debate, (transnational) NGO networks, and local civil society groups in Finland, France, India, Indonesia, Malawi, Russia, and the US (Alapuro 2010; Ylä-Anttila and Kukkonen 2017).

  2. The authors want to thank Anna Kukkonen, Tomi Lehtimäki, Elina Mikola, and Veera Nurmenniemi for their help with the Finnish interviews.

  3. The authors want to thank Hastings Honde and James Mkandawire for interviewing and analytic insights in the Malawian context.

  4. This results in, for example, the particular system of financing of civic associations and NGOs, based largely on various forms of government funding, including the profits of the state-owned gambling monopoly, Finland’s Slot Machine Association.

  5. Activists’ ages varied from their early twenties to late forties, thus the length of prior experience in social movement organizations also varied significantly. However, only one interviewee had less than two years of campaign experience at the time of the interview.

  6. The acronym stands for “reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation.” This issue was first placed on the agenda of the 2005 international climate-change negotiations and has since become both influential and the source of controversy in a global movement (IIED 2018).

  7. The authors thank Tom Hannan for this observation.

  8. There were two types of negative cases in the thirty-five interviews where narratives were strikingly different. The first was a narrative-cluster of a few interviewees who were above fifty years old and thus not part of the same generation; the second, the only interviewee who did not have a high school certificate. Although these cases are important, we do not analyze them here for reasons of space.

  9. Boltanski and Chiapello (2005) have suggested that the order of the project is a novel form of justification, in which the common good is adaptability, flexibility, and continuous re-connecting, and the logic of belonging and ordering depends on temporal assemblages of peoples and things. In our analysis, the world of projects does not, however, emerge in this fashion. The shared goals of the Malawian activists did not portray the project itself as a purpose or an evaluated good, but instead the advancing of the plural individual plans and forging the common in the form of shared goals (see Eranti 2016).

References

  • Alapuro, R. (2010). Climate change and civil society. Research plan. Helsinki: Academy of Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alapuro, R., & Stenius, H. (1987). Kansanliikkeet loivat kansakunnan [Popular movements created the nation]. In R. Alapuro (Ed.), Kansa liikkeessä (pp. 7–52). Helsinki: Kirjayhtymä.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S., & Maccarini, A. M. (2013). Engaging with the world: Agency, institutions, historical formations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, E. A., & Bernstein, M. (2008). Culture, power, and institutions: A multi-institutional politics approach to social movements. Sociological Theory, 26(1), 74–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biernacki, R. (2012). Reinventing evidence in social inquiry: Decoding facts and variables. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bobel, C. (2007). ‘I’m not an activist, though I’ve done a lot of it’: doing activism, being activist and the ‘perfect standard’ in a contemporary movement. Social Movement Studies, 6(2), 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R., & Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond “Identity”. Theory and Society, 29(1), 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. L. (1985). Strategy or identity: new theoretical paradigms and contemporary social movements. Social Research, 52(4), 663–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigall-Brown, C. (2011). Patterns of protest: trajectories of participation in social movements. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2006). Social movements: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasoph, N., & Lichterman, P. (2003). Culture in interaction. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 735–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englund, H. (2006). Prisoners of freedom: Human rights and the African poor. Berkeley: California University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eranti, V. (2016). Individuals doing politics: Urban participation, social media campaigning and online nano-politics. University of Helsinki: Publications of the Faculty of Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eranti, V. (2018). Engagements, grammars, and the public: from the liberal grammar to individual interests. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 5. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2018.1442733.

  • Frye, M. (2012). Bright futures in Malawi’s new dawn: educational aspirations as assertions of identity. American Journal of Sociology, 117(6), 1565–1624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, J. (1995). Must identity movements self-destruct. A queer dilemma. Social Problems, 42(3), 390–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaziani, A. (2011). Post-gay collective identity construction. Social Problems, 58(1), 99–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, J. (1997). The libidinal constitution of a high-risk social movement: affectual ties and solidarity in the Huk rebellion, 1946 to 1954. American Sociological Review, 62(2), 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., & Polletta, F. (2009). Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hantrais, L. (2009). International comparative research: Theory, methods and practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. A., & Benford, R. D. (1994). Identity talk in the peace and justice movement. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22, 488–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IIED. (2018). REDD: protecting climate, forests and livelihoods. https://www.iied.org/redd-protecting-climate-forests-livelihoods, consulted 01/2018.

  • Jasper, J. M. (1997). The art of moral protest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jepperson, R. L. (2002). Political modernities: disentangling two underlying dimensions of institutional differentiation. Sociological Theory, 20(1), 61–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Hanks, J. (2002). On the modernity of traditional contraception: time and the social context of fertility. Population and Development Review, 28(2), 229–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Hanks, J. (2006). Uncertain honor: Modern motherhood in an African crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, H., & Klandermans, B. (Eds.). (1995). Social movements and culture. London: UCL press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, H. P. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16(1), 57–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, M. (2014a). Comparing everything to everything else: Freeing the practice from the theory. Paper Presented at the American Sociological Association, San Francisco.

  • Krause, M. (2014b). The good project: Humanitarian NGOs and the fragmentation of reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuukkanen, M. (2018). Anarkistien keinot ja päämäärät. Tutkimus suomalaisesta anarkistiliikkeestä 2010-luvun alussa. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammert, C., & Sarkowsky, K. (2010). Travelling concepts: Negotiating diversity in Canada and Europe. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M., & Thévenot, L. (Eds.). (2000). Rethinking comparative cultural sociology: Repertoires of evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichterman, P. (1996). The search for political community: American activists reinventing commitment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luhtakallio, E. (2010). Perceptions of Democracy in Helsinki and Lyon. In Stenius, Henrik & Alapuro, Risto (eds.): Nordic Associations in a Comparative Perspective (pp. 281-306). Nomos.

  • Luhtakallio, E. (2012). Practicing democracy. Local activism and politics in France and Finland. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: the case of freedom summer. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 64–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, A. (1995). The process of collective identity. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 41–63). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. S., Whittier, N., & Robnett, B. (2002). Social movements: Identity, culture, and the state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (2002 [1843]). A system of logic: Ratiocinative and inductive. Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mische, A. (2009). Projects and possibilities: researching futures in action. Sociological Forum, 24, 694–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mische, A. (2014). Measuring futures-in-action: projective grammars in Rio+ 20 debates. Theory and Society, 43(3-4), 437–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1985). New social movements: challenging the boundaries of institutional politics. Social Research, 52(4), 817–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyakawa, M. (2015). “Turning private pain into public action”: the cultivation of identity narratives by a faith-based community organization. Qualitative Sociology, 38(4), 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polletta, F. (1998). “It was like fever …” narrative and identity in social protest. Social Problems, 45(2), 137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polletta, F., & Jasper, J. M. (2001). Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 283–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, A. J. (2013). What good are interviews for thinking about culture? demystifying interpretive analysis. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 1(1), 42–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reger, J., Myers, D. J., & Einwohner, R. L. (Eds.). (2008). Identity work in social movements. Vol. 30 of Social movements, protest, and contention. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Junco, N. (2011). Losing neutrality in your everyday life: framing experience and activist identity construction in the spanish environmental movement. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 40(6), 713–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simi, P., Futrell, R., & Bubolz, B. (2016). Parenting as activism: identity alignment and activist persistence in the white power movement. The Sociological Quarterly, 57(3), 491–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: a social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. J. (2003). Patronage, per diems and ‘the workshop mentality’: the practice of family planning programs in Southeastern Nigeria. World Development, 31(4), 703–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., & Johnston, H. (2002). Globalization and resistance: Transnational dimensions of social movements. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. A., & McAdam, D. (2000). Identity work processes in the context of social movements: Clarifying the identity/movement Nexus. In S. Stryker, T. J. Owens, & R. W. White (Eds.), Self, identity, and social movements (pp. 41–67). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M. (1992). Narrativity, narrative identity, and social action: rethinking english working-class formation. Social Science History, 16(4), 591–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (2000). Identity competition: key to differential social movement participation? In S. Stryker et al. (Eds.), Self, identity, and social movements (pp. 21–40). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., Owens, T. J., & White, R. W. (Eds.). (2000). Self, identity, and social movements. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, A., & Watkins, S. C. (2009). “Teach a man to fish”: the sustainability doctrine and its social consequences. World Development, 37(7), 1182–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, A., & Watkins, S. C. (2017). A fraught embrace: The romance and reality of AIDS activism in Africa. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in movement: Social movements, collective action and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavory, I. (2011) The Question of Moral Action: A Formalist Position. Sociological Theory 29(4):272-293

  • Tavory, I., & Eliasoph, N. (2013). Coordinating futures: towards a theory of anticipation. American Journal of Sociology, 118(4), 908–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, V., & Whittier, N. (1995). Analytical approaches to social movement culture of the women’s movement. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 163–187). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thévenot, L. (2001). Pragmatic regimes governing the engagements with the world. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. Von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 56–74). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thévenot, L. (2007). The plurality of cognitive forms and engagements: moving between the familiar and the public. European Journal of Social Theory, 10, 413–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thévenot, L. (2013). The human being invested in social forms: Four extensions of the notion of engagement. In M. S. Archer & A. M. Maccarini (Eds.), Engaging with the world: Agency, institutions, historical formations (pp. 162–180). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thévenot, L. (2014). Voicing concern and difference: from public spaces to common-places. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1(1), 7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: from grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valocchi, S. (2001). Individual identities, collective identities, and organizational structure: the relationship of the political left and gay liberation in the United States. Sociological Perspectives, 44(4), 445–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valocchi, S. (2013). Activism as a career, calling and way of life. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 42(2), 169–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viterna, J. (2013). Women in war: The micro-processes of mobilization in El Salvador. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettergren, Å. (2009). Fun and laughter: culture jamming and the emotional regime of late capitalism. Social Movement Studies, 8(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2013). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD Checked 2015-5-26.

  • Ylä-Anttila, T., & Kukkonen, A. (2017). How arguments are justified in the media debate on climate change in the USA and France. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 8(4), 394–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylä-Anttila, T., & Luhtakallio, E. (2016). justifications analysis: understanding moral evaluations in public debates. Sociological Research Online, 21(4), 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylä-Anttila, T., & Swarnakar, P. (2017). Crowding-in: how indian civil society organizations began mobilizing around climate change. The British Journal of Sociology, 68(2), 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank the reviewers of Theory and Society for insightful comments that pushed our thinking further. We are grateful for comments and discussions on different versions of the text to Rogers Brubaker, Nina Eliasoph, Veikko Eranti, Robert Jansen, Paul Lichterman, Laurent Thévenot, the participants of the HEPO Seminar, the participants at the IASR/Tampere lectures, and the participants of the comparative historical workshop at UCLA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eeva Luhtakallio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luhtakallio, E., Tavory, I. Patterns of engagement: identities and social movement organizations in Finland and Malawi. Theor Soc 47, 151–174 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-9314-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-9314-x

Keywords

Navigation