Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Education and entrepreneurial success

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper estimates the effect of education on the success of entrepreneurial activity, using survey data from Malawi. An instrument variable approach is used to address the endogeneity of education. We find a significant and substantial effect of an added year of primary education on entrepreneurial profitability. This is consistent with theoretical arguments that primary schooling provides a generalised form of competence that underpins the variety of skills an entrepreneur needs to succeed in business. Results are robust to non-random selection into entrepreneurship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In two meta-studies van der Sluis et al. (2005, 2008) suggest that an added year of education raises entrepreneurial profits by on average 5.5 % in developing countries, and 6.1 % in developed economies. See also the review by Dickson et al. (2008).

  2. Consistent with these arguments, Barouni and Broecke (2014) estimate wage returns of education for 12 African countries, and find a substantially higher effect of secondary and tertiary education than for primary education.

  3. Agriculture constitutes 36 % of GDP in Malawi, and almost 60 % of Malawi’s exports stem from tobacco (Republic of Malawi/World Bank 2006). The expansion of the private sector is an aim of domestic industrial policy (IMF 2007; Record 2007), and education has been suggested as one possible means to making the private sector more profitable and productive (Republic of Malawi/World Bank 2006).

  4. See for instance Orr (2000) on the ownership of Malawian estates.

  5. While land may in principle be used as collateral for loans, facilitating access to capital, additional regressions showed no significant relationship between access to land and business related loans.

  6. While one may argue that the education decision is usually made before the entrepreneurship decision, reversing the order of the first two stages produces very similar estimates of returns to education.

  7. See www.worldbank.org/html/prdph/lsms/country/malawi04/docs/IHS2%20Basic%20Information.pdf for further documentation.

  8. While one may question the accuracy of reported profits, this appears to be the best available indicator of entrepreneurial success (cf. Mel et al 2009). We have checked the consistency of this variable with reported revenues less costs, and the correlation is high (0.81). Using the log of profits means we lose 95 non-positive observations.

  9. Rather than age, some previous studies use age minus years of schooling −6 as a measure of labour market experience, doing so does not change results. We have chosen not to include industry dummies in our estimations, as these are likely to be endogenously determined and influenced by education (cf. e.g. Wang 2013). A number of other possible control variables suggested by previous studies proved highly insignificant in preliminary estimations and have not been included in our main estimations. These include the number of household members working in business (another measure of firm size), ethnic minority status of the owner and the marital status of the owner.

  10. In the full IHS2 data set, almost 50 % of urban inhabitants live in a household that has access to land (compared to more than 95 % in rural areas). The proportions are about the same in our sample. There is hence no reason to believe that the access to land instrument is not relevant in urban areas. Running the estimation of the selection equation for only urban dwellers, access to land and its square displays much the same relation to entrepreneurship status as in the full sample.

References

  • Angrist, J. D., & Imbens, G. W. (1995). Two-stage least squares estimation of average causal effects in models with variable treatment intensity. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 430–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barouni, M., & Broecke, S. (2014). The returns to education in Africa: Some new estimates. Journal of Development Studies,. doi:10.1080/00220388.2014.936394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belzil, C. (2007). The return to schooling in structural dynamic models: A survey. European Economic Review, 51, 1059–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, D. (1995). Using geographic variation in college proximity to estimate the return to schooling. In L. N. Christofides, E. K. Grant, & R. Swidinsky (Eds.), Aspects of labour market behaviour: Essays in honour of John Vanderkamp (pp. 201–222). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, D. (2001). Estimating the return to schooling: Progress on some persistent econometric problems. Econometrica, 69(5), 1127–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Mel, S., McKenzie, D. J., & Woodruff, C. (2009). Measuring microenterprise profits: Must we ask how the sausage is made? Journal of Development Economics, 88(1), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, M. (2013). The causal effect of education on wages revisited. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 75(4), 477–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, P. H., Solomon, G. T., & Weaver, K. M. (2008). Entrepreneurial selection and success: does education matter? Journal of Small Businesses and Enterprise Development, 15(2), 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, C., Oosterbeek, H., & Walker, I. (2003). The returns to education: Microeconomics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(2), 115–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2007). Malawi: Poverty reduction strategy paper—Growth and development strategy, IMF Country Report No. 07/55, Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.

  • Jul-Larsen, E., & Mvula, P. (2009). Security for many or surplus for the few? Customary tenure and social differentiation in Southern Malawi. Journal of Southern African Studies, 35(1), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolstad, I., Wiig, A., & Moazzem, K. G. (2014). Returns to education among entrepreneurs in Bangladesh. Journal of Asian Economics, 34, 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, K. (1993). Ability bias, discount rate bias and the return to education, mimeo. Boston: Boston University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, Ed. (2004). Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 94(2), 208–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, D., & Woodruff, C. (2014). What are we learning from business training and entrepreneurship evaluations around the developing world? World Bank Research Observer, 29(1), 48–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. (1958). Investment in human-capital and personal income-distribution. Journal of Political Economy, 66(4), 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience, and earnings. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mkandawire, F. R., & Mulera, D. (2010). “Malawi” in Peterson. In P. E. Baker & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 666–672). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R. (2008). Estimating marginal treatment effects in heterogeneous populations, mimeo, revised January 2008, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

  • Orr, A. (2000). Green gold? Burley tobacco, smallholder agriculture, and poverty alleviation in Malawi. World Development, 28(2), 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Record, R. (2007). From policy to practice: Changing government attitudes towards the private sector in Malawi. Journal of International Development, 19, 805–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Republic of Malawi/World Bank. (2006). Malawi poverty and vulnerability assessment: Investing in our future. http://www.aec.msu.edu/fs2/mgt/caadp/malawi_pva_draft_052606_final_draft.pdf. Accessed November 29 2010.

  • Söderbom, M., Teal, F., Wambugu, A., & Kahyarara, G. (2006). The dynamics of returns to education in Kenyan and Tanzanian manufacturing. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 68(3), 261–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staiger, D., & Stock, J. H. (1997). Instrumental variable regressions with weak instruments. Econometrica, 65(3), 557–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J. H., & Yogo, M. (2005). Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In D. W. K. Andrews & J. H. Stock (Eds.), Identification and inference for econometric models: Essays in honor of Thomas Rothenberg (pp. 80–108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van der Sluis, J., & van Praag, M. (2008). Education and entrepreneurship selection and performance: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(5), 795–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Sluis, J., van Praag, M., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2007). Why are the returns to education higher for entrepreneurs than for employees? IZA Discussion Papers 3058, Bonn: Institute for Labour.

  • van der Sluis, J., van Praag, M., & Vijverberg, W. (2005). Entrepreneurship selection and performance: A meta-analysis of the impact of education in developing economies. World Bank Economic Review, 19(2), 225–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. (2013). How does education affect the earnings distribution in urban China? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 75(3), 435–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Erik Ø. Sørensen, Magnus Hatlebakk, Bertil Tungodden, Eyolf Jul-Larsen, Øivind Anti Nilsen, and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments and advice. We are grateful to the National Statistical Office (NSO) of Malawi for providing the data. However, further processing and application of the data was the responsibility of the authors and the views expressed are those of the authors and not of the NSO.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivar Kolstad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kolstad, I., Wiig, A. Education and entrepreneurial success. Small Bus Econ 44, 783–796 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9621-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9621-1

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation