Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Factors contributing to citation impact in social-personality psychology were examined in a bibliometric study of articles published in the field’s three major journals. Impact was operationalized as citations accrued over 10 years by 308 articles published in 1996, and predictors were assessed using multiple databases and trained coders. Predictors included author characteristics (i.e., number, gender, nationality, eminence), institutional factors (i.e., university prestige, journal prestige, grant support), features of article organization (i.e., title characteristics, number of studies, figures and tables, number and recency of references), and research approach (i.e., topic area, methodology). Multivariate analyses demonstrated several strong predictors of impact, including first author eminence, having a more senior later author, journal prestige, article length, and number and recency of references. Many other variables — e.g., author gender and nationality, collaboration, university prestige, grant support, title catchiness, number of studies, experimental vs. correlational methodology, topic area — did not predict impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adair, J. G., Vohra, N. (2003), The explosion of knowledge, references, and citations: Psychology’s unique response to a crisis. American Psychologist, 58: 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldi, S. (1998), Normative versus social constructivist process in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model. American Sociological Review, 63: 829–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D. V. (1991), The reliability of peer-review for manuscripts and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14: 119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, W. S. (1984), Graphs in scientific publications. American Statistician, 38: 261–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. (1983), The hierarchy of the sciences? American Journal of Sociology, 89: 111–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B., Overfelt, K. (1994), Citation-based auditing of academic performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45: 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B., Shaw, D. (1999), Citation, funding acknowledgement and author nationality in four information science journals. Journal of Documentation, 55: 402–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J. T. (1981), The emergence of the colon: An empirical correlate of scholarship. American Psychologist, 36: 879–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, R. J. (1992), How to write a highly cited article without even trying. Psychological Bulletin, 112: 405–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, M. A. (1986), Citations: Are they an objective measure of scholarly merit? Signs, 11: 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1987), Mapping the world of science: Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? In: D. N. Jackson, J. P. Rushton (Eds), Scientific Excellence: Origins and Assessment. Sage Publications, pp. 98–128.

  • Gottfredson, S. D. (1978), Evaluating psychological research reports: Dimensions, reliability, and correlates of quality judgments. American Psychologist, 33: 920–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. S., Shuh, E. S. (1994), An ethnic bias in scientific citations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24: 623–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. P., Hooten, P. A. (1992), Information-science and scientists — JASIS, 1972–1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43: 583–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., Beane, W. E., Lucker, G. W., Matthews, K. A. (1980), Making it in academic psychology: Demographic and personality correlates of attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39: 896–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, J. (2007), Be known by the company you keep: Citations — quality or chance? Scientometrics, 71: 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, L. (1985), Effects of disciplines and countries on citation habits: An analysis of empirical papers in behavioral sciences. Scientometrics, 8: 205–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. D., Vicente, K. J., Cassano, A., Shearer, A. (2003), Can scientific impact be judged prospectively? A bibliometric test of Simonton’s model of creative productivity. Scientometrics, 56: 223–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewison, G., Hartley, J. (2005), What’s in a title? Numbers of words and the presence of colons. Scientometrics, 63: 341–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, D. (1988), Assessing precision in the manuscript review process: A little better than a dice roll. Scientometrics, 14: 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarty, C. (2000), The citation impact factor in social psychology: A bad statistic that encourages bad science? Current Research in Social Psychology, 5: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968). The “Matthew effect’ in science. Science, 159: 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1995), Ranking of U.S.A. PhD programs in psychology. Retrieved from http://www.socialpsychology.org/ranking.htm

  • Over, R. (1990), The scholarly impact of articles published by men and women in psychological journals. Scientometrics, 18: 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patsopoulos, N. A., Analatos, A. A., Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005), Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 293: 2362–2366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, D. P., Ceci, S. J. (1982), Peer review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5: 187–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., Fleming, M. A., Fabrigar, L. R. (1999), The review process at PSPB: Correlates of interreviewer agreement and manuscript acceptance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25: 188–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinones-Vidal, E., Lopez-Garcia, J. J., Penaranda-Ortega, M., Tortose-Gil, F. (2004). The nature of social and personality psychology as reflected in JPSP, 1965–2000. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86: 435–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R. Jr. (1989), The perception and evaluation of quality in science. In: B. Gholson, W. R. Shadish, Jr, R. A. Neimeyer, A. C. Houts (Eds), The Psychology of Science: Contributions to Metascience. Cambridge University Press, pp. 383–436.

  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (2005), Academic ranking of world universities. Retrieved from http://www.ed.sjtu.edu.cn/rank/2005/ARWU2005Main.htm

  • Simonton, D. K. (2006), Scientific status of disciplines, individuals, and ideas: Empirical analyses of the potential impact of theory. Review of General Psychology, 10: 98–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. C., Bayer, A. E. (1986), Author collaboration and impact: A note on citation rates of single and multiple authored articles. Scientometrics, 10: 297–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Gordeeva, T. (1996), The anatomy of impact: What makes an article influential? Psychological Science, 7: 69–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. A. (1983), Achievement and ascriptive processes in the recognition of scientific articles. Social Forces, 62: 166–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC 3010, Melbourne, Australia

    Nick Haslam, Lauren Ban, Leah Kaufmann, Stephen Loughnan, Kim Peters, Jennifer Whelan & Sam Wilson

Authors
  1. Nick Haslam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lauren Ban
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Leah Kaufmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stephen Loughnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kim Peters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jennifer Whelan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sam Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Haslam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haslam, N., Ban, L., Kaufmann, L. et al. What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology. Scientometrics 76, 169–185 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1892-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1892-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation