Abstract
This paper seeks to map out the emergence and evolution of entrepreneurship as an independent field in the social science literature from the early 1990s to 2009. Our analysis indicates that entrepreneurship has grown steadily during the 1990s but has truly emerged as a legitimate academic discipline in the latter part of the 2000s. The field has been dominated by researchers from Anglo-Saxon countries over the past 20 years, with particularly strong representations from the US, UK, and Canada. The results from our structural analysis, which is based on a core document approach, point to five large knowledge clusters and further 16 sub-clusters. We characterize the clusters from their cognitive structure and assess the strength of the relationships between these clusters. In addition, a list of most cited articles is presented and discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We follow the studies cited earlier in their focus on the Web of Knowledge databases. The biases of the used databases are well known (see e.g., Glänzel 2012) and interpret our results within this specific context.
References
Cornelius, B., Landström, H., & Persson, O. (2006). Entrepreneurial Studies: The dynamic research front of a developing social science. Entrepreneurship-Theory and Practice, 30(3), 375–398.
Glänzel, W. (2012). Bibliometrics as a research field (p. 160). Leuven: Course Script.
Glänzel, W., & Czerwon, H. J. (1996). A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level. Scientometrics, 37(2), 195–221.
Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., Thijs, B., & Debackere, K. (2009). Subfield-specific normalized relative indicators and a new generation of relational charts: Methodological foundations illustrated on the assessment of institutional research performance. Scientometrics, 78(1), 165–188.
Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2011). Using ‘core documents’ for the representation of clusters and topics. Scientometrics, 88(1), 297–309.
Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2012). Using ‘core documents’ for detecting and labelling new emerging topics. Scientometrics, 91(2), 399–416.
Janssens, F., Glänzel, W., & de Moor, B. (2008). A hybrid mapping of information science. Scientometrics, 75(3), 607–631.
Landström, H., & Persson, O. (2010). Entrepreneurship research: Research communities and knowledge platforms. In H. Landström & F. Lohrke (Eds.), Historical foundations of entrepreneurship research (pp. 46–76). Cheltenham: Elgar.
Meyer, M., Libaers, D., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2011). The emergence of entrepreneurship as a research field. In E. Noyons, P. Ngulube, & J. Leta (Eds), Proceedings of ISSI 2011—The 13 th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics, Durban, South Africa (pp. 552–557).
Meyer, M., Thijs, B., Libaers, D., Grant, K., Glänzel, W., & Debackere, K. (2012). On the origin and emergence of entrepreneurship as a research field. In É. Archambault, Y. Gingras, & V. Larivière, Proceedings of 17th international conference on science and technology indicators, (pp. 879–880).Montréal: Science-Metrix and OST.
Schildt, H., Zahra, S. A., & Sillanpää, A. (2006). Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: A co-citation analysis. Entrepreneurship–Theory and Practice, 30(3), 399–415.
Small, H. (1973). Cocitation in scientific literature: New measure of relationship between 2 documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.
Teixeira, A. A. C. (2011). Mapping the (in)visible college(s) in the field of entrepreneurship. Scientometrics, 89, 1–36.
Acknowledgments
The methodology has partially been developed in the context of the ERACEP project within the Coordination and Support Actions (CSAs) of the ERC work programme. The authors wish to acknowledge this support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meyer, M., Libaers, D., Thijs, B. et al. Origin and emergence of entrepreneurship as a research field. Scientometrics 98, 473–485 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1021-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1021-9