Skip to main content
Log in

Origin and emergence of entrepreneurship as a research field

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper seeks to map out the emergence and evolution of entrepreneurship as an independent field in the social science literature from the early 1990s to 2009. Our analysis indicates that entrepreneurship has grown steadily during the 1990s but has truly emerged as a legitimate academic discipline in the latter part of the 2000s. The field has been dominated by researchers from Anglo-Saxon countries over the past 20 years, with particularly strong representations from the US, UK, and Canada. The results from our structural analysis, which is based on a core document approach, point to five large knowledge clusters and further 16 sub-clusters. We characterize the clusters from their cognitive structure and assess the strength of the relationships between these clusters. In addition, a list of most cited articles is presented and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See also the more recent work by Teixeira (2011) as well as the exhaustive overview by Landström and Persson (2010).

  2. We follow the studies cited earlier in their focus on the Web of Knowledge databases. The biases of the used databases are well known (see e.g., Glänzel 2012) and interpret our results within this specific context.

References

  • Cornelius, B., Landström, H., & Persson, O. (2006). Entrepreneurial Studies: The dynamic research front of a developing social science. Entrepreneurship-Theory and Practice, 30(3), 375–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2012). Bibliometrics as a research field (p. 160). Leuven: Course Script.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Czerwon, H. J. (1996). A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level. Scientometrics, 37(2), 195–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., Thijs, B., & Debackere, K. (2009). Subfield-specific normalized relative indicators and a new generation of relational charts: Methodological foundations illustrated on the assessment of institutional research performance. Scientometrics, 78(1), 165–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2011). Using ‘core documents’ for the representation of clusters and topics. Scientometrics, 88(1), 297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2012). Using ‘core documents’ for detecting and labelling new emerging topics. Scientometrics, 91(2), 399–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssens, F., Glänzel, W., & de Moor, B. (2008). A hybrid mapping of information science. Scientometrics, 75(3), 607–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landström, H., & Persson, O. (2010). Entrepreneurship research: Research communities and knowledge platforms. In H. Landström & F. Lohrke (Eds.), Historical foundations of entrepreneurship research (pp. 46–76). Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M., Libaers, D., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2011). The emergence of entrepreneurship as a research field. In E. Noyons, P. Ngulube, & J. Leta (Eds), Proceedings of ISSI 2011—The 13 th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics, Durban, South Africa (pp. 552–557).

  • Meyer, M., Thijs, B., Libaers, D., Grant, K., Glänzel, W., & Debackere, K. (2012). On the origin and emergence of entrepreneurship as a research field. In É. Archambault, Y. Gingras, & V. Larivière, Proceedings of 17th international conference on science and technology indicators, (pp. 879–880).Montréal: Science-Metrix and OST.

  • Schildt, H., Zahra, S. A., & Sillanpää, A. (2006). Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: A co-citation analysis. Entrepreneurship–Theory and Practice, 30(3), 399–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H. (1973). Cocitation in scientific literature: New measure of relationship between 2 documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, A. A. C. (2011). Mapping the (in)visible college(s) in the field of entrepreneurship. Scientometrics, 89, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The methodology has partially been developed in the context of the ERACEP project within the Coordination and Support Actions (CSAs) of the ERC work programme. The authors wish to acknowledge this support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Meyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer, M., Libaers, D., Thijs, B. et al. Origin and emergence of entrepreneurship as a research field. Scientometrics 98, 473–485 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1021-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1021-9

Keywords

Navigation