Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Characteristics of international collaboration in sport sciences publications and its influence on citation impact

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some bibliometric research has been carried out in sport sciences, but compared with other disciplines there is still no intensive study at macro level, especially on international collaboration. This study attempts to observe the status and trend of international collaboration in sport sciences at macro level, and to look at its relationship with academic impact. 20,804 publications from 63 consistently issued journals belonging to the Sport Sciences category in Web of Science database in 2000–2001 and 2010–2011 were analyzed. The main objects include co-authorship links of country pairs, the share of international co-authored publications, tendency and “affinity” in collaboration, and citation impact of international publications. Differences between countries and periods were observed. There is a rapid increase of the share of international collaboration in sport sciences. In some countries the share is even above 2/3; Co-authorship networks imply some cultural, political or geographical factors for collaboration, and their changes exhibit some new trends; Selected countries have strong tendency in collaboration; International collaborated publications have a higher performance than domestic ones in citation impact. But gaps between countries are narrowing. International collaboration really intensified in this field. European, especially Nordic countries are very fond of collaboration and have gained outstanding performance as a partner. It is meaningful to further explore the underlying motivation behind international collaboration in sport science research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Costa, F. D. (2009). Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation? Higher Education, 57, 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agullo-Calatayud, V., Gonzalez-Alcaide, G., Valderrama-Zurian, J. C., et al. (2008). Consumption of anabolic steroids in sport, physical activity and as a drug of abuse: an analysis of the scientific literature and areas of research. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 42, 103–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, D. C. (2013). Bibliometric analysis of South American research in sports science from 1970–2012. Motriz, 19, 783–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J., Robertson-Wilson, J., & Sedgwick, W. (2003). Publishing productivity in sport psychology 1970–2000: An exploratory examination of the Lotka-Price Law. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25, 477–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballesteros, J. A., & Rico, A. M. (2001). Public financing of cooperative R&D projects in Spain: The concerted projects under the National R&D Plan. Research Policy, 30, 625–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartneck, C., & Hu, J. (2010). The fruits of collaboration in a multidisciplinary field. Scientometrics, 85, 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2002). Pajek—analysis and visualization of large networks. Graph Drawing, 2265, 477–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present and future. Scientometrics, 52, 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. D., & Rosen, R. (1979). Studies in scientific collaboration. Part II. Scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French elite. Scientometrics, 1, 133–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnholtz, J. P. (2007). When do researchers collaborate? toward a model of collaboration propensity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2226–2239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33, 599–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1985). Scientometric indicators. A 32 country comparison of publication productivity and citation impact. Singapore-Philadelphia: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Publication and cooperation patterns of the authors of neuroscience journals. Scientometrics, 51, 499–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, L. (2003). Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications: The effects of a funding formula based on publication counts. Research Policy, 32, 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherebetiu, G. (1980). Collaboration among the doctor, the coach, and the player. Volleyball Technical Journal, 5, 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coronado, R. A., Wurtzel, W. A., Simon, C. B., et al. (2011). Content and bibliometric analysis of articles published in the journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 41, 920–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabić, M., & Drenjčević-Perić, I. (2008). Is there a potential impact of research and development (R&D) policy on health care system development in Croatia? Medicinski Glasnik, 5, 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daprano, C. M., Bruening, J. E., Pastore, D. L., et al. (2005). Collaboration in sport research: A case from the field. Quest, 57, 300–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkers, M. P. (2008). International collaboration and communication in rehabilitation research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90, 711–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feller, I., Ailes, C. P., & Roessner, J. P. (2002). Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: Evidence from engineering research centers. Research Policy, 31, 457–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franchignoni, F., & Lasa, S. M. (2011). Bibliometric indicators and core journals in physical and rehabilitation medicine. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 43, 471–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenken, K., & Leydesdorff, L. (2004). Scientometrics and the evaluation of European integration. In J. Ulijn & T. Brown (Eds.), Innovation, entrepreneurship and culture: The interaction between technology, progress and economic growth (pp. 87–102). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2000). Science in Scandinavia: A bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 48, 121–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51, 69–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2002). Co-authorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980–1998) A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50, 461–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50, 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H. F. M. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies on S&T Systems (pp. 257–276). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Zhou, P. (2011). Publication activity, citation impact and bi-directional links between publications and patents in biotechnology. Scientometrics, 86, 505–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schlemmer, B., Schubert, A., & Thijs, B. (2006a). Proceedings literature as additional data source for bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 68, 457–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Leta, J., & Thijs, B. (2006b). Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study. Scientometrics, 67, 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gossart, C., & Özman, M. (2009). Co-authorship networks in social sciences: The case of Turkey. Scientometrics, 78, 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimby, G. (2011). Bibliometric indicators and international publishing in physical and rehabilitation medicine. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 43, 469–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimby, G. (2012). Journal of rehabilitation medicine: Looking back at 13 years as editor-in-chief. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44, 517–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, J. W. (2002). Patterns of collaboration in mathematical research. SIAM News, 35, 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1439–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, S. E., & Parker, J. N. (2011). Collaboration and productivity in scientific synthesis. Bioscience, 61, 900–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S. L., et al. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists’ perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 952–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. T. (1977). Unconventional uses of on-line information retrieval systems: Online bibliometric studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 28, 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, K., & Preuss, W. (1990). 25 years of the international review for the sociology of sport: a content analysis. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 25, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliegl, R., & Bates, D. (2011). International collaboration in psychology is on the rise. Scientometrics, 87, 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudson, D., Bahamonde, R. (2012). Twenty- five year trends of authorship and sampling in ISBS proceedings. P 30th Conference of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports 30:381.

  • Landry, R., & Amara, N. (1998). The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research. Research Policy, 27, 901–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leta, J., Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2006). Science in Brazil. Part 2: sectoral and institutional research profiles. Scientometrics, 67, 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidor, R., Miller, U., & Rotstein, A. (1999). Is research on aging and physical activity really increasing A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 7, 182–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippi, G., Guidi, G. C., Nevil, A., et al. (2008). The growing trend of scientific interest in sports science research. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26, 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science Technology and Human Values, 17, 101–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín, I., Olmo, J., Chirosa, L. J., et al. (2013). Bibliometric study (1922–2009) on rugby articles in research journals. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation, 35, 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Morilla, J. A., Ruiz-Caballero, J. A., Brito-Ojeda, E., et al. (2012). Scientific output on cardiology and sport: ranking of journals (2010) and excellence. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte, 12, 299–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Stevens, K., & Whitlow, E. S. (1990). Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21, 313–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2003). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 101, 5200–5205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NordForsk. (2012). Sport sciences in the Nordic countries 2014. http://www.nordforsk.org/files/sport-sciences-in-the-nordic-countries. Accessed 11 Nov 2014.

  • O’Connor, J., French, R., Sherrill, C., et al. (2001). Scholarly productivity in adapted physical activity pedagogy: A bibliometric analysis. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 18, 434–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paier, M., & Scherngell, T. (2011). Determinants of collaboration in European R&D networks: Empirical evidence from a discrete choice model. Industry and Innovation, 18, 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peset, F., Ferrer-Sapena, A., & Villamón, M. (2013). Scientific literature analysis of Judo in Web of Science. Archives of Budo, 9, 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. G. (2012). Australia’s position in the world of science, technology & innovation. Occas Pap Ser, 2, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porac, J. F., Wade, J. B., Fischer, H. M., et al. (2004). Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance. Research Policy, 33, 661–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouris, A. (2009). Fluorine research in South Africa and four benchmarking countries: Comparative mapping and assessment. Scientometrics, 78, 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, G., & Prupas, A. (1998). A documentary analysis of research priorities in disability sport. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 15, 168–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salton, G., & Mcgill, M. J. (1983). Introduction to modern information retrieval. Auckland: McGraw-Hill.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, J. M. S., & García, P. C. (2011). A bibliometric analysis of sports economics research. International Journal of Sport Finance, 6, 222–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1990). World flash on basic research: international collaboration in the sciences, 1981–1985. Scientometrics, 19, 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., & Glänzel, W. (2006). Cross-national preference in co-authorship, references and citations. Scientometrics, 69, 409–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shilbury, D. (2011). A Bibliometric study of citations to sport management and marketing journals. Journal of Sport Management, 25, 423–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H., & Bonzi, S. (1998). Patterns of self-citations across disciplines (1980–1989). Journal of Information Science, 24, 431–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsigilis, N., Grouios, G., Tsorbatzoudis, H., et al. (2010). Impact factors of the sport sciences journals: current trends, relative positions, and temporal stability. European Journal of Sport Science, 10, 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugolini, D., Neri, M., Cesario, A., et al. (2013). Bibliometric analysis of literature in cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases rehabilitation: growing numbers, reducing impact factor. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94, 324–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valcárcel, J. V., Devís-Devís, J., Villamón, M., et al. (2010). Scientific cooperation in the field of physical activity and sport science in Spain. Revista Espanola De Documentacion Cientifica, 33, 90–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P., & Maloney, N. G. (2007). Collaboration structure, communication media, and problems in scientific work teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 712–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Xu, S., Wang, Z., et al. (2012). International scientific collaboration of China: Collaborating countries, institutions and individuals. Scientometrics, 95, 885–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. J., & Kendall, L. R. (2007). A profile of sports science research (1983–2003). Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 10, 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaminfirooz, M., Siamian, H., Jahani, M. A., et al. (2014). Scientific production of sports science in Iran: A scientometric analysis. Acta Informatica Medica, 22, 195–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Wouter Jeuris and Mehmet Ali Abdulhayoglu, colleagues at ECOOM of KU Leuven for their assistance in preparing the data.

Funding

Support for this study was received from Shanghai University of Sport, Ph.D. Academic Visiting Program (shtyfx20130111).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Physical Education and Training, Shanghai University of Sport, 650 Qingyuanhuan Rd, Shanghai, China

    Lei Wang

  2. ECOOM and Department MSI, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Lei Wang, Bart Thijs & Wolfgang Glänzel

  3. Department of Science Policy and Scientometrics, Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary

    Wolfgang Glänzel

Authors
  1. Lei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bart Thijs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wolfgang Glänzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Glänzel.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 31 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Thijs, B. & Glänzel, W. Characteristics of international collaboration in sport sciences publications and its influence on citation impact. Scientometrics 105, 843–862 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1735-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1735-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation