Abstract
It is commonly thought that feminist and evolutionary explanations of rape cannot be integrated. As I aim to show, this view is incorrect. Although feminist and evolutionary approaches are not compatible on all fronts, theories incorporating factors from both perspectives have been proposed, on theoretical as well as empirical grounds. Unfortunately, the debate between feminist and evolutionary scholars is frequently characterized by a lack of mutual openness and by the use of illegitimate arguments. The book A Natural History of Rape (Thornhill and Palmer 2000), and the controversy it provoked, is a case in point. I will highlight a more productive interaction of both perspectives by discussing the work of the feminist evolutionary biologist Barbara Smuts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, R. D., & Noonan, K. M. (1979). Concealment of ovulation, parental care, and human social evolution. In N. A. Chagnon & W. Irons (Eds.), Evolutionary biology and human social behaviour: An anthropological perspective (pp. 436–461). North Scituate: Duxbury.
Angier, N. (2000, June/July). Biological bull. Ms., 10, 80–82.
Betzig, L. (1993). Sex, succession, and stratification in the first six civilizations: How powerful men reproduced, passed power on to their sons, and used power to defend their wealth, women, and children. In L. Ellis (Ed.), Socioeconomic stratification and social inequality (pp. 37–74). New York: Praeger.
Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York: Ballantine Books.
Brownmiller, S. (2000). Thornhill: Rape on the brain. Retrieved from http://www.susanbrownmiller.com/susanbrownmiller/html/review-thornhill.html.
Buchwald, E., Fletcher, P. R., & Roth, M. (2005). Transforming a rape culture (Revth ed.). Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Conflict between the sexes: Strategic interference and the evocation of anger and upset. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 735–747.
Buss, D. M. (1996). Sexual conflict: Evolutionary insights into feminism and the “battle of the sexes. In D. M. Buss & N. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 296–328). New York: Oxford University Press.
Buss, D. M. (1999). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
Card, C. (1996). Rape as a weapon of war. Hypatia, 11, 5–18.
Clutton-Brock, T., & Parker, G. (1995). Sexual coercion in animal societies. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1345–1365.
Coyne, J. A. (2000). Of vice and men: The fairy tales of evolutionary psychology. The New Republic, 3, 27–34.
Coyne, J. A., & Berry, A. (2000). Rape as an adaptation: Is this contentious hypothesis advocacy, not science? Nature, 404, 121–122.
de Waal, F. (2000, April 2). Survival of the rapist. The New York Times, pp. 1–2.
Ehrenreich, B., & English, D. (2005). For her own good: Two centuries of the experts’ advice to women (Rev. ed.). New York: Anchor Books.
Einon, D. (2002). More an ideologically driven sermon than science. Biology and Philosophy, 17, 445–456.
Ellis, L. (1989). Theories of rape: Inquiries into the causes of sexual aggression. New York: Hemisphere.
Ellis, L. (1991). A synthesized (biosocial) theory of rape. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 631–642.
Geary, D. (2010). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Ghiglieri, M. P. (1999). The dark side of man: Tracing the origins of male violence. New York: Basic Books.
Gowaty, P. A., & Buschhaus, N. (1998). Ultimate causation of aggressive and forced copulation in birds: Female resistance, the CODE hypothesis, and social monogamy. American Zoologist, 38, 207–225.
Gregor, T. (1990). Male dominance and sexual coercion. In J. W. Stigler, R. A. Shweder, & G. H. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology (pp. 477–495). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Groth, A. N., & Birnbaum, H. J. (1979). Men who rape: The psychology of the offender. New York: Plenum.
Hagen, R. (1979). The bio-sexual factor. Garden City: Doubleday.
Herman, J. L. (1990). Sex offenders: A feminist perspective. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 177–193). New York: Plenum.
Holcomb, H., III. (1993). Sociobiology, sex and science. New York: State University of New York Press.
Keeley, L. H. (1996). War before civilization: The myth of the peaceful savage. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lalumière, M. L., Chalmers, L., Quinsey, V. L., & Seto, M. C. (1996). A test of the mate deprivation hypothesis of sexual coercion. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 299–318.
Lalumière, M. L., Harris, G. T., Quinsey, V. L., & Rice, M. E. (2005). The causes of rape: Understanding individual differences in male propensity for sexual aggression. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of patriarchy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacKinnon, C. (1987). Feminism unmodified. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Malamuth, N. M. (1996). The confluence model of sexual aggression: Feminist and evolutionary perspectives. In D. M. Buss & N. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 269–295). New York: Oxford University Press.
Malamuth, N. M. (2003). Criminal and non-criminal sexual aggressors: Integrating psychopathy in a hierarchical-mediational confluence model. In R. A. Prentky, E. S. Janus, & M. C. Seto (Eds.), Sexually coercive behavior: Understanding and management (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences) (pp. 33–58). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Malamuth, N. M., & Malamuth, E. Z. (1999). Integrating multiple levels of scientific analysis and the confluence model of sexual coercers. Jurimetrics, 39, 157–179.
Malamuth, N. M., Sockloskie, R., Koss, M. P., & Tanaka, J. (1991). The characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 670–681.
Malamuth, N. M., Heavey, C. L., & Linz, D. (1993). Predicting men’s antisocial behavior against women: The interaction model of sexual aggression. In G. C. Hall, R. Hirschman, J. R. Graham, & M. S. Zaragoza (Eds.), Sexual aggression: Issues in etiology, assessment, and treatment (pp. 63–97). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
McCahill, T., Meyer, L., & Fischman, A. (1979). The aftermath of rape. Lexington: Lexington Books.
Mesnick, S. (1997). Sexual alliances: Evidence and evolutionary implications. In P. Gowaty (Ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology: Boundaries, intersections, and frontiers (pp. 207–257). New York: Chapman & Hall.
Miller, G. (2000, March 6). Why men rape. Evening Standard, p. 53.
Muehlenhard, C. L., Danoff-Burg, S., & Powch, I. G. (1996). Is rape sex or violence? Conceptual issues and implications. In D. M. Buss & N. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 119–137). New York: Oxford University Press.
Niarchos, C. N. (1995). Women, war, and rape: Challenges facing the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Human Rights Quarterly, 17, 649–690.
Oosterveld, V. (1998). When women are the spoils of war. UNESCO Courier, 51, 64–66.
Palmer, C. T. (1988). Twelve reasons why rape is not sexually motivated: A skeptical examination. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 512–530.
Palmer, C. T. (1989a). Is rape a cultural universal? A re-examination of the ethnographic evidence. Ethnology, 28, 1–16.
Palmer, C. T. (1989b). Rape in nonhuman animal species: Definitions, evidence, and implications. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 355–374.
Palmer, C. T. (1991). Human rape: Adaptation or by-product? Journal of Sex Research, 28, 365–386.
Palmer, C. T., & Thornhill, R. (2003a). A posse of good citizens brings outlaw evolutionists to justice: A response to Evolution, gender, and rape. Evolutionary Psychology, 1, 10–27.
Palmer, C. T., & Thornhill, R. (2003b). Straw men and fairy tales: Evaluating reactions to A natural history of rape. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 249–255.
Perilloux, C., Duntley, J. D., & Buss, D. M. (2006). The psychology of sexual victimization: Perceived costs and strategies of prevention. Poster presented at the 4th Annual SPSP Evolutionary Psychology Pre-Conference, Palm Springs, CA.
Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. London: Allen Lane/The Penguin Press.
Polaschek, D. L., Ward, T., & Hudson, S. M. (1997). Rape and rapists: Theory and treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 2, 117–144.
Rose, H. (2001). Debating rape. Lancet, 357, 727–728.
Sanday, P. R. (1981). The sociocultural context of rape: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 5–27.
Sheehan, E. A. (1997). Victorian clitoridectomy: Isaac Baker Brown and his harmless operative procedure. In R. Lancaster & M. Di Leonardo (Eds.), The gender/sexuality reader (pp. 325–334). New York: Routledge.
Shields, W., & Shields, M. (1983). Forcible rape: An evolutionary perspective. Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 115–136.
Smithyman, S. D. (1978). The undetected rapist [Doctoral dissertation], Claremont Graduate School. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
Smuts, B. (1995). The evolutionary origins of patriarchy. Human Nature, 6, 1–32.
Smuts, B. (1996). Male aggression against women: An evolutionary perspective. In D. M. Buss & N. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 231–268). New York: Oxford University Press. Original article published 1992 in Human Nature, 3, 1–44.
Smuts, B., & Smuts, R. W. (1993). Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: Evidence and theoretical implications. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 22, 1–63.
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. T. (2000). A natural history of rape: Biological bases of sexual coercion. Cambridge: MIT.
Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. T. (2001). Rape and evolution: A reply to our critics (Preface for paperback edition of A natural history of rape). Retrieved from http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/THOUH/thornhill-preface.pdf
Thornhill, R., & Thornhill, N. W. (1983). Human rape: An evolutionary analysis. Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 137–173.
Thornhill, R., & Thornhill, N. W. (1989). The evolution of psychological pain. In R. W. Bell & N. J. Bell (Eds.), Sociobiology and the social sciences (pp. 73–103). Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.
Thornhill, N. W., & Thornhill, R. (1990a). An evolutionary analysis of psychological pain following rape: I. The effects of victim’s age and marital status. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 155–176.
Thornhill, N. W., & Thornhill, R. (1990b). An evolutionary analysis of psychological pain following rape: II. The effects of stranger, friend and family member offenders. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 177–193.
Thornhill, N. W., & Thornhill, R. (1990c). An evolutionary analysis of psychological pain following rape: III. Effects of force and violence. Aggressive Behavior, 16, 297–320.
Thornhill, N. W., & Thornhill, R. (1991). An evolutionary analysis of psychological pain following human (Homo sapiens) rape: IV. The effect of the nature of the sexual assault. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 105, 243–252.
Thornhill, R., & Thornhill, N. W. (1992a). The evolutionary psychology of men’s coercive sexuality. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 363–375.
Thornhill, R., & Thornhill, N. W. (1992b). The study of men’s coercive sexuality: What course should it take? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 404–421.
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.
Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.
Vandermassen, G. (2004). Sexual selection: A tale of male bias and feminist denial. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 11, 9–26.
Vandermassen, G. (2005). Who’s afraid of Charles Darwin? Feminism and evolutionary theory. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Vincent, N. (2006). Self-made man: One woman’s journey into manhood and back again. New York: Viking.
Ward, C. A. (1995). Attitudes toward rape: feminist and social psychological perspectives. London: Sage.
Wertheim, M. (2000, March 24–30). The boy can’t help it. LA Weekly, pp. 31–32.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The man who mistook his wife for a chattel. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 289–322). New York: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1993). An evolutionary psychological perspective on male sexual proprietariness and violence against wives. Violence and Victims, 8, 271–294.
Wilson, M., & Mesnick, S. (1997). An empirical test of the bodyguard hypothesis. In P. Gowaty (Ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology: Boundaries, intersections, and frontiers (pp. 505–511). New York: Chapman & Hall.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Johan Braeckman, David Buss, Marysa Demoor, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair, Donald Symons, Jan Verbeeren, and two anonymous reviewers for valuable feedback on earlier drafts of this paper.