Skip to main content
Log in

Developing an Index of Deprivation Which Integrates Objective and Subjective Dimensions: Extending the Work of Townsend, Mack and Lansley, and Halleröd

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents a new approach to index development, extending the methods used by Townsend, Mack and Lansley and Halleröd to measure deprivation in the developed world. The index combines three ‘objective’ dimensions of deprivation (i.e. monetary, consumption and work-related), and weighs them according to subjective perceptions regarding which items are more critical to deprivation. A particular application of factor analysis to determining deprivation measures and their corresponding weights leads to a more sophisticated and theoretically robust index than those used previously. The index draws on data from interviews with both partners of 17 households randomly sampled from a Turkish squatter settlement. The article contends that the methodological and substantive advantages of this approach are relevant to both developing and developed contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baharoğlu D. and Kessides C. (2001). Urban Poverty, Unpublished Working Paper. The World Bank, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callan T., Nolan B. and Whelan C.T. (1993). Resources, deprivation and the measurement of poverty. Journal of Social Policy 22: pp. 141–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Eroğlu, Ş.: 2004, What Difference Do Resources Make? A Longitudinal Study of Household Responses to Poverty in a Gecekondu Settlement in Ankara, Turkey, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, School of Social Policy Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent

  • Goedhart T., Halberstadt V. and Kapteyn A. (1977). The poverty line: Concept and measurement. Journal of Human Resources 12: pp. 503–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitmez A. and Morçöl G. (1995). A typology of the urban poor in Turkey. Journal of Urban Affairs 17: pp. 413–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon D., Adelman L., Ashworth K., Bradshaw J., Levitas R., Middleton S., Pantazis C., Patsios D., Payne S., Townsend P. and Willias J. (2000). Poverty and Exclusion in Britain. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutkind E. (1986). Patterns of Economic Behaviour among the American Poor. St. Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Halleröd, B.: 1994, A New Approach to the Direct Consensual Measurement of Poverty, SPRC Discussion Paper No. 50, Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales

  • Halleröd B. (1995). The truly poor: Direct and indirect consensual measurement of poverty in Sweden. Journal of European Social Policy 5: pp. 111–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halleröd B., Bradshaw J. and Holmes H. (1997). Adapting the consensual definition of poverty. In: Gordon, D. and Panzatis, C. (eds) Breadline Britain in the 1990s, pp. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack J. and Lansley S. (1985). Poor Britain. George Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser C.O.N. (1996). Household Responses to Poverty and Vulnerability, Volume I–II–III. The World Bank, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble M., Ratcliffe A. and Wright G. (2004). Conceptualizing, Defining and Measuring Poverty in South Africa: An Argument for a Consensual Approach, Working Paper. Centre for the Analysis of South African Social Policy, University of Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Piachaud D. (1981). Peter Townsend and the holy grail. New Statesman 57: pp. 419–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Piachaud D. (1987). Problems in the definition and measurement of poverty. Journal of Social Policy 16: pp. 147–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders P., Hallerod B. and Matheson G. (1994). Making ends meet in Australia and Sweden: A␣comparative analysis using the subjective poverty line methodology. Acta Sociologica 37: pp. 3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A.K. (1982). Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A.K. (1987). The Standard of Living. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Security Institute (Sosyal Sigortalar Kurumu), Sosyal Güvenlik Reform Kanunu no. 4447 (Social Security Reform Law no. 4447), available at: <www.ssk.gov.tr> accessed December 2002

  • Social Security Institute (Sosyal Sigortalar Kurumu): 1981, İş Kazaları ve Meslek Hastalıkları Sigorta Prim Tarifesi (The Premium Tariff for Occupational Illness and Accident Insurance), Publication no. 597, General Directorate of Social Security Institution, Ankara

  • Şenses, F.: 2001, KüreselleŞmenin Öteki Yüzü: Yoksulluk. The Other Face of Globalisation: Poverty, İletiŞim, İstanbul

  • Tabachnik B.G. and Fidell L.S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. Allyn and Bacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom: A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend P. (1993). The International Analysis of Poverty. Wheatsheaf, Harvester

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag, B., Hagenaars A. and J. Weeran (1982). Poverty in Europe. Review of Income and Wealth 28: pp. 345–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veit-Wilson J.H. (1987). Consensual approaches to poverty lines and social security. Journal of Social Policy 16: pp. 83–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebnem Eroğlu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eroğlu, S. Developing an Index of Deprivation Which Integrates Objective and Subjective Dimensions: Extending the Work of Townsend, Mack and Lansley, and Halleröd. Soc Indic Res 80, 493–510 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-0004-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-0004-0

Key words

Navigation